How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/EU2022_CZ/status/1602444958849441793First let's clarify figures. Most have been fooled by @EU_Commission's talk of 65% funds suspension or @EUCouncil's agreement today on 55%. But that was 65% (or 55%) of only 3 specific funds, NOT 65% or 55% of the total. Focus on the denominator my friends.
https://twitter.com/theeconomist/status/1598753640478556162Article rightly points out this is illegal under EU law. So why hasn’t Commission taken action?…..
https://twitter.com/POLITICOEurope/status/1597840229100294146A mixed bag. Comm recommending fund suspension to Council is good news. Not as big of a suspension as was legally warranted, but still good news and more than I expected from appeasement oriented Commission. So bravo to @vonderleyen & @JHahnEU for showing some resolve… however-
https://twitter.com/mij_europe/status/1590254234804490240First, the supposed “reforms” being proposed by Orban have already been revealed to be a total sham in their entirety. This is well documented. See for instance work by @KimLaneLaw @BardPetra & Mészaros in @Verfassungsblog
https://twitter.com/verfassungsblog/status/1589988277913894912
https://twitter.com/shonamurray_/status/15703577633933312012. First important to know that ratings bodies like @vdeminstitute & @freedomhouse already declared Hungary was no longer a democracy some years ago. politico.com/news/2020/05/0…
https://twitter.com/daniel_freund/status/15113411511518658762. Commission could have triggered this mechanism already a year ago, but chose to procrastinate & keep handing Orbán tens of millions of €s that helped finance his kleptocracy & helped him win Sunday's grossly unfair election, but better late than never.
https://twitter.com/rdanielkelemen/status/1511304372986261505?s=20&t=Nk5szx8eYXMofrpvJW7kgQ
https://twitter.com/rdanielkelemen/status/1510255998841364488
https://twitter.com/rdanielkelemen/status/1509482375130103809?s=20&t=9Oij_VCwv8UxTGznoO7vwA
https://twitter.com/panyiszabolcs/status/15094312257814691892.
https://twitter.com/daniel_freund/status/1509869575361515522
https://twitter.com/mij_europe/status/14938513914078330982. You write, “senior officials in Brussels’ other institutions argue that its scope is in fact much narrower, that it is a tool designed to protect EU taxpayers from fraud. Thus, if it’s possible to prove EU budget funds have been misused, they can be suspended.”
https://twitter.com/daniel_freund/status/14932848860939100182. @EU_Commission's decision to delay application of Regulation until after @EUCourtPress rules on annulment actions this week was unlawful. The filing of an annulment action does not suspend the applicability of a Regulation. But Commission agreed to delay on political grounds
https://twitter.com/EUCourtPress/status/14920831711350374644) @vonderleyen & @JHahnEU may still try to stall, claiming Comm needs to digest ruling, finalize “guidelines” (which were not required in first place) etc,
https://twitter.com/zosiawanat/status/14616394706551889932. Sending such letters is not a required step in the regulation. @EU_Commission could have triggered the regulation with a notification immediately after it came into force
https://twitter.com/rdanielkelemen/status/1450536806269788160
https://twitter.com/Mij_Europe/status/14537546753968455702. I hope I'm wrong but if- as it seems she will from statement in @Mij_Europe tweet- the appeaser @vonderleyen approves release of Covid recovery funds she will be breaking the law as @DanielSarmiento @ProfPech @JMorijn & @alemannoEU explain here: thegoodlobby.eu/2021/08/30/6-r…
https://twitter.com/alemannoEU/status/14505014632355102722. First, the Commission would PRETEND to trigger the rule of law conditionality regulation without actually doing so. How? By sending a request for info to Hungary and Poland under Art 6(4) of the reg & pretending this counts as triggering the regulation eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/…