"what's next for CAC Testing in 2021 (and beyond)?"
What are the main applications in the future?
@miguelcainzos23@jaideeppatelmd
#1 CAC has come a long way
-evolving to the needs of the past decade from screening test to a SDM tool
-best tie breaker, adding the dimension of de-risking
-cost-effective and reassuring ok to avoid treatment
-cautiously approved by ACC/AHA guidelines @Heart_SCCT
Jul 23, 2021 • 14 tweets • 7 min read
#1
While as preventive cardiologist we all organize information from imaging and biomarkers in a debate with my dear friend @CBallantyneMD , asked tough Q what would I choose if I had one option?
The answer is clear and maybe not debatable anymore
@ASPCardio@Heart_SCCT
# 2 What ur risk? remains the foundational strategy in preventive cardiology and in this pursuit we continue to rely on risk factors and a growing list of biomarkers
For most of us on the frontline including myself, the 100% focus in the last 4 months, rightly so, been on beating the initial sickness
Unaware it may be just the first of many battles
Sometimes we all need perspective (definitely I did)
#2
For me, As a physician, it was my collogues, including Dr Wu a surgeon one of the first doctors falling sick all across in US
learning from their personal experience as a patient….
getting insights on their anxieties, isolation and struggles was an eye opening experience
Jul 25, 2020 • 8 tweets • 10 min read
Debate CAC vs CTA in primary prevention?
I will start with a provocative statement
Screening, foundational strategy for decades in prev cardio is a seductive paradigm
Its so 1990’s
We are barking on the wrong tree
In 2020, I will explain why this strategy is a fallacy #ASPC2020
#1 Both primary and secondary prevention lower disease burden and outcomes
#2 Marginal benefit of extensive screening
#3 Whats left to screen? Majority already treatment candidates
#4 Our stakeholders asking for "derisking" vs "screening"
Truly proud to be among the pantheon of cardiology giants who were previously recognized.
In reality honor for #PowerOfZero is really a tribute to the man with Midas touch
Privilege to work & learn so closely, this relationship blossoming not only with him but entire family
@Agatston_Center is national treasure & even today remains a source of inspiration for me🙏
Apr 28, 2020 • 6 tweets • 4 min read
#1 Many raised concerns reg racial disparities in face of recent COVID-19 pandemic @eff_ve leading efforts @HMethodistMD to systematically examine inequalities reg susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in nation’s most diverse metropolitan area: Houston medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
#2 @eff_ve building a novel data platform form to automatize ingestion, organization & analytics serving @HMethodistMD entire research community data needs via COVID-19 Surveillance and Outcomes Registry (CURATOR)
Operational details of this registry/platform coming soon.
Hope it’s not too late! @rblument1@hmkyale@MichaelJBlaha@RonBlankstein@ErinMichos@MBittencourtMD.
Some thoughts👇 onlinejacc.org/content/early/…
#1 Going back to early 2000’s when many showed RF-based approach fell short for individual patient management decisions... aspirations for CAC ‘screening’ gained momentum, though progress stalled due to lack of RCT & waiting for prospective cohorts to confirm prognostication
Feb 11, 2018 • 11 tweets • 6 min read
makes some good points. agree from screening prospective (not on treatment->screen->find disease->treat->improve outcomes), there is no RCT-> show "screening" helps. I may even go further & said in 2015 (apply more in 2018) do we need screening (even with CAC?)
#1 so basically statin are great, we decide candidates based on PCE in asymptomatic, but what are the tradeoffs (too many eligible, PCE overestimates, patient uncertain & reluctant).