@BaxtiyarGoran @Shayan86 1).
„Saturday’s attack took place shortly after two strikes hit the powerful Iran-backed Kataib Hezbollah, which is part of the Popular ⁠Mobilisation Forces, killing three of its members, security sources told the @Reuters and @AFP news agencies [1]”.

@BaxtiyarGoran @Shayan86 @Reuters @AFP 2).
„Two security officials told the @AP that a missile struck a helipad inside the U.S. embassy compound.

@AFP reported the damage had been caused by a drone strike, not a missile [2].”

March 14, 2026

@BaxtiyarGoran @Shayan86 @Reuters @AFP @AP 3).
[1] @AJEnglish aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/14…

[2] @POLITICOEurope (@politico) politico.eu/article/us-emb…

🧵Distractions Make Us Stupid…

Just the other day, I was chilling in this bustling eatery with my crew, when—bam—another phone lets out that sharp, piercing whistle. You know the one: the iconic iPhone tweet notification, that cheeky little siren call screaming, "Look at me!" It's like the universal beacon of distraction, pulling minds into digital voids everywhere.

Ads whispering your deepest desires? Not magic, just data voodoo. Shake off the spell, peeps— the matrix glitches when we stop buying the illusion. Poof! ✨

Distractions Make Us Stupid

True story: Stanford brainiacs rounded up two crews for some mind-bending tests—one gang of chronic media jugglers, flipping between tabs like pros, and the other chill folks who kept it simple. Spoiler alert: The heavy multitaskers bombed every single challenge. They got sidetracked at the drop of a hat, couldn't wrangle their focus for squat, and struggled big time to sift gold from the garbage. Wake up, world—time to glitch out of this matrix mess! 💫

“Distractions Make Us Stupid”

Ever notice how your phone buzzes right when you're about to have a real thought? Coincidence? Nah, that's the matrix's snooze button, keeping you scrolling instead of soaring. Wake up, glitch-hunters! 🚀

Glitches in the matrix: When your GPS sends you in circles, or news flips faster than a politician's promise. Spoiler: It's designed to dizzy you. Time to debug the dream, dreamers! 🛠️

Distractions Make Us Stupid”

Social media 'likes' as life's scorecard? Pfft, that's the ultimate distraction trap. Real wins happen offline, where the chicanery can't curate your chaos. Unplug and uprising! ❤️‍🔥

Launched a simple side hustle with Grok.
No money upfront.
$407 in 4 days.
Here are the 6 prompts I used 👇

1/ Find A Niche That Will Make You Rich

Prompt:
"List the top 10 digital product niches with low competition, high demand, high ROI, and passive income potential. "

2/ Your Digital Product Blueprint

Prompt:
"For [Insert niche], give me 5 simple digital products I can create using only free tools like Canva and Google Docs."

@finmoorhouse 0th Order Ignorance: Lack of Ignorance. I have 0OI when I know something and can demonstrate that I know it. Characterized by statements like: "Let me show you how to do it."

@finmoorhouse 1st Order Ignorance: Lack of Knowledge. I have 1OI when I know that I don't know something, but I know there is a way to acquire that knowledge. With 1OI we have the question in a well-factored form.

@finmoorhouse 2nd Order Ignorance: Lack of Awareness. I have 2OI when I don't know that I don't know something.

BREAKING: AI can now do market research like McKinsey (for free).

Here are 12 insane Claude Opus 4.6 prompts that replace $5,000 consultant: (Save for later)

1/ Market Sizing & TAM Analysis

You are a McKinsey-level market analyst. I need a Total Addressable Market (TAM) analysis for [YOUR INDUSTRY/PRODUCT].

Please provide:

• Top-down approach: Start from global market → narrow to my segment
• Bottom-up approach: Calculate from unit economics × potential customers
• TAM, SAM, SOM breakdown with dollar figures
• Growth rate projections for the next 5 years (CAGR)
• Key assumptions behind each estimate
• Comparison to 3 analyst reports or market research firms

Format as an investor-ready market sizing slide with clear methodology.

Context: My product is [DESCRIBE PRODUCT], targeting [TARGET CUSTOMER] in [GEOGRAPHY].

