I say the reason that governments/politicians/the media don't want to communicate climate change dangers with the fear tactics, they use to change public attitudes and opinion, with every other issue, is because they don't want the public to demand climate action
2/
Just think about it for a moment. With every other issue from drugs, smoking, crime, obesity, and now with immigration, terrorism, threats of other powers, the left, what tactics do they reach for, but fear tactics, because it works?
3/
Yet, sagely, we are told fear tactics won't work to change public attitudes over climate change, people will switch off, become paralysed, so governments/politicians/the media all downplay the dangers of climate change.
4/
Has this downplaying the dangers of climate change worked? Well, hell no!
The public have become indifferent to the dangers of climate change, don't think about it too much, and mistakenly think the economy is more important.
5/
I say, this big lie, is no accident. It is now clear that governments, politicians and big business, never actually wanted to address the climate crisis, only to pretend they wanted to address, and then break their pledges.
6/
Surely, it is no coincidence, that 33 years after pledging to address the climate crisis at the 1992 Rio Earth, it is clear that our politicians lied, and they never any intention of phasing out fossil fuel burning. That is why they have made people, indifferent to the danger.
7/
Can anyone name any other major issue, where governments/politicians/the media have thought it was necessary to take action, and change public attitudes, but where they have deliberately, downplayed the dangers?
I can't think of any. Am I missing something?
8/
I say, this false claim, that we must downplay the dangers of climate change, to supposedly get the public behind climate action, is the biggest orchestrated lie, and instance of gaslighting, in human history.
9/
Let us look at a parallel, the ongoing genocide, war crimes and humanitarian crisis, in Gaza. Western governments/the media, support Israel, so they dispute it is genocide, don't show the child, and indeed adult victims, and there is an orchestrated attempt to downplay it.
10/
Funny how, when Western governments/politicians/the media, don't want the public to demand action over the genocide in Gaza, that they use exactly the same downplaying tactic, they have used with the climate crisis.
11/
In fact, these are very close parallels. The only types of protest, governments are trying to suppress in a very orchestrated and oppressive way, are climate protests, and protests about genocide, in Gaza.
I suggest this is not a coincidence.
12/
Governments and the media, especially, Western countries, are actively trying to suppress activists, from alerting the public about these crises, to stop the public demanding action. Protests, are a way to circumvent the oligarch owned media, suppressing public awareness.
13/
The circumstantial evidence, is very strong. For the last 33 years, our governments, corporations and the media, have in a very orchestrated way, been deliberately downplaying the dangers of climate change, and falsely claiming they had technofixes to the climate crisis.
14/
All to make the public indifferent to the climate crisis, so that the public wouldn't demand climate action, and to stop it becoming a big political issue, in elections.
15/
This is epic lying and gaslighting, because with every other danger or hazard, governments/politicians/the media, use blatant fear tactics, to change public attitudes - EXCEPT with regard to climate change.
16/
If anyone disputes what I say, please cite any other example, where governments/politicians/the media, have wanted public attitudes to change, but where they have not primarily used fear tactics, to change public attitudes?
17/
Please don't claim, I've restricted anyone responding to my question, by making it so only accounts I follow, can respond. Just quote repost my question, if you can cite exceptions to what I've said.
18/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There seems to be some sort of censorship going on, because this very important thread I wrote, does not appear on my X profile timeline, despite the very clear evidence that I wrote and posted it.
As I point out here, on every other matter, where politicians/governments/the mainstream media want to change public attitude, they use widespread and repeated warnings, to create public fear of these issues.
To clarify something. I'm briefly focused on questioning the moral and ethical fitness of the current Keir Starmer Labour regime, over the planned sickness benefit cuts and the justification of the horrific genocide in Gaza. This is not because I've forgotten the climate.
1/🧵
My biggest criticism of Keir Starmer's regime, is his failure to produce any realistic climate policy, his scrapping of nature and environment protection and his focus on economic growth, to the exclusion of all else (it is what is driving the climate and ecological crisis)
2/
This illustrates that Keir Starmer and other senior cabinet members, have seriously malfunctioning moral compasses, where they are wiling to sacrifice the long term survivability of our civilization, for short term economic benefit, for the very rich.
3/
To add to this, I think it is necessary to go back to the drawing board, with the whole messaging as regards the climate, ecological and social justice crisis.
Communication over these matters, evolved out of a situation, which has either ceased to exist, or never existed.
1/🧵
The strategy all along, was to convince politicians to take the necessary action. Indeed, governments have supposedly been committed for 53 years to take action on this polycrisis.
However, they've never even attempted to take the pledged action.
Governments are so secretive, that we can never be certain about why they failed to take the action they pledged. Whether they never intended to take the action they pledged and were deceiving the public, or if something changed.
3/
We were told by members of Rishi Sunak's cabinet, and now Keir Starmer's cabinet, that there was no reason why the numbers of those claiming sickness and disability benefits were increasing.
Whilst, actually, there is a crisis of poor health in the UK's poorest communities.
2/
We keep getting told by those taken in by the right wing Tory Press, that this increase in sickness and disability isn't occurring elsewhere in Europe, but here's the evidence of sickness being higher in the UK.
I admit to having made a huge error. In my time commenting on the Guardian, I thought I had explained enough about the climate and ecological crisis, to straighten out many of the misconceptions about it. But obviously I hadn't.
1/🧵
I know much of my commenting was well read and influential. It was not a guess. Just before the pandemic, the former editor of the Guardian Environment section, the late John Vidal, invited me to his Nature Festival in Oswestry, because he told me he wanted to meet me.
2/
He told me that he and the current Guardian Environment Editor Damian Carrington were very impressed by my arguments. George Monbiot was very complimentary, and referenced me in some of his articles. 3/
There's a necessity to understand big picture thinking, joined up thinking, the overview.
All the things I've been commenting about, the climate and ecological crisis, politics, the genocide in Gaza, the pursuit of economic growth, neoliberalism, are all highly interlinked.
1/🧵
The interlinking theme, is humanity and social justice. As @GretaThunberg has explained, she is a climate activist, because of the threat to humanity. It is entirely mistaken to see climate activism, as somehow apart from other social justice issues.
If we do not urgently address the climate and ecological crisis, it will cause massive impacts, starvation, and the likely collapse of our civilization. This, and other social justice issues, all have one major cause.