Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Neil Chilson ⤴️⬆️🆙📈 🚀 Profile picture
Neil Chilson ⤴️⬆️🆙📈 🚀
@neil_chilson
Lawyer, computer scientist & author of book 'Getting Out of Control.' Was chief technologist @FTC, now Head of AI Policy at Abundance Institute.
2 subscribers
Sep 16 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
Yesterday, I filed comments on the DOJ's request for information on state laws that are harming economic growth and interstate commerce. We highlighted the growing state AI law patchwork and offered fixes. 🧵 Image We break the many many state laws affecting AI into three broad categories:
1) laws that directly regulate AI model development
2) laws that affect AI model development
3) laws that regulate AI uses
These different categories present different challenges and solutions. 2/
Sep 10 • 25 tweets • 5 min read
The AI Action Plan was received with near-universal praise for its optimism, pragmatic ambition, and recognition of the need for US AI dominance. But there has been a steady drumbeat of AI pessimism from degrowthers of all political stripes. Excite to have the solid Plan back in the news with today’s hearing.Image Watch it here: commerce.senate.gov
May 20 • 12 tweets • 6 min read
The proposed moratorium to slow the avalanche of state AI bills (1000+ in 2025) has really spun up folks, but they aren't making great arguments.

Take a new letter by @demandprogress (irony!) and other progressive orgs. It gets basic facts wrong and misrepresents research. 🧵 Image 1/ This characterization of the moratorium is wrong: it isn't a total immunity because states can still enforce any general purpose law against AI system providers, including civil rights laws and consumer protection laws. In fact, the moratorium specifically says that. Image
May 14 • 14 tweets • 2 min read
The flood of state AI regulatory proposals threatens to drown the U.S. AI industry. A late-night @HouseCommerce markup is about to discuss a moratorium on state AI regulation. We submitted a letter from twelve state-based organizations supporting this important provision. A 🧵 Image
Image 2/ Problem: Over 1,000 AI bills proposed in the last 4 months, most in state legislatures. This regulatory tidal wave risks drowning innovation in confusion and conflicting rules.
Jan 24 • 13 tweets • 4 min read
1/ Big shift in AI policy: This week Trump repealed Biden’s AI Executive Order and introduced his own Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence to shift direction. BUT which Biden-era AI actions should Trump focus on? 🧵Image 2/ Trump’s new executive order underscores a commitment to cutting red tape and fostering innovation. But Biden’s AI policy isn’t completely gone—it lingers in ongoing agency initiatives. Sect 5 of the EO attempts to clean up these leftovers: Image
Apr 9, 2024 • 21 tweets • 8 min read
There is a new AI proposal from @aipolicyus. It should SLAM the Overton window shut.
It's the most authoritarian piece of tech legislation I've read in my entire policy career (and I've read some doozies).
Everything in the bill is aimed at creating a democratically unaccountable government jobs program for doomers who want to regulate math.
I mean, just check out this section, which in a mere six paragraphs attempts to route around any potential checks from Congress or the courts.Image @aipolicyus The amount of bureaucracy this bill would unleash is staggering. The bill attempts to streamline some of this by providing a "Fast track" but the main takeaway of this is how broad the types of software that are likely to be subject to regulation are: Image
Nov 28, 2023 • 10 tweets • 4 min read
“More libertarian,” a DALL-E sequence.

“Create an image of a prototypical Washington, DC libertarian.” Creating an image of a prototypical Washington, D.C. libertarian involves combining elements that are often associated with libertarian philosophy and the professional style of Washington, D.C. Imagine an individual standing in front of a recognizable Washington, D.C. landmark, like the Capitol Building. The person is dressed in business attire, which reflects the professional environment of the city. They could be holding a book or a pamphlet that symbolizes libertarian ideology, such as a copy of "The Road to Serfdom" by F.A. Hayek or "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand. The ... More libertarian To emphasize the libertarian aspect more, the individual could be depicted with symbols or items that are strongly associated with libertarian values. For instance, they could be holding a sign or wearing a badge with a well-known libertarian symbol, like the Gadsden flag ("Don't Tread on Me") or a porcupine, which is often used to represent the Libertarian Party in the United States. Additionally, they could be engaged in an activity that reflects libertarian principles, such as peacefully protesting for individual freedoms or engaging in a discussion about free-market economics....
Jun 6, 2023 • 8 tweets • 3 min read
This @FT op ed by Marietje Schaake pairs well with my op ed with @ckoopman. Keep Congress AND tech CEOs away from AI regulation. 😏

Not joking. A 🧵 ImageImage Schaake is correct that CEOs have an interest in shaping regulation to benefit their business model. But legislation isn't the only way regulatory capture happens. All prescriptive regulation inheriently favors incumbents b/c it is written for the present. 2/
Jan 26, 2023 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
guy who is afraid we'll solve climate change with technology instead of upending capitalism. the guy is real
Oct 28, 2022 • 12 tweets • 4 min read
Starting ASAP, @elonmusk should require Twitter staff to record all requests for content moderation or user discipline from governments or government officials.

