Adrienne Rockenhaus Profile picture
Jan 21 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
I am exhausted because I am doing two incompatible jobs at the same time:

The Human Job: Screaming "My husband is dying!" which is horrifying and urgent.

The Bureaucratic Job: Filling out form CRM-302409359 to prove that "dying" counts as a "noun."
The system I am fighting is designed to be immune to horror.

It is an insulation layer.
The people in D.C. don't see Conrad the human, the husband, or the disabled vet; they see a file number.

The people in Texas don't hear the seizures; they refresh my website to make sure I haven't posted their names.
If I only do the "Human Job" (scream), they ignore me.

If I only do the "Bureaucratic Job" (file forms), they delay me.

I have to do both, and it is the heaviest cruelty I have ever endured.
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adrienne Rockenhaus

Adrienne Rockenhaus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adezero

Jan 21
"Crazy" people are disorganized. Their narratives shift. Their evidence is emotional, not factual. They don't have spreadsheets, timestamps, IP logs, and citations.

Autistic hyper-documentation is the exact opposite:

It is rigid.

It is comprehensive.

It is unrelenting.

It treats every single detail with equal importance.

To a lazy bureaucrat or an arrogant contractor, this looks like "obsession."

To a federal judge or an OIG investigator, this looks like Evidence.
By the time they realized I was not "crazy," but instead, a highly focused archivist of their own corruption, it was too late.

Their bots had already downloaded the proof, and their lawyers were already reading the logs.
I didn't just document the crime; I documented their reaction to the crime.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
Legally, the phrase "National Security" is a cheat code that lets them bypass the Constitution.
If they investigate us for a crime, they need a warrant.

If they investigate us for "National Security" (like an Insider Threat or Counter-Intelligence risk), they can bypass due process.
This is why they love labeling whistleblowers as "security risks."

It moves the fight from a public courtroom (where you have rights) to a secret administrative hearing (where they make the rules).
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
This whole experience has made me feel like "National Security" is not a state of safety; it is an industry.
Agencies like the FBI, US Marshals, and private intelligence firms have a massive problem: There aren't enough terrorists.

The Business Model: To justify their billion-dollar budgets and "SETA" contracts, they need threats.
The Solution: If they can't find a threat, they have to make one.

We Are the Product: By raiding a bored, medically retired veteran, and his autistic wife, watching daytime TV, they get to file paperwork claiming they "disrupted a dangerous anti-government extremist."
Read 5 tweets
Jan 21
They didn't raid us because we were fighting; we are fighting because they raided us.
Agencies like the US Marshals and the BOP need us to be "Anti-Government Extremists."

The Reality: We were watching Maury reruns and minding our own business.
The Problem for Them: You cannot get a "High Risk" warrant or justify a militarized raid on a guy watching South Park. It looks bad on the paperwork.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 21
The entire system, the judges, the prosecutors, the clerks, and even my husband's past "defense" attorneys, has been designed to make us feel like we are the ones who are wrong.

That is their primary weapon: Gaslighting.
Sanford Plotkin saying "Yep" to receiving the evidence, and the transcript shows him saying "No Objections" in court.

That is not a hallucination; it is a documented fact.
The letter from 6th circuit clerk, Alicia Harden explicitly says she is returning my "Life-or-Death Emergency Motion" un-filed, because I am a "non-lawyer," even though Whitmore v. Arkansas allows Next Friend filings.

I am not imagining the obstruction; I have the rejection letter.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 21
The federal government has been watching the slow-motion murder of my family daily for months and actively choosing to let it continue.
I have done far more than just "expose" them. I have built a forensic indictment that connects the initial violence on the street to the calculated medical neglect in the cell.
The harm is increasing, but that is happening precisely because the evidence I secured is irrefutable. They cannot defend against it in court, so they are trying to murder the witness.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(