🚨🧵The Fauci Files: Part 1

"We do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible."

That sentence, published in Nature Medicine in March 2020, did more to shape the public conversation about COVID's origin than almost any other single line written during the pandemic. It came from five scientists (Kristian Andersen, Andrew Rambaut, Ian Lipkin, Edward Holmes, and Robert Garry) in a paper called "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2." For years, questioning it publicly got you labeled a conspiracy theorist.

Thanks to roughly 3,000 pages released by Sen. Rand Paul's Senate committee across 2025 and 2026 (Fauci's personal diary, the authors' own private Slack messages, and Ralph Baric's sworn 2026 testimony) we now have a detailed record of what those same scientists, and the government's top infectious-disease official, were saying about lab origin in private.

Guess what? It doesn't match the sentence above.

Here's the timeline, in their own words.

January 31, 2020. Jeremy Farrar of the Wellcome Trust urgently connects Anthony Fauci with virologist Kristian Andersen. That night, Fauci emails Farrar relaying Andersen's alarm about the furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein — and tells him that if the concern holds up after review, it should be reported "to the appropriate authorities... the FBI... MI5."

February 1, 2020. Fauci's own diary records the call convened the next day, with Andersen, Eddie Holmes, Ron Fouchier, Farrar, Robert Garry, and others on the line:

"The people on the phone felt that the mutations around the furin cleavage site of the spike protein could not have occurred naturally since it would require an evolutionary 'jump' that they found nowhere in bat isolates. They bring up the possibility that this could have been deliberately inserted." Fauci records the room as roughly split down the middle with about half the scientists thought a constructed or lab origin was plausible, half thought natural.

Weeks later, the same core group of scientists published Proximal Origin, stating flatly that they did not believe any lab-based scenario was plausible. No language about being "roughly split." Settled.

1/ Before Tony’s diary, there was the prequel. I'm releasing Fauci's own 465-page historical record of events from 2001 to 2015 — his personal account of building the federal biodefense complex and the classified access that came with it.

2/ In 2001, a scientist told Fauci the anthrax mailed to Sen. Daschle was better-engineered than any bioweapon the U.S. had ever built. Days later, the head of Homeland Security said publicly it was "garden-variety." Fauci wrote that someone was "masking the truth."

3/ When then Vice President Cheney asked what powers he needed to run biodefense at NIAID, Fauci asked for sole-source contracting, rapid grants, and "DARPA-like powers."

Part of the case: "CIA intelligence that Iraq has smallpox" — the basis for plans to vaccinate 10 million Americans.

WRN Wales has today raised a serious safeguarding concern with @FAWales and the Chief Executive @NoelMooney13 after being alerted to the presence of a male playing in several Welsh women’s football and walking football teams.
1/8

We were approached by a spectator at a recent match who told us that a male aged in his 50s or 60s was playing on a team that included teenage girls and young women.
And it wasn't the first occasion either .....
2/

We have raised this as a safeguarding concern with @FAWales, @sportwales and @WelshGovernment
because:

🚨There is a significantly increased risk of injury to women and girls playing against a male opponent.

3/

🚨During my talk with @JeremyDBoreing, I told him when I was a 911 truther, I eventually saw videos that debunked some of my beliefs, the ones in this thread.

This shows what initiated the collapse of each tower: weakened trusses pulling outer columns inward until they snapped.

Another fact I mentioned is that the Twin Towers did not actually collapse at freefall speed, unlike the debris, which did.

This video times the collapse of each tower, and you can see this fact is undeniable. If they were demolished, they would've fallen even faster.

Finally, Building 7.

It wasn't hit by a plane, but it was hit by tons of falling debris.

Truthers never show the full video of the collapse: the penthouse collapses first, several seconds before the rest of the building, after being on fire for EIGHT hours.

The FT reports Burnham will cut the welfare bill by tailoring school curricula to local employer needs.
Most people read that as an education story.
But, this is undeniably a free zone story.
My Substack article goes much deeper than the FT piece. Please read, share, and subscribe.

A thread. 🧵open.substack.com/pub/europeanpo…

The UK already has more than 20 University Enterprise Zones, explicitly designed to align university research, curriculum, and graduate output to corporate partners inside zone boundaries.
The Manchester Baccalaureate does the same at secondary school level.
Burnham's welfare reform adds benefits conditionality at the bottom.

The pipeline in full:
Age 14: school curriculum tailored to zone employer needs; University: research and graduate output aligned to zone corporate partners.
Welfare: benefits conditional on taking opportunities those employers define, Jobcentres: devolved to the mayors who oversee the zones.
This is not education policy. It is managed human capital production for the zone economy, publicly financed and privately directed.

Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "The United Nations is choosing a new secretary general to replace António Guterres.

There are 6 candidates. I have reviewed the records, the statements about world issues and UN problems, of all six.
1)

@rlefraim Four women and two men are seeking the job.

One of the strongest candidates on the left is former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet, a Socialist, who supported Chavez and Maduro in Venezuela, Castro in Cuba, and Lula in Brazil, and in the UN organization,
2)

@rlefraim she authored a report condemning Israel for Israeli settlement activity, falsely claiming they violated international law, though they do not, indicating a bias or at best being ignorant about international law. She 100% approves of continuing the US as it is.
3)

1/ Gas prices were lowered, restrictions were lifted, and queues vanished temporarily for a visit to Irkutsk by Vladimir Putin. Russians are calling it a modern-day Potemkin village, but it appears to show how hard Putin's underlings try to hide Russia's problems from him. ⬇️

2/ The original Potemkin villages were said to be fakeside river towns built by Grigory Potemkin to fool Empress Catherine the Great in 1787 (though it appears to be a myth). However, it was an attempt to fake success, rather than hiding failure from a leader inhabiting a bubble.

