Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Karla Ortiz Profile picture
Karla Ortiz
@kortizart
Karla is a Puerto Rican artist who works on Films & TV (MCU, HBO), Games, etc. Passionate advocate for better artist industries+ rights✌️Opinions are my own 🙌
Aug 30, 2024 • 17 tweets • 9 min read
1/ Hi @Oprah . This event will be the first time many people will get info on Generative Ai. However it is shaping up to be a misinformed marketing event staring vested interests (some who are under a litany of lawsuits) who ignore the harms GenAi inflicts on communities NOW 🧵
Image
Image 2/ With your power and reach there is an opportunity, even a responsibility, to show the world the real ways GenAi harms the public, harms creatives whose work these models solely depend on to function at capacity and so on. Harms seen from the inception of the tech to its output
Aug 12, 2024 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
1/3 HUGE update on our case!

We won BIG as the judge allowed ALL of our claims on copyright infringement to proceed and we historically move on The Lanham Act (trade dress) claims! We can now proceed onto discovery!

The implications on this order is huge on so many fronts! Image 2/3 Not only do we proceed on our copyright claims, this order also means companies who utilize SD models for and/or LAION like datasets could now be liable for copyright infringement violations, amongst other violations.

The whole thing is worth a read. I love these parts!

Image
Image
Image
Jun 10, 2024 • 12 tweets • 6 min read
1/ Apple “Intelligence” is here and 0 questions of “where does the data come from?” to be seen in press.

APPLE is trying to shove a huge privacy risk and tech that screams scraped off the internet without consent to the public. So here’s a list of potential data sources 🧵
Image
Image 2/ The thing is Apple has been hinting to what these models could be or where the data comes from for quite a bit.

For starters let’s take a look at one potential lead to where the data could come from.

Here is a research project called DataComp

machinelearning.apple.com/research/datac…
Feb 27, 2024 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
1/6 Everything that makes the internet feel wonderful and open, where creatives shared their work freely, these wonderful works are now being stolen and extracted by tech execs in a rush to train genAI models that mimic those wonderful creators.

It’s disgusting and immoral. 2/6 Honestly, I’m not convinced any ToS really can hold because of the uniqueness of this scenario in so many ways. For starters companies want to claim Section 230 protections so they’re not responsible for user content, but at the same time they want to own that user content?-
Mar 21, 2023 • 10 tweets • 4 min read
1/ I really hope what @Adobe claims is true and if it were it would be a good step in the right direction. However after some cursory digging I have serious questions. Lets dig in 🧵 2/ Right off the bat, have Adobe Stock contributors given their explicit full consent to be a part of this? Did they agree to opt in? Why is there no option for Adobe contributors to not opt out? This seems concerning to me.

helpx.adobe.com/stock/contribu… Image
Mar 15, 2023 • 13 tweets • 9 min read
1/ This might be the most important oil painting I’ve made:

Musa Victoriosa

The first painting released to the world that utilizes Glaze, a protective tech against unethical AI/ML models, developed by the @UChicago team led by @ravenben. App out now 👇

glaze.cs.uchicago.edu/download.html Woman representing a creati... 2/ This painting is a love letter to the efforts of this incredible research team and to the amazing artist community. This transformational tech takes the first of many steps, to help us reclaim our agency on the web, by making our work not be so easily exploited. Detail shots: ImageImageImage
Jan 15, 2023 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
1/ As I learned more about how the deeply exploitative AI media models practices I realized there was no legal precedent to set this right. Let’s change that.

Read more about our class action lawsuit, including how to contact the firm here:
stablediffusionlitigation.com 2/ I am proud to be one of the plaintiffs named for this class action suit. I am proud to do this with fellow peers, that we’ll give a voice to potentially thousands of affected artists. I'm proud that now we fight for our rights not just in the public sphere but in the courts!
Dec 27, 2022 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
1/ This. It’s all a distraction from Ai companies and ai advocates to divert focus on the real issue: that this tech is exploitative and it relies on ill-gotten data, of artists and the public, to train for profit models without our knowledge, or consent. Essentially theft 2/ They’ll squirm and try to divert in any way possible. So you’ll hear cries on why it’s actually ok for Ai media to be exploitative because “it’s Art!”. But if it is art, it’s stolen art.
“This is ableist” they’ll cry, while ignoring how this deeply affects disabled artists
Dec 20, 2022 • 13 tweets • 6 min read
1/ A reminder to Mr. Kelly (one of the founders of @wired), that a month ago he was explained in full detail how AI is harmful to artists+the public. Instead he ignored it all to continue the objectively untrue narrative that harm is imaginary. Read here:

2/ Important to note we learn about awful new things almost on a daily basis now. Like for example when @samdoesarts work was turned into ai models, and a company called civitai emailed him to mock him, just a couple weeks ago.
Dec 14, 2022 • 11 tweets • 4 min read
1/ Deeply embarrassing response to artists protesting for their rights from @ArtStationHQ.

This language is so contradictory. No artists got to decide or choose how THEIR work was used, when AI companies scraped their work from sites like Art Station (cont.) 2/ No artists got to decide or choose when AI users use their full names to generate imagery based on their work. (also sly move there Art Station, lumping AI users with your artist userbase...)

Furthermore by citing they don't want to become a "gatekeeper" (cont)
Dec 9, 2022 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Good morning!

