SG Profile picture
Jun 26 20 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "The sad fact is that the State of Israel has not been allowed to really win a war. Israel has always been pushed to compromise, be the “good guy” to allow others to save face.
1)
Imagine had World War II in Europe ended in 1944 after it appeared that Germany would lose, in a peace conference with Ribbentrop, Cordell Hall, and Anthony Eden signing a ceasefire with the Nazis promising to disarm, just to see Hitler and
2)
the regime allowed to survive and make war again once they rebuilt their strength.

That is what the world has done to Israel; in 1949, 1956, 1967, and 1973, and it looks like again that the European left and
3)
the Israeli left that wants them to like it will only be happy when Israel pulls back and accepts a ceasefire, while Hamas rebuilds and rearms, and Iran redevelops its nuclear capacity for a “next episode.”

Face it. Israel gets cheated out of any real victory.
4)
And look carefully at the past. 1949, Ben-Gurion accepted a ceasefire and truce in the face of a British embargo that most of Europe and the USA complied with.
5)
In effect, Israel would be the bad guy to be punished with starvation if it did not help the Arabs save face and allow Jordan and Egypt to occupy land allocated originally to the Jewish homeland and control half of Jerusalem.
6)
Then 1956, Israel sacrificed lives and equipment to help the British and the French against Egypt and now had a buffer — the Sinai and control of Gaza — which made Israel infinitely safer, but under pressure from Dulles in the USA, and
7)
the British government that worried about losing its markets in the Muslim world, withdrew, setting the stage for 11 years later.

And through year after year of terrorism — terrorism that was paid for by the UN, by various nations financing it — what was Israel told?
8)
Don’t attack them lest you start a war. Don’t complain because no one will listen. Look reasonable and European so you will be liked.

And then came 1967, the Six-Day War. Israel was threatened with extinction for two months while the world warned Israel to keep calm and
9)
the UN did nothing. Israel’s ports were blocked, the economy was dying, France, under de Gaulle, chose to refuse to deliver aircraft that were paid for and boats that were paid for. In short, the attitude in Europe was “let the Jews die,” only 12 years after the Holocaust.
10)
But Israel won, on its own, with no one’s help. We all know the story.

And then the USA decided for the first time to help Israel, not because they loved Jews, but because of the Cold War &;the realization that the USSR had captured the leadership in the nearby Arab states.
11)
And then in 1973, Israel was attacked. Europe boycotted Israel 100%, even to the extent of blocking American efforts to resupply Israel. It was clear that European governments were willing to accept Israel’s destruction rather than deal with any reaction from Muslims,
12)
Muslim markets, and Muslim violence domestically — something which since has become much worse.

But why did the USA then rush to help in 1973? To prevent Israel from actually acting in desperation to do what could have killed millions of Egyptians and
13)
Syrians. (I don’t have to define that.)

And that brings us to today.

Will Israel be allowed to win?

That depends on how the events go from now.

Gaza must be cleared of Hamas and any population that subscribes to Hamas ideology, which may mean everyone in that place.
14)
The threat to Israel must be removed completely and replaced by a renewed Israeli-Jewish Gaza population.

Judea and Samaria must be cleared of all those who are hostile to the state of Israel and Jews. The potential threat must be removed now.
15)
This can be done in one of two ways. First, deportation en masse of hostile populations. Second, establishing a peace based on local government being local and national identity of Arabs being as citizens of Jordan, but the establishment of Israeli Jewish sovereignty and
16)
population throughout the area. The game that the world has played — that peace must depend on Jews leaving an area, as Jews were removed from Yamit and later from Gaza — has to stop.

