Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
Read it again.
But in the vaccine injury scheme the judge is not a judge. In fact, you aren't allowed to make a claim in open court - you have to go through the "United States Court of Federal Claims"
So, not judges or commissioners. In fact the only other place I have heard of "special masters" are in freemasonry, surely a coincidence.
It's not what you expect for a court ruling on complex medical issues.
In fact none of the special masters are medically trained.
And the "Chief Special Master" is the one who ruled on Debbie's case - Brian H Corcoran.
Here is is being revered at the "Vaccine Law Conference", which is the annual conference for "Vaccine Law".
So now we have an association running an annual conference at which "Vaccine Law" is being debated to influence "Special Masters" and presumably to make sure they stay in line.
But it gets worse. This annual conference and the organisation behind it runs out of Virginia, home of the US intelligence agencies.
You literally can't make this stuff up.
And to give you a feeling of the kind of people that are fluffed by this organisation last year's award was given to the guy who made millions of dollars on a rotavirus vaccine that didn't save a single life but was funded by the US government.
In case you missed it here was @DrPaulOffit mocking the bereaved parent of a previously healthy child who literally died within hours of a routine vaccine.
The board of the Vaccine Law Conference includes Dorit Reiss, a high-ranking member of the Shots Heard pharma harassment group which is funded by the Pharma lobby and targets doctors who want vaccine safety.
And for those of you who don't know about the Shots Heard Pharma harassment group the definitive guide is covered by Broken Truth Media here - who broke the story of their membership of >1000 people including @kevinault of the prior ACIP group.
So these people market themselves as some kind of independent health lawyers and are literally running the Vaccine Injury compensation scheme out of Arlington.
And the victims have no idea that they are heavily invested with the pharma corporations that they are up against.
But their sole job is to malevolently influence the public.
Here is Brian in action.
Dorit is worse, as are many of the others on that list who hound anybody that dares says anything about vaccine safety issues. If you're a doctor they will try and get you deregistered.
And Brian and Dorit (of shots heard infamy) cozy together at one of the "National Vaccine Law" Conferences
And not a single "special master" declares their dependence on or conflicts with this organisation.
Which is why, when I saw Debbie's tweet earlier and went digging to find this, it all became clear.
It makes no sense that a plaintiff loses a case (with prejudice, essentially) but is awarded most of their legal costs, unless...
So you now have
▶️Coercion to agree to keep the cases sealed so other victims don't come forward
▶️Pay offs for legal fees to keep the victims quiet that they feel they should "quit while they are ahead
Literally this:
If you don't play ball, the pharma mafia, presumably aided and abetted by the warp speed intel agencies living next door, will make your life hell.
"And don't forget to thank our sponsors".
Your rights are protected, provided that you don't - under any circumstances ever - suggest that the vaccines aren't safe.
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.
A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.
Just putting this into context. @DrCatharineY was originally DOD then published on a DARPA grant. One of her few co-authors is Stephanie Petzing of the "Center for Global Health Engagement"
All one big OneHealth family to nudge you into believing this @epiphare slop is real.
For the explanation as to why these "real world data" with "data not available" publications are absolutely junk and shouldn't be accepted to any major journal please see arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Dr Young (DARPA/DOD) is clearly now working as an ambassador to cover for the actions of the corrupt Biden regime who we are learning covered up huge amounts of adverse events from their COVID program whilst funding pharma in the "cancer moonshot"
It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.
Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.
This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics). nature.com/articles/s4154…
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"
There are a lot of pharma agents celebrating on twitter recently because the now-conflicted @cochranecollab dropped their standards and published something on HPV vaccination they didn't understand.
To explain it you need to understand the difference between the two studies quoted.
The first (Bergman) analysed a bunch of real studies (including RCTs) and concluded that the effect on cancer couldn't be seen - despite nearly 20 years of follow up.
The second (Henschke) cherry picked a bunch of "real world data" studies and concluded that the vaccine prevented a gazillion cervical cancers, pretending that it analysed 132 million patient records. It did nothing of the sort. What it did was look at two studies, take out the bit where it showed that the vaccine increased the risk of cancer (Kjaer 2021, over 20s) - replicated in multiple country statistics, split them into three studies, ignore the other studies showing the opposite, and ignore the fact that none of this data is verifiable.
Notably, one of the major studies (Palmer 2024, which was found to be seriously flawed) has been excluded from the meta-analysis because it did not show a cancer benefit in the under 16 age group.
It is very difficult to "fix" a randomised controlled trial.
It is very easy to "fix" a meta-analysis of observational studies where the data is "not available".
There is a huge difference between "real" studies and "real world data" studies because the latter are cherry picked or even fully synthetic, and the authors don't have access to the data. They are produced by vested interests groups to sell a narrative.
This was the most corrupted review that Cochrane have ever performed and this time they shot themselves in the foot by contradicting their own reviews. cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…
your childish insults drew my attention to your lab's quite incredible paper confirming that chronic activation of cGAS-STING, as happens with plasmid-contaminated vaccines, causes cancer.