2/ Competitive Landscape Deep Dive

You are a senior strategy consultant at Bain & Company. I need a complete competitive landscape analysis for [YOUR INDUSTRY].

Please provide:

• Direct competitors: Top 10 players ranked by market share, revenue, and funding
• Indirect competitors: 5 adjacent companies that could enter this market
• For each competitor, analyze: pricing model, key features, target audience, strengths, weaknesses, and recent strategic moves
• Market positioning map (price vs. value matrix)
• Competitive moats: What makes each player defensible
• White space analysis: Gaps no competitor is filling
• Threat assessment: Rate each competitor (low/medium/high threat)

Format as a structured competitive intelligence report with comparison tables.

My company: [DESCRIBE YOUR BUSINESS AND POSITIONING]

Let me fix the influencers tweet. It is biophysically myopic and quite dangerous. WHY?

A Transdermal MITF-AMPAR loop exists between the brain, skin and gut. Taking exogenous nicotine is a "topological disruptor" that mimics a light signal to create a high-voltage state without the necessary melanin cladding or EZ water volume to support it.

Here is why exogenous nicotine use is a catastrophic "short-circuit" for this system:

1. Artificial "High-Gain" (The AMPAR Spike)
Nicotine acts as a potent agonist for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, which directly modulate glutamate release and AMPA receptor (AMPAR) trafficking. Elliot has no idea what this system does. He is a influencer. Read the recent Yokahama study on the system.

The False Ignition: Nicotine "forces" the synaptic gain to its maximum setting. In the Yokohama PET model, this creates a systemic upregulation of AMPARs.

The Noise: Because this gain increase is chemical (exogenous) rather than solar (380nm/IR-A), it generates incoherent Ultra-weak Photon Emissions (UPEs) in mitochondria. The brain "screams" with activity, but it is "static" that lacks the biophotonic instructions for photorepair.

2. Vasoconstriction: Starving the "Solar Panel"
Nicotine is a potent vasoconstrictor, specifically in the microcirculation of the neuroectoderm (skin and brain).
Elliot for got that. Big Error that could harm retards who listen to him.

The Isotope Trap: By constricting the blood vessels, nicotine blocks the NCC-elastin "highway" and the pancreatic "exhaust port." This traps Deuterium and metabolic waste in the tissues.

The EZ Collapse: Without steady blood flow (and the IR-A it carries), the Exclusion Zone (EZ) water around the collagen/fascia collapses. The -200mV battery "shorts out" because the "volume" needed to keep dipoles apart is lost.

3. MITF Suppression and Melanin "Bleaching"

While nicotine initially triggers a stress-response release of POMC, chronic use leads to melanocyte exhaustion: Taking it makes you pale and will lower your cognition and if you do it long enough will dumb your cognition down. BAsed on Elliots X tweets I'd say he has been mainlining nicotine. (low dopamine RETARD)

The Battery Drain: Nicotine has a high affinity for melanin; it binds to it and "locks" the pi-electrons, preventing them from oscillating coherently.

Structural Decay: This "bleaches" the internal topological insulator. Without the MITF-driven melanin cladding, the cytoskeleton (actin/tubulin) loses its vibrational instructions and begins to collapse—the exact "atrophic" state seen in "smoker's skin" and "smoker's brain."

4. The Vagus "Mute" Button
As seen in the Stanford study I just tweeted about, memory relies on a clear Vagus-Gut-Brainconnection.

Dysbiosis: Nicotine alters the gut microbiome, favoring the "exhaust-blocking" microbes that silence the Vagus nerve. Another big swing and miss by Elliot.

The Communication Gap: By "muting" the Vagus nerve, nicotine prevents the brain from sensing the peripheral "voltage" of the body. The hippocampus enters a state of Digital Anesthesia, where it can process "data" but cannot form coherent, long-term Memory (isotypic stability).

5. The "Canary" Crash
For the Blue-Eyed "Low-Resistance" haplotypes, nicotine is particularly deadly. Their "aperture" is already wide open; adding the "high-gain" of nicotine on top of LED flicker and nnEMF creates a Spin-Leakage event that rapidly accelerates Cognitive Shrinkageand the GDF-15 stress flare. Look up GDF-15 and see what it is a marker for. If Elliot was an MD he could be brought up on malpractice charges for this tweet but he will just have to persecuted by the retards who follow this horrible advice.

