The Jasper report has 9 key themes and 23 recommendations.
But Danielle Smith has taken issue with one of those themes, claiming the town of Jasper owes her an apology.
But again, the Streisand effect strikes and Dani has trouble truthing!
Let’s take a look!
/1
First, let’s establish some timelines!
Fortunately, the report does that very early on.
The report clearly demonstrates that the first fires inside the town of Jasper were reported on July 24th at roughly 6 PM.
/3
Ok!
With that out of the way, let’s take a look at what Smith is taking issue with!
It’s predominantly these two sections.
The report states that “the Province of Alberta, though not jurisdictionally responsible to lead the incident, regularly requested information and sought to exercise decision-making authority.”
/3
Now again, this is simply one identified areas of weakness, there are 9 themes and 23 recommendations.
The provinces insistence on having “decision making authority” is a single factor of many.
/4
But yesterday when asked about the provinces involvement, Dani demanded an apology and claimed the province had nothing to do with anything until after the town had burned.
No really!
Here she is!
/5
Except…
That’s not quite true is it?
Because if we take a look at a presser that occurred on July 23rd, the day before the fire entered Jasper, Mike Ellis spoke about how he and the premier were making constant calls to AEMA, who were imbedded in the command.
/6
So…
It seems Alberta was “embedded” in the command teams and the premier was making phone calls and requested information.
Just like the report says.
But that’s not even the biggest point here.
/7
The report doesn’t single out the provinces involvement.
It’s listed as one factor among many.
What’s on display here is Dani’s reaction to criticism.
Escalate and react, without any regard for truth, context or facts.
That’s how the premier consistently responds.
/8
And that should be the real cause for concern.
It’s highly unlikely that Smith read the report before being asked these questions.
She could have just said that.
But instead, she went on the attack, laid blame, ignored what actually happened and demanded apologies.
/9
That Smith and her minister were making calls for information is a matter of the word of her minister.
So who’s lying?
Ellis then?
Or Smith now…
Guess we could always ask her?
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today on "Danielle Smith lies a lot and very, very easily about unimportant details just to make a story sound better..."
Earlier today she tweeted out this picture, claiming that it was from the opening of a new recovery community...
/1
#abpoli #ableg #cdnpoli
It seems weird that you would have a crowd that big for a recovery community opening...
Especially when it appears to be in downtown Calgary.
Where they haven't opened any recovery communities.
But that's where this note gets to be important.
/2
Because it turns out that "Cameron" was a performer at a street festival held for "Recovery Day", who is kinda big deal in the country music community, having just been nominated for 6 awards at the Canadian Country Music Association Awards and winning 2.
A briefing memo on the future of pharmacare for Albertans.
If you’re expecting Smith to deliver on her promises of “we’ll opt out of the federal program to make pharmacare better”…
This ain’t it.
Especially if you’re a senior.
/1
So what are the coles notes?
Basically, the UCP seem to be believing that seniors have access to meds that prevent health conditions from getting worse is just costing too darn much.
So what if, just like the did with AISH, they create a new program where seniors get less!
/2
The proposal is to get rid of all the separate programs that exist to care for people with different needs and means and just create a single one that is income tested against seniors and their families!
Since Smith and the UCP have announced a delayed deadline for the first “CorruptCare” investigation report…
We thought it might be fun to offer up a mini-report tonight!
So strap in, cause this gets wild!
/1
Today, the Globe & Mail dropped a story about two characters who have had their toes in both AHS MHCare waters.
Allegedly, Jitendra Prasad was working both sides of the fence when Alberta Surgical Group was trying to get new contracts after being turned down.
/2
Even more intriguing, the report allegedly also claims that Blayne Iskiw, who was later hired by MHCare pushed through contract terms that were above and beyond what his coworkers believed should have been offered.