Ukraine wiped out 40% of Russia’s bombers in a surprise strike—and Steve Bannon says the U.S. is now on the brink of getting dragged into World War III.
But the media shrugs. The public sleeps.
Then Bannon went nuclear—calling for two brutal consequences for Senator Lindsey Graham upon returning home from Ukraine.
🧵 THREAD
Steve Bannon didn’t waste time with pleasantries.
Speaking with Chris Cuomo, he opened with a dire warning: the United States is heading toward a global catastrophe, and most Americans have no idea how close we really are.
“Chris, we’re being sucked into a kinetic Third World War right now, that’s going to dwarf the 20th century’s First and Second World War. Inextricably we’ve been drawn in every day,” Bannon said.
The trigger, he argued, was Ukraine’s recent and audacious drone strike deep inside Russian territory—an operation that reportedly destroyed 40% of Russia’s strategic nuclear bombers.
According to Bannon, the attack wasn’t just bold, it was reckless.
“They attacked part of the strategic triad of the Russians… They took out 40% of Russia’s strategic nuclear bombers. This is something Curtis LeMay would never think of.”
But what stunned Bannon even more than the scale of the strike was what didn’t happen: there was no warning.
“What the Ukrainians did, and what the White House has said is that they never got a heads up,” he said.
“It was audacious, it was bold—but we’re sponsoring this. We’re funding it. We’re cutting deals. And now they’re dragging us in.”
That, Bannon warned, could have consequences far beyond Eastern Europe.
“Did they think they can go in and really attack into Russian territory and drag us into conflict with Russia that could metastasize?”
For context on Ukraine’s surprise attack in Russia
Russia's Pearl Harbor: Ukraine Wipes Out Nuclear Bombers in Massive Surprise Attack on Air Bases vigilantfox.com/p/russias-pear…
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
The deeper concern, Bannon explained, is that Americans remain largely unaware of the global forces pulling them toward war.
While the media focuses on domestic distractions, decisions are being made abroad that could change the course of history.
“People are not awake of what is happening throughout the world and how we're being sucked in and supposedly by somebody we support, like Zelenskyy,” he said.
The fact that Ukraine allegedly launched such a provocative strike without consulting Washington was, in Bannon’s words, “outrageous.”
He doubled down on the danger of continuing to back a foreign leader who’s now acting unilaterally, without American oversight or input.
“To know that he never gave the White House heads up. He never asked permission to do this.”
Adding fuel to the fire, Senator Lindsey Graham was in Ukraine the same weekend, publicly reaffirming U.S. support. That, according to Bannon, is only making things worse.
“It's outrageous! And Lindsey Graham all weekend's over there stirring the pot—We can’t have people over there telling Ukrainians that we're going back more.”
In contrast, Bannon said, Donald Trump is trying to de-escalate.
“What we try do is calm this down. What President Trump is trying to say is like, look, let's get to a cease-fire. Let's put our weapons down. Let's talk peace and prosperity.”
Even if there’s disagreement on the economics, Trump views a negotiated settlement as the only realistic way forward.
“We don't support the economic deal. But President Trump is saying that he needs it as a central part of a peace plan.”
Still, none of that matters, Bannon warned, if others are charging forward recklessly.
“We can't have Lindsey Graham and particularly Zelenskyy leading us into a 3rd World War with a deep strike into Russia.”
And Vladimir Putin, he said, is already responding.
“And Putin came back today and said, hey, we're gonna get to the bottom of this and we're going to see who is accountable in Ukraine and beyond. And that was a message to the United States.”
That message wasn’t just rhetorical—it may have real consequences.
And for Bannon, those enabling escalation on the U.S. side shouldn’t get a free pass.
That’s when the conversation went nuclear.
During the exchange, Chris Cuomo pushed back.
“I don't understand how you could want to jail a U.S. Senator because he’s saying something you don't like. That sounds like worst of the deep state.”
But Bannon was ready.
“No, what he's doing over there right now is stirring it up. He's giving the Ukrainians false hope.”
Cuomo countered: “But it’s not illegal.”
“He’s giving Ukrainians false hope that we’re there to support them on engaging Russia on a kinetic conflict, and we are not,” Bannon said firmly.
When Cuomo pressed again, asking if Bannon really believed Graham should be jailed, Bannon unloaded with both barrels.
“Two things ought to happen. Either cancel his passport and don't let him back in the country, or put him in jail if he comes back!”
He added, “Lindsey Graham is stirring it up right now, and people better wake up to the fact that we’re getting sucked into this war!”
The conversation ended where it began—with a chilling reminder that this isn't just politics as usual.
According to Bannon, we’re crossing a line that past generations of military leaders never dared to cross.
“If the intelligence committee actually did this, this is an act of war against Russia.”
He posed a blunt question to NewsNation viewers:
“Did the American people vote to go to war with the Russian people?”
And while the drone strike was tactically impressive, Bannon said it carried massive geopolitical risk.
“This thing is so serious!” he said.
