Working on increasing Bitcoin adoption among Energy co's, Family Offices & Fund Managers. Not on Insta, Bluesky. Won't DM you. Other accounts are fakes
7 subscribers
Feb 14 • 10 tweets • 2 min read
0/7
Waited 34 months for this moment!
In March '22 I said that Bitcoin mining helps avoid expensive grid upgrades and decarbonize grids, a lot of non-Bitcoiners were skeptical
Now, a Duke University Report confirms all this and more
"To the extent a new load can temporarily curtail its electricity consumption from the grid during these peak stress periods, it may be able to connect while deferring—or even avoiding—the need for certain [grid] upgrades"
Dec 28, 2024 • 17 tweets • 19 min read
1/17
You've read many times Bitcoin is bad for the environment. But now you're confused. The media, sustainability magazines, even peer reviewed journals are saying it can support climate action.
Next-level greenwash?
There a reason the message has changed. Let's dive in
👇
2/17
The change in message has less to do with Bitcoin than something psychologists call "negativity bias"
Imagine it's 100,000BCE. You see an animal silhouette on the horizon. Is it your food, or you're it's food?Negativity bias says "assume in the negative and run!" (away)
Jul 2, 2024 • 10 tweets • 6 min read
1/10
10 images that forever changed our perceptions about Bitcoin and energy
1. Rhodes et al showed that flexible datacenters like Bitcoin mining allow grid owners to stack more intermittent renewable energy sources onto the grid
Source:
🧵lancium.com/wp-content/upl…2. This powerful chart from @woonomic showed that Bitcoin mining is now more sustainable than the industries it can in theory obviate (banking, as a method of transacting. Gold, as a store of value)
source: chainalysis.com/blog/africa-cr…
"Crypto has penetrated key markets and become an important part of many residents’ day-to-day lives."
With the combination of autocracy and high inflation, use of Bitcoin in Nigeria is off the charts
Feb 12, 2024 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
1/6
Many people don't realise how much peer reviewed scientific literature came out in the last 18 mths endorsing Bitcoin mining's net-positive environmental potential
Here's 5 of the most recent publications with
♻️source
♻️headline
♻️TL;DR summary
🧵
2/6
How Bitcoin Can Support Renewable Energy Development and Climate Action
(Cornell University)
source:
TL;DR:
Bitcoin mining helps renewable developers generate more profits that is typically re-invested, accelerating the renewable transition pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac…
Jan 31, 2024 • 22 tweets • 9 min read
🧵
How 3 EU Central Banks are working together to try to weaken Bitcoin
What action each of them has taken
What are their next moves
What we must do
👇
First, some background
During The GFC, Central Bankers realised the risk people could discover our Central Bank based financial system had been transferring from the poor to the rich for generations.
The injustice of bailing those who caused the crisis led to the Occupy Movement.
Jan 31, 2024 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
🧵While we were sleeping, the European Commission (via ESMA & ECB) has been creating a report which they plan to label bitcoin
-environmentally harmful
-a threat to EU energy security
-a haven for financial criminals
Paving the way for 2025 de facto EU bans on BTC & BTC mining2/5
How we know:
ODFoundation founders @LyudaKozlovska and @jardemalie have done the hard work for us of reading through every EC document. They've been fighting this for 18 months. @stephanlivera recently interviewed them on his podcast. .
For the love of God, in rebutting the provably false claim Bitcoin uses too much water, please do NOT say "water is part of a natural cycle so it doesn't matter"
It's not that simple
You'll sound ignorant
There's a simpler reason the "Bitcoin and Water" attack is wrong
🧵
Yes, water cannot be destroyed. Yes, it's a renewable resource. That's not the point. Overuse of water can absolutely decimate a local environment, and the water that evaporates does not necessarily come back to the same place.
Nov 19, 2023 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
1/7
Within just 53 days this year, the ESG narrative on Bitcoin flipped
This tweet documents the 5 key events that led to the flip
It happened so fast that many of the world's Investment Committees have not yet caught up
Let's help them!
🧵
Narrative Shift 1: The KPMG Report (1 Aug)
Bitcoin mining is essential for the renewable transition
Here's why in one less-than-10-tweet thread
To achieve net zero, IEA report we will need 10x more demand response
That's grid jargon for "really really flexible consumers who can shut off and power on any time"
🧵
IEA say we need 10x more demand response (DR) to achieve net-zero because solar/wind are unpredictable and intermittent in their supply
To counterbalance that, they need a lot of really flexible customers
Otherwise grids can have too much or too little power (blackout risk)
Mar 7, 2023 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
1/4
@woonomic was in the country, so we teamed up to create something we've planned for a bit:
4 Dynamic Bitcoin ESG Charts
Whatever your view of ESG, Govt & Institutional Investors need this data. Now we have it
1. shows Bitcoin's progress to 52.6% sustainable energy
👇 2/4 Total Emissions
This shows that since the China-ban the previous rising emissions trend has reversed.
Network emissions are trending downwards, even as hashrate and electricity consumption increase
Miners switching to sustainable energy is a big driver for this
Feb 20, 2023 • 6 tweets • 4 min read
1/4
Having a model means we can start building charts
Here's 4 new charts for Bitcoin & Energy
#Bitcoin has grown its sustainable energy mix @ 6.2% p.a from Jan 2020
* 6.2% growth rate is faster than any major industry
* 52.6% Sustainable mix is ⬆️ any major industry
🧵 2/4
Bitcoin Emissions have trended down since the China ban
Due to known model omissions, CCAF (over)estimates emissions at 58.58 MTCO2e (ccaf.io/cbeci/ghg/index)
With off-grid mining factored in, the figure is 33% lower at 39.33 Mt CO2e
(0.079% of global CO2e emissions)
Feb 2, 2023 • 24 tweets • 5 min read
1/24
On Jan 31 @greenpeaceusa continued it's paid campaign against a technology that the research consistently says is net environment positive with its most sensationalist and ludicrous heading yet
Rather than research you've actually doubled down on more paid (& failed) misinformation, courtesy of $5+1 Million from billionaire altcoiner Chris Larsen who has a vested interest attacking Bitcoin
Faux environmental concern: his pretext
You've become his paid attack dog
Jan 27, 2023 • 13 tweets • 3 min read
1/13
By using Proof of Work, Bitcoin has
*12 humanitarian benefits
*21 environmental benefits
*5 env'l drawbacks
*weighted env'l benefit:cost ratio = 31:1
On Proof of Stake it would've had
*0 humanitarian benefits
*0 env'l benefits
*0 env'l drawbacks
👇