And one more important thing to consider. The nature of war has changed, and
17)
war has become more expensive for a small nation. If Israel is forced to be the one to compromise, to “take risks” for promises that history teaches have never been honored,

The next war, which will happen if Israel is looked at as vulnerable and
18)
weak because it makes concessions and seems dependent on outsiders, by an Islamic ideology that identifies being nice with being weak, Israel may be forced to use non-conventional weapons to completely destroy threats to its existence."
19)
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SG

SG Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GREENESJ333

Jun 26
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, “What to do realistically with Gaza, Judea, Samaria
1)
Here are the real choices, like it or not, and there’s no room for wishful thinking, nor for being pushed into deals that several years in the future will mean more terrorism and more Jewish deaths.

So, let’s set parameters of what goals should be set.
2)
1. No nation can tolerate vulnerability to existential threats. Poland and Czechoslovakia after WWII deported Germans who had lived in their territories for generations, declaring them to be an ‘existential security and cultural risk.’
3)
Read 15 tweets
Jun 26
such as France and Germany, both of which currently have shrinking populations, lots of resources, fertile land, and an abundance of space.

4. Like it or not, we need to be realistic. Gaza rebuilt for its current population will still, within a very short time,
11)
be “Hamastan,” with a population motivated to repeat October 7. And the population of Judea and Samaria that openly demonstrated its agreement with Hamas’ massacre—as soon as they can, they will be planning another massacre, not just in Gaza but from Samaria,
12)
with thousands coming out of Tulkarem and Qalqilia into the center of Israel.

And do not expect help from those you think are friends when the next wave of terrorists comes. Remember October 7, 2023, when for 24 hours the world said it was horrible, and
13)
Read 5 tweets
Jun 25
Roger Froikin, @rlefraim wrote, "JUST A THOUGHT ABOUT THE USA ON ITS 250TH BIRTHDAY

The USA is still different than the rest of the world, and here are a few reasons:
1)
1. That has as its basic belief, that all men are created equal, and that no man is the subject of a leader, a government, a king, or any other human being.
2)
2. The only nation that has incorporated into its basic laws (the US Constitution) a list of rights that the individual citizen has that government cannot take away — 'The Bill of Rights.'
3)
Read 6 tweets
Jun 25
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "Shabbat Shalom ——-
Parsha Chukat
numbers 19:1–22:1

This is a sad Parsha in many ways. In this Torah portion, God instructs Moses and Aaron regarding the red heifer. Miriam, who is the sister of Moses and Aaron, dies.
1) Image
Moses hits a rock to bring forth water rather than speaking to it. At the end of the parsha, Aaron dies.

Of course, there is more to it.

After years of wandering through the desert, the people arrive in the wilderness of Zin. Miriam dies, and
2)
the people thirst for water. G‑d tells Moses to speak to a rock and command it to give water. Moses gets angry at the complaining people and strikes the stone. Water flows, but Moses is told by G‑d that neither he nor Aaron will enter the Promised Land.
3)
Read 17 tweets
Jun 21
Regime change in Iran would solve many of the most serious problems facing the Middle East. It would remove what many consider the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism, cutting off the regime's financial and military support for Hamas,
1)
Hezbol!ah, the Houthis, and other Iranian-backed proxy groups.

It would also fulfill the promise President Trump made to the Irqnian people when he expressed support for their struggle against the Islamic Republic.
2)
Many Iranians interpreted his message as encouragement to continue seeking freedom despite the risks. According to figures cited by commentators such as Goldie Ghamari and Mayar Tousi, between 40,000 and 50,000 Ir@nians—including protesters, women, children, and
3)
Read 7 tweets
Jun 21
The JD Vance MOU, if carried through successfully, risks handing the Islamic Republic of Iran a strategic lifeline that directly undermines the expansion of the Abraham Accords.
1)
The likely end state is not regional stability, but a recalibration in which Iran regains economic and geopolitical breathing room and rebuilds while Gulf states grow more hesitant to align openly with Israel.
2)
Even under nominal compliance, Ir@n has a long track record of testing boundaries—probing how far “compliance” can be stretched while preserving its long-term strategic goals.
3)
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(