Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in U.S. v. Skrmetti. This is the culmination of our fight against the barbarism of child sex-changes, and it could be a Dobbs-style earthquake in terms of protecting children. Here's what you need to know.
2/ In Sept 2022, I published an investigation into TN’s most prestigious hospital — Vanderbilt — exposing staff talking about trans procedures as “huge money makers,” “consequences” when doctors object, and the hormones & mastectomies given to youth.
3/ The public was outraged, TN politicians demanded answers, and Vanderbilt promised to “pause” and “review” their surgeries for removing the breasts of healthy teenage girls.
4/ To urge swift action, I hosted a rally at the capitol with @MarshaBlackburn @TulsiGabbard @RobbyStarbuck @ChoooCole & more. Notably, TN Senate Leader @SenJohnson & House Leader @WilliamLamberth took the stage & committed to making a ban their first legislation of 2023.
5/ Leaders Johnson & Lamberth followed through. When the legislative season opened in Jan 2023, they put forward SB1/HB1 to ban the drugs & surgeries that were castrating, sterilizing, and mutilating TN children in the name of transgenderism — and @GovBillLee signed it into law.
6/ Not content to leave children’s bodies alone, the ACLU & Biden Administration sued the state of Tennessee to keep transing the kids. The case went through a series of court battles from a Federal Judge, up through the Sixth Circuit. But we won. Tennessee kids were safe.
7/ The ACLU and Biden Administration then took their fight to castrate, sterilize, and mutilate kids to Washington DC and the Supreme Court of the United States. In June 2024, the Court agreed to review the case.
8/ The Supreme Court consolidated the ACLU & Biden’s US DOJ into one case against Tennessee Attorney General, Jonathan Skrmetti.
9/ In the US v. Skrmetti, the Court will assess the question of whether Tennessee’s law is discriminating against children on the basis of sex, thus violating equal protection. If you’re wondering how one could possibly make this argument, allow me to explain the twisted logic…
10/ The ACLU & Biden Admin are essentially claiming that because a doctor prescribes medication to delay the harmful early onset of puberty in a girl with a medical condition, it is sex discrimination to not prescribe the same to a physically healthy boy who thinks he is a girl.
11/ The argument is obviously absurd. The ACLU & Biden Administration are relying on ideologically driven claims that have no basis in truth, and “science” that has been wholly debunked by many experts — and all of us with reason & morals — repeatedly.
12/ On December 4, 2024, TN AG Skrmetti will stand before the Supreme Court, against the ACLU and the Biden Admin, and make the case for Tennessee, and by extension all states seeking to protect healthy children from castration, sterilization, and mutilation.
13/ What gender ideology lacks in logic, science and morality, it makes up for in left wing money, violent activism, educational indoctrination, and legacy media support. But we won’t stop working to protect children from this barbaric ideology.
14/ Once the Biden Administration and trans activists are exposed at the Supreme Court, the next step is a nationwide ban on child sex-changes. This isn't just good politics. It's morally necessary, and it's time Republicans enacted it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Kamala became VP in 2020 because of DEI. She became the nominee in 2024 because of DEI. Now, @DoNoHarm has compiled a list of all the ways the Biden-Harris Admin spent your money on DEI. As a certified DEI expert myself, here are my favorites:
2/ The TSA deployed new "imaging technology" to "reduce the instances of enhanced screening for trans persons." Basically, TSA officers no longer ask your gender, and they don’t mind seeing unexpected "objects" when "women" walk through the body scanner. Feel safer yet?
3/ HUD announced a new plan to combat the scourge of homeless asexuals.
1/ Tim Walz' government is paying $10,500 for a they/them and a he/they to take sexually confused kids as young as 11 into the woods to talk about “queer” animal sex and trans frogs. Parents aren't welcome. 🧵
2/ The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources “No Child Left Inside” grant is funding “QUEERY,” a program by the Clean River Partners that stands for “Queer Unity, Environmental Education, and Recreation for Youth.”
3/ Run by a “trans-non-binary” “they/them” named Heron, the club is “specifically designed for queer and questioning middle and high school youth” to “explore how queerness shows up in nature.”
BREAKING: The @AmerAcadPeds has kicked out a detrans group that included Chloe Cole, Abel Garcia, Soren Aldaco, and Nicolas Flowers from their annual conference. Why is the AAP preventing doctors from hearing these stories?
2/ Video of the incident shows the AAP claimed one individual was associated with a different group who, last year, violated the code of conduct. Security wouldn’t confirm who the individual was, what the violation was, or why it impacted this different group in a different year.
3/ Rather than speak for themselves, the AAP sent venue security to inform these mental health professionals, mothers, and detransitioners that they had 10 minutes to pack up their booth and exit the conference venue.
1/ Many have asked how it's possible that our new film "Am I Racist?" hasn't been reviewed by a single mainstream critic, even with a 99% audience score, a “Verified Hot” rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and a top 5 box office debut. Here's what's happening behind the scenes. 🧵
2/ Beginning in mid-August, we reached out to dozens of mainstream outlets, offering an early screener of the film. Those outlets included @TIME, @AP, @IndieWire, @Variety, @THR, @nytimes, @NewYorker, and many others. We followed up to virtual silence.
3/ We did, however, receive a flurry of unprofessional emails from independent critics who were enraged we'd even ask them to review the film. One of them wrote that he won't waste any "professional time" on a movie opening in over 1,500 theaters because I was involved.
Don’t listen to the lies about Amendment 4. It will absolutely without question codify a right to abortion UNTIL BIRTH. Anyone who supports the amendment is supporting a Soros funded initiative to kill fully developed infant children. I will show you why.
Here’s the text of the amendment: “No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider.”
Notice the “or.” The “or” is the whole point here.
The amendment enshrines the right to abortion PAST viability if it “protects the patient’s health.” Notice it doesn’t say “life.” This isn’t abortion to protect the patient’s life, but health. What does health mean? Well it means literally anything. Physical health, mental health, emotional health, financial health. In other words, it means that a woman can get an abortion for literally any reason as long as it’s framed broadly and vaguely under the umbrella of “health.”
A lot of very bad parenting ideas have become popular in recent decades. One of the worst is that you should never offer “because I said so” as an answer to your child when he asks why he has to do something or why he can’t do something. In fact, “because I said so” is one of the best and most effective answers you can give. You should say it as much as possible. A child should be trained to respect your authority and follow your instructions whether or not he understands or agrees. Weak leaders explain themselves, cajole, and negotiate. Many parents today are weak leaders in their homes.
“Why” questions in this context from a child are almost always an act of defiance. He doesn’t really care why you’re telling him to turn off the TV. He’s just looking for a point to argue. “Because I said so” is not an answer that invites argument, which is why it’s much better than actually trying to explain your reasoning.
The great @JohnKRosemond has written extensively on this point