Been talking to a lot a media lately and I’d like to boost two articles from reporters that are bringing much needed scrutiny to these new technologies!

This one from @SheenaGoodyear :

cbc.ca/radio/asithapp… And the next one from NBC news @morgan_sung !

Also a quick note: there’s a quote in there that I’d like to add a word to:

“But really what they’re bringing is *potential* forgery, art theft [and] copying to the masses.” 

This is because no court-

nbcnews.com/tech/internet/…
Dec 8, 2022 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
So Illustration and concept aren’t creative or original now?🥴🥴🥴 Bummed that thread was so tone deaf, especially for someone who considers themselves a peer. Dismissing + diminishing the real reason why artists are so mad (artist’s data utilized to train ai models for profit without our knowledge or consent and no true way get out) just sucks
Dec 7, 2022 • 8 tweets • 5 min read
1/ I am immensely disappointed with @Adobe on this decision and I hope decision makers there reconsider.

Adobe will allow contributors who submit AI generated content to get royalties (profit) while imposing unenforceable guidelines to what kind of AI is submitted. 2/ Furthermore the person they use as advertisement is the same individual who tried (and got denied) to copyright an Ai comic. This comic used Zendaya a lot as a prompt.

This same person is trying to appeal the Copyright’s office and their lawyer (cont.)
gizmodo.com/ai-art-shutter…
Dec 4, 2022 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
1/ This protection is in place because taking works that aren’t in public domain to profit from, economically affects the artists, big and small, who innovated in the first place.

There ONLY barriers to ethical creations is just time+knowledge. Stealing artworks is not the way 2/ btw Metropolis owns! Even Sargent is public domain which bruh. There’s top tier stuff in there.

Also pretending like taking artist’s work and data (for commercial purposes) without knowledge, consent is some kind a fight against the big corps is silly. I deeply get (cont.)
Dec 2, 2022 • 4 tweets • 4 min read
I wanted to share my favorite painting I did for #MarvelStudios #loki . This was long before the fantastic Owen Wilson was cast. This unused story moment depicts Loki in Pompeii doing whatever he wants, since he's in an apocalyptic event. And so he decides to murder a slaver. Image This key was a so fun to do. Love me some crowd scenes, some action, and some good ol' enviroments. Painting all back in 2019ish. Below are the preliminary sketches done for this key. #loki #MarvelStudios ImageImage
Dec 2, 2022 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
1/ The speed in which tech companies are stumbling upon themselves to use AI models that rely on the deceptively gotten IP data and private data of artists and the public is outstanding. Shame on you @Apple and @tim_cook

machinelearning.apple.com/research/stabl… 2/ A reminder to everyone how deeply effed this all is, in convenient 28 tweet form:
Nov 28, 2022 • 19 tweets • 5 min read
1/ After following the AI conversation for so long there is one argument that is made over and over, by well meaning and not so well meaning folk.

“AI is inspired by artists the same way humans are”.

As a professional artist I can safely say that's nonsense. Lets discuss 🧵 2/ First and foremost note that I am not a AI engineer, a neurologist, a scientist or a lawyer. I am however a professional artist with over 13 years of experience in film, games, etc, who teaches art via workshops all over the world. Creativity is certainly my wheelhouse ✌️
Nov 18, 2022 • 31 tweets • 65 min read
@kevin2kelly @glichfield @FlyingTrilobite @neilturkewitz @WIRED @sciam 1/ Mr. Kelly you are operating on assumptions. You claim that "AI has not harmed actual people", which is entirely speculation and not facts. So let's talk facts, and with the evidence you ask for. Let's begin, and please be patient, it's going to be a bit long 🧵👇: @kevin2kelly @glichfield @FlyingTrilobite @neilturkewitz @WIRED @sciam 2/ A quick intro to who am I. I am a professional artist of over 15 years working in the film industry (Marvel, HBO, Universal etc), and have been an advocate for my community, raising alarms on the unethical practices of AI companies, and how it harms our community.
Oct 5, 2022 • 13 tweets • 6 min read
1/ Today we learn the unexpected news that Kim Jung Gi has passed away. My heart is broken by this. I want to wish his family, Hyun jin Kim, the rest of the Super Ani crew and his friends my deepest condolences. 2/ I’ve had the immense pleasure to know Jung Gi throughout the years, and was looking forward to seeing him in a week. My mind has been thinking of all the joyful moments Jung Gi gave us throughout the years. I hope to share these precious memories with you all.
Oct 1, 2022 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
1/ You know how I know AI companies like Stability AI, knowingly and purposefully took and used visual artists and general public copyrighted data and private data without a care or concern (aside from seeing data on where they scraped their data from.)? 2/ Let me present to you the way Stability AI has handled their music model, Dance Diffusion.

They built their data sets entirely out of copyright free music and allowed musicians to opt in. Read their own admission : Image
Sep 13, 2022 • 18 tweets • 5 min read
1/ These are the words of Stability AI founder, @EMostaque, who also provided an initial grant for Midjourney.
This is dehumanizing language, intent on reducing human artists to mere "tools". It is a deeply offensive tactic, but there is purpose behind these words. Let's discuss- 2/ Your labor, your craft, your dedication, and your human experience has to be reduced to that of a tool. He needs your artistic existence and your contributions erased in order to make *his* tool more palatable, to ease the potential existential threat this is to human artists.