Pierre Rehov Profile picture
Sep 6, 2025 9 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Qatar: The Tiny Emirate that Corrupts the World in the Name of Hamas
A Microstate Built on Exploitation

With fewer than 300,000 citizens and nearly three million migrant workers living under a quasi-feudal system, Qatar is a demographic dwarf and a gas giant. Its wealth stems from energy rents and from the systematic exploitation of foreign laborers who built its skyscrapers, stadiums, and highways. The 2022 World Cup, sold to the world as a triumph of modernity, was in truth a monument to servitude: stolen wages, deaths on construction sites, and lives destroyed in silence.

But Qatar’s scandal does not stop at its borders. It has exported corruption and influence on a global scale, buying the complicity of universities, politicians, and media outlets, while simultaneously protecting and financing the most violent terrorist movements of our time.Image
Financing Terrorism: A Persistent Pattern

For decades, Doha has played a duplicitous role. In 2014, the U.S. Treasury denounced Qatar as a “permissive jurisdiction for terrorist financing.” In June 2017, President Donald Trump went further, declaring Qatar “a long-time funder of terrorism at a very high level.”

It is not by chance that Hamas leaders found sanctuary in Doha. Khaled Meshaal resides there in luxury, while Ismail Haniyeh, the head of Hamas’s political bureau, lived in Qatar until his assassination in Tehran in 2024 — he was buried in Doha, symbolizing the emirate’s unbreakable bond with terrorism. Every time a hostage negotiation emerges, Qatar positions itself as a “mediator.” But the truth is simple: it mediates because it harbors the very criminals holding the hostages.Image
Soft Power and the Corruption of Western Elites

Qatar’s billions have flooded Western institutions, particularly American universities. Georgetown, Northwestern, Texas A&M, and Cornell have all established campuses in Doha, financed by Qatari largesse. Since 2001, over $6 billion in donations and contracts have flowed into U.S. academia. In 2019, the Department of Education revealed that billions in foreign gifts, much of it from Qatar, had not even been declared — proof of a systemic, opaque strategy of influence.

As documented by scholar Charles Asher Small before the U.S. Congress, these funds are not charitable. They are ideological investments aligned with the agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood, of which Qatar is the main state sponsor. Under the guise of academic cooperation, Doha has funded the intellectual normalization of Islamism on Western campuses.Image
Qaradawi: The Theologian Who Praised Hitler

The moral compass of Qatari Islamism was long embodied by Youssef al-Qaradawi, the Brotherhood’s spiritual leader and a guest of honor in Doha for decades. In January 2009, Qaradawi declared on live television:

“Allah imposed Hitler upon the Jews to punish them… the last punishment was carried out by Hitler… next time, it will be at the hands of the believers.”

These are not rumors. They are his own words, broadcast to millions. A regime that elevates such a figure as its spiritual voice cannot hide its true nature: antisemitism raised to the level of religious doctrine.Image
Al-Jazeera: Propaganda, Not Journalism

Western audiences have long been seduced by Al-Jazeera’s polished image of bold reporting. In reality, it is nothing more than the propaganda arm of Doha — and by extension, the media division of Hamas.

Israel, the only true democracy in the region, with a free press and an independent judiciary, has exposed the facts: numerous Al-Jazeera “journalists” were in fact Hamas or Islamic Jihad operatives. Since October 2023, several have been eliminated in targeted operations in Gaza:

Ismail al-Ghoul, identified as a Hamas operator, neutralized in July 2024.

Samer Abu Daqqa, killed in December 2023, serving Hamas brigades in Khan Younis.

Hossam Shabat, eliminated in March 2025, identified as a Hamas gunman.

Anas al-Sharif, killed in August 2025, confirmed as a commander of rocket-launching cells.

