در دهه گذشته من با اتهامات متعدد و متناقضی روبرو شده‌ام. از دست نشانده آمریکا تا حامی جمهوری اسلامی تا آلت دست انگلیس. من عموماً به تهمت‌های بی‌اساس که هدفی جز تخریب شخصیت ندارند واکنش نشان نمی‌دهم.
اما این بار پاسخ می‌دهم چراکه با سطح سخیفی از روزنامه‌نگاری مواجه هستیم.

https://twitter.com/AliVaez/status/1706746875485864175

2| من در سال 2012، زمانی که مذاکرات هسته‌ای در حال شکل گیری بود، به گروه بحران پیوستم. آن دوران مصادف شد با فشرده‌ترین و مستمرترین تعاملات دیپلماتیک بین ایران و ایالات متحده در سه دهه گذشته. حضور 5 کشور دیگر و مجموعه‌ای از مسائل بسیار فنی را هم به پیچیدگی قضیه می‌افزود.

Over the past decade, I've been called an American agent, an Iranian regime sympathizer and a British stooge.

I usually choose to dismiss such defamatory nonsense.

But on this occasion, I'm going to respond, because this is straight up hatchet journalism.

2 | When I joined @CrisisGroup in 2012, it was just as the nuclear negotiations were taking shape - the most sustained, intensive diplomatic engagement between the US & Iran in over three decades. Add to that 5 other nations and a highly technical set of issues.

🚩 به تازگی انتشار اخبار (بعضاً نادرست یا نادقیق) در مورد «توافق با ایران» یک سرگردانی در افکار عمومی ایجاد کرده.
اما حقیقت ماجرا چیست؟ به صورت کلی در سه حوزه تحولاتی در جریان است:

- گفتگوهای هسته‌ای/امنیتی
- زندانیان دوتابعیتی
- پرونده‌های پادمانی

#رشتو ۲/ مذاکرات هسته‌ای-امنیتی بین ایران و آمریکا: گفتگو بر سر توافق موقتی که مستلزم رفع تحریم باشد مطرح نیست. چراکه چنین توافقی، با توجه به فضای سیاسی قدرتمندی که علیه ج.ا در واشنگتن ایجاد شده، ۱.با مخالفت کنگره مواجه خواهد شد ۲.به بایدن از نظر سیاسی در آستانه انتخابات ضربه خواهد زد.

در ۶ سال گذشته، امسال اولین سالی است که گروه بین‌المللی بحران در تاریخ ۱۶ ژانویه، روز اجرای برجام، گزارشی از وضعیت اجرای این توافق منتشر نخواهد کرد چراکه چیزی از برجام باقی نمانده و مذاکرات احیای آن نیز از سپتامبر متوقف شده‌اند. 🧵👇 در همان زمان گروه بحران گزارشی منتشر کرد و هشدار داد که گذر زمان به نفع احیای برجام نیست: «اقدامات تنش‌زا و یا اتفاقات غیرمنتظره» به راحتی می‌توانستند تیر خلاص به توافق هسته‌ای باشند که در شرایط بسیار متزلزلی قرار داشت. و همین اتفاق هم افتاد. ۲/
crisisgroup.org/fa/b87-middle-…

گزارش جدید گروه بحران از مذاکرات هسته‌ای منتشر شد.

تلاش‌های اخیر برای احیای برجام از مرز توافق تا مرز فروپاشی در نوسان بوده است. الان به نقطه‌ای رسیده‌ایم که باید پرسید: آیا اصلاً برجام قابل احیاست؟ اگر بله، چگونه؟ و اگر خیر، جایگزین چیست؟ ۱/

crisisgroup.org/fa/b87-middle-… مذاکرات احیای برجام به نوبه خود تجربه بسیار منحصربه‌فردی بوده است: دو طرف اصلی ماجرا، بدون گفتگوی مستقیم و با حضور اعضا و میانجی‌های متعدد، بر سر بازگشت به توافقی مذاکره می‌کنند که آن را چند سال قبل امضا کرده بودند. ۲/

From near-conclusion to near-collapse, back to near-conclusion, now edging again toward collapse: New @CrisisGroup report on the #Iran nuclear negotiations, which have had more twists than a telenovela and higher stakes than ever.🧵👇
crisisgroup.org/b87-middle-eas… 2| Talks to revive the JCPOA have been a peculiar, even sui generis exercise: 2 central protagonists with no direct engagement, negotiating a return to a deal they've already agreed to, with multiple parties engaged directly or indirectly as participants or mediators.

"It is important to stop and remember that we are not debating between excellent and ideal alternatives, but between alternatives that are currently on the table – which are a situation with an agreement versus a situation without an agreement." 1/ bit.ly/3wXiEiv 2/ "As much as we at @INSSIsrael have analyzed the scenario of a lack of an agreement, we have consistently come to the same result – significant progress by Iran in its nuclear program, which will bring it to a nuclear threshold."

If Iran is so adamant on closing @IAEAOrg safeguards investigation once and for all, best thing it could do is acknowledge past undeclared activities instead of making up excuses about fabricated/planted evidence and politicized probes. It's easy: Here's a statement. 🧵 2/ "In the late 90s and early 2000s, we were pretty worried about what Saddam was up to with his WMD program. We know the rest of the world was too, because the Americans started a war over it. So yes maybe we did look into a bit of R&D and forgot to disclose it. Busy times".