3/ The Russian Telegram channel 'Honesty, and that's final' reports on unusual events that happened during Putin's recent visit to the western Siberian city of Irkutsk:

And the Pradhan paper is mentioned in the Fauci diary.

I cried when I read the paper and said out loud in tears: "They made it".

I will never forget that moment.
Page 13.
@jikkyleaks @RandPaul @SenRonJohnson @jeffreytucker paul.senate.gov/wp-content/upl…

You can find the pdf of the Pradhan paper here.
substacktools.com/sharex/IkI_Wf9E

sars2.net/pradhan.html

Your money, on the world’s most powerful network

𝕏 Money is rolling out to U.S. Premium and Premium+ subscribers starting today

With 𝕏 Money, you get:

• Free, instant transfers on 𝕏
• Up to 6.00% APY
• 3% cashback on eligible purchases with the 𝕏 Card
• Early direct deposit — up to two days before your normal payday
• Wires, checks, and free ATM withdrawals
• Fast, dedicated support when you need it

Security is at the core of 𝕏 Money:

• Your Money account is secured with passkeys for safe and fast authentication
• Set custom limits and require authentication for the transactions you choose
• Every card transaction is protected by Visa’s security and risk management capabilities
• FDIC insurance up to $10M through our Cash Sweep Program

1/20 So here are Tucker Carlson’s 20 most egregious lies. Anyone who still insists that he is a man of principle, courage and truth is not merely gullible, but actively volunteering to be deceived. I would say I have a bridge to sell you, but let’s be honest: you would buy any bullshit he wrapped in a confident tone.

1. The 2020 presidential election was stolen.

Carlson repeatedly told viewers that serious evidence had emerged showing the election was unfair or fraudulent. After receiving January 6 footage, he still claimed that “no honest person” could deny that the election had betrayed American democracy.

In reality, Biden won 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232, and recounts, audits, litigation and investigations found no fraud capable of changing the result. Court filings also showed Carlson privately describing Sidney Powell’s election allegations as reckless and unbelievable while Fox continued spreading election-fraud narratives.

https://x.com/splendid_pete/status/2081784215692329336

2/20 Dominion voting machines helped steal the election.

Carlson’s programme gave airtime and legitimacy to claims connecting Dominion’s machines to election manipulation, despite Carlson privately doubting the allegations.

Fox eventually agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million to settle its defamation lawsuit. The case exposed the gap between what Carlson and other Fox figures privately believed and what their network permitted on air.

3/20 January 6 was essentially a peaceful sightseeing visit.

Carlson cherry-picked calm surveillance footage and described most participants as “meek” sightseers rather than insurrectionists.

The omitted reality was that approximately 140 police officers were assaulted, more than 100 defendants were accused of carrying or using weapons, and the riot caused millions of dollars in damage and security costs. Showing quiet corridors between outbreaks of violence did not make the violence disappear.

#PaleoAgainstAI
Strangers from beyond the paleo circles, friends of old.
We have gathered here to answer the threat of AIGC.
Paleo-related creativity of all shapes and sizes now stands on the brink of destruction. None can escape it.
WE WILL UNITE OR WE WILL FALL.
A THREAD: (1/?)

So what's the imminent threat? Let's examine a few events.
1. On 25 Feb 2026, the trailer of a new docu, 'Mystery of the Megafauna', was released. The film claims to have used 'stunning CGI'. What it really did was passing VFX models made by artist Antonio Peres through AI.
(2/?)

2. Starting from 3 May 2026, Paleorex has been posting a series of short videos called 'Tales of Prehistory'. They used a mixture of photobashing and AIGC to achieve seeming photorealism. Uninformed viewers can no longer identify the inconsistencies of AIGC with confidence. (3/?)

“In order not to have a contradiction with Biden” 🧵1/11

On November 24, 2020, Anthony Fauci sat down and wrote something federal officials almost never put on paper.

President-elect Biden had just said publicly that his staff had been in touch with Fauci and that Fauci had been “very, very helpful.”

That created a problem. It did not match what Fauci had been telling reporters.

So he explained the discrepancy to himself.

https://x.com/dotconnectinga/status/2081781730936025136

🧵2/11 From his diary (released page 223 / physical page 493):

“I had told he press that I had not heard from the Biden team since my conversations with Ron Klain were supposed to be confidential since over the past several days Ron has contacted me about my advice for CDC Director and FDA Commissioner. I recommended Rochelle Walensky for CDC. Ron called he and liked her.

In order not to have a contradiction with Biden, I have told CNN (Kaitlan Collins, Jim Acosta, etc.) GMA”

The sentence breaks off there. It never says what he told them.

🧵3/11 To understand why this matters, remember what the country was being told that month.

President Trump had not conceded. The GSA had not issued ascertainment. Biden’s team could not get formal agency briefings.

But the public argument went further. On November 16, Biden said “more people may die if we don’t coordinate.” The claim was not that contact was difficult. It was that contact could not happen at all.