Attractiveness and artistic quality are different categories, and when it comes to choosing a mate, people don't care about the second one. I'll explain in this thread.
For this thread I'm actually going to propose four categories that correspond to the way we normally talk about visual appeal. "Hot," "beautiful," "artistic," and "interesting."
Contrary to what some people want to believe, there's no contradiction between "beauty" and "hotness." While distinct, these categories mostly overlap.
"Artistic" and "interesting," however, DON'T overlap with "beauty" and "hotness" a whole lot. Most people don't care about them at all so they never bother to consider this. Arty girls, however, can get confused.
AI-girl images like this one don't have high artistic value. But, they can still teach us a lot about beauty, hotness, and seduction.
To explain further I've made a Venn diagram. It may look confusing at first glance, but it's just four overlapping circles. I'll explain the meaning in the next post.
Here are some typical examples of the different areas in the aesthetic space.
The area that's hot, beautiful, artistic, AND interesting is very small. And, to be honest, men don't really care about it. Thankfully they are not so demanding that they actually expect you to squeeze into that space.
Men are happy with girls who look hot and beautiful and don't really care if their look is "interesting." 99% of the time interesting is just bad because it involves sacrifices to hotness and beauty.
Arty girls may get somewhere sacrificing a little hotness to be a little more interesting, but this only works in small amounts on a minority of men.
Looks that are artistic and interesting but not hot or beautiful can be worth contemplating. Just don't confuse this with attractiveness. In practice, they're best left on the canvas.
By chance I wrote this new section yesterday, and lo, today it's come to life with the viral mermaid controversy. The mermaid statue is high in hotness and beauty but low in artistic quality and interest.
Nobody cares about art and most modern public statues are just as bad, so as we all know the real reason people are complaining so loudly is that they're irritated by a public representation of hotness and beauty.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ideal tropical design that is extremely energy efficient - but illegal in America because the windows are not double-glazed. Very stupid energy code.
You probably don't believe me, so here's Grok. American performance modeling assumes no ventilation from windows and requires them to be double-glazed instead (unnecessary, expensive).
American performance modeling ALSO doesn't reward good building geometry.
This is a travesty and makes no sense in ANY state.
The large majority of men can never be fully satisfied with their relationships if their women don't make explicit efforts to please them. But it has now become a point of modern ideology that women should never make such efforts. The result is predictable. What's in it for men?
Let me explain further. Human nature is such that when all things are equal, men experience more desire and women experience more pleasure. This observation goes back to the ancient Greeks. We don't notice this unless we pay explicit attention to it. Why?
Markets are driven by desire, not pleasure. In fact, markets often fail to serve pleasure and instead create pain. Consider consumerism. People buy things that don't bring them enough pleasure to justify the expense. They have a craving similar to an addiction.
Men never disliked dyed hair for fundamental reasons. It's common in artistic representations of very attractive women. They disliked it because they associated it with bad personalities and bad politics. So as soon as Amelia changes that, they're good to go.
Also, more chokers please.
Learn more in the definitive account of feminine beauty:
Can AI answer the oldest question in the world? In this sciencey thread we're going to find out.👇
Let's start with some peer-reviewed data. Everyone loves peer reviewed data!🧪
So, apparently men typically last 10-20 seconds while women last 20-60.
Ok, seems reasonable at first blush.
But... you might have noticed those numbers are different. By a factor of almost THREE.
Hmm...
I was a bit surprised by this so I asked ChatGPT to check the data three different times in two different sessions. And, it came up with very similar answers each time.
At some point feminism morphed from a movement seeking freedoms to one covertly aimed at masculinizing women. It's time to be open about the fact that this is a TRANS movement--just on a psychological level instead of a biological one.
The confusion derives from the dishonest name. "Feminism" sounds like it must be pro-female and pro-feminine. To be clear, that's certainly true of some strains. But it's not true of the dominant one today.
The strain of feminism that's dominant today valorizes masculinity in women and denigrates femininity in women. Explaining this point in detail would take many pages. But it's already obvious in the iconography, and I think you know it's true.