Each case illustrates the same reality: Al-Jazeera staff were not neutral reporters. They were combatants in disguise, hiding behind press credentials to wage war against Israel.Image
Qatargate: Buying Europe’s Silence

In December 2022, the European Parliament was shaken by the “Qatargate” scandal. Bags of cash, luxury gifts, and lavish favors were exchanged for political influence. The vice president of the Parliament, Eva Kaili, was arrested, and former MEP Pier Antonio Panzeri confessed to having orchestrated the scheme. The episode laid bare the cynicism of Doha’s strategy: buy Europe’s politicians to sanitize its image while continuing to finance terror.Image
The “Palestinian Cause” as a Cover for War

Qatar parades as the defender of the “Palestinian cause.” In truth, it bankrolls only the most radical faction: Hamas. It has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Gaza, not to build schools or hospitals, but to dig tunnels, manufacture rockets, and arm death squads.

The “Palestinian cause” championed by Doha is not the cause of peace or of a viable two-state solution. It is the cause of perpetual war, the destruction of Israel, and the glorification of violence.Image
Timeline: Two Decades of Qatari Duplicity

2001–2010

Billions in Qatari funds pour into U.S. universities.

January 2009: Qaradawi praises Hitler on live television.

2011–2014

Hamas installs its political bureau in Doha.

2014: U.S. Treasury denounces Qatar as permissive for terror financing.

2015–2017

Revelations of Qatari money reaching Islamist networks.

June 2017: Trump calls Qatar “a long-time funder of terrorism at a very high level.”

2018–2020

Qatar expands its “soft power”: museums, sports, and the World Cup project.

U.S. investigations reveal billions in undeclared Qatari gifts to universities.

2021–2022

“Qatargate” erupts in Brussels: European politicians bought by Doha.

2023

October 7: Hamas massacres 1,200 Israelis, funded and sheltered by Qatar.

2023–2025

Israel exposes Al-Jazeera operatives as Hamas members.

December 2023: Samer Abu Daqqa killed.

July 2024: Ismail al-Ghoul eliminated.

March 2025: Hossam Shabat neutralized.

August 2025: Anas al-Sharif killed near Al-Shifa hospital.

Today

Doha remains the safe haven of Hamas leaders, the financier of Islamist networks, and the corrupter of Western institutions.
Conclusion: Doha, Capital of Cynicism

Qatar pretends to be a mediator. In truth, it is the arsonist who lights the fires. It finances terror, harbors antisemitic preachers, corrupts universities and parliaments, exploits migrant workers, and disguises Hamas operatives as journalists.

Israel, by exposing these facts and targeting the terrorists hidden behind Al-Jazeera’s cameras, has lifted the mask. The world must now face the reality: Qatar is not a partner for peace. It is the financier of war, the sponsor of antisemitism, and the sworn enemy of the free world.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pierre Rehov

Pierre Rehov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rehoov

Dec 6, 2025
How to Fight Back: Strategic Paths to Win the Information War

Let me propose some ways to reverse the tide. Yes, the other side is larger and louder. Yes, it often feels like shouting alone against a mob. But numerical disadvantage has rarely stopped history’s moral revolutions. Remember: J’accuse!—one of the most powerful pro-Jewish texts ever written—was not written by a Jew. Our friends have often shouted louder than we could.
So shed the “whole world is against us” mindset. Self-pity is not a strategy. We have enemies, but we also have powerful allies. Let’s analyze the battlefield and see what can actually be done. (Follow🧵🧵)
1. Who Are the Real Anti-Israel Masses?

The two largest blocs of anti-Israel activism are Muslims and Marxists.
The noise from fringe right-wing pundits (Tucker, Candace, etc.) distracts many people, but they do not fill the streets. Their followers click “like,” not Molotov cocktails. The real street force—riots, marches, intimidation—comes overwhelmingly from Muslims and Marxist radicals.
About Muslims:

As individuals, you cannot influence them. They are soldiers in a broader ideological war fueled by foreign leadership—from Iran to Qatar. Their behavior changes only when their leadership is pressured.

A perfect example: the single, symbolic strike in Doha that jolted Qatar into recalculating its stance—after years of obstinacy and tens of thousands dead in Gaza, Lebanon, and Yemen. When even the general, not just the foot soldiers, felt threatened, the retreat began immediately.

Diplomacy and military leverage can change the Muslim front. Individuals cannot.

About Marxists:

This is where your personal involvement matters, because Marxists—like Islamists—also operate as a military-style hierarchy: foot soldiers, officers, generals.

