By just 5 votes, a 0.1% margin, Harrison has gotten his majority and held on.
I personally didn’t believe the results when I first saw them. Point one percent? I thought for sure it was a meme.
One begins to wonder if victory at any cost, by five votes, nonetheless, was worth it.
And that 0.1% margin was hard to come by. It was so obvious that Harrison’s guys were running scared, moving heaven and earth to eke out even the most pathetic of victories.
Almost overnight the endorsements rolled in. Ball told his voters to fall behind Harrison. Almost every major LCMS social media figure endorsed Harrison, and almost all at once.
Even Ball’s core backers fell in line for Harrison before Ball did.
Everyone also suddenly started referring to him as “Dr. Harrison.” Clearly there were worries that Harrison’s lack of credentials when compared to his rival would cost votes. Of course, the voters only care about the title and not the honorary nature of the title.
But that’s not all! Harrison’s camp is clearly full of seasoned politickers, and they knew that even with the avalanche of endorsements, Harrison had no chance.
No, Biermann, their greatest contributor to the perfectly sound New Catechism, had to be dragged through the mud.
Indeed, Biermann—more of a conservative than anything else—became the stalking horse of an imminent liberal takeover of the LCMS unseen since before Harrison became president (convenient framing for the Harrison camp, no?)
But I thought Harrison saved the Synod?
But how could Biermann be the harbinger of liberalism in the LCMS? The man used to teach that morality should be legislated, for crying out loud!
Thankfully, Harrison’s camp specializes in the fine art of guilt by association, and a lot of liberals really wanted Biermann.
Really, many more groups than liberals wanted Biermann. If one had to describe why Biermann experienced such a surge in support, it really comes down to one fact: he’s not Harrison. A commendable appeal, considering Harrison was not supposed to run again.
But those poor supporters of Biermann who simply wanted anyone else in charge were lumped in with the most ardent liberals by the Harrison campaign. This, I think, surprised them. I saw many of them asking, “but what about the 8th commandment?”
Unfortunately for them, Harrison’s team also specializes in aggressively interpreting the 8th commandment. Yet more unfortunate is the unofficial hermeneutic of the LCMS, that anything benefiting Harrison does not actually violate the 8th commandment. I feel bad for them.
But if Biermann’s core supporters were an eclectic group who wanted Harrison out, who were Harrison’s core supporters?
It’s entirely unclear. And it seems that Harrison was worried about the lack of support.
So, Harrison decided that he really needed to appeal to today’s youth. But the youth of today don’t want the same things as the boomers of yesterday. I suspect there was a great deal of strife from the Issues Etc. boomers when Harrison decided to interview on an outside podcast.
But it’s pretty clear that Harrison was desperate during the interview. When asked what to do about the young men kept out of the institutions, Harrison said those young men should be invited in and welcomed to the LCMS. What a flip-flop on his actions these last four years!
Yes, I could’ve sworn that Harrison, beholden to his boomer sensibilities and allies, is the man who has ruthlessly driven young men out of the LCMS! Beyond my own case, I’ve heard of other young men driven from congregations and young pastors removed for criticizing the man.
But that was far from Harrison’s biggest pivot this election.
No, in the process of begging for any votes from any voter, Harrison let slip that the entire CTCR did not review the New Catechism and instead parceled out the reviews. What a fascinating time to change the story!
“… it was a disaster.”
What a great admission! A “disaster”? Was this not the faithful book that was unfairly and unfoundedly maligned by the scary “alt-right”? How could the CTCR be at fault for a book that Harrison (and the holy CTCR) ruled to be faithful and sound?
But this interview, and who knows how many other promises and behind-the-scenes maneuvers, gave Harrison his necessary margin of five votes.
Five votes! What kind of Peruvian electoral absurdity has Lutheranism found itself in?
By this point, I’m sure there’s some Harrison supporter or creature of the synod ready to accuse me of secularizing matters of the church, making them out like American politics rather than something sacred, and otherwise wrongfully making light of serious matters.
That objection used to work, but I think now everyone can see what a farce this election was. Yes, both sides campaigned. Yes, the campaigns were political. No, this process was not holy, nor was it serious. It was only fitting that it ended by a margin of five votes.
