BREAKING: In a nationwide ruling against a Trump Administration religious conscience rule, a federal district Court today ruled against the Little Sisters of the Poor. The Court sided with Pennsylvania and New Jersey in their years-long effort to force the Little Sisters of the Poor to provide contraceptive and abortion coverage in their healthcare plans. Today’s ruling keeps that effort alive, and the Little Sisters have vowed to appeal the decision.
The Little Sisters of the Poor are an order of Catholic nuns who have cared for the elderly poor for nearly 200 years. They have been in court for over fourteen years, fighting for protection from the contraception mandate which requires them either provide services like the week-after pill in their healthcare plan or pay tens of millions of dollars in fines. becketfund.org/case/commonwea…
Fourteen years ago, the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a federal mandate as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), requiring employers to provide contraceptives like the week-after pill, including some that can cause abortion, in their health insurance plans. The mandate did not provide a religious exemption. becketfund.org/research-centr…
In 2016, the Little Sisters won protection against the federal government at the Supreme Court, and in 2017, a new federal rule was created which exempted groups like the Little Sisters from the mandate. However, more than a dozen state governments in multiple cases immediately sued over the rule, attempting to strong-arm the Little Sisters into either providing contraceptives or paying tens of millions in fines.
In 2020, the Little Sisters won again at the Supreme Court, securing protection from the mandate. But Pennsylvania and New Jersey have continued to fight in court to strip the Little Sisters of that protection.
The Little Sisters of the Poor dedicate their lives to caring for the elderly poor until God calls them home. They will continue to fight for the right to carry out their mission without violating their faith and pray for an end to this needless harassment.
The district court blessed an out-of-control effort by Pennsylvania and New Jersey to attack the Little Sisters and religious liberty, and the nuns have vowed to appeal the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
It is absurd to think the Little Sisters might need yet another trip to the Supreme Court to end what has now been more than a dozen years of litigation over the same issue. But we will fight as far as we need to fight to protect the Little Sisters’ right to care for the elderly in peace.
BREAKING: Just hours before Thanksgiving, @UCLA asked a federal court to toss three Jewish students’ and a Jewish professor’s claims against the university’s administrators for their role in helping antisemitic agitators ban them from large parts of campus. UCLA continues to refuse to accept blame for the rampant antisemitism it has facilitated and encouraged against its very own students and faculty. becketlaw.org/case/frankel-v…
Yitzchok Frankel, a law student and father of four, faced antisemitic harassment last semester for simply wearing a kippah. He was forced to abandon his regular routes through campus because of the Jew Exclusion Zone. Frankel is just one of the many Jewish students at UCLA who faced this “abhorrent” and “unimaginable” mistreatment, as Judge Mark C. Scarsi correctly called it.
UCLA helped a group of activists as they harassed Jewish students and barred access to critical parts of campus. The university reinforced these zones—including by providing metal barriers and sending away Jewish students—while taking no effective action to ensure they were given safe passage. These actions are blatantly antisemitic.
#BREAKING: A federal court just blocked @UCLA from allowing and assisting antisemitic encampments that bar Jewish students from large parts of UCLA’s campus. The ruling: becketnewsite.s3.amazonaws.com/20240813183534…
UCLA helped a group of activists as they set up an encampment where they harassed Jewish students and stopped them from accessing classes, the library, and other critical parts of campus. UCLA reinforced these zones —both by providing metal barriers and by sending away Jewish students—while taking no effective action to ensure safe passage for Jewish students.
@UCLA On June 24, three current UCLA students asked the court, with help from @BECKETlaw and co-counsel Clement & Murphy PLLC, to put an immediate stop to UCLA’s actions so that they could return to class free from fear that they would be harassed and excluded for being Jewish.
A Catholic couple in Indiana asked #SCOTUS to hold the state accountable for keeping their child out of their home. With the help of Becket and attorney @JosHershberger, Mary and Jeremy Cox filed their reply brief and asked the Justices to take their case. becketnewsite.s3.amazonaws.com/20240215202036…
Mary and Jeremy Cox are a faithful Catholic couple living in Indiana. In 2019, their son informed them that he identified as a girl.
Because of their religious belief that God creates human beings with an immutable sex, they could not refer to him using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biology.becketlaw.org/case/m-c-and-j…
The Coxes also believed their child needed help for underlying mental health concerns, including an eating disorder. To address both issues, they provided therapeutic care for their child’s gender dysphoria and scheduled appointments with a specialist to help him with the eating disorder.
The New Jersey Supreme Court just issued an important new #religiousfreedom decision, unanimously protecting the right of religious schools to require their teachers to follow their faith without courts getting involved. Find the court’s decision here: njcourts.gov/system/files/c…
Becket intervened in Crisitello v. St. Theresa School on behalf of Agudath Israel of America, an national Orthodox Jewish umbrella organization, arguing that religious schools must be free to govern themselves, including choosing those who teach and pass on the faith.
THREAD: All about today’s argument in #Fulton v. Philadelphia. Both the Justices and the parties agreed that Catholic Social Services, Sharonell Fulton, and Toni Simms-Busch do vital work to protect needy kids in Philadelphia. #FreeToFoster#fultonvphiladelphia (1/13)
By contrast, the Justices repeatedly worried that city officials were going out of their way to manufacture an unnecessary fight, taking a position that will hurt kids in foster care and shut down CSS’s 200-year-old ministry. (2/13) #fultonvphiladelphia
For instance, Justice Breyer said that it was “bothering me a lot” that “no family has ever been turned down by this agency—indeed has never applied,” but city officials still tried to shut Catholic Social Services down. (3/13) #SCOTUS#Fulton
"It's no wonder that so many successful foster parents say that the support of their faith community and the religious agencies they partner with has been a vital resource." #FreeToFoster#SCOTUS#Fulton#fostercare