Let’s start with the soldiers.
2. Understanding the Foot Soldiers of the Anti-Israel Mob

The rank-and-file of anti-Israel activism are not motivated by love for Palestinians. They are frustrated people searching for meaning, dissolving their empty personal lives into a grand crusade. “Palestine” is simply their modern opium—an emotional escape hatch.
They cannot fix their own lives, so they immerse themselves in unattainable causes. The more distant the goal, the better. Their demonstrations look less like humanitarian vigils and more like barbarian celebrations—euphoric, manic, tribal. Their true hatred is not aimed at Israel or Jews, but at the Western civilization in which they feel alienated.
Why Israel? We’ll get to that when we discuss their generals.

Why Israelis struggle to communicate with them:

Most Israelis and Israel supporters are satisfied with their lives. Israel consistently ranks among the world’s happiest nations. Happy people speak pragmatism; fanatics speak absolutism. These two languages are mutually unintelligible.

Rational people are not the target

Some rational Westerners side with the mob simply to avoid trouble. They want calm lives. You will not convince them to risk comfort for lofty principles. Remove the threat to their comfort, and they drift back to neutrality. That’s good enough.

Fanatics, however, cannot be persuaded

Trying to “debate” them is like training harder at chess to beat someone who intends to punch you in the face.

You cannot extinguish their hatred—it's their emotional painkiller. But you can redirect it. Fanatics switch causes like switching video games. The key is to give them a new, emotionally rewarding “game.”

This is why forging connections with Europe’s and America’s rising mass movements is essential. Unlike passive media pundits, mobilizers like Tommy Robinson have proven capable of rallying hundreds of thousands into the streets. These movements can absorb frustrated youth and redirect their rage away from Israel and toward genuine threats: Islamism and Marxism.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 16, 2025
How the Israeli “ultra-left” nearly tore the nation apart (follow 🧵) The Kaplan Force phenomenon, the anti-Netanyahu protest movement and its allied galaxy, represents more than just a simple political contestation: for its detractors, it embodied a systematic strategy of national division, pressure against the State, and — in its excesses — an aggravating factor in the security failures of October 7. Here’s how, according to this reading, the “ultra-left” nearly precipitated Israel into chaos.🧵Image
1. Dividing the State Around the Judicial Reform — A Signal to the Enemy

The Kaplan movement was born in the contestation of the government's judicial reforms (2023), with targeted actions: road blockades, “siege” of the airport, symbolic paralysis — all signs of organized civil disobedience. For its opponents, what was supposed to remain an internal reform became the prism through which the entire society was fragmented. By advocating institutional sedition, especially by insinuating that reservists might refuse to serve, the movement would have sent a catastrophic signal: that of the weakness of national consensus and a potentially disobedient army. Some commentators put it bluntly: “Hamas, seeing Israel implode from within, understood that the ground was ripe for attack.” In other words, this is not just an institutional battle: it is a strategy of destabilization. And when the roots of national trust waver, the enemy has only to drive the nail in.Image
2. Taking hostage families “politically hostages”

When the October 7 attack occurred, everything changed completely. The hostage families became the emotional heart of the entire nation. But it was precisely there that the Kaplan movement and its allies saw an opportunity: to transform the human tragedy into a political weapon. They put pressure on the government, demanding not only the release of the captives—a legitimate demand—but also the fall of the Prime Minister, as if one could not happen without the other. This shift—from a humanitarian demand to a political condemnation—fractured the national front. The massive demonstrations—sometimes arbitrary, sometimes provocative—served to stigmatize Netanyahu. And in a context of war, the line between a “peaceful” demonstration and moral sabotage becomes thin.Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 15, 2025
Comment l’“ultra-gauche” israélienne a failli déchirer la nation ( suivez 🧵)

Le phénomène Kaplan Force, le mouvement de protestation anti-Netanyahu et sa galaxie alliée, représente plus qu’une simple contestation politique : pour ses détracteurs, il a incarné une stratégie systématique de division nationale, de pression contre l’État, et — dans ses excès — un facteur aggravant dans les failles sécuritaires du 7 octobre. Voici comment, selon cette lecture, l’“ultra-gauche” a presque précipité Israël dans le chaos. 🧵Image
1. Diviser l’État autour de la réforme judiciaire — un signal à l’ennemi

Le mouvement Kaplan est né dans la contestation des réformes judiciaires du gouvernement (2023), avec des actions ciblées : blocages routiers, “siège” de l’aéroport, paralysie symbolique — autant de signes d’une désobéissance civile organisée.

