1) Yesterday's #GPT4 experiment: I input the evidence against Zac Prince's, Erin's, and @BlockFi's conduct into the system, and then asked it questions about the case. 2) It suggested that the causes of action were negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent misrepresentation. It stated the odds of success on the former were 30-50% and the odds of winning on the latter were 40-60%.

1) Today's #GPT4 thoughts after another day of use:

People are worried about AI "automating" the writing of code, causing developers to be fired. The reality is that as of last week, the world shifted to where efficiency and computing cost is now the only reason to write code. 2) You can pretty much ask #GPT4 to execute any code you can think of, because natural language is essentially code execution. Last night, my brother used @turbotax for part of his taxes, and asked #GPT4 to complete the theft loss forms for the @GenesisTrading scam.

1) I spent a large part of yesterday using GPT-4. One thing I was able to do with it was to design and then simulate an entire D&D battle sequence. The software knew the rules and taught me new things. 2) One thing that didn't happen, though, was any weird output whatsoever by the AI that suggested it was unaligned. It understood what a game simulation was and it didn't go off the rails and suggest ways to actually play out the battle in real life.