I'm frustrated that (at least on my Twitter feed) this isn't the main storyline of the historic gun control bill passed in the wake of the #ParklandSchoolShooting, especially in light of @teamtrace's recent piece on precisely how the NRA wields influence in the legislature. 1/n
Main stories I'm seeing: from the left, the NRA's lawsuit against Florida, and concerns about arming teachers; from the right, following the NRA's talking point about this bill being an affront to 2nd-amendment rights. 2/n
Re: arming teachers, I'm seeing a lot of rhetoric about how the proposal is really about selling more guns, or giving guns to all teachers. But the text of the actual bill mandates a *TON* of requirements for who can be essentially a school version of an air marshal. 3/n
Read the bill here: flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2…. Reqs include 132 hrs of firearm safety/proficienty training, passing psych eval, initial and continuing random drug tests, ongoing annual firearms training, 12 hrs diversity training. 4/n
If these comprehensive reqs are met for a potential volunteer teacher (who would apply for the program), local officials decide whether to approve arming that teacher or funneling funds to other school needs. 5/n
Further, school employees whose sole function in the school is classroom instruction cannot apply, unless they are in a training corps program, current servicemember, or current/former LEO. Previous stringent reqs still apply. 6/n
I'm concerned we as a nation might waste this rare moment of (contentious, but sincere) bipartisan effort to pass gun violence policies in defiance of NRA lobbying and even outright policy writing in Florida. Again SIXTY-SEVEN Rs with A ratings crossed the aisle for this. 7/n
Let's applaud these efforts, and the amazing #Parkland-sparked #NeverAgain movement that pushed for this to happen, and build on this success, small though it may seem to some! /end
Should add I'm speaking as a lay but concerned (have 2-year old son) citizen who wants to be informed. Any errors in interpretation mine based on reading the bill itself, please correct if I'm wrong!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Can #toolsforthought like RoamResearch, Obsidian, and Notion actually help us think better? If so, how?
In our #UIST2024 paper, we distill hypertext patterns from real-world usage that augment sensemaking by addressing temporal + spatial fragmentation of sensemaking
I see this work as complementary to the rich practical wisdom many have shared in the #toolsforthought community - I hope that connecting this wisdom with research on hypertext and sensemaking can enrich our understanding of how these tools can help us think better
If this sounds interesting to you, dig into the paper here:
And come chat with us during/after the "Learning to Learn" session at 3:35p on Wed 10/16 @ #UIST2024!
I get wonderful shared delight from hearing others talk abt deep insights that influence/delight them.
I'm also curious what constitutes "depth" (broad implications, surprise, difficulty, etc.).
Would you share a deep insight that influences/delights you + explain why?
Thought sparked by this snippet from @Noahpinion's interview w/ @VitalikButerin where they get into the reasoning behind the coming switch of Ethereum from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake:
#Idea - NLP to do initial clustering/classification of altmetric-aggregated discussion of preprints, to facilitate finding high-signal discussions and critiques of preprints (honestly would want this for any paper!).
Preprint servers already hook into @altmetric to expose mentions of a paper in news/blogs + social media (tweets).
But it links to an undifferentiated list of sources (not titles, citation contexts) - good for signaling "attention", missed opportunity to get real context.
If preprint servers have access to commercial API from @altmetric, classifying (and then clustering, enabling searching by) these mentions is eminently doable (e.g., can frame as a straightforward citation context classification problem, like with @scite and @SemanticScholar)
A striking example of "behind the scenes" of great research: Esther Duflo noted that a crucial enabler of her Nobel-prize-winning work was a masterful synthesis of human resource economics in a handbook chapter.
I... think I tracked down the (141-page!!!) handbook chapter?
And it is indeed wonderful!
What a synthesis indeed of a conclusion!
Clearly identifying progress, and also crucial open problems, deeply grounded in a detailed analysis of the literature.
Started as a "short thread", turned into a longer thing. Hope you find it helpful!
There's been some good discussion on effective search as a core primitive for tools for thought, and the limitations of existing tools, such as @RoamResearch wrt search.