Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
My conversation with Google Gemini on the progression of the war and its consequences. (🧵 1 of X)
Martin Uhr: Leaving aside the authenticity of the data for this consideration and analyzing the scenario based on the available data: What does the loss of 1.4 million men mean for the total population of Russia, in the short and long term? Is this loss negligible?
Google Gemini: The loss of 1.4 million men is not negligible for Russia's total population; instead, it severely worsens an already existing demographic crisis. Although 1.4 million statistically represents only about 1% of Russia's total population (approx. 146 million), this loss almost exclusively affects young, working-age men in their reproductive years.
Here is the detailed analysis of the short- and long-term consequences:
Short-Term Consequences (The Immediate Shocks)
•Extreme Labor Shortage: Over a million workers are suddenly missing in key industries such as construction, manufacturing, and logistics.
•Drop in Economic Output: Fewer employed people mean fewer tax revenues and a decline in Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
•Loss of Purchasing Power: 1.4 million consumers disappear. This severely slows down domestic trade and consumption.
Long-Term Consequences (The Permanent Damages)
•The "Demographic Echo Wave": These men are no longer available as fathers. The already low birth rate collapses further. Millions fewer children will be born, causing the population to shrink even faster in 20 to 30 years.
•Massive Gender Imbalance: An enormous surplus of women emerges in the 20-to-40 age group. This destroys the marriage market and profoundly changes the social structure.
•Collapse of Social Systems: Fewer young taxpayers must support an increasingly aging population. Pension and health insurance funds face an unresolvable imbalance.
Why the Loss is NOT Negligible: An Analogy
This loss must not be compared to the total population, but only to the group of young, healthy men. Before the recent crises, Russia had about 15 to 17 million men aged between 20 and 40.
•The True Percentage: 1.4 million out of 15 million is nearly 10% of all young men in the country.
•The Image: Imagine a car that loses 1% of its total weight. That sounds like little. But if that 1% is the entire engine starter, the car won't drive anymore. Young men are the economic and demographic engine of the country.
Martin Uhr: Leaving aside the authenticity of the data for this consideration and analyzing the scenario based on the available data: What does the loss of 1.4 million men mean for the total population of Russia, in the short and long term? Is this loss negligible?
Google Gemini: The loss of 1.4 million men is not negligible for Russia's total population; instead, it severely worsens an already existing demographic crisis. Although 1.4 million statistically represents only about 1% of Russia's total population (approx. 146 million), this loss almost exclusively affects young, working-age men in their reproductive years.
Here is the detailed analysis of the short- and long-term consequences:
Short-Term Consequences (The Immediate Shocks)
•Extreme Labor Shortage: Over a million workers are suddenly missing in key industries such as construction, manufacturing, and logistics.
•Drop in Economic Output: Fewer employed people mean fewer tax revenues and a decline in Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
•Loss of Purchasing Power: 1.4 million consumers disappear. This severely slows down domestic trade and consumption.
Long-Term Consequences (The Permanent Damages)
•The "Demographic Echo Wave": These men are no longer available as fathers. The already low birth rate collapses further. Millions fewer children will be born, causing the population to shrink even faster in 20 to 30 years.
•Massive Gender Imbalance: An enormous surplus of women emerges in the 20-to-40 age group. This destroys the marriage market and profoundly changes the social structure.
•Collapse of Social Systems: Fewer young taxpayers must support an increasingly aging population. Pension and health insurance funds face an unresolvable imbalance.
Why the Loss is NOT Negligible: An Analogy
This loss must not be compared to the total population, but only to the group of young, healthy men. Before the recent crises, Russia had about 15 to 17 million men aged between 20 and 40.
•The True Percentage: 1.4 million out of 15 million is nearly 10% of all young men in the country.
•The Image: Imagine a car that loses 1% of its total weight. That sounds like little. But if that 1% is the entire engine starter, the car won't drive anymore. Young men are the economic and demographic engine of the country.
Martin Uhr: Let's deepen the analysis, but under the assumption that Russia continues to wage war for about another year and loses another 35,000 soldiers monthly. So we are assuming 2 million dead and mutilated by the time of the post-war upheaval.
Google Gemini: Under the assumption that Russia continues the war for another year and loses 35,000 soldiers per month, the total loss rises to around 2 million young men. This loss is catastrophic for Russian society and economy, marking a demographic point of no return.
Here is the deeper analysis of this scenario for the post-war era:
Economy: The Blocked Engine
•Acute Shortage of Skilled Labor: 2 million missing men in their prime working age tear a massive gap. This corresponds to about 5% of Russia's total male workforce. Industries like high-tech, construction, agriculture, and heavy industry will be paralyzed.
