Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
CC Profile picture
CC
@ccpolitics123
Anti-establishment, independent thinker. The MSM is our true enemy.
Dec 16, 2022 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
It is pretty disappointing to see so many right-leaning accounts cheer on the suspension of prominent people on the left.

This is why partisan politics are so awful. How can we destroy the notion that “free speech matters, but only when it benefits my side”? The location of @elonmusk’s private jet puts him and his family in no more danger than the members of congress after Trump’s comments on January 6th.

To avoid ambiguity, I am suggesting both groups were in essentially no danger at all.
Nov 9, 2022 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
In general, it doesn’t matter which party is in power, but I really had more faith in humanity to vote out the tyrants who destroyed people’s lives during COVID regardless of political idealogy. It’s a sad indictment of the people in NY that @KathyHochul was elected governor. When you are free to gloat about locking people down, forcing children to wear masks, and firing people who did not want to take an experimental shot without any consequences, what does that say about what you can do moving forward?
Jan 9, 2022 • 4 tweets • 3 min read
This is how people end up spreading “misinformation”. This study appears to show that the risk of myocarditis is greater after COVID infection than after vaccination, but everyone in the study was VACCINATED. It is impossible to tell from the data if the myocarditis was caused from the shot or from COVID. Perhaps the shot puts you at greater risk and then infection exacerbates that risk?

An honest study would also compare the risk for UNVACCINATED people with and without COVID.
Jan 5, 2022 • 4 tweets • 3 min read
According to @CDCgov, from 2020-2022, 803 children age 0-18 died of COVID.

In the two years from 2018-2020, 858 children age 0-17 died of the flu.

Do you remember the same level of hysteria then about masks, vaccines, remote learning, social distancing, etc.? ImageImageImage For comparison’s sake, in 2021, emergency department visits for suspected suicide attempts of girls age 12-17 nearly doubled from the 2019 levels and reached as high as 1,000 per week (based on available data). It has also been steadily increasing since around March 2020. Image
Oct 5, 2021 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
This is EXACTLY how people who speak truth to power are treated by the establishment. 🙄

60 minutes special, blue checkmark on brand new Twitter account, Hillary Clinton tweeting about you, and a Senate testimony less than a day later. This has psyop written all over it. None of this is to say that Facebook does good things for humanity (they don’t), but there is a deeply sinister agenda here. This “whistleblower” will likely testify that the government needs to have editorial oversight for content published on social media.
Sep 7, 2021 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
This chart has the current COVID deaths per 100,000 in each state from the @nytimes compared to the 2019 @CDCgov homicide rates. At this moment, you are between 4 (Idaho) and 55 (Maryland) times more likely to be murdered than to die of COVID. Sources:

New York Times: nytimes.com/interactive/20…

CDC: cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom…
Aug 14, 2021 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
If the vaccine mandates were really about the “greater good” and “stopping the spread” of COVID then why not allow negative COVID tests too?

I know tests are not always super accurate but the efficacy of the vaccine is also questionable especially with new mutations. I don’t know if anyone remembers this, but MIT developed an app that they claimed could detect individuals who have COVID with around 99% accuracy simply by having them cough into their phone’s microphone.

news.mit.edu/2020/covid-19-…
Jan 17, 2021 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
1. When people noticed anomalies and asked questions about the election they were censored, demonetized, deplatformed, and called conspiracy theorists.

A better response would have been to push for and support forensic audits to remove any doubt or suspicion of foul play. 2. To quote the Washington Post “Democracy Dies in Darkness”. We are long past that. We are now living in an authoritarian, technocratic nightmare.

Anyone who questions election integrity from here on out will be branded an “election denialist” and will be shunned from society.
Nov 4, 2020 • 11 tweets • 4 min read
1. I am seeing cognitive dissonance from left leaning ppl. When the DNC cheats right in front of your eyes to rig the primary against Tulsi and Bernie, you recognize it as outright fraud, but when they cheat against Trump, it must be valid because Orange Man Bad. 2. This was clearly their plan all along. They spent six months pushing the narrative that Trump was going to try to declare victory on election night, but we must wait until all the votes are counted. Hillary said not to concede under any circumstances.

nbcnews.com/politics/2020-…
Aug 13, 2020 • 12 tweets • 4 min read
1. I just have to get this off my chest because it is driving me crazy right now. Do people understand what the DNC is doing? Am I the only one who thinks it is obvious??

They are hijacking the democratic process to install their chosen candidate, @KamalaHarris, as president. 2. She performed poorly in the primaries, was destroyed by @TulsiGabbard on national television in the debates, and was one of the first candidates to drop out.

