This was just posted by @GretaThunberg on Instagram. I want to totally endorse this, and I want everyone to get behind this, especially if they are influential and have a platform.
It's gone too far. If you don't get behind this, and claim to care, then you're a poseur.
1/🧵
The reason I say everyone who cares, needs to get behind this, is because #GretaThunberg is the clearest voice there is. This is not about getting behind her as a person, she doesn't want fame or adulation. It is getting behind her message.
2/
No more picking and choosing which issues you care about. Either you care about the whole situation, or you don't really care at all. You think your career, your reputation matters more, then you need to learn and to change your attitude.
3/
Greta has already made it clear, that she doesn't want to be a leader of this movement. She is without ego. It is not about her. As I say, she does not want you to follow her personally, but to address her message. She is a messenger, not an idol.
4/
Don't just say, isn't she marvellous, and think you have done your bit, because if you don't get fully behind the message, then you don't really care.
I am aware most people don't have the platform, or the ability to do much, but you can if you join together.
5/
It all comes down to those with the influence and the platform to make more of this. It has gone much too far, to starting picking over which issues you prefer, either you care, or you don't care. It is not about your ego.
6/
The reason I say to get behind @GretaThunberg's message, is not adulation. I have been saying it much longer. It is because in 55 years of caring about these matters, Greta has got the clearest message there is.
7/
Since #GretaThunberg became famous 7 years ago, I have never heard one single misstep from her. She has been absolutely on message in a joined up way, and none of this has ever been about her. Again, listen to what she says, don't think about her personally.
8/
If you think you disagree over something with Greta, then either you don't really care, you have just been posturing, or you have been misled.
#GretaThunberg has been subjected to a mountain of smears, and misrepresentation. It is not about liking her.
9/
Often, when people spell out uncomfortable truths, people feel uncomfortable. Greta has not been trying to win any popularity contests. She does not want fame or adulation. She just wants you to listen to what she is saying, and act on it.
10/
So any, I don't like #GretaThunberg, she's part of the WEF, or any other nonsense, is nonsense. Greta doesn't represent anyone, other than humanity. As I say, it is not about her as a person, it is about her message.
11/
By supporting Greta's message, you are not aiding her becoming anything, because I am absolutely certain, that if you supported what she is saying, and forgot all about her, that no one would be more pleased than Greta.
That is why you must listen to her, if you're genuine.
12/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm fucking furious about this, our fascistic leadership, who have totally lost any semblance of a moral compass, are turning our societies into an Orwellian hell.
That this vulnerable, honest young man was arrested like this, makes my blood boil.
All my life, I have been defending vulnerable people from bullying, often for just been slightly different, or simply caring in an honest way.
And now the state, and its apparatus, are that vicious bully. WTF is going on? They have totally lost their moral compass.
2/
Any right thinking politician reading about this, knowing about the myriad of things that honest people like this care about, from the climate crisis, to genocide in Gaza, and all the other preventable catastrophes, should be saying, something has gone very wrong.
3/
@ClimateDad77 I keep trying to explain, seeing this in terms of slow decline in food yield/production, is a profound thinking error. Perhaps I better understand this faulty thinking, as an ecologist. What matters most, is food yield in a given year, not the average.
@ClimateDad77 What population ecology teaches us, is that the population of a species, does not depend on food availability averages over a long period of time, but specific shortfalls of food in a given year. This can totally collapse the population, even if the average is fine after.
2/
@ClimateDad77 It's the same with our civilization. It doesn't matter what the theoretical food yield is, until the end of the century, if food shortages in a given year, result in societal chaos, and the collapse of our civilization. We live in a free market economy.
3/
@MrMatthewTodd Whilst its true that extreme heat, will impact the old and vulnerable most. It is a profound error to just think this all that will happen. As I keep trying to point out, our civilization could collapse in the near future, because of climate related food shortages.
1/
@MrMatthewTodd It would only take food short supply, not such abundance as usual, not absolute shortages, in one year, due to the climate ducks, lining up, to in a free market system, to create food hyperinflation, and societal chaos and collapse, which could bring the whole system down.
2/
@MrMatthewTodd If that happened, no one would be safe. Billionaires would lose everything, and the collapse of the system would result in possibly billions starving to death over the next few years. The trope that some people would be safe, the rich, the healthy, is absolutely false.
3/
@JohnHann0404 Your reasoning, is completely wrong. It is not that people have suddenly developed these conditions. You don't suddenly, develop ASD or ADHD. It is that it is being recognized more now. Lots of those people have been struggling all their lives.
1/
@JohnHann0404 Let me give an example. I have severe complex PTSD. It didn't suddenly happen, although it got much worse after the death of my sister 16 years ago (we had a shared history of abuse). I objectively had PTSD when I was a child, in the 1960s.
2/
@JohnHann0404 However, the condition of PTSD wasn't officially recognized until 1984, then only for military veterans. They took their time, given shellshock was well known in WWI, it was just not medically described. In the UK, complex PTSD is not yet officially recognized by the NHS.
3/
Ideally, we could do with a name for this campaign, a simple strategy. It's all beyond me, because I don't have a high profile, I do not have any celebrity friends, but I would call on people who have to come together and work this out. @brianeno @AURORAmusic @ExtinctionR
2/
It is necessary to follow clear effective problem solving steps to succeed. First recognize the problem, and try to get a consensus on it. Second, do not broaden it out too much. Just focus on getting the core problem recognized.
3/
My reason for posting this, is because all concerned people, need to recognize the situation, accept it, and work together to come up with solutions and strategies of how to deal with this reality.
1/🧵
Throughout the existence of modern environmentalism, and the pursuit of social justice, because I strongly believe they are inextricably linked, the primary assumption has been that we should pursue the necessary change, through our political systems.
2/
Indeed, as recently as with the 2015 our political leaders agreed to try to keep warming to less than 1.5C. There has been no announcement, that this aspiration had been abandoned, although it is now impossible, as no major government made any effort.