But the biggest mockery has yet to come.
After the ubiquitous doom-mongering used throughout the election, we will now be told to calm down, that everyone confesses the same faith, and that we all need to get along and walk together. It’s enough to give one whiplash!
Already, Harrison’s supporters are saying that this is not a secular election, so pointing out Harrison’s 5-vote majority is meaningless. But that’s a false assumption. It was secular in all but name, and Harrison will continue politicking without support.
Even Harrison’s biggest supporters at Issues, Etc. understand the suffocating malaise surrounding his presidency. When they celebrated his victory, they led not with a photo of the man, but a photo of the more beloved man Harrison caricatures.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Events are forgotten a few weeks after surfacing thanks to modern news cycles. It is, therefore, very easy to brush everything under the rug.
A lot publicly transpired online for the LCMS, and it shouldn't be so easily forgotten.
At the start of the year, there was an admission by an LCMS pastor that women could somehow be better pastors than he could (despite the fact that only men can be actual pastors), even admitting they could be pastors conditional upon their faithfulness.
Also in January, Pastor Fiene sought the answer to the radicalization of young men. Contrary to many on the right, blaming the trend on the treatment of young men, he argued that the main cause ("demon") was the entitlement of young men.
This isn’t the main discussion, but “We’re not like the other Protestants” is a very real group, and the identity is fundamentally unstable. It’s purely a means to disassociate with less respectable evangelicals, and part of doing that is putting on a more historical mask.
Lutherans are the most notorious in this group. The conservative Lutheran identity was once linked to a very strong German-American tradition that predated the 1848ers (whom they denounced as atheist socialists in their own language when they arrived).
During the progressive era, however, the Lutherans anglicized, and beyond anglicizing, there was a huge push to Americanize. This entailed largely altering or abolishing parts of the culture that had been carried over or had developed for nearly a century at that point.
“Satanism, the actual worship or service of the devil, is more dangerous than the simple practice of the occult. Yet many people today consider themselves so civilized and sophisticated that they are unwilling to accept the idea that some people actually worship and serve Satan…
It sounds so medieval! However, in an 80-page report concerning specific charges of satanic child molestation brought against a day care center, the California attorney general said that the sheriff’s deputies so doubted the accusations that they…
neglected to search for additional evidence. ‘This failure to substantiate the children’s claims became more pronounced when allegations of satanic rituals and homicides emerged. The more bizarre allegation—and the lack of evidence to support it—the more…
The end of “The Believing Christian Rejoices in His Regeneration”:
Adding these prayers to the daily evening prayers at home has highlighted a lot of the differences in diction between modern Christians and Christians a century ago. Besides “Worldlings” and “birthright”, the “sinful world and… its society” is a common derogatory phrase.
In fact, these older prayers treat the world’s society as something to be disdained, even despised.
I doubt these (far more) faithful Christians would scan through parts of the world’s society, like Hollywood films, looking for Christian elements to justify their consumption.
Today on May 15th, 2024, a close friend of mine sent me a public Facebook post and YouTube video from First Lutheran Church. As read out by Reverend Joseph Highley on the morning of May 12th, First Lutheran Church in Ponca City has declared me excommunicated.
If treated as valid, this would exclude me from every LCMS congregation. Reverend Highley and First Lutheran have done this despite resigning my membership with them on April 8th, having declared multiple times that the excommunication is a necessary punitive action.
The charges follow the same vague and politically contrived rationale that was made public last May. The first condemned me for not submitting to Reverend Highley’s and First Lutheran’s ‘God-established’ authority, also condemning me for having recorded and published everything.
Since I do not want America intervening across the world and sending our young men to die for, frankly, nothing, I want to oppose what it actually does.
Accusing it of “conquering Europe” is one of the few things it hasn’t done. It’s unconvincing.
It’s doubly unconvinced to accuse me of “covering” for American foreign intervention, considering I’ve spent a great deal of time criticizing it, writing against it, and generally opposing it. It’s a position I was raised with, and it’s not something I’ve ever discarded.
When I wrote on the topic, I did not delve into baseless assertions as to the spiritual character of Americans along with banal esoterica, so perhaps it’s a lesser work. Nonetheless, I wrote it.