جنگ روسیه و بحران انرژی در اروپا برای کشورهای دارای ذخائر نفت و گاز فرصتی طلایی ایجاد کرده. ۵ماه است که نه ایران و نه غرب نتوانسته اند از این موقعیت منتفع شوند. این بازی باخت-باخت، با احیای برجام می تواند به بازی برد-برد تبدیل شود.👇 ۲/ اروپا برای گرامایش اساساً به گاز احتیاج دارد. ایران به علت نداشتن زیرساخت‌های لازم (که تحریم در آن نقش بسزا داشته) نمی‌تواند به اروپا گاز صادر کند. بنابراین استیصال اروپا در زمستان به تقویت اهرم فشار تهران در مذاکرات نمی‌انجامد. اما فرصت برای ایران کجاست؟

How would Donald Trump, “master”salesman, be pitching the nuclear deal with Iran?

A thought experiment [thread] 2/ "We've just finished restoring what many people call the best nuclear deal ever reached with Iran. It's incredible. I've always said nuclear is very important to me. They can't have a bomb, they just can't. And let me tell you, you're gonna love it".

The past few years have offered a case study to test the argument made against limiting Iran's nuclear program through diplomacy: That covert operations and sabotage can do the job better and without giving any sanctions relief.

Here's what happened instead [thread]:

https://twitter.com/Jerusalem_Post/status/1562845499232645121

2/ When Natanz was attacked in July 2020, intel assessment from the Trump admin and Israel claimed it would take up to 2 years for Iran to get back to pre-attack capabilities.

2 years later, Iran had 4x as many advanced centrifuges running, at higher levels of enrichment.

Iran agreed to a roadmap with the @IAEAOrg on clarifying these issues in March.

Here's what that framework said: provision of clarifying documents, exchanges between the IAEA and AEOI, and a report from the DG at June board meeting.

https://twitter.com/muhamadjamshidi/status/1555600847995899904

2/ Here's what the IAEA reported: At Marivan, information consistent with explosive experiments, and no clarification regarding the presence of man-made uranium particles.

IAEA DG: "A safeguards regime, reinforced by the additional protocol and the amended small quantities protocol, can give us the trust and confidence we need that those states using nuclear energy for the wellbeing of their people, are not hiding anything." 1/

https://twitter.com/iaeaorg/status/1554736421549887488

2/ "Those who truly favour effective safeguards, would never use their cooperation as a bargaining chip, or IAEA inspectors as pawns in a political game.

While diplomatic negotiations over the IRI’s nuclear programme continue, the IAEA has been steadfast and clear:

Almost 5 months to the day that E3 negotiators left #ViennaTalks with, as @PhilippeErrera put it, "our job done", it's back to the Asparagus Palace - first time all of the P4+1, U.S., and Iran will be in the same place at the same time since March. [Thread] 2/ At the time, success seemed within touching distance: "The FTO and a pair of footnotes", as one senior Western official told me. Iran and @IAEAOrg were agreeing on a roadmap to address safeguards, concluded in Tehran on 5 March. But that's also when the unravelling began.

It was 7 years ago today that the US, Iran and other world powers concluded the nuclear deal in Vienna.

Today, that agreement exists as little more than a theoretical construct, with restoration prospects trending to nil.
And I don't think the devil is in the details anymore.🧵 2/ The key understanding that underpinned the entire JCPOA construct was a trade off: nuclear restrictions in return for sanctions relief.

Throughout the negotiations on reviving the agreement, underlying assumption has been that the construct still held; talks were over terms.

Was looking forward to reading this piece from a recently-retired veteran of Israel's MoD & Mossad. If it's indeed reflective of views w/in the natsec establishment, as author claims, those views built on poor foundations and poor prescriptions. [Thread]

bit.ly/3nByqul 2/ We know from leaked discussions and exit interviews with senior Israeli officials that there is a constituency supporting a JCPOA return. But the political line under Netanyahu and Bennett throughout was bad deal, terrible deal. Now? Ah well, too late, what a shame!

The U.S. & Iran are about to resume indirect, EU-mediated talks in Doha in an effort to break deadlock over restoring the nuclear deal.

Having the two key protagonists in one place is a necessary ingredient for diplomacy to succeed. But a breakthrough is far from assured. 🧵 2/ Since #ViennaTalks were paused in March, there have been efforts through various intermediaries, but mainly @enriquemora_, to find middle ground on the remaining issues of disagreement, which are bilateral US-Iran differences rather than technical matters involving wider P4+1.

At #SFRCIran, @USEnvoyIran: When the deal was initially concluded and debated by the Congress, and again when the previous administration left the deal, this question prompted heated arguments based on hypotheticals and counterfactuals. But we do not need to rely on theory or thought experiments to answer it now. For we have gone through several years of a real-life experiment in the very policy approach critics of the JCPOA advocated: a so-called maximum pressure policy, designed to strangle revenue for…

🧵 IAEA DG @rafaelmgrossi: "Two things ongoing at the moment, which are parallel & interconnected. One is the attempts to revive the JCPOA. This has been a long process, ongoing for more than a year, which at the moment seems to be going through a great deal of difficulty" 1/ 2/ Because of things that perhaps have not much to do with nuclear matters.

I think the nuclear aspects of the agreement are pretty much finalized.

But still, there are doubts.

#OTD in 2018, President Trump announced that his administration was withdrawing the U.S. from the Iran nuclear deal.

It was a massive gamble. It was a failed gamble. But should be an instructive gamble. 🧵👇 2/ Trump had criticized the agreement on the campaign trail, but held off for over a year from pulling the plug, in part because senior members of his team believed the deal continued to serve U.S. non-proliferation interests.

Tomorrow marks 1 year since the first round of #ViennaTalks kicked off.

A state of play on where we've been, where we are, and where we might be going in this very peculiar exercise.🧵

https://twitter.com/enriquemora_/status/1379443189703131139

2| It was clear from the outset that despite shared goal of reviving JCPOA, path would be anything but easy. To destroy is easier than to rebuild, & even having a baseline text already available still required a way for both sides to resume commitments under new realities.