The Jasper report has 9 key themes and 23 recommendations.
But Danielle Smith has taken issue with one of those themes, claiming the town of Jasper owes her an apology.
But again, the Streisand effect strikes and Dani has trouble truthing!
Let’s take a look!
/1
First, let’s establish some timelines!
Fortunately, the report does that very early on.
The report clearly demonstrates that the first fires inside the town of Jasper were reported on July 24th at roughly 6 PM.
/3
Ok!
With that out of the way, let’s take a look at what Smith is taking issue with!
It’s predominantly these two sections.
The report states that “the Province of Alberta, though not jurisdictionally responsible to lead the incident, regularly requested information and sought to exercise decision-making authority.”
/3
Now again, this is simply one identified areas of weakness, there are 9 themes and 23 recommendations.
The provinces insistence on having “decision making authority” is a single factor of many.
/4
But yesterday when asked about the provinces involvement, Dani demanded an apology and claimed the province had nothing to do with anything until after the town had burned.
No really!
Here she is!
/5
Except…
That’s not quite true is it?
Because if we take a look at a presser that occurred on July 23rd, the day before the fire entered Jasper, Mike Ellis spoke about how he and the premier were making constant calls to AEMA, who were imbedded in the command.
/6
So…
It seems Alberta was “embedded” in the command teams and the premier was making phone calls and requested information.
Just like the report says.
But that’s not even the biggest point here.
/7
The report doesn’t single out the provinces involvement.
It’s listed as one factor among many.
What’s on display here is Dani’s reaction to criticism.
Escalate and react, without any regard for truth, context or facts.
That’s how the premier consistently responds.
/8
And that should be the real cause for concern.
It’s highly unlikely that Smith read the report before being asked these questions.
She could have just said that.
But instead, she went on the attack, laid blame, ignored what actually happened and demanded apologies.
/9
That Smith and her minister were making calls for information is a matter of the word of her minister.
So who’s lying?
Ellis then?
Or Smith now…
Guess we could always ask her?
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just over a week ago, we asked our audience to ignore an account that was set up clearly to troll us and harass a journalist and private citizen.
/1
#abpoli #ableg #cdnpoli
Since that time there have been multiple coincidences that suggest some connection between an individual known to “fix” in politics, that account and another individual.
/2
We have since been provided a court ruling that clearly spells out that one of these individuals has a history of criminal harassment and severe untreated mental health issues (as of May 2025).
So remember the lawsuit launched by Danielle Smith's former chief of staff Marshall Smith?
Where's he's suing both former AHS CEO Athana Mentzelopolous and the Globe and Mail?
The statements of defense have been filed!
Let's take a look!
Thread!
/1
#abpoli #ableg #cdnpoli
It's worth remembering that the defamation claims against Mentzelopoulos seem to hinge entirely on what was included in her statement of claim against the government in her wrongful dismissal case...
Which a few legal beagles have already said can't be ruled as defamatory.
/2
In his statement of claim, Marshall Smith claims that he indeed did speak to the CEO about Nate Pike and alleges that he had a lawsuit he was looking to launch against Pike.
Also apparently for defamation.
Legit have no idea what he's talking about there...
The Alberta Prosperity Project (who Danielle Smith called her "Plan B") has released their "fully costed" (it's not) fiscal plan for a nation of Alberta.
There's a lot to unpack in this numerical train wreck, but today let's focus on just 1 piece...
Their immigration policy
/1
Because in the country of Alberta, individual value would be determined by points.
Want to move to Alberta?
You have to meet the prescribed number of points.
/2
But a closer look really highlights the darker elements at play...
Despite Alberta having a significant francophone population, points are only awarded for English.