Thread by @Farrier105

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD I assume that the DNA damage repair is inhibited because of viral spike protein bonding to the ACE2 receptors of a number of cells, changing the gene expression of those cells and causing downstream damage.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD We were not informed by vaccine developers and pharma executives that the spike protein was dangerous prior to the vaccines being rolled out. However, we were informed of a significant mutation of the SARS-COV-2 RNA genome coded by the vaccine developers that was...

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD ...originally described as a way to stop the vaccine spike protein from moving from a closed position to an open position, which was called "shape shifting," which the vaccine developers claimed would reduce immune response. In actuality, the mutation prevents the spike...

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD ...from binding to the ACE2, or any other receptor of a cell since the spike protein has to assume an open position to do that.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD This mutation was patented by its developers. Here is the link to an extensive interview with the developer behind the "Mutagenesis" of the spike protein that produced a VARIENT to the spike protein of the virus.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD Note that the interviewer and the vaccine developer did not mention any dangers posed by the spike protein of the SARS-COV-2 virus. There is no reason to believe the vaccine developers did not know what the spike protein can do when it binds to someone's cells as that...

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD ...was known back in the days of original SARS, circa 2003-2007.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD nature.com/articles/nrmic…

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD Vaccine developers have been all over the spike protein of corona viruses since the very beginning of the corona virus problem. They all knew about the spike protein being dangerous, but chose not to tell us about it, although under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)...

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD ...full disclosure of all risks, along with mitigations of those risks, must be disclosed by law. Unfortunately, the problem with the secrecy was someone would find some other spike protein threat and document it just before, or sometime after, EUA rollout.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD In December 2020, the rollout began. The potential recipients had access to all kinds of articles, Web sites, and You Tube videos showing how the vaccine worked and was geared to achieving immunity from the SPIKE PROTEIN OF THE VIRUS. We'll deal with this later.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD Most of the educational material described the spike protein as harmless separate from the rest of the virus, and never said anything about it being a MUTATION, or "VARIANT," of the spike protein of the virus, or about the dangers of the spike protein of the virus.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD On Pfizer's Web site, this description was found in the Frequently Asks Questions section:

"2. How does an mRNA vaccine work?
mRNA, delivered to your body's cells by lipid nanoparticles, instructs the cells to generate the spike protein found on the surface of the...

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD "... novel coronavirus that initiates infection. Instructing cells to generate the spike protein spurs an immune response, including generation of antibodies specific to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein."

Keep the last 6 words (SARS-COV-2 being 1 word) in mind.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD Our cells supposedly produce the same spike protein that protrude from the surface of the virus. In fact, our cells produce a MUTATION or "VARIANT," not the exact same spike protein found on the virus. The immune response is to the MUTATION. Very important.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD So, these words on the Pfizer Web site are not accurate:

"mRNA, delivered to your body's cells by lipid nanoparticles, instructs the cells to generate the spike protein found on the surface of the virus."

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD This talks about the spike protein of the vaccine being the same as the spike protein of the virus changed with Salk Institute produced this paper about the time the vaccines rolled out in 12/2020:

salk.edu/news-release/t…

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD That's when the narrative changed to the spike protein of the virus being DIFFERENT than the spike protein of the vaccine. We were told that the vaccine would:

1. Stay in the arm muscle and not enter the bloodstream.
2. Spike protein would be displayed on the surface...

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD ...of the cells and not enter the bloodstream or go anywhere else in the body.
3. The locking of the spike protein of the vaccine in a Closed Position rendered it impossible to find with ACE2 receptors.

1-3 made the spike protein harmless now, not being separate from the virus.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD Unfortunately, Immunologist Doctor Shane Crotty also told us that:

1. The vaccine was NOT designed to stay in the arm, but the intent of the vaccine developers was to let some of the injection roam to other parts of the body to find "rare immune cells."

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD 2. The vaccine developers always knew some of the spike proteins would NOT be expressed on the surface of cells but would, like the lipid nanoparticle packages that do not stay in the arm muscle, could roam around, too.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD So, two of the three claimed safety features of the vaccine to mitigate spike protein dangers were NOT actually safety features, but were used as mere talking points when objections to the spike proteins being made in the body were raised. This kind of thing does not help.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD Now that it is out that the SPIKE PROTEINS OF THE VACCINE are actually VARIANTS, OR MUTATIONS, this gives to the question---"Is the mutation built into the spike protein of the vaccine enough to inhibit the production of an immune response to the SPIKE PROTEIN OF THE VIRUS?

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD I do not have an answer to that question, but it is a reasonable and legitimate question to be raised. It is NOT the spike protein of the virus--not exactly. We were told it was originally, but that narrative is now in shambles.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD We need research to DETERMINE if the spike protein of the vaccine can achieve immunity from the spike protein of the virus. Assertions that it can are not acceptable. We need thorough, peer-reviewed research, with full disclosure of all supporting evidence.

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD Deconstructing Narratives:

@John_for_hope @RWMaloneMD @threadreaderapp Please unroll as I will need it again for further use and research. Thank you.