•The "Innovation Vacuum": Precisely those men who should be founding new companies and developing technology are dying or fleeing. Russia loses its innovative power and falls further behind the West and China technologically.
•Inflation and Wage Spiral: Because labor is so extremely scarce, companies must raise wages sharply just to find employees. This drives up the prices of all products massively (wage-price spiral).
Demographics: The "Black Hole" of Births
•Wiping Out a Generation: Russia already suffers from the consequences of the 1990s, when very few children were born due to the economic crisis. The group of 20-to-30-year-olds today is already very small. If 2 million men are lost from this group, this generation is effectively halved.
•Millions of Unborn Children: Since these men can no longer start families, the birth rate collapses in the long term. This "demographic echo" will repeat itself in 25 years when the children who are not being born now are missing. The population shrinks unstoppably.
•Extreme Aging: A shrinking number of young workers must support a huge, aging generation of retirees. The social and pension system faces state bankruptcy.
Society: The Post-War Upheaval
•Colossal Surplus of Women: A massive imbalance arises in the 20-to-40 age group. Millions of women will not find a partner. This changes the structure of families, increases the number of single parents, and raises the pressure on state support.
•The Burden of Invalids: A large portion of the 2 million men are not dead, but severely mutilated or traumatized (PTSD). The healthcare system must care for and financially support millions of invalids for decades, instead of these men paying taxes.
•Psychological Crisis: After the war, Russian society will be engulfed by a wave of frustration, grief, and crime. Historically, the return of millions of traumatized soldiers without economic prospects often leads to social instability and violence.
Conclusion: The Historical Parallel
This loss is proportionally comparable to the heaviest crises in Russian history. It acts like a "demographic heart attack." Even if the war ends in a year, Russia will feel the economic, social, and human consequences of these 2 million lost men for the next 50 to 100 years in every layer of society. The country is sacrificing its own future for short-term territorial gain. (🧵 2 of X)
Google Gemini: Under the assumption that Russia continues the war for another year and loses 35,000 soldiers per month, the total loss rises to around 2 million young men. This loss is catastrophic for Russian society and economy, marking a demographic point of no return.
Here is the deeper analysis of this scenario for the post-war era:
Economy: The Blocked Engine
•Acute Shortage of Skilled Labor: 2 million missing men in their prime working age tear a massive gap. This corresponds to about 5% of Russia's total male workforce. Industries like high-tech, construction, agriculture, and heavy industry will be paralyzed.
•The "Innovation Vacuum": Precisely those men who should be founding new companies and developing technology are dying or fleeing. Russia loses its innovative power and falls further behind the West and China technologically.
•Inflation and Wage Spiral: Because labor is so extremely scarce, companies must raise wages sharply just to find employees. This drives up the prices of all products massively (wage-price spiral).
Demographics: The "Black Hole" of Births
•Wiping Out a Generation: Russia already suffers from the consequences of the 1990s, when very few children were born due to the economic crisis. The group of 20-to-30-year-olds today is already very small. If 2 million men are lost from this group, this generation is effectively halved.
•Millions of Unborn Children: Since these men can no longer start families, the birth rate collapses in the long term. This "demographic echo" will repeat itself in 25 years when the children who are not being born now are missing. The population shrinks unstoppably.
•Extreme Aging: A shrinking number of young workers must support a huge, aging generation of retirees. The social and pension system faces state bankruptcy.
Society: The Post-War Upheaval
•Colossal Surplus of Women: A massive imbalance arises in the 20-to-40 age group. Millions of women will not find a partner. This changes the structure of families, increases the number of single parents, and raises the pressure on state support.
•The Burden of Invalids: A large portion of the 2 million men are not dead, but severely mutilated or traumatized (PTSD). The healthcare system must care for and financially support millions of invalids for decades, instead of these men paying taxes.
•Psychological Crisis: After the war, Russian society will be engulfed by a wave of frustration, grief, and crime. Historically, the return of millions of traumatized soldiers without economic prospects often leads to social instability and violence.
Conclusion: The Historical Parallel
This loss is proportionally comparable to the heaviest crises in Russian history. It acts like a "demographic heart attack." Even if the war ends in a year, Russia will feel the economic, social, and human consequences of these 2 million lost men for the next 50 to 100 years in every layer of society. The country is sacrificing its own future for short-term territorial gain. (🧵 2 of X)
Martin Uhr: Is it to be expected that a large part of the surplus of women will emigrate abroad? How large will the total population be in 30 years under the previously mentioned conditions?