Pour ses opposants, ce qui devait rester une réforme interne est devenu le prisme à travers lequel toute la société a été fragmentée. En prônant la sédition institutionnelle, surtout en insinuant que des réservistes pourraient refuser de servir, le mouvement aurait envoyé un signal catastrophique : celui de la faiblesse du consensus national et d’une armée potentiellement désobéissante. Certains commentateurs le formulent crûment : “Hamas, voyant Israël imploser de l’intérieur, a compris que le terrain était mûr pour attaquer.”

En d’autres termes, ce n’est pas seulement un combat institutionnel : c’est une stratégie de déstabilisation. Et quand les racines de la confiance nationale vacillent, l’ennemi n’a plus qu’à enfoncer le clou.Image
2. Prendre les familles d’otages “en otage politique”

Quand l’attaque du 7 octobre est survenue, la donne a changé du tout au tout. Les familles d’otages sont devenues le cœur émotionnel de toute la nation. Mais c’est justement là que le mouvement Kaplan et ses alliés ont vu une opportunité : transformer le drame humain en épée politique.

Ils ont fait pression sur le gouvernement, en exigeant non seulement la libération des captifs – revendication légitime – mais aussi la chute du Premier ministre, comme si l’un ne pouvait se faire sans l’autre. Ce glissement — d’une revendication humanitaire à une condamnation politique — a fracturé le front national.
Les manifestations massives — parfois arbitraires, parfois provocantes — ont servi à stigmatiser Netanyahu. Et dans un contexte de guerre, la frontière entre manifestation “pacifique” et sabotage moral devient mince.Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 11, 2025
LES JUIFS MARTYRISÉS EN PALESTINE OTTOMANE : L’HISTOIRE QU’ON VOUS CACHE (thread 🧵)

Depuis des décennies, une propagande savamment orchestrée prétend que la « Palestine » aurait toujours été une terre arabe, et que les Juifs n’y seraient que des colons venus d’Europe.
C’est un mensonge, répété jusqu’à devenir dogme par l’alliance contre-nature du monde islamiste, de la gauche post-coloniale et de ce qu’il faut bien appeler le néo-antisémitisme contemporain.
La vérité est plus simple, mais plus dérangeante : la Judée et la Samarie — rebaptisées Syria Palaestina par l’empereur Hadrien pour effacer la mémoire juive après la révolte de 132 — n’ont jamais cessé d’être habitées par des Juifs. Ils y ont vécu, souffert, prié, survécu, martyrisés sous chaque domination.
Sous les Ottomans comme sous les Mamelouks, ils furent humiliés, rackettés, battus, parfois massacrés, réduits au statut de citoyens de seconde zone.
Et pendant que les gauchistes de salon pleurnichent sur le “peuple palestinien”, personne ne se souvient de ces siècles de persécutions oubliées. ( follow 🧵)Image
1. Une présence juive ininterrompue

Les Juifs n’ont jamais quitté cette terre.
Depuis la destruction du Second Temple en 70, malgré les déportations romaines, les conversions forcées et la misère, des communautés juives ont subsisté à Jérusalem, Hébron, Safed, Tibériade, Bethléem et ailleurs.
Elles parlaient arabe, hébreu ou ladino, vivaient pauvrement, mais restaient sur la terre de leurs ancêtres.
Quand les nationalistes arabes et les marxistes déguisés en humanistes parlent d’“occupation”, ils oublient que leurs propres ancêtres ont conquis cette terre mille ans après les premiers royaumes d’Israël.
La Judée n’a pas été colonisée par les Juifs : elle a été occupée par ceux qui ont prétendu les chasser.Image
2. Le statut de dhimmi : une humiliation institutionnalisée

