Keir Starmer is quite baffling. He gives every sign of being a puppet taking orders and following them. His policy is totally incoherent and impossible to understand, except it's the talking points of right wing think tanks and the Tory Press.
1/
1/
https://twitter.com/SteB777/status/1937601273785655549
Often when a politician holds rigidly, to a set of policies, often it is a sign of some sort of deep ideological beliefs. But this is the thing, Starmer doesn't actually seem to have any coherent principles or beliefs.
2/
2/
This has been much commented on, especially in the lead up to the general election, with both the public and political analysts, struggling to work out what Starmer really stands for, if anything. It's no clearer now. He's dogmatic, but it's not clear why.
3/
3/
Take his position over the EU and Brexit. Since well before the election, since he has been leader, he has been repeating, we must abide by Brexit, there is to be no considering re-joining the EU, the single market etc.
4/
4/
This is baffling, because it was always clear that there would come a point, where the public got fed up with Brexit and there would be growing public opinion in favour of rejoining the EU, or closer ties.
5/
5/
The reason it is utterly baffling, is that Starmer never had any apparent ideological beliefs about this, never had any clear views on it. At first it seemed, maybe focus groups, advisers etc, had said don't talk about it, as it might be unpopular.
6/
6/
However, with public opinion changing in favour of the EU, it makes absolutely no sense he has this dogmatic position, unless Starmer is being controlled by right wing think tanks and Tory Press barons, who demand he not reconsider it.
7/
7/
It is the same with much of Starmer's other positions, where over benefits for the sick and disabled, his unwavering support for Israel, and denial of genocide, refusing to consider nationalizing the water companies.
8/
8/
I can just go on, with his anti-nature policy, the refusal to consider a wealth tax, his wrecking climate policy in favour of fossil fuel industry solutions, his Enoch Powell type speech, clamping down on climate protests and genocide protests.
9/
9/
Starmer is absolutely dogmatic about this stuff, even though it makes him very unpopular. He wants you to believe he's making tough choices for the British people, but most of these dogmatic positions, are not for the good of anyone, but oligarchs.
10/
10/
The only position it all seems to chime with are the themes of right wing think tanks and the talking points of the Tory Press. But this makes no sense, as the right hates Starmer, and he's not winning any respect from them, and he's creating an open goal for Reform.
11/
11/
It only makes sense, if there are powerful people, demanding Starmer stick to unpopular positions, which are driving up support for Reform, whilst at the same time, not winning any approval from the right wing press, or right leaning voters.
12/
12/
Starmer is politically incompetent, and seems devoid of any original thought, or any real moral principles. His rationale, seems to be to suck up to powerful right wing forces like Trump, the Tory Press barons, oligarchs, regardless of the political consequences for Labour.
13/
13/
His latest warmongering stuff, whipping up fear of foreign attacks on British soil, is right in the vein of all the other stuff. This is a theme pushed by the Tory Press, parroting stuff from right wing think tanks.
14/
14/
Let's get this clear, Starmer won this huge majority, because the Tories imploded after making themselves deeply unpopular, essentially pursuing the same policy Starmer is essentially pursuing. It wasn't because of any belief in Starmer.
15/
15/
There is nothing particularly new, original, or controversial about me saying Starmer seems to be a principle free zone, as that is the opinion of most. It is, that he has these dogmatic positions, over everything, whilst having no principles, which is weird.
16/
16/
To conclude, usually, when a politician rigidly and dogmatically sticks to certain policy, it's because they are an ideologue, with very clear beliefs about how things should be. Starmer is the diametric opposite of this, but he is not pragmatic at all.
17/
17/
Most politicians without strong principles, tend to be pragmatic, going along with whatever makes them or their party popular. Yet bafflingly, Starmer is dogmatic, for reasons that are not at all clear. As I say, he acts like a puppet.
18/
18/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
