Modern shyster politicians (manipulative gaslighters), like the UK PM, Keir Starmer, convince the public with lies, that the vulnerable, such as the sick and disabled have to suffer cuts, because there is no money. What a massive lie.
2/
The very rich pay a fraction of the tax they used to pay. In the 1950s and 1960s, the top tax rate in both the US and the UK, was 95%. Now, billionaires often pay a lower percentage in tax, than nurses. How did this come about?
3/
I never remember, there being the public demanding that the very rich, should pay much less tax. It's just that once in power, our corrupt politicians, gift these tax cuts to the very rich, presumably because they get rewarded for doing that for them.
4/
This is how utterly corrupt our politicians are. They get elected by the people, but then once in office they only serve the very rich, and corporate interests.
They laughably claim, with lies, that they are doing this for the people. To make us prosperous.
5/
Yet the wealth of the very rich skyrockets, whilst costs of living, leave ordinary people, with less and less. In whose name is this happening?
Where does all this extra money people have to pay for necessities go? Well, into the coffers of the very rich.
6/
"A survey by Oxfam found that 86% of people supported paying for public services by “closing loopholes” that allow wealthy individuals and large corporations to use tax havens."
This clearly shows governments acting against the wishes of the people.
Keir Starmer wants the public to believe, that he is forced to massively slash the already meagre benefits for the sick and disabled, because he has no other choice. But strangely, he chooses not to tax the very wealthy? Why? Because he's as bent as a nine bob note.
8/
What this illustrates is how our politicians lie to the public, and gaslight them, into falsely believing the cuts to our public services are out of necessity. Simply so the very rich, have to pay very little tax.
9/
What, do the very rich, do with this vast wealth they accumulate?
Well they use it to buy our politicians, so the super rich, can get even richer, and pay off our crooked politicians, for their favours for them. It is viciously circular.
Why do we let them get away with it?
10/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just how ironic. After claiming they suspected automated behaviour on my account on Instagram, after appealing they found no breaches of Community Standards.
The irony, is that it is some sort of stupid AI that keeps telling Instagram, that I'm not a human. 1/
Instagram's stupid AI seems incapable of learning from experience. So even though previous appeals, have proved I was a real human being, not breaching Community Standards, it keeps making the same mistake over, and over again.
I'm going to go on a bit of a rant about AI. AI is actually not intelligent at all, it is in fact, very stupid, and always will be. Machine learning is very good at some things, like lots of parallel processes, but it totally lacks human intelligence.
3/
Keir Starmer is quite baffling. He gives every sign of being a puppet taking orders and following them. His policy is totally incoherent and impossible to understand, except it's the talking points of right wing think tanks and the Tory Press. 1/
Often when a politician holds rigidly, to a set of policies, often it is a sign of some sort of deep ideological beliefs. But this is the thing, Starmer doesn't actually seem to have any coherent principles or beliefs.
2/
This has been much commented on, especially in the lead up to the general election, with both the public and political analysts, struggling to work out what Starmer really stands for, if anything. It's no clearer now. He's dogmatic, but it's not clear why.
3/
This was just posted by @GretaThunberg on Instagram. I want to totally endorse this, and I want everyone to get behind this, especially if they are influential and have a platform.
It's gone too far. If you don't get behind this, and claim to care, then you're a poseur.
1/🧵
The reason I say everyone who cares, needs to get behind this, is because #GretaThunberg is the clearest voice there is. This is not about getting behind her as a person, she doesn't want fame or adulation. It is getting behind her message.
2/
No more picking and choosing which issues you care about. Either you care about the whole situation, or you don't really care at all. You think your career, your reputation matters more, then you need to learn and to change your attitude.
3/
I'm fucking furious about this, our fascistic leadership, who have totally lost any semblance of a moral compass, are turning our societies into an Orwellian hell.
That this vulnerable, honest young man was arrested like this, makes my blood boil.
All my life, I have been defending vulnerable people from bullying, often for just been slightly different, or simply caring in an honest way.
And now the state, and its apparatus, are that vicious bully. WTF is going on? They have totally lost their moral compass.
2/
Any right thinking politician reading about this, knowing about the myriad of things that honest people like this care about, from the climate crisis, to genocide in Gaza, and all the other preventable catastrophes, should be saying, something has gone very wrong.
3/
@ClimateDad77 I keep trying to explain, seeing this in terms of slow decline in food yield/production, is a profound thinking error. Perhaps I better understand this faulty thinking, as an ecologist. What matters most, is food yield in a given year, not the average.
@ClimateDad77 What population ecology teaches us, is that the population of a species, does not depend on food availability averages over a long period of time, but specific shortfalls of food in a given year. This can totally collapse the population, even if the average is fine after.
2/
@ClimateDad77 It's the same with our civilization. It doesn't matter what the theoretical food yield is, until the end of the century, if food shortages in a given year, result in societal chaos, and the collapse of our civilization. We live in a free market economy.
3/
@MrMatthewTodd Whilst its true that extreme heat, will impact the old and vulnerable most. It is a profound error to just think this all that will happen. As I keep trying to point out, our civilization could collapse in the near future, because of climate related food shortages.
1/
@MrMatthewTodd It would only take food short supply, not such abundance as usual, not absolute shortages, in one year, due to the climate ducks, lining up, to in a free market system, to create food hyperinflation, and societal chaos and collapse, which could bring the whole system down.
2/
@MrMatthewTodd If that happened, no one would be safe. Billionaires would lose everything, and the collapse of the system would result in possibly billions starving to death over the next few years. The trope that some people would be safe, the rich, the healthy, is absolutely false.
3/