Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Jan 11 27 tweets 6 min read Read on X
The reason the extreme right are running circles around progressives, is simple.

It is about emotions, and their use of emotional responses, to manipulate people.

Lies, conspiracy theories, and fear of outsiders, all produce emotional responses.
1/🧵
Progressives, have failed to learn from this.

I see so many influential people, using the false argument, that we mustn't tell the full truth about the climate emergency, because of specious pseudo-explanations, that fear paralyses people into inaction - no it motivates.
2/
Extreme right wing climate change deniers have got into power, by using fear tactics, such as non-existent WEF conspiracies about taxing people to pay for Net Zero policy.

It's about time, that progressives learned that emotions matter, and fear is not the only emotion.
3/
If you use purely intellectual arguments, against unprincipled people who tell lies, to create fear and panic, you will lose.

Neoliberal centrist politicians, use weak arguments, so not to upset the oligarchs, and the billionaires who prop them up.
4/
These centrist, liberal and neoliberal politicians used to have emotionally persuasive arguments, to entice the public, such as clear rises in living standards, via economic growth.
5/
However, economic growth, no longer promises rising living standards in the richer countries, with a cost of living crisis, and a massive flow of wealth going to billionaire oligarchs, who then use their wealth and ownership of the media to promote right wing fear politics.
6/
This you've never had it so good, political sales pitch, used in both the US and UK, in the 1950s, was just a temporary flash in the pan of the post-war period. Now the fortunes of billionaires grows exponentially, and everyone else struggles.

7/oxfam.org/en/press-relea…
A self-amplifying feedback loop (positive feedback) has been created, whereby the richer the world's billionaires get, the more they can control our system for their own end, and fund fear politics, and propaganda. @ClimateHuman

8/theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
The overall dynamic is this. Politicians can no longer sell rising living standards as the emotional content, in a situation of a cost of living crisis, caused by billionaires and big corporations, taking a bigger unfair slice for themselves (via their control of politics).
9/
To stop the oligarchs and the rest of the top 1% being blamed for sucking up all the wealth, they sponsor and support extreme right wing politics, which blames, immigrants, WEF climate policy, and other lies, for this stagnation of living standards.

10/
It's very simple and effective, because this fear politics, even if it is produced by outright lies, has emotional content.

The arguments of neoliberal, supposedly progressive politicians lacks emotional content, and sincerity.
11/
Progressive politics has been hijacked by neoliberal politicians, sucking up to oligarchs, and vested interests, who pay very well.

The oligarchs and vested interests, have totally corrupted our political systems.
12/
Modern, centrist, neoliberal politicians, are often, nearly as right wing, as Conservatives were in the past.

These centrist, neoliberal politicians, are playing right into the hands of the extreme right, who know how to play the emotional game, and steal their votes.
13/
The extreme right, don't just play fear politics, with their demonizing propaganda, against immigrants, Muslims, made up woke ideology and conspiracy theories, but claim a bright revival of prosperity is on the horizon, if only you vote for them.
14/
Whereas progressive politics, has been captured by dreary neoliberal centrists, who try playing both sides, cosying up to the oligarchs, whilst putting on a poor disingenuous show of being there for everyone, totally devoid of emotion and sincerity.
15/
Literally, the only emotional content, left in the centrist armoury, was fear of the right, which is collapsing, as the public develops learned helplessness, and thinks the rise of the oligarch sponsored right is inevitable.

16/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learned_h…
The neoliberal, centrist, economic growthers, refuse to highlight the wealth of those at the top, because they're either in the top 1% themselves, or they're trying to appease the oligarchs, who would be very disapproving of wealth taxes.

17/
This is the irony, there is a potential narrative, rich in emotional content, of the oligarchs growing wealth, and their out of control behaviour. Yet no centrist politician wants anything to do with this, as they're too busy trying to suck up to the oligarchs.
18/
There's a bigger source of emotional content. The climate and ecological emergency.

As @KevinClimate says “There are now no non-radical futures". Our future is going to be radically altered by climate change, and other parts of the ecological crisis.

19/bellacaledonia.org.uk/2023/04/18/no-…
We face a simple choice, either we take radical action, in drastically reducing our carbon emissions, halting biodiversity loss etc, otherwise our civilization will collapse, and there will be mass starvation.

20/pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
However, few of our politicians will tell the truth about the choice we face, because they're neoliberals, obsessed with economic growth, and beholden to the oligarchs.

Telling the truth, would have deep emotional content, but they won't use it.

21/theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Either progressives learn to use emotionally charged arguments, honest ones, or they will go under. There is no need to create made up conspiracy theories, when the climate and ecological emergency has all the potential emotional charge, necessary.
22/
We have the truth and science on our side. The extreme right, just has lies and science denial. The climate crisis is real, and the extreme right climate change deniers will be exposed as liars, as it hits us.