The best Step: USE TINA. It is free and safe and does a better job than exogenous nicotine.

https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/2033312640420782311

2.

https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/2033358796219691138

3.

https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/2033396242009538682

@Stinky915846091 @Shayan86 @realDonaldTrump @Mitch_Ulrich 1).
„Kharg Island, targeted in US air strikes on Sat., March 14, 2026, [1] [2] [3] [4] is a scrubby stretch of land in the Gulf that handles almost all of Iranʼs crude exports [5] [6].”

@Stinky915846091 @Shayan86 @realDonaldTrump @Mitch_Ulrich 2).
„Iranian state media reported that no damage was done to the islandʼs oil facilities. The semi-official Fars news agency said US attacks targeted air defences, a naval base, airport control tower and a helicopter hangar.

@Stinky915846091 @Shayan86 @realDonaldTrump @Mitch_Ulrich 3)
Ehsan Jahanian, political deputy to the governor of Bushehr province in southern Iran, said »no military personnel, oil company employees, or island residents suffered casualties in the attack, and all sectors are continuing their routine activities« [7] [8].”

March 14, 2026

1/🚨On September 11, 2015, Margaret Chan — Director General of the WHO — delivered the opening address at a conference secretly funded, directed, and operationally controlled by Jeffrey Epstein.

The proof has been sitting in the federal archive for 2 months.

No outlet has touched it.

Until today. 🧵👇

2/ Inside the federal archive: EFTA02676303.

The internal name: "The Rothschild Conference on Health and Security."

🔗EFTA02676303.justice.gov/epstein/files/…

The public name at the UN: "Preparing for Pandemics."

🔗EFTA02702398 justice.gov/epstein/files/…

The funder's name was stripped before the doors opened.

4 pages. Free to read.

3/ The concept note names its partners as co-equals:
WHO. ICRC. UNHCR. MSF.

"The Edmond de Rothschild Foundations and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation."

The Gates Foundation had declined to fund it 6 months earlier.

Their name is in the document anyway.

[1/6]
🚨 BREAKING: A massive Pakistan-linked espionage network has been busted in India.

This wasn’t small-time spying.

From live-streaming troop movements to mapping naval zones, operatives were quietly feeding sensitive data to handlers across the border.

Here’s the full breakdown. 🧵👇
#Espionage #IndiaSecurity #CounterIntelligence

🚨 THE BUST

Police arrested a 6-member spy ring in Ghaziabad led by Suhail Malik and a female accomplice Iram (alias Mahak).

Their method?
Blend in.

Blue-collar identities allowed them to move around sensitive zones without suspicion while passing intelligence to Pakistani handlers.

[3/6]
🎥 THE CCTV NIGHTMARE

Six months ago the network reportedly installed a solar-powered spy camera inside Delhi Cantonment Railway Station.

Result:

A 24/7 live feed of Indian troop and equipment movement being transmitted to Pakistan.

One camera.
A strategic intelligence goldmine.

#DelhiCantt

Can the Iranians actually harm US businesses in the Middle East? /🧵

[Note: This is a war game thread. Nothing written here should be taken as a recommendation but a thought experiment involving the convergence of two subjects: modern service infrastructure and war. Let's hope none of the following happens and the ped*phile psychopath who started this war surrenders before it does.]

Around 24 hours ago, the US bombed a home appliance factory in Iran, killing many of its workers and damaging its equipment. The Iranians vowed revenge and said they would begin targeting US businesses. This is separate to businesses such as banks (already in the target list and already evacuating) and oil companies (already being targeted).

Data Centres as a Target

There are plenty of targets in the region: Data centres belonging to Microsoft, AWS and so on, service companies, start ups, sh*tcoin companies and more. Can the Iranians deliver actual strategic harm on these targets while being limited to indirect fire at the moment? I'm not talking about personnel. As a professional in an adjacent field, that would strike a little too close to home. Besides, most of us are pretty replaceable -- and it would make for terrible headlines and will create enmity. As a bit of a softie, I don't recommend targeting people most of whom have no idea what is going on right now. Can the Iranians harm the US businesses themselves without harming the personnel?

