Free newsletter: The ROI debate has come at worst time for Anthropic and OpenAI - two companies that can’t afford to slow down thanks to their $1.1 trillion in compute commitments and a data center buildout that needs a trillion in annual revenue by 2030. wheresyoured.at/ai-is-slowing-…
My appearance on Bloomberg last week ruffled some feathers because I don't have "skin in the game" (IE: money in the market). This is because AI boosters can't imagine somebody with a moral position on an industry run by grifters and sold with lies. wheresyoured.at/ai-is-slowing-…
The AI industry is anxious because it knows it made too many egregious promises. There are 190GW+ in planned AI data centers, and to justify their existence, they'll need $2 trillion+ in AI compute revenue by 2030.
Anthropic and OpenAI need to be making over $170 billion each in annual revenue by EOY 2029 to keep up with their $1.1 trillion in compute commitments.
As we speak, customers are already cutting their AI token spend thanks to a lack of measurable ROI.
The current scale of the AI industry is less than 10% of where it needs to be by 2030 to substantiate both Anthropic and OpenAI's projected revenues and the 190GW+ of planned data center capacity. It cannot afford to slow down for even a single month. wheresyoured.at/ai-is-slowing-…
The shift to token-based billing, which just happened in Q1 2026, has given corporate America a bad case of sticker shock, and they’ve started to rein in their AI use. AI is slowing down at exactly the worst time for OpenAI and Anthropic's IPOs.
The tech industry is meant to be a community of meritocracy and harsh rationality - yet they continue to coddle products with questionable ROI, ruinous costs and many data points that suggest LLMs create a lot of slop software that nobody uses.
Both Claude Code and OpenClaw's televangelists are saying that their users must start using "loops" instead of "prompts" to burn more tokens. This is a transparent attempt to push users to spend more on tokens at a time when the companies are desperate. wheresyoured.at/ai-is-slowing-…
No matter how much you dress up whatever AI service has gaslit you into believing it’s sentient, generative AI is inherently limited, impossibly expensive and economically unviable. And it needs to be ten times larger than it is in less than four years.
I’m going to leave you with a little tease. In the next few weeks, I’ll publish a newsletter that will reveal, with numbers that were never meant to be shown, something that very well may burst the AI bubble. wheresyoured.at/ai-is-slowing-…
The damning figures I received came from a source.
And if you have something to share, please contact me. I feel your pain and your anger, and I see how you have been mistreated. And I will protect your identity. My signal is ezitron.76.
If you want to support my work, consider signing up for a subscription. For $7-a-month or $70 annually, you get weekly deep dives into the AI bubble that are anywhere from 10,000 to 20,000 words long, and helps support these free pieces too.
Free newsletter: The dawn of token-based billing has shown that generative AI doesn’t have a return on investment. It's too unpredictable, too unreliable, you can't easily measure the cost of tasks, and organizations are already pulling back. wheresyoured.at/ai-doesnt-have…
Ever since the AI industry started its transition away from subscriptions to token-based billing, users have been hit with sticker shock. Once companies start paying the real cost of AI, they realize there's no measurable ROI to be found.
GitHub Copilot moved users to token-based billing on June 1 from a request-based system that allowed them to burn thousands of dollars for $39 a month.
Users are currently burning their entire monthly balance in a couple of prompts.
Today’s premium newsletter is part 1 of my What If...We're In An AI Bubble? series, covering scenarios that could burst the bubble starting with token-based billing's destruction of most AI products, and the slow collapse of data center construction. wheresyoured.at/premium-what-i…
I’ve spent hundreds of thousands of words in the last year talking about the very and scary signs that we are an AI bubble, and the exuberance fueling it. Today is the first time in a long time where I’ve discussed the potential consequences in depth.
I feel like people are very cavalier when discussing the AI bubble, saying stuff like "we're in an OpenAI bubble," not realizing that the collapse of OpenAI would destroy AI investment, AI startups, and kill debt issuance for AI data centers. wheresyoured.at/premium-what-i…
Free newsletter: The economics of AI don't make sense. Monthly subscriptions to AI services are scams that represent a product that is impossible for OpenAI and Anthropic to provide long term, and AI data centers are an economic disaster at scale. wheresyoured.at/ais-economics-…
Github Copilot, as I reported last week, is moving towards token-based billing, charging the actual cost of token burn — a move that alienated many of its users who built entire workflows around a request-based product that no longer exists. wheresyoured.at/ais-economics-…
This is the subprime AI crisis — and a crisis of deception. AI products tricked users by offering unsustainable monthly subscriptions built to separate the process of using AI from its real cost. Eventually everybody will go token-based. wheresyoured.at/ais-economics-…
Premium Newsletter: OpenAI needs to raise or make $852 billion through 2030 to pay for its compute costs, and must pay $75bn a year for Oracle's 7.1GW of Stargate data centers, or Oracle will collapse, destroying its share price and Ellison's empire. wheresyoured.at/how-openai-kil…
It’s been little over a year since Sam Altman, Masayoshi Son, and Larry Ellison stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Donald Trump to announce the "$500 billion" Stargate data center project. In truth, no entity was ever formed, and no money was invested. wheresyoured.at/how-openai-kil…
The "$500 Billion" Stargate data center project is really a $340 billion, 7.1GW Oracle-and-debt-funded construction nightmare. Outside of Abilene - which existed before the announcement - these data centers are mostly scaffolding and steel beams. wheresyoured.at/how-openai-kil…
$5 billion TO DATE? This heavily suggests that Anthropic? Over $10 billion in inference and training costs? This heavily suggests that almost every story about Anthropic’s revenue and costs they’ve leaked is wrong and that it’s been misleading the media.
Remember: reports said Anthropic made $4.5bn for all of 2025, and all of this guff about “$19bn in annualized revenue” no longer make sense, especially as that “exceeds $5 billion” line is from a lawsuit filed in *march*. This is a scandal!
The only thing that makes sense here is that Anthropic’s 2025 revenues were much lower than $4.5 billion. $5bn ALL TIME? Through march? Remember this is filed with a court. Suggests Anthropic is a much much smaller business than we believed
Premium: The AI Bubble is a time bomb, burdening hyperscalers with billions of new depreciation a quarter that will soon eat away profits, VCs with dead equity in fallen AI startups, and Oracle with hundreds of billions of unpayable leases. wheresyoured.at/premium-timebo…
A year ago, I wrote that Coreweave was a timebomb — a rickety tower of debt and bad deals that was primed to blow.
I could have made that argument about hyperscalers, NVIDIA and OpenAI. Everybody is waiting for somebody else to make AI a success.
The AI bubble is slowly turning cash-rich, margin-heavy hyperscalers into something far worse. Now these asset-light, high-margin software companies are becoming bloated, filled with tens of billions of dollars in GPUs and data centers. wheresyoured.at/premium-timebo…