We have the fight of our lives on our hands. Let's get serious.
23/
Let's fight back against the oligarch sponsored, extreme right wing liars, and wannabe fascists, with the truth. Let's get emotional, in a constructive way.

Let's expose the greedy manipulative oligarchs, and save ourselves. Outrage, is emotional.

24/threadreaderapp.com/thread/1878049…
Let us no longer be ashamed of telling the unbridled truth, and saying how bad the situation is. Ignore all the deep lies about alarmism, as the truth is alarming enough, without having to invent or exaggerate anything. Fight for your lives.
25/
Just a caveat, for those who misrepresent my arguments. No, I am not advocating communism, or any other ism, because IMHO, it doesn't deal well with sustainability. The capitalism/communism, false dichotomy is false, and I am non-ideological.
26/
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

Jan 11
@GreenJennyJones @GeorgeMonbiot It is truly a difficult nut to crack, but I believe it is doable.

We need to focus on creating collaborative narratives, on how the fortunes of billionaires, are accumulated, at our expense.

1/threadreaderapp.com/thread/1876257…
@GreenJennyJones @GeorgeMonbiot It needs to be collaborative for 2 main reasons:

1) The current approach, is lots of competing narratives, with lots of people trying to sell their solution. Divided, we are conquered, it is ineffective, which is what the oligarchs want.
2/
@GreenJennyJones @GeorgeMonbiot The 2) reason, is that effective problem-solving, involves lots of creative solutions, most of which will fails. So it's back to the drawing board, to learn from our failures. Individuals, are usually reluctant to acknowledge their plan didn't work. Groups less so.
3/
Read 5 tweets
Jan 11
@JKSteinberger You're right, as usual. I have spent virtually my whole life trying to understand this.

However, to become better at it, means killing lots of sacred cows, overcoming false ideas people have about the world, that they hold dear.
1/
@JKSteinberger I keep telling people, the reification fallacy, mistaking the map for the territory, is the key for unlocking all this. No one gets what I am saying.

What this involves, is completely ditching the false concreteness of language.

2/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reificati…
@JKSteinberger The whole of Western Thinking, is shot through with this core logical fallacy. There isn't any area of our academia, which is not a house built on the sand of the reification fallacy. It is this false concreteness, which gives those with great power, their great power.
3/
Read 9 tweets
Jan 9
"Artificial intelligence companies have run out of data for training their models and have “exhausted” the sum of human knowledge, Elon Musk has said."

It seems like the richest man in the world, is a bit of a simpleton, and very uneducated.

1/theguardian.com/technology/202…
The vast majority of human insight and knowledge, can't be verbalized, and the only thing you can find about this on the internet, is why this is so. If AI has overlooked that, it might be artificial something, but whatever it is, it certainly, ain't intelligent.
2/
I put off studying ecology at university for a long time, because the natural world was always such a magical place to me, and I feared it all being explained away.

When I had access to a vast academic library, I spent most of my time, trying to work out what was known.
3/
Read 16 tweets
Jan 6
In a just world, billionaires wouldn't exist. There should be an escalating tax system, which makes it impossible for an individual to accumulate a billion or more. No one can accumulate that level of wealth, purely from their own work, not taking more than their fair share.
1/🧵
This level of wealth, always involves taking far more than their fair share from others. Essentially, by stealing from other people. This takes place because as someone accumulates great wealth, it also gives them great power and the ability to corrupt and subvert our system.
2/
For the hard of thinking, or the dishonest, this is not communism, it's just common sense, and fairness. We are not talking about ordinary levels of wealth.

Disregarding interest, if someone were to save 1 million a year, it would take 1000 years to accumulate 1 billion.
3/
Read 13 tweets
Jan 4
With my threads, all I'm trying to do, is to clarify matters around the climate and ecological crisis, because there is so much false framing, and mistaken ideas about the situation.

People, can only think about it, more clearly, when the situation is clarified.
1/
One of the methods I try to use, is what I call, accurate simplification. Simplifying matters, can produce falsehoods. However, if you are careful, and never overreach yourself, you can produce accurate simplifications, but not of everything.
2/
Let me clarify what I mean. Philosophy is full attempts to produce wide ranging truths, for deduction. All Swans are white, all Crows are black, all men are mortal type thing. The big problem is the "all" bit, because all Crows are not black, even if most are.
3/
Read 20 tweets
Jan 3
In my recent thread, I highlighted a key component, of why humanity is failing to recognize, the climate and ecological emergency.

This is the cultural myth of our modern culture, that this chattering ego we are very aware of, is our mind.
1/🧵
Whenever I highlight this, people dismiss what I'm saying, because a central myth of the European origin culture, which now dominates the world, after this culture colonized the world, is this self-conscious ego, which thinks in words, is our mind.
2/
It may surprise people to know, that no other culture saw our mind like this, and this idea of our culture, that our ego, is our mind, our soul, well pre-dates any understanding of science. It's a cultural construct, not a scientific concept.
3/
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(