Google Gemini: It is not to be expected that a large part of the surplus of women will emigrate abroad, as emigration is mostly tied to education, wealth, and networks. Under the extreme conditions mentioned, Russia's total population in 30 years (around the year 2056) is estimated to plunge to about 115 to 120 million people.
Here is the detailed breakdown:
Will the Surplus of Women Emigrate Abroad?
A mass, million-fold "exodus" of Russian women abroad is unlikely for several structural reasons:
•The Migration Barrier: Emigration is expensive and bureaucratically difficult. Visa restrictions by Western states and language barriers prevent the broad masses from leaving the country. Brain drain primarily takes place in the well-educated, urban upper class.
•No Historical Parallel: After World War II, the Soviet Union lost over 20 million men, creating the largest surplus of women in modern history. Yet, the women stayed in the country, rebuilt the economy, and adapted socially (e.g., through an extremely high female employment rate).
•Domestic Obligations: Many women in the affected age group are kept in the country by family obligations—they must care for aging parents or already have children, making fleeing abroad drastically harder.
•What Happens Instead: Instead of mass emigration, social adaptation occurs. The birth rate drops dramatically, the number of single-person households and single parents skyrockets, and women are forced to en masse take over jobs traditionally held by men (e.g., in heavy industry or logistics).
How Large Will the Total Population Be in 30 Years?
Even before the escalation of the conflict, official UN projections (medium scenario) assumed that Russia's population would shrink to about 135.8 million by 2050. Adding your extreme scenario (2 million lost/invalid men, massive economic crisis, ongoing flight), the country inevitably slides into the most pessimistic UN scenario:
•The Estimated Value: In 30 years, the total population will likely be only between 115 and 120 million people.
•The Shrinkage Turbo: The loss of 2 million young men prevents the birth of an estimated 1.5 to 2.5 million children over the next two decades. The fertility rate will plunge from an already low 1.4 to historic lows (below 1.1).
•The Migration Collapse: Previously, Russia could partially offset its population loss through immigration from Central Asia. Under the conditions of a post-war economic upheaval and high instability, Russia will lose its attractiveness for migrant workers. The most important buffer against shrinking thus breaks away. (🧵 3 of X)
Google Gemini: It is not to be expected that a large part of the surplus of women will emigrate abroad, as emigration is mostly tied to education, wealth, and networks. Under the extreme conditions mentioned, Russia's total population in 30 years (around the year 2056) is estimated to plunge to about 115 to 120 million people.
Here is the detailed breakdown:
Will the Surplus of Women Emigrate Abroad?
A mass, million-fold "exodus" of Russian women abroad is unlikely for several structural reasons:
•The Migration Barrier: Emigration is expensive and bureaucratically difficult. Visa restrictions by Western states and language barriers prevent the broad masses from leaving the country. Brain drain primarily takes place in the well-educated, urban upper class.
•No Historical Parallel: After World War II, the Soviet Union lost over 20 million men, creating the largest surplus of women in modern history. Yet, the women stayed in the country, rebuilt the economy, and adapted socially (e.g., through an extremely high female employment rate).
•Domestic Obligations: Many women in the affected age group are kept in the country by family obligations—they must care for aging parents or already have children, making fleeing abroad drastically harder.
•What Happens Instead: Instead of mass emigration, social adaptation occurs. The birth rate drops dramatically, the number of single-person households and single parents skyrockets, and women are forced to en masse take over jobs traditionally held by men (e.g., in heavy industry or logistics).
How Large Will the Total Population Be in 30 Years?
Even before the escalation of the conflict, official UN projections (medium scenario) assumed that Russia's population would shrink to about 135.8 million by 2050. Adding your extreme scenario (2 million lost/invalid men, massive economic crisis, ongoing flight), the country inevitably slides into the most pessimistic UN scenario:
•The Estimated Value: In 30 years, the total population will likely be only between 115 and 120 million people.
•The Shrinkage Turbo: The loss of 2 million young men prevents the birth of an estimated 1.5 to 2.5 million children over the next two decades. The fertility rate will plunge from an already low 1.4 to historic lows (below 1.1).
•The Migration Collapse: Previously, Russia could partially offset its population loss through immigration from Central Asia. Under the conditions of a post-war economic upheaval and high instability, Russia will lose its attractiveness for migrant workers. The most important buffer against shrinking thus breaks away. (🧵 3 of X)
I want you to look at this chart and ask yourself one question.
Your veins carry the exact same blood as your arteries. The same LDL. The same cholesterol. The same ApoB particles.
Veins almost never develop atherosclerosis. Arteries do.
Same blood. Same LDL. Different wall.