“But look, I'm being serious, Curtis LeMay at the top of the game and during the worst years in the Soviet Union, during the Cuban missile crisis, we never even conceived of going out and taking out 40% of their bombers on runways.”
“The attack was audacious. It was brilliant.”
But brilliance, Bannon warned, can still be catastrophic, and the average American wants nothing to do with this.
“The problem is it gets us involved in a conflict that no one in the United States wants to be part of and it's going to make it tougher for us to break off.”
Thanks for reading. For more in-depth stories the mainstream won’t touch, follow me on 𝕏.
—> @VigilantFox
Looking for something else to read?
Top Forecaster Issues a Grim Prediction for Europe and NATO
RFK Jr. told Tucker Carlson the CDC buried its own internal study showing a 1135% INCREASE in autism risk from hepatitis B vaccination.
The researchers were shocked.
So they covered it up.
How?
“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are too young to be diagnosed [with autism].”
Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.
Then telling everyone it’s “safe.”
Forget what Dr. Fauci or your AI chatbot tells you.
Here’s what the real data shows about the risks and benefits of 11 vaccines still in use today. 🧵
The information in this report comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and eye-opening details, read the full article below:
If you think vaccines are perfect, you’ve bought into a myth.
Vaccines are marketed as safe and effective silver bullets. But many don’t prevent infection, fail to stop transmission, and carry real, underreported risks.
The bar for justifying most vaccines is nowhere near as high as it should be.
Something shocking just happened and barely anyone is talking about it.
Tucked within the 2026 Farm Bill is an alarming provision. Farmers who adopt AI and precision agriculture technologies will be reimbursed for it—90% of the total cost. And the standards governing this tech won’t be set by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself.
An article from Fortune titled ‘The 2026 farm bill quietly hands big tech control over American farmland. Here’s the fine print’ reads:
Tucked inside the 2026 Farm Bill is a provision that would reimburse farmers 90% of the cost of adopting AI and precision agriculture technologies—15 percentage points above the normal EQIP cap.The private sector standards governing those technologies would be set not by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself.This could be a Trojan horse of sorts for something called “precision agriculture” and artificial intelligence (AI), which big tech firms will be able take advantage of farmers and further wrest control over the food system from them.
The article goes on to describe precision agriculture, saying:
Not only is precision agriculture defined, but it is complemented by a list of what are deemed appropriate technologies, including GPS, yield monitors, data management software, and the particularly strange sounding, “Internet of Things and telematics technologies.”That last bizarre phrase, which most would probably consider a typo, is actually a concept that abounds in tech company circles. One definition from an industry leader notes that the “Internet of Things,” or IoT, is the “network of physical objects — “things” — that are embedded with sensors, software, and other technologies for the purpose of connecting and exchanging data with other devices and systems.”
You read that right. They’re connecting your food to AI.
Paired with this definition is the government opening the way for corporations to have, well, a “field day” with precision agriculture, including for AI. Tucked away in the Rural Development Title, is the “promoting precision agriculture” subsection. AI, we are told particularly, is to be guided by “private sector-led interconnectivity standards, guidelines, and best practices.”
In short, this is a Big Tech takeover of our food supply.
But what does that really mean?
According to the proponents of Agenda 2030, of which Big Tech are, they want us to consume zero meat and zero real dairy, everything must be bioengineered, and our food must contain vaccines.
While we’ve seen legislative efforts to stop that from occurring, but when private companies with billions of dollars to spare on lawsuits seize control of the food supply and you have no options left, guess what happens?
mRNA lettuce. And bioengineered everything.
They even admit the aim is to have the food connected to AI. Thus, consuming it would presumably connect you and your loved ones to AI, too.
Not only is this a privacy and complete control nightmare technocrats of old could have only dreamed of, this opens up a range of issues for a whole host of diseases humans will undoubtedly start to suffer from, because this will not be real food.
Joining us now to discuss one of the solutions to metabolic health and the increased threat on it is Ryan Richardson. 🧵
Maria opened the interview by asking a bigger question, why does it feel so hard for people to actually get healthy?
She pointed to recent efforts to change vaccine schedules being blocked and said it feels like “everything is poised against humanity” when it comes to breaking free from what’s making people sick in the first place.
From there, she shifted the focus to what people are experiencing outside that system. More and more individuals, she explained, are finding answers elsewhere, which suggests something important isn’t being addressed.
That’s when Ryan stepped in and brought it down to something much more basic.
He explained that a lot of what we’re dealing with today may come down to what’s missing, not just what’s wrong. Using vitamin B17 as his example, he said it used to be naturally present in everyday foods—for generations. But it has largely disappeared from our modern diet.
And in Ryan’s view, that’s not just a small detail.
It’s the starting point.
He believes several nutrients have been stripped from our food over time, but one stands above the rest in terms of impact.
“Vitamin B-17 is the most important.”
#ad: Want protection from surveillance, hacking, and even electromagnetic threats?
The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block GPS, Bluetooth, RFID skimming, and EMF—perfect for phones, laptops, wallets, and more.
