I have just come up with an idea for how to unify a progressive alliance.
It could be called something like "Oppose Neoliberalism", and be a declaration of common cause, in opposing neoliberalism.
1/🧵
The idea would be to put the focus on the political parties (or their leadership), that secretly adhere to the tenets of neoliberalism, and to put clear water, between parties and leaders who support, neoliberalism, and those who oppose it.
2/
The aim would be to allow space for various groups and other parties to formulate their own policy, and approach, but to agree, that it must not be neoliberal, and they must strongly oppose and challenge neoliberalism.
3/
In other words, at least at first, this agreement/declaration, should not go beyond a statement of strong disagreement of neoliberalism, but not defining any other specific policy, just the ideals of a progressive outlook.
4/
Aside from unifying progressives, the aim would be to put the spotlight on neoliberalism, and its name. To highlight that the reason no matter what major party people vote for, they always get very similar policy, neoliberal policy.
5/
Many will say, this is a clunky title, as not enough, know what neoliberalism is. That is the whole point of it, to get people aware of it, and what it means, to make it clear that if people vote for Starmer's Labour, Conservative, or Reform, that they'll be voting neoliberal.
6/
To make it clear, in this declaration, that neoliberalism is the agenda of oligarchs, corporations etc. and the refusal to tax the very wealthy, to consider nationalising the water industry etc, is because of neoliberalism.
7/
I have no firm ideas on how it would all work, I will leave others to work this out, other than to say it must focus on neoliberalism, name it, describe what it is, and who is behind this agenda, and that these main parties, are currently neoliberal.
8/
It should avoid being too specific, and too attached to one party or group, other than it opposes, anti-human neoliberal policy, which just sees humans as livestock, to be exploited by oligarchs and corporations, for profit.
9/
This is just getting the idea out there, for others to add to. It may be possible, if well thought out, for members of these mainstream parties, to be able to sign the declaration, without breaching party rules.
10/
Please tag in anyone you think may be interested in this, as I am terrible at remembering relevant names and handles. @owenjonesjourno @zarahsultana @ZackPolanski @GreenJennyJones @jeremycorbyn @natalieben @labourlewis @carolvorders @CarolineLucas @DrFrancesRyan @novaramedia
11/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Whilst I am on a roll with neoliberalism, I want to spell out how I think this neoliberal agenda was laid out in a very corrupting and manipulative fashion. I have never seen or heard anyone else say this.
This was derived from my own contemporary observation.
1/🧵
One odd thing that stood out to me, when the Thatcher government, first started implementing neoliberal policy in the UK. They tried to strictly constrain wage rises for ordinary people, whilst directly encouraging unlimited salary rises at the very top.
2/
The way the Thatcher government justified this very hypocritical and contradictory policy, was that they needed the very best people at the top, so they needed to pay them the highest salaries to attract, retain, and motivate them.
3/
I woke up with a very clear view of the massive problem we face.
A virtual neoliberal dictatorship, has been imposed on our societies, because all the main parties have secretly been taken over by neoliberalism. Yet, most of the public, has no idea what neoliberalism is. 1/
Yes, the public is baffled, by why no matter who they vote for, they bizarrely get the same nasty policy they hate. But they completely baffled, by why politicians, insist on imposing the same hated and stupid policy on them.
2/
The public have no idea, that this hated policy, that seems to make no sense, is neoliberal doctrine, because:
1) 95% of the public have no idea what neoliberalism is.
2) Our politicians hide their neoliberalism, and pretend what they are doing, is just common sense.
3/
I want to expand this, as it seems a lot are not getting what I'm saying and why.
The vast majority of the public, have no idea what neoliberalism is, or that the mainstream parties they vote for, all adhere to neoliberal ideology, as they don't declare it, and deny it.
1/🧵
The main problem with neoliberal ideology, is its invisibility, hence the title of George Monbiot and Peter Hutchinson's book and film about it, being called the Invisible Doctrine. George sums it up in the short trailer.
2/
However, whilst I applaud this attempt to document and expose neoliberalism, there is a huge problem, in that most people will never see it, read it etc, because the media they see and read, never mentions neoliberalism.
3/
Any claim that business as usual BaU can continue for much longer, is not credible. It is an article of faith, by those who believe in our system now, as some sort of quasi religious tenet.
I will make a brief supported argument, as to why the continuation of BaU, is physically impossible. Currently, in the system that is crashing natural systems, 18% of the global population own a car, and over 80% don't fly.
"Climate change-induced food price shocks are on the rise and could lead to more malnutrition, political upheaval and social unrest as the world’s poorest are hit by shortages of food staples."
However, there is a fundamental flaw in the thinking of this research, which grossly under-estimates the threat from this danger, which I will outline here.
Most of these assumptions, mistakenly see a steadily increasing problem.
2/
Yes, climate change will result, over time in steadily rising impacts, but this totally overlooks the serious danger of sudden disruption.
In the real world, if you plot this over time, it will see this as a steady rise in impact. Not sudden impacts within a given year.
3/
This is part 3 of my thread, in which I want to return to my original theme of taxing rich, the very rich, not slightly better off. This both illustrates the obstacle, and the solution.
1/🧵
As I initially explained, despite over 75% of the UK public, wanting a wealth tax, this Labour government and all previous governments, will refuse to agree to it, because of neoliberal doctrine, which is essentially the credo of oligarchs.
2/
This is the reason for these threads. There is the illusory vision of freedom and democracy, which fools people to believe, that because it is a majority view, if we campaign hard enough, that the government will do it, because it is sensible.
3/