Dan Bishop Profile picture
Proud representative of NC's 8th District and candidate for Attorney General. Fighting to protect freedom, defend constitutional rights, and uphold the law.
Oct 24, 2024 9 tweets 3 min read
🚨NC crime stats for 2023 were released quietly some time last week, and it seems clear why the numbers were posted with little fanfare. #ncpol

Crime went up statewide, and up DOUBLE DIGITS in NC's urban centers.

Let's look at some of the numbers...🧵

ncsbi.gov/Services/Crime… Start with car jackings.🚗

From 2022 to 2023, car jackings in North Carolina jumped more than 38%.

Look at suburban Cary, NC, for instance. In 2022, there were 126 motor vehicle thefts.

In 2023, there were 306 — a 143% INCREASE. Image
Sep 26, 2024 11 tweets 3 min read
Ladder-climbing TikTok influencer Jeff Jackson (he/him) has been running for statewide office for nearly a decade.

In 2016, he said he was “seriously considering” a run for U.S. Senate.

In 2018 there was no election for U.S. Senate, otherwise Jackson surely would’ve thrust himself into the spotlight. In 2020, Jackson tried to run for U.S. Senate again before failing out. Here's what the conversation with Schumer probably looked like:
Image
Sep 20, 2024 6 tweets 2 min read
.@JuliaMCoin, your @theobserver profile yesterday of Jeff Jackson contains an error. You wrote:

"Under North Carolina’s constitution, Jackson could not work in the district attorney’s office and be a state senator. So, he stepped into private practice in 2014 at the law firm Womble Bond Dickinson. There, he worked on a few civil cases, representing Wells Fargo when it was a defendant in an insurance case; a man who was owed money from Holly Springs and its town manager; and a woman asking for a divorce, according to court records." (Emphasis added.)

Actually, it's even more pitiful. Two of those cases predated Jeff's move to Womble in 2014. He filed the (uncontested) divorce case in 2010 and the money-owed case against the Holly Springs town manager in 2013. So, "there" (i.e. in his eight years at Womble), state court records show that he "worked on" ONE case, not these "few."

Screenshots from the online, publicly accessible court records are posted below.

charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-… Suit against Holly Springs, 2010. Image
Jul 11, 2024 13 tweets 4 min read
🧵 THREAD:
Jeff says, “This job is not really intended to be an entry level position.”

He’s correct, and that’s why he’s unsuited to be #NCAG.

Let’s see why …

#ncpol Image 2/Jeff was an assistant district attorney for 3 years.

I practiced law for 29.
Jul 9, 2024 7 tweets 1 min read
🧵1/Despite Democrats having to pay legal fees for frivolous interference with the Green Party's ballot access in 2022, Democrats appear to be using their control of the State Elections Board to run the same playbook against the parties supporting Cornell West and RFK Jr. #ncpol 2/After stalling the Green Party's petition for recognition in 2022 on fatuous grounds, the NCSBE's Democrats finally voted approval with a federal court breathing down their neck and then pivoted to trying (unsuccessfully) to block the GP presidential candidate from the ballot.
Feb 9, 2024 5 tweets 2 min read
1/I listened to the entire SCOTUS argument in the CO Trump iNsuRrECtion case. Not one question from any Justice on:

1. the definition of "insurrection" in Amdt 14, § 3 and how to distinguish it from riot;

2. what it means to "engage" in insurrection on facts of the case; ... or 2/
3. how to reconcile those issues with incitement doctrine under 1A per Brandenburg.

This almost certainly foreshadows that the Court will not reach the merits but will reverse 9-0 on a threshold issue, i.e. (a) is § 3 self-executing, ...
Dec 20, 2023 6 tweets 2 min read
Good question. Notice that the CO court did not ONLY stay its ruling until January 4: “If review is sought in the [US] Supreme Court …, then the stay shall remain in place … until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.” So, … /1 Trump will appeal. If SCOTUS applies ordinary months-long process, the order will not take effect and Trump will appear on the state primary ballot. SCOTUS might then be able to dismiss the appeal as moot without deciding.

Why would the CO court issue an intentionally toothless order? Hmm. /2
Dec 20, 2023 12 tweets 3 min read
I read all 213 pages of opinions in the Colorado Supreme Court ruling excluding President Trump from the ballot. SCOTUS will reverse, but this parody of judicial decisionmaking is a frightening sign how far gone our judiciary is. Court is all Democrat appointees; split 4-3. /1 Some credit due to dissenting Justice Samour for calling out the "procedural Frankenstein" of the lower court process ... a "summary proceeding" for simple challenges to residency, age, etc. qualifications, which statute mandates to be resolved within a week of filing. /2
Oct 4, 2020 15 tweets 3 min read
1/Updating Dem efforts to green light absentee-ballot fraud in NC:

Sept 30 (review) - Federal Judge Osteen’s order observes that State Elections Board “settlement” “has eliminated the one-witness requirement under the guise of compliance with this court’s order.” #ncpol 2/As background, Judge Osteen has presided since May 22 over suit attacking antifraud protections for absentee ballots. On Aug 4, Osteen issued a 188-page order largely upholding procedures the legislature modified on Jun 12, including the witness requirement.