Their premium ballistic backpack even combines Faraday shielding with Kevlar armor, giving you the upper hand in an unpredictable world.
Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets—because protection shouldn’t stop with your phone.
Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
The 50-Year-Old Cancer Miracle Hiding in Plain Sight
Back in 1968, the FDA discovered something incredible: a common dye combined with DMSO (Dimethyl Sulfoxide) could destroy cancer cells without harming healthy ones.
Instead of fast-tracking this breakthrough, they chose to bury the evidence.
But now, as @MidwesternDoc shows, doctors have proven this combination works—safely treating otherwise “incurable” cancers. 🧵
DMSO—or Dimethyl sulfoxide—was discovered in the 1960s and quickly gained medical recognition.
It turns out DMSO has a shocking ability to treat everything from inflammation and stroke to autoimmune diseases and even cancer. midwesterndoctor.com/p/hundreds-of-…
The dye used in combination with DMSO was Hematoxylin, a natural extract traditionally used for staining tissue under a microscope.
When doctors combined it with DMSO, they witnessed something extraordinary: aggressive, recurring cancers began to vanish.
It worked even in cases where standard treatments had failed. The results were so promising, they should’ve launched a new era of cancer care.
This 75-year-old, who had been blind since birth, suddenly regained his sight after using DMSO to cure sinusitis.
Ten years ago, doctors gave up on him: “There’s really nothing I can do.”
But when he used DMSO to treat his sinusitis, he “became aware of the fact that [he] could see color with [his] left eye, which [he] found to be interesting.”
“I can see color quite distinctly now. I can see detail,” Murray said.
“I can count fingers, which I could never do before.”
DMSO has repeatedly been shown to help heal eye issues medicine still can’t solve, like blindness and macular degeneration, while also reducing floaters and cataracts.
But helping the eyes is just the surface of what DMSO can do.
Because once you dig deeper, you start to see that many diseases we’ve been told are “incurable” may not be after all. 🧵
For decades, a simple compound has been quietly linked to diseases medicine still calls “incurable.”
Autoimmune disorders. Fibrotic conditions. Degenerative diseases tied to protein damage. Even rare conditions where the body slowly hardens into immobility.
What makes this unusual isn’t one study, it’s how often it keeps appearing across completely different categories of disease.
Sadly, most people have never even heard of it.
For decades, DMSO has mostly been framed as a fringe solvent with odd medical lore attached to it.
But the truth is DMSO treats a wide range of issues and it’s much, much bigger than pain relief. In fact, it’s such a useful tool that it’s been hidden from us for decades.
This incredible tool can treat inflammation, fibrosis, protein misfolding, and even some of the “incurable” disorders medicine manages rather than solves.
The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.”
“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.
“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”
But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.
In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.
“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵
Something strange has happened in modern medicine.
For decades, vaccine debates focused on obvious adverse events like allergic reactions or acute neurological injuries.
But a quieter question has lingered in medical literature: could vaccines sometimes cause subtle neurological changes that alter behavior, personality, or emotional development?
What happens when people report sudden personality shifts, or changes in emotional bonding, or even changes in sexual attraction following vaccination?
When signals appear, we’re suppose to pause and look a little deeper—not dismiss them because they’re uncomfortable.
But that’s exactly what society does when things like autism and gender identity are involved.
Are there links between vaccination, human connection, autism, and sexual orientation? If we don’t stop to ask these questions, we’ll never know the answers.
Researchers have historically focused on dramatic vaccine injuries like seizures or encephalitis while overlooking smaller neurological effects.
But something is quietly breaking human connection at the deepest level and we have to get to the bottom of what’s causing it.
Romantic partners feel distant.
Intimacy lacks real passion or spontaneity.
Emotional warmth is harder to find.
And gender confusion has exploded, especially in the young.
This isn’t random. It’s the result of neurological changes. And some of those changes may be triggered by mass vaccination.
For more than a century, evidence shows vaccines cause wide-ranging neurological and autoimmune disorders, including autism and middle ear infections.
DISTURBING: Peter Thiel is hosting secret Antichrist lectures in Rome, setting up a collision course with the Pope while advancing the very AI systems causing many to fear the future.
Behind closed doors, the Palantir founder is warning of a “one-world state,” as critics stress his very own technology is helping build it in real time.
Following similar invite-only sessions in California, Thiel is now gathering elites at undisclosed locations in Rome, with no recordings allowed, where he frames tech regulation as a path to the Antichrist. He even claims that warning about the catastrophic risks helps bring them about, but his critics say that logic is backwards.
Voices within the Catholic world are calling this a direct challenge to the Pope’s push for AI restraint.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Tucker Carlson says the CIA is preparing a criminal referral against him after reading texts he sent to Iran, as a growing rift within MAGA intensifies.
He insists this was just routine journalism—part of his job. But critics are framing it as a potential national security issue, and conflicting reports are only adding to the uncertainty.
Carlson says he isn’t concerned—but should he be?
What actually set this off, and why it escalated so quickly, becomes much clearer in @zeeemedia's report. 👇 rumble.com/v777k8q-tucker…