Regular man during day, blockchain passionate at night.
Mar 14, 2021 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Remember not long ago:
"#Chainlink team holds big % of $LINK. IT'S CENTRALIZED"
& had to explain what each allocation was for
Look, the ultimate goal is: CL team hodls ZERO LINK
Ironically (soon): people cheering when a fund buys 100's M$ of LINK. Where does that come from?
Extra thoughts:
1) Those $LINK put in circulation now will end up in their vast majority locked in nodes (even funds getting them at some moment will want the % revenue a node provides)
Sep 10, 2020 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
1/N
Some highlights from Thomas Hodges ( #Chainlink Integration Engineer) AMA from yesterday:
1) Currently Chainlink is able to provide 32 byte responses, which is a bit limited (enough for prices and few other usecases) BUT since $LINK is designed to provide any kind
-->
2/N
--> of response. They are working in "Multiword responses" where the size of the answer can be any size, enabling any use case responses.
Simply if you need bigger responses you will pay more for it.
(continues)
Mar 4, 2020 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
#Chainlink now belongs to all efforts of CORE of blockchain protocols + all the task forces
