Important new research on Wales’ Basic Income pilot for care leavers. 👇
Professionals on the frontline saw both promise and risks — ambition vs. vulnerability.
This debate matters for how we design future schemes.
🧵 #BasicIncome #Wales
1/ 🚨 Wales ran the UK’s first #BasicIncome pilot for care leavers: £1,600/month (£1,280 after tax) for two years.
A new study asks: what did the professionals who supported these young people think of the scheme?
Here’s what they said. 👇
2/ 🌟 The hopes
Professionals described the pilot as:
“Bold and ambitious”
A chance to reduce disadvantage
A way to give young people stability, dignity, and better transitions into adulthood.
3/ ⚠️ The concerns
Others worried the money could:
Exacerbate problems for the most vulnerable (e.g. those facing addiction, housing precarity)
Create a new “cliff edge” when payments stop at 20
Be unfairly targeted at care leavers but not other disadvantaged groups.
4/ 🤔 Mixed feelings
Many professionals felt conflicted.
They recognised the transformative potential of unconditional income — but feared risks without tailored support.
This tension shaped how the scheme was delivered.
5/ 🏛️ Politics and policy clashes
Devolution allowed Wales to act, but Westminster retained powers over benefits, tax and legal aid.
Example: UK Gov refused to exempt pilot income from legal aid means tests — limiting access to justice for some participants.
6/ 🧑🏫 Corporate parenting role
Professionals highlighted their duty as “corporate parents.”
That meant balancing:
Giving young people trust and autonomy
Protecting against harm
Navigating a system not fully designed for unconditional support
7/ ✅ Takeaway
The pilot is seen as ambitious and necessary — but also politically complex and practically challenging.
This study reminds us: it’s not just about giving cash.
It’s about designing support structures that ensure every young person benefits.
8/ 🔍 Full open access paper here: [Link to BJSW article]
Authors: Roberts, Holland, Westlake, Mathur, Lloyd, Bezeczky, Ablitt, Hick, Johnson & Sanders (2025).
Published in the British Journal of Social Work.
#BasicIncome #Wales #SocialWork
9/ 🗣️ How does that stack up against young people’s voices (from the evaluation reports)?
The contrast is striking...
10/ 🌟 Young people said the basic income was the right:
Group (care leavers)
Age (18–20)
Amount (£1,600 / £1,280 after tax)
They valued freedom to make choices, from driving lessons to saving for uni.
11/ 💬 Many reported:
Better mental health & wellbeing
Eating more regularly, joining sports, going out with friends
More control over education & job decisions
Confidence to plan ahead!
12/ ⚠️ But they also shared concerns:
Worry about the “cliff edge” when payments stop
Unequal outcomes — those in high-rent supported housing had less left to spend
Some struggled to budget and wanted more financial advice.
13/ 🔄 Compare this with professionals’ fears:
Risk of harm for the most vulnerable
Uneven needs across care leavers
Anxiety over unconditionality (“shouldn’t they have to do something?”)
14/ ✅ The overlap?
Both groups highlighted the need for extra support — budgeting advice, mentoring, guidance.
Both flagged the danger of payments ending suddenly.
15/ ❌ The difference?
Young people overwhelmingly embraced the scheme as life-changing.
Professionals were more cautious, worrying about risks and unintended effects.
16/ 🧩 Put together, the evidence suggests:
Cash works — young people use it to build stability, dignity, and opportunity.
But design matters: wraparound support and smoother exits are essential.
17/ 🔮 With the full evaluation due in 2027, one lesson is already clear:
Trust young people. Their voices show what’s possible when given autonomy and security.
#BasicIncome #Wales #CareLeavers
@meinbge 3/ 🔹 Mental Health improved significantly. Recipients reported:
– Better sleep
– Less stress
– Reduced anxiety
– Improved overall well-being
UBI gave people breathing room to think, plan, and rest.
This is a huge milestone in evidence-based support for homeless families. $9,500 direct cash might sound bold—but it’s just what Illinois pays for 3 months in a shelter. Now we get to see what happens when families are trusted with that money instead.👇
1/- In June 2024, @GiveDirectly gave $9,500 each to 315 homeless families in Chicago—the largest cash transfer ever to unhoused Americans. Why? To test if direct cash can help families get housed faster.
📊 Results are due this year.
@GiveDirectly 2/- Traditional housing programs take 12–18 months to place families.
In this pilot, the full $9,500 was delivered in just 3.5 weeks.
That’s 17× faster—with strong fraud safeguards in place.