How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

Most of the concerns expressed during the passage of the #JSA2013 are found not to have been realised in practice. But there are 20 practical recommendations for improvement of the system. /2
https://twitter.com/mikarv/status/1511247225812393987This enabled the crime to be pinned on a previously unsuspected architect, whose professional movements over a long period corresponded with those of the incriminating phone. /2



This is not just an SW1 issue, but fundamental to public perceptions of (and thus, ultimately, continued acceptance of) our democratic way of life. /2 https://twitter.com/timd_IFG/status/1455110146770841601
It may have solved their political problems, at least in the Commons, but does not solve their legal ones. /2
https://twitter.com/bricksilk/status/1304003877012938752So would it be OK for Parliament to pass a law allowing specific international commitments, recently accepted and passed into law, to be simply disregarded? Lord Keen (wisely perhaps) did not address the moral/reputational aspects of this, but pointed to a "precedent". /2
The (concise) judgment of the Court of Appeal is here bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/…. It records these reassuring words from Lord Faulks, the ex-Justice Minister now heading the Commission into judicial review.
https://twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1303265142826823680It may not be fanciful to derive from this RT of @davidallengreen another recent sign of his disenchantment: it refers to the ill-judged and derogatory comment by @ukhomeoffice (which @PermSecGLD once proudly served) about "activist lawyers".
https://twitter.com/PermSecGLD/status/1301878365159387137?s=20/2
https://twitter.com/bricksilk/status/1301902945550831622Text of the Order is here
https://twitter.com/itvnews/status/1301282106438496263And here it comes ... itv.com/news/2020-09-0… Sir Geoffrey Nice QC is an experienced and fair-minded lawyer: I look forward to following the progress of this latest tribunal.
https://twitter.com/Law_Commission/status/1300812275612299265A new defence to prosecutions under #OSA1989 is recommended for disclosures that, though unauthorised, are considered by a jury to be (objectively) “in the public interest”. /2
It’s the same kind of neglect for the rule of law (albeit in trying circumstances) that I was identifying in this speech: theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2020… /2