Most people seem to think nothing important is happening. They are still posting about baseball and influencers, and don't understand why I would drop everything to argue against this war. In this thread I'll share my view for my readers.
First of all, this war was started by the US and Israel without justification. National interest aside, it is morally wrong to go starting wars without justification. The stain of this unnecessary violence will haunt America for years to come.
The war rhetoric coming out of the Department of Defense is highly disturbing, and in some cases nakedly evil.
Renaming the DoD the Department of War is a red flag in itself. Promoting real violence with video game clips is psychotic. I could go on, but I won't....
This war will do great harm to the global economy. Today I read the delusional claim that the world will blame IRAN for this harm. No. The world can see who is to blame for starting this war. It is not Iran.
Having everyone hate you for impoverishing them, including your longtime allies, is bad strategy. China will seem like the more reliable partner, while America will seem like a crazed bully.
"But the US will survive crashing the global economy better than anyone else. We have our own oil."
Whether this is true or false, hurting literally EVERYONE so that you come out ahead is immoral. And why be so sure you'll come out ahead?
China is further along in electrification than any other country. They have been planning for this specific scenario for years. Their electric cars are suddenly going to seem very attractive abroad. Their industrial might is unsurpassed. They have a huge petroleum reserve.
Russia's budget depends on selling oil. Now that oil is worth a lot more. The US has even been forced to roll back sanctions to reduce the economic fallout. It is effectively handing Ukraine to Russia for the privilege of blowing up Iranians. This is extremely retarded.
Thus, the Iran War seems to strengthen the position of America's main opponents while weakening the position of its allies. Furthermore, it is not improbable that the US will be ejected from the Middle East entirely.
I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on military strategy. But I don't need to be. We've all seen that America can't even conquer Afghanistan. AFGHANISTAN. Trying to take on Iran is jumping up MULTIPLE levels of difficulty from Afghanistan. It's totally nuts.
It would be nice if we could just blame one crazy president for this war. Well, certainly he takes a bigger share of the blame than anyone else. He campaigned against this war and then started it anyway. A betrayal of historic proportions.
However, congress has effectively given its approval. The corruption of America's leaders is deep and broad.
Important nodes in that corruption trace back to the Epstein ring.
The reasonable conclusion based on the evidence is that a foreign nation used blackmail and media ownership to capture enough American leaders that they could manipulate America into fighting an immoral war that is against its national interest and against the will of its people.
That said, some normal Americans bear the guilt for this war as well. They have thoughtlessly allowed themselves to be herded into dehumanizing those who will suffer from it. They have an arrogant view that America cannot lose, and that allies don't matter.
They have mindlessly accepted the propaganda that our world is defined by a clash of civilizations between the "Judeo-Christian" and Islamic world. This is not remotely true. The Islamic world is simply not a threat to the West at all. America's only serious competitor is China.
And while China may be America's most serious COMPETITOR, anyone who's paying attention should have noticed that another, much smaller nation, has done America more grievous harm by breaking its democratic political system. And that culprit is NOT an Islamic nation.
Now, my analysis may be wrong. Again, I am not an expert. But when it comes to starting a war, "trust the experts" doesn't cut it. Proponents need to make its necessity immaculately clear to the public. And they haven't even tried. Because they have nothing. Nothing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Americans are being ripped off by low taxes. Wait - LOW taxes? Yes, low taxes.
Healthcare costs are skyrocketing to a significant extent because the US is insisting on a weird private insurance model instead of just taxing.
Building energy code is forcing huge costs on new...
homes that are very inefficient with respect to their stated goals. If reducing carbon is the goal, it would be cheaper and more cost effective just to build cleaner power plants instead of overregulating construction.
The results of the above are wasteful and clear for all to see. Thus, they erode trust in government. The irony is that this distrust makes Americans want to insist even harder on not solving these problem through taxation.
In other words, psychological lock-in, to a bad system.
Ideal tropical design that is extremely energy efficient - but illegal in America because the windows are not double-glazed. Very stupid energy code.
You probably don't believe me, so here's Grok. American performance modeling assumes no ventilation from windows and requires them to be double-glazed instead (unnecessary, expensive).
American performance modeling ALSO doesn't reward good building geometry.
This is a travesty and makes no sense in ANY state.
The large majority of men can never be fully satisfied with their relationships if their women don't make explicit efforts to please them. But it has now become a point of modern ideology that women should never make such efforts. The result is predictable. What's in it for men?
Let me explain further. Human nature is such that when all things are equal, men experience more desire and women experience more pleasure. This observation goes back to the ancient Greeks. We don't notice this unless we pay explicit attention to it. Why?
Markets are driven by desire, not pleasure. In fact, markets often fail to serve pleasure and instead create pain. Consider consumerism. People buy things that don't bring them enough pleasure to justify the expense. They have a craving similar to an addiction.
Men never disliked dyed hair for fundamental reasons. It's common in artistic representations of very attractive women. They disliked it because they associated it with bad personalities and bad politics. So as soon as Amelia changes that, they're good to go.
Also, more chokers please.
Learn more in the definitive account of feminine beauty:
Can AI answer the oldest question in the world? In this sciencey thread we're going to find out.👇
Let's start with some peer-reviewed data. Everyone loves peer reviewed data!🧪
So, apparently men typically last 10-20 seconds while women last 20-60.
Ok, seems reasonable at first blush.
But... you might have noticed those numbers are different. By a factor of almost THREE.
Hmm...
I was a bit surprised by this so I asked ChatGPT to check the data three different times in two different sessions. And, it came up with very similar answers each time.