Sous domination musulmane, les Juifs furent des dhimmis — des “protégés”, autrement dit des inférieurs tolérés à condition d’accepter leur soumission.
Ils payaient la jizya, un impôt de honte pour avoir le droit de vivre.
Ils ne pouvaient pas porter les armes, ni monter à cheval, ni construire des maisons plus hautes que celles des musulmans.
Ils devaient baisser les yeux, céder le passage, éviter de chanter, prier à voix basse, et surtout ne jamais oublier leur place : au bas de l’échelle.
Les synagogues ne pouvaient rivaliser en hauteur avec les mosquées. Les Juifs étaient exclus de la justice, interdits de fonctions publiques, et punis s’ils osaient contester un musulman.
Voilà la fameuse “tolérance” islamique dont on nous rebat les oreilles : un apartheid religieux vieux de treize siècles.Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 10, 2025
La grande imposture du wokisme : autopsie d’un virus intellectuel (🧵)
1. Les racines du mal : quand Foucault et Derrida ont ouvert la porte au relativisme absolu

Le “wokisme” n’est pas né sur les campus américains — il a été conçu en France, dans les années 1960, par une poignée d’intellectuels nihilistes. Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Deleuze et consorts ont semé les graines d’un poison : l’idée que toute vérité n’est qu’une construction sociale, que le bien et le mal n’existent pas, que la morale est une invention de ceux qui détiennent le pouvoir.

Sous couvert de “déconstruction”, ces penseurs ont dynamité les fondements de la civilisation occidentale : la raison, la hiérarchie, la responsabilité individuelle, la distinction entre mérite et victimisation.
Le paradoxe veut que cette école de pensée, née en France, ait été d’abord rejetée par l’intelligentsia française, avant d’être idolâtrée aux États-Unis, où des universitaires en mal de révolte ont vu dans cette “French Theory” un outil de destruction massive contre tout ce qui incarne l’Occident.
Le wokisme est donc le produit d’un croisement entre la philosophie du néant et la culture de la culpabilité.
Foucault, déviant sexuel assumé et admirateur du totalitarisme iranien, prônait la libération de tous les tabous, y compris sexuels. Derrida, lui, proclamait qu’aucun texte n’a de sens fixe — autrement dit : que la vérité n’existe pas.
Ce cocktail explosif allait devenir l’idéologie de notre époque : la sacralisation du doute, de la déviance et de la déconstruction. (suivre le🧵)Image
2. L’expansion mondiale d’un virus moral

Des amphithéâtres de la Sorbonne aux campus de Berkeley, le poison s’est répandu.
Sous couvert de “pensée critique”, le wokisme s’est infiltré partout : universités, médias, écoles, plateformes numériques. Il s’est vendu comme un combat pour la “justice sociale”, mais il s’est révélé être une machine à produire la haine, la division et la médiocrité.
La logique est simple : si tout est relatif, alors tout se vaut. L’excellence devient oppression. Le mérite devient privilège. Le génie devient suspect.
Les institutions académiques américaines ont fait du wokisme une religion d’État, avec ses dogmes (le privilège blanc, la fluidité de genre, le colonialisme structurel), ses prêtres (les professeurs militants), et ses inquisiteurs (les étudiants activistes armés de Twitter).

Le monde entier a suivi, hypnotisé par cette nouvelle morale du ressentiment.
Sous l’apparence de compassion, le wokisme ne produit que peur, autocensure et chaos.
C’est un virus social, qui détruit le tissu commun sous prétexte de diversité, et fabrique des générations entières d’êtres fragiles, persuadés d’être victimes avant d’avoir agi.Image
3. Quand les ennemis de l’Occident financent la décadence

Le “wokisme universitaire” n’a pas grandi dans le vide.
Après la chute de l’URSS, les anciens réseaux marxistes ont cherché d’autres moyens de saper l’Occident de l’intérieur.
Ils ont trouvé un terrain fertile : les universités américaines, financées par des mécènes venus du Qatar, de la Turquie ou d’Iran, tous soucieux d’encourager une idéologie qui affaiblit les défenses morales de l’Occident.
Les pétrodollars islamiques ont arrosé les “centres d’études postcoloniales” et “décoloniales” qui pullulent à Harvard, Columbia ou Yale.
Ces institutions se sont transformées en laboratoires de haine de soi, enseignant que l’homme blanc, hétérosexuel et chrétien est l’ennemi public numéro un.
Ce n’est plus de l’éducation, c’est un endoctrinement lent, subventionné par les ennemis de la liberté.
Le terrorisme a changé de méthode : il ne frappe plus seulement avec des bombes, mais avec des concepts.
L’arme du XXIᵉ siècle, c’est le wokisme — la guerre cognitive contre la raison occidentale.Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 4, 2025
SUBMISSION OR RESPONSIBILITY?
Follow the thread 🧵