Rather than admit defeat and move on, the DNC decided to rework their strategy.
Mar 6, 2020 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
For people paying attention, this is the most likely explanation for why the DNC establishment just consolidated all their support behind Biden.

They need to be able to play the “attacking a political rival” card for a little longer. I don’t know a ton about the Burisma investigation, but I suspect it links back to other high profile politicians, and they are desperate to keep it covered up.

zerohedge.com/geopolitical/u…
Feb 20, 2020 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
1. More media bias from the @nytimes. When @andrewcuomo named the first openly gay judge to the New York Court of Appeals that WAS the story. When @realDonaldTrump names the first openly gay cabinet member it is reduced to an afterthought. ImageImage 2. Not only is it hidden away at the end of the third paragraph, but they do not even care enough to fact check it saying he “would apparently also be the first openly gay cabinet member”.

“Apparently” as in “we are not sure and are not even going to take the time to check”. Image
Feb 13, 2020 • 9 tweets • 4 min read
1. The amount of propaganda oozing from this article is insane. The MSM sound desperate to prevent her from being approved. #EndTheFed 2. The Fed’s independence is always spun by establishment elites, MSM, and economists as necessary to create a functioning economy, but I have news for you. The current economy does NOT function for most of the population. The Fed’s independence is a huge part of the problem.
Feb 12, 2020 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
1. Short thread: @JoeBiden was doomed from day one. He never had any real support outside of the mainstream media. They all knew he was never a serious contender. Their goal was to prop him up just long enough that they could try to pull off their impeachment of @realDonaldTrump. 2. Remember the impeachment itself was based on the public believing that Joe Biden posed a threat to Trump and was a viable “political opponent”. Without that the entire narrative would have fallen apart.
Aug 9, 2019 • 10 tweets • 4 min read
1. Short thread about how the mainstream media uses subtle propaganda to influence how we think.

Here is an example of media treatment of @BarackObama vs. @TulsiGabbard with regards to gay rights. 2. I am not here to argue that what Tulsi said in the past is okay or that her comments then were not hurtful to people. I just want to explore how the media narrative can completely change the way we think about a person or an issue.
Jun 17, 2019 • 12 tweets • 9 min read
1. THREAD about the @DNC @NBCNews primary debate selection from last week.

The candidates were “randomly selected” in a closed meeting at 30 Rock. Four of the top five polling candidates ended up in the same group: @JoeBiden, @BernieSanders, @PeteButtigieg, and @KamalaHarris. 2. This all seems a bit fishy to me so I decided to dig a little further. Notice that @BuzzFeed and @NBCNews can’t seem to agree on who conducted the actual drawing.
Jun 2, 2019 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
THREAD: Excerpts from John F. Kennedy’s commencement address at American University on June 10, 1963 about peace.

Sad that it has been over 50 years, and we do not seem to be any closer to his vision. “I realize the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic as the pursuit of war—and frequently the words of the pursuers fall on deaf ears.”
May 29, 2019 • 9 tweets • 5 min read
1. THREAD: 2020 candidates - media coverage vs. @twitter followers

This is the U.S. cable news media coverage for each of the 2020 candidates over the last two weeks (ending this past Saturday). Data comes from @gdeltproject. 2. This is the aggregated polling data from @RealClearNews over a similar timeframe.

Source: realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/pr…
May 24, 2019 • 8 tweets • 4 min read
1. THREAD Bipartisan charades. Last night @realDonaldTrump shared a compilation video of Nancy Pelosi stuttering at a press conference earlier in the day.

2. The @washingtonpost published a piece around the same time talking about fake @SpeakerPelosi videos circulating on social media where the videos were slowed down to give the impression of slurred or drunken speech.

washingtonpost.com/technology/201…
May 20, 2019 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
I don’t trust the official polls related to the 2020 primary so I have been looking at Twitter data. While users on Twitter may not match voting demographics, it certainly paints a different picture. If retweets can be taken as a vote of support then this is the current ranking. This is a graph of Tulsi’s retweets per tweet over time compared to her polling data over a similar time. Clearly something does not add up. It is just one poll, but she seems to be consistently hovering around 1% in every poll.

Source of the poll: morningconsult.com/2020-democrati…
May 17, 2019 • 11 tweets • 6 min read
1. You are probably not going to find anything like this in the MSM. This is an analysis of recent tweets by 2020 presidential candidates to see who is the most controversial based on their reply to like ratio. The winners are @BilldeBlasio, @HowardSchultz, and @SenGillibrand. 2. It is generally accepted that if your tweet gets a lot more replies than other engagements (likes, retweets) you said something pretty controversial, and people do not agree. @MerriamWebster is even looking into adding “ratioed” to the dictionary.

merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/…