If LDL caused plaque by simply crossing the wall, your veins would be full of it. They are not. Nobody in cardiovascular medicine has ever answered this question honestly.
The wall decides. Not the LDL.
Your veins carry the exact same blood as your arteries. The same LDL. The same cholesterol. The same ApoB particles.
Veins almost never develop atherosclerosis. Arteries do.
Same blood. Same LDL. Different wall.
If LDL caused plaque by simply crossing the wall, your veins would be full of it. They are not. Nobody in cardiovascular medicine has ever answered this question honestly.
The wall decides. Not the LDL.
My cardiologist told me my LDL was the problem. I asked him one question he could not answer.
If LDL causes plaque by crossing any wall it touches, why do my veins not have plaque? Same blood. Same particles. Same concentration. Running through my veins right now.
He said veins are different. I said that is exactly the point. The wall is different. The blood is not. So the wall is the variable. Not the LDL.
He changed the subject.
If LDL causes plaque by crossing any wall it touches, why do my veins not have plaque? Same blood. Same particles. Same concentration. Running through my veins right now.
He said veins are different. I said that is exactly the point. The wall is different. The blood is not. So the wall is the variable. Not the LDL.
He changed the subject.
Here is what makes arteries different from veins.
Arteries are under high pressure. Every heartbeat sends a wave of force through the arterial wall. At certain points, that force creates turbulence. Disturbed flow. Mechanical stress on the endothelium.
Veins are low pressure. Smooth flow. Minimal wall stress.
The endothelium is a single-cell-thick lining inside every blood vessel. When it is healthy, it keeps LDL moving through normally. When it is damaged by mechanical stress, inflammation, or metabolic dysfunction, LDL particles get trapped underneath.
The endothelium is the gatekeeper. Damage the gatekeeper and everything gets in. Blame the delivery truck for what happens after the gate is broken.
Arteries are under high pressure. Every heartbeat sends a wave of force through the arterial wall. At certain points, that force creates turbulence. Disturbed flow. Mechanical stress on the endothelium.
Veins are low pressure. Smooth flow. Minimal wall stress.
The endothelium is a single-cell-thick lining inside every blood vessel. When it is healthy, it keeps LDL moving through normally. When it is damaged by mechanical stress, inflammation, or metabolic dysfunction, LDL particles get trapped underneath.
The endothelium is the gatekeeper. Damage the gatekeeper and everything gets in. Blame the delivery truck for what happens after the gate is broken.
My conversation with Google Gemini about the progression of the war and its consequences: 🧵(1 of X)
Martin Uhr: You call that an extreme scenario; I see it as a realistic scenario because I currently see no basis for an early end to the war. As an extreme scenario, I see the continuation of the war for another 3 years and a total loss of around 3 million Russian men before Russia collapses.
Google Gemini: If we take your definition and analyze this new extreme scenario—a continuation of the war for another three years with a total loss of 3 million Russian men before a state collapse—we enter the realm of demographic and structural system failure.
A loss of 3 million young men means the factual wiping out of around 20% of the entire core male population between the ages of 20 and 40. Here is how this leads to the collapse you mentioned:
The Path into Economic Collapse
•The Collapse of the Civilian Economy: If tens of thousands of men are sent to the front monthly over years, businesses must close. It's no longer just specialists who are missing, but simply everyday labor. Buses won't run, power plants cannot be maintained, and harvests will rot in the fields.
•The Unaffordable War Economy: To cope with 3 million casualties, the state must pay immense sums for soldiers' pay, invalid pensions, and survivor compensations. At the same time, tax revenues from the civilian economy break away. This leads to hyperinflation and state bankruptcy.
•Erosion of Resource Extraction: Even Russia's vital oil and gas extraction in Siberia will collapse. These industries require physically fit men and complex technology under extreme climatic conditions. Neither will be available in this scenario.
The Demographic Death Blow
•Halving a Generation: The age group of 20-to-35-year-olds today is already historically small in Russia. If 3 million men of this group die or are severely mutilated (along with the millions who fled abroad), this generation is biologically almost completely wiped out.
•The Total Absence of Births: The birth rate would fall to a low never before seen globally (perhaps 0.7 or 0.8 children per woman). There are simply no couples left. This means that the total population in the following decades will not just shrink, but implode—a decline to under 100 million inhabitants by mid-century becomes realistic.
The Post-War Collapse: The Scenario After the Upheaval
If the system collapses under this weight after 3 years, the situation differs fundamentally from previous historical crises (like the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991):
•No Demographic Cushion Left: In 1991, the Soviet population was young and growing. After a collapse in this scenario, the population is old, traumatized