The price of freedom From Socrates to Jean-Paul Sartre, the philosophy of free will rests on a simple and demanding truth: to be free is to be responsible. Authentic freedom is not whimsy, nor the absence of constraints, but the ability to choose—and to bear the consequences of one's choices. Spinoza wrote: "The free man thinks of nothing less than of death, and his wisdom is a meditation on life." In other words, freedom is not a gift, but a permanent conquest against fear. From Saint Augustine to Kant, from Bergson to Camus, the free man is the one who recognizes the element of necessity in the world, but never renounces the element of decision that belongs to him. Yet, this responsibility is heavy. It confronts each person with the anguish of choice, the possibility of error, moral solitude. And it is often there, facing the vertigo of freedom, that the average man throws in the towel. He seeks a master, a guide, an ideology. Someone—or something—to tell him what to do, what to think, and how to live. From this fear arise all forms of submission. And from submission arise totalitarianism. As Eric Voegelin summed it up: "The man who refuses the responsibility of freedom seeks to deify himself through the collective."🧵Image
The Ideologies of Renunciation

The 20th century was the tragic laboratory of these renunciations. Fascism and Nazism replaced individual responsibility with the cult of the leader, of blood, of race, of the nation. The citizen became a cog in a collective body, deprived of his own soul. Hannah Arendt observed: “Totalitarianism begins where man is no more than a functionary of his own destiny.” Soviet communism, in the name of equality, imposed another form of servitude: that of the proletariat fused into the Party, where individual consciousness was no more than a “bourgeois deviation.” In China, in Cuba, in Cambodia, in Venezuela, the same pattern repeated itself: the common good decreed from above, the crushing of freedoms, the repression of dissidents.
As for political Islamism, it represents today the religious version of this same mechanism: a theocratic totalitarianism where faith becomes a tool of power, and submission, a sacred duty. In all cases, the common point remains: the promise of a collective paradise at the price of the abolition of individual consciousness. George Orwell had anticipated it: “The choice is between freedom and happiness, and for the great majority, happiness is better.”Image
The Mechanics of Submission

Submission, in all its forms, is based on a principle: the abdication of responsibility. The cult of personality, whether it be Lenin, Stalin, Mao, or Hitler, creates a substitute for the divine on earth. The individual dissolves into the figure of the leader, who is supposed to embody the collective destiny. Alexis de Tocqueville already warned: “I see an innumerable crowd of men, similar and equal, constantly turning in upon themselves to procure small and vulgar pleasures.” In the case of religious totalitarianism, the process is identical. For centuries, medieval Christianity imposed its dogmatic hierarchy, until the philosophy of the Enlightenment restored man to his central place in the universe. The Church then lost its monopoly on souls in favor of reason and conscience. But political Islam, for its part, pursues this project of total submission. The very word Islam means “submission.” By submitting to Allah, the believer abdicates his moral responsibility: everything is written, everything is willed. The Quran, considered the uncreated word, codifies the smallest gestures of daily life. The believer becomes the executor of a program, the “hand of Allah.” His choices no longer belong to him: he acts according to a code, not according to his conscience. From this codification flows an extreme ritualization: five daily prayers, always identical, turned toward the same center; prohibition of any personalization of faith or prayer; rejection of introspection in favor of repetition. Islamism transforms spirituality into automatism, faith into reflex, religion into discipline. As Nietzsche wrote: “Whoever wants to be a disciple must deny himself.” Thus, political and conquering Islam becomes a sect on a global scale, where the individual effaces himself before the Ummah — the community — and where doubt, the condition of all thought, is eradicated.Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(