This info should be publicly released in periodic reports like the ones platforms do for law enforcement requests. All other platforms should do this, too, btw.
Aug 6, 2021 • 14 tweets • 4 min read
So I've been stewing on the swirl around the @Facebook / NYU's Ad Observatory / @FTC issue for a few days, and it just keeps getting further under my skin. This latest news triggers me. A THREAD. washingtonpost.com/technology/202… As prelude, I am a strong supporter of independent research on social media platforms. My org has funding at seven figures+ such research. I support even adversarial research and would support CFAA reform to enable it. (Reach out if you want to collaborate there!)
Jan 12, 2021 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
The Parler antitrust case against Amazon AWS is weaker than a wet noodle.

Yes, I am going to beat this dead horse. THREAD. /1 It's not surprising to see Parler attempting to use antitrust laws to force Big Tech back into doing business with them. Antitrust seems like everyone's fix-it tool these days. But Parler wields this tool particularly ineptly. /2
Dec 9, 2020 • 8 tweets • 3 min read
Ok, I've read the FTC complaint against Facebook and have a few initial thoughts. A quick thread. At first, I was like "Wow, this court filing is so well written and the grammar is tight and it's filed in the right court!"

And then I realized I've been reading too many Trump team election appeals so my standards might be low.
Dec 9, 2020 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
You may be asking, "Wait, the FTC vote on the Facebook case was 3-2, but where are the dissents?" I am! Well, there are two possibilities. SHORT THREAD. 1) Sometimes dissenters don't post out of courtesy to staffe. That's more common in low-stakes cases. Seems unlikely here.
Oct 20, 2020 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
The DOJ complaint against Google is out. Here is a thread with a few thoughts i had while reading it. courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… As with all complaints, first read alleged violations (p55) to learn what the DOJ thinks actually matters, legally.

*Not* in the allegations: search bias, acquisitions, Play store fees, scraping, self-preferencing, or display ads. Many GOOG enemies prob. feeling left out today.
Jun 24, 2020 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
"How in 20 years did we go from the promise of the Internet to democratize access to knowledge ... to this litany of daily horrors," Hany Farid says @EnergyCommerce.

A theory: the internet is disrupting the shit out of powerful social gatekeepers & they are fighting back. Here's some evidence for that theory from my paper with @CaseyMattox_ about online free speech and antitrust: knightcolumbia.org/content/the-br…
Feb 18, 2020 • 16 tweets • 4 min read
I'm on a panel at tomorrow's DOJ Workshop on Section 230. Here is my submission. A few highlights, including a story about my amazing 7-month-old daughter: 1/16 techliberation.com/2020/02/18/my-… First, Section 230 is a focused law that embodies a clear and conservative principle of individual responsibility. In the simplest terms, it says that individuals are responsible for their actions online, not the tools they use. 2/
Jan 21, 2020 • 13 tweets • 4 min read
This short essay has sparked a THREAD. One of the most formative books of my preteen years was James Gleick's "Chaos," about fractals, nonlinear systems, and other complex yet orderly systems. 1/? Another was "Metamagical Themas" by Douglas Hofstadter, which talked about memes, strange attractors, self-referential systems, and complexity theory (among many other things). 2/ amazon.com/Metamagical-Th…
Sep 23, 2019 • 20 tweets • 7 min read
Attending the “Social Media and the First Amendment” discussion hosted by the Knight First Amendment Institute and @FreeSpeechGU. Thus far, lots of negativity about social media. Scams, misinformation, Donald Trump. Don’t any of these people use social media to, you know, keep in touch with friends and family?
Jul 24, 2019 • 40 tweets • 8 min read
I'm digging in to the Facebook complaint and order. My real time thoughts. Thread. First, a little background on how I like to read such things. I read the complaint first. All of the background one should read a context. This section usually seeks to paint the defendant in the worst possible light, so I expect a lot of pejorative language here. BUT...
Jul 2, 2019 • 10 tweets • 6 min read
THREAD: So #USWMNT has just beat England in #WWC19! 🇺🇸

Last weekend @FTC Commissioner Christine Wilson also invaded England with a great speech to @BIICL on what U.S. history can teach us about our approach to big tech. Read it! A few highlights. 1/n ftc.gov/system/files/d… She argues we can learn a lot from past attempts to regulate the dominant industries of the time - specifically the failures of the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Civil Aeronautics Board. (Hey look, "non-discrimination" requirements. Paging @HalSinger!) 2/n