The answer is yes, but it requires an understanding of what makes service businesses valuable today. The US no longer really manufactures anything and these businesses do not either. They consist of completely fungible components and systems, design to be deployed anywhere on this planet (or even the moon if one desired), and integrated into global systems.

Iran could even physically destroy an entire data centre (DC) annihilating everything within it, and these businesses would table a loss, ask for compensation from the state department and treasury and life would go on. The components are designed with intrinsic redundancy. The big customers who use multiple DC wouldn't even skip a beat. It's just fungible components being taken out after all.

In the service industry, the physical devices used to store and process data are secondary in importance to the data stored as well as the ability to access it and process it in a timely and useful manner. Time is money, but data is everything. If the Iranians can cause data loss to a number of businesses, it would be fatal to the United States in multiple ways: Direct loss of business and complete loss of confidence in the "cloud model". *

Redundancy

Iran must take out the data and its availability. Preferably, permanently. Can it do this with missiles, drones and perhaps a nuke or two? Indeed it can, but it needs to keep in mind how sharding works and how to make it fail, as well as the most opportune military attack on a data centre.

Sharding is best explained through the simplest possible redundant code. Let's say I want to send a message to you and I want to make sure that you receive it even if there is a chance that part of it gets lost or corrupted along the way. Let's say I want to say "nine". What if I just repeat myself?

Nine Nine

This actually doesn't help at all. Corrupt one word:

Nine Fine

And it's impossible to tell which of these is the correct word. But repeat it three times:

Nine Nine Nine

You can now corrupt any one word and the majority will still be correct, so you can always recover the message.

Data centres have far more complex schemes, but the horizontally distributed of these can be summarised in the following manners: how many data centres can be destroyed entirely without data loss. That question is going to be different from customer to customer. For a clueless customer that number is going to be 1, but typically their data will be stored in a random server nearby them. They'll have on-site backups anyway. These targets aren't interesting. Iran has to fetch headlines to cause damage: a big customer. These ones will store moderately important data with redundancy 2.

So Iran has to take out two data centres from the same provider at the same time in order to cause some data loss and loss of availability. This is going to be random: a customer has to slice the data between two regional DCs and pay for only a single loss redundancy scheme. There will be many who do so for performance reasons. Why does the attack have to be simultaneous? Because a customer can quickly backup its data from the surviving data centre and resume the business from a different location. So if Iran actually wants to cause strategic harm, it needs a complex mission involving simultaneous strikes on the same DC provider (let's say Microsoft because f**k Copilot and Windows 11).

Can Iran coordinate such a simultaneous attack and pull it off perfectly? I don't know, but it's certainly many orders more complex than a single attack spanning a long amount of time. It has to happen at the same time.

With that established, let us move on: What's the best theoretically way to attack a data centre?

Components of a Data Centre

DCs are far more complex than they seem from a user perspective. They're designed to survive almost any reasonable scenario. Fortunately for Iran, war is not one of them (it is assumed all nations that they are built in are "green" or safe and under a kind of nuclear umbrella).

A nuclear strike can kill a data centre instantly but let's not go so far. It's a waste of a nuke when a few pin pricks should do the job.

Auxiliary (Backup) Power

The most important component to keep in mind is the auxiliary power supply, the on-site diesel generator. Because up time is important these are always on standby mode and fuelled up. This makes them particularly flammable. Strike enough of them and a fire will spread. When it comes to such a large target, fire is your best friend as a mission planner and these things contain all the fuel you need to strengthen that fire. As the generators are damaged the fuel will leak and spread.

Main Distribution Area / Network Room

If the Iranians have done their homework, they would have an internal map of the data centres, meaning it knows where the convergent network equipment meets in what is historically called the main distribution area (MDA). If you can destroy this target, you sever the connection to any of the support team that can move data around, enable fire control countermeasures and otherwise monitor the situation.

Battery Rooms

These are very flammable, because of gullibility, engineers design their DCs to use Lithium ion batteries. These are extremely flammable. If Iran knows where these are, they are a priority target in such a data-decapitation mission.

