So it can't be claimed that I have misquoted what @jasonhickel said during that interview with @AaronBastani, I took the trouble to carefully transcribe what he said from the YouTube closed captions.
"You have some climate scientists like Kevin Anderson, one of the UK's most prominent climate scientists uh who routinely says 3 degrees is not compatible with organized human civilization as we know it. Now, that doesn't mean that there is going to be mass deaths. ..."
2/
"... I think that's an unlikely scenario, but um it does mean that a lot of the things we take for granted about the organization of society, would not be feasible in such a world. So it's kind of a different sort of planet."
3/
Therefore, I am not misrepresenting what @jasonhickel said. I am accurately quoting what he actually said. That even if we have 3C of warming, and civilization collapses, there won't be mass deaths, just things will be a bit different.
4/
For a start, he is not quoting @KevinClimate on that. Where does @jasonhickel get the idea, that if at 3C of warming, and the collapse of our civilization, that there would be no mass deaths?
5/
As I said in my thread, those that dismiss the likelihood of mass starvation, if our civilization collapsed due to extreme climate change, never support their assertions, which seem to be no more than wishful thinking.
6/
What do people like @jasonhickel think, 8 billion people would be eating, if our civilization collapsed, along with the complex supply chains, that keeps our agriculture going, so it can feed 8 billion people? It's bizarre.
7/
He seems to have zero understanding of the logistics necessary to feed 8 billion people, and that if it falters, even if only briefly, people will start starving. It would not be like other famines, where food could be supplied from outside, as there would be no outside.
8/
How would the Global North escape that because of their wealth. They would have no wealth, because the financial system would have collapsed. In fact, the Global North is more reliant on outside supply, and paper wealth, than anyone else.
9/
All I am asking @jasonhickel to do, is to re-think and reconsider, what he said, and to look carefully, at the basis of his assumptions, to see how well founded they are. He would soon find, there is no solid foundation for his conclusions.
10/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'll briefly explain what I'm attempting to do. We face several serious crises. The climate and ecological crisis. A social justice crisis and the creeping control of us and our societies, by a powerful clique of billionaires and corporate interests. All this is interlinked.
1/🧵
All this is putting our societies on a catastrophic course, where the powerful vested interests I mention, try to mislead us about the situation we are in, so they can exploit us and accumulate far more wealth from our exploitation.
It is not in the interests of billionaires and corporate interests, for the people, the public, to know, how much danger they are in because of the climate crisis, because the burning of fossil fuels are a key part of how the very rich, increase their wealth.
3/
I want to briefly explain my purpose in writing this. I am shocked to find how many academics apparently arguing for climate action, are actually in deep denial about the probably consequences of not taking urgent action now. That are in denial of the consequences. 1/9
Specifically, when pressed, they actively deny that the climate and ecological crisis, is an immediate existential threat to our civilization. They actively deny that there could be mass deaths, and falsely imply that anyone who says this, is an alarmist.
2/9
“There are now no non-radical futures. The choice is between immediate and profound social change or waiting a little longer for chaotic and violent social change. In 2023 the window for this choice is rapidly closing.” @KevinClimate
I agree with @jasonhickel's view of capitalism, driving the climate crisis etc. But after a watching a Novara media interview with him, just over a week ago, I have serious reservations about his understanding of the climate and ecological crisis, and its implications.
1/🧵
What I say here, is in the manner of positive criticism i.e. in the hope of that criticism leading to a better understanding.
I was very concerned about some of the things @jasonhickel said in this interview.
2/
For instance @jasonhickel cited what @KevinClimate said about 3C of warming, making civilization as we know it almost impossible. But then went on to say this wouldn't mean mass deaths (not derived from Kevin) and seemed to think, this would only impact some regions.
3/
I want to write this from an overall perspective, rather than particulars, or you end up not being able to see the wood for the trees.
The BIG question, is how did we end up with such a dire and dreadful PM?
1/🧵
When Keir Starmer stood for leader after Jeremy Corbyn resigned, whilst he didn't appear to stand for much, it seemed like we had some idea of what he was. An MP who was willing to work with the left, and a broad church leader.
2/
When standing for leader, he pledged not to change Labour much, and to keep most of Corbyn's policy. Yet as soon as he was elected, he started to systematically renege on everything he had pledged, waging war against the left, and expelling Corbyn from the Labour Party.
3/
Here's a funny old fact. None of these "free speech" warriors. Not Elon, not Far-right-rage, not Trump, are the slightest bit worried about peaceful people being arrested for holding a bit of paper, protesting against genocide. In fact, they say arrest them all, good.
1/🧵
This tells you that "free speech" warriors are totally fake. That they don't really believe in free speech. They want the right to be racist in public, to call for violence against vulnerable minorities. They want the freedom to be Nazis, with no come back for them. No shame.
2/
If they really believed in free speech, and they absolutely don't, they'd support the right of others to be fairly heard, without fear of arrest, even if they didn't agree with them. But they don't, they want peaceful climate and anti-genocide activists, to be arrested.
3/
My only reason for posting this, is that at last, we have sensible politicians, with a realistic chance of making a political breakthrough, and political parties who represent the interest of ordinary people, who are not puppets of the rich and powerful.
1/🧵
We have just under 4 years until the next general election, unless the Labour Party call it early, to work out a strategy for creating a political breakthrough, and nullifying Reform, a fake grassroots party, that only pretends to represent ordinary people.
2/
This is why I'm asking for this cooperation to be sorted out now, so these new political movements, can focus on effectively taking on the big fake political parties, that are actually representing the interests of rich and powerful vested interests, against public interest.
3/