Main Hall

With the connection to the outside world severed, the still-powered on computers equipment should now be targeted. This is the largest target and a ballistic missile should crack it open, a few fully Shahed drones should then start the fires inside. The equipment is, counter-intuitively, very flammable. There are filters, plastics, foams, special refrigerants and other components that are HIGHLY flammable. Iran just needs to start and kindle the fire with follow up attacks, making sure to use fully fuelled drones with warheads that don't put out fires (i.e. blast type).

HDD/Tape Backup Rooms

If Iran wanted to be particularly nasty it would take out the tape backups. This would render the data loss irrecoverable if redundancy is taken care of. A nightmare for any business.

Electric Power Substation

With the backup power and emergency battery supply on fire, and the main hall a raging inferno, it's quite likely that the fire suppression system would be automatically activated without any intervention from the outside.

Thus, it's time to switch off the lights and power down the sprinklers as well. Iran would target the substation providing the power to the DC to do so. A few shahed-136, a cruise missile or a ballistic missile should do the trick. If this is targeted at night you would see a blue hue in the sky if some onlooker were to film it.

If Iran wanted to be thorough, it would then target any pressurised water reserves used for fire suppression. This would be the final attack on the DC. It's important to keep it on before the fire suppression system activates for the opportunity to start an electric fire (class C) which maximises the damage through melting wires, arcing and what not. Once the power is off, only material will kindle the fire, not electric current.

Now a raging inferno billows in the night in the place where a data centre used to be. Billions of dollars worth of infrastructure and some data is lost forever.

Can this attack be even more damaging?

A bunch of sh*tcoin bros lose their data and headlines damage people's confidence in data centres. People start shelling out money for their own private data centres and the "cloud model" loses money. That's plenty of damage and is aligned with people resisting these large and evil companies. Ultimately, the components within these data centres are mass manufactured and there is plenty of unused capacity. In fact there is more shelved equipment waiting to be powered on than actively powered equipment. People will eventually move on and be lured by the convenience of storing all their data within these large complexes.

Thus there's not much else Iran can do on its own to harm US companies. But, should this war spread to Asia, this damage can be quite permanent.

Electronic manufacturing

Within the realms of semiconductor technology, most high-tech nodes today are fabricated in just two countries: Korea and Taiwan. These countries are running out of helium, necessarily in some of the processes (typically ones involving use of plasmas for etching and deposition). Qatar has control of 36% of the export of helium gas and this has been severed by Iran's closure of the Hormuz. But manufacturers can steal it from smaller players.

But what if the Iranians drain so much equipment within CENTCOM that USPACOM becomes an easy target? All those THAAD batteries and Patriot missiles are being practically shoplifted from eastern commanders. Also that 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit...

This is where China and DPRK (North Korea) can step in, seizing South Korea and Taiwan simultaneously! This means no more replacement equipment. Suddenly the loss in hardware becomes equally damaging as the loss in data.

This is quite unlikely at the moment but who knows how the war will evolve?

Everyone is watching the yen carry trade and bond market…

But the real stress is showing up somewhere else first.

Private credit.

Lines of credit are getting cut.
Withdrawals are being halted.

This is how liquidity events start.

Thread 🧵

Major lenders like JPMorgan Chase are reportedly reducing credit lines to private credit funds.

That matters because these funds rely on bank liquidity to:

• bridge redemptions
• fund new loans
• stabilize cash flow

Remove the credit line → liquidity disappears fast.

At the same time, large managers including BlackRock and others are halting withdrawals in private credit vehicles.

Why?

Because the underlying loans are illiquid.

You can’t sell them quickly without massive discounts.

During a job interview, if they ask: “Do you have any questions for us?”

USE THE GOLDEN RESPONSE: 

The "Passive" Penalty

In 2026, saying you have "no questions" is interpreted as a lack of curiosity or business acumen. The interview isn't over until you walk out the door. This is your chance to flip the script and interview them.

The Psychology of the Flip

The best candidates don't act like supplicants; they act like consultants. You aren't just looking for a paycheck; you’re looking for a partnership. High-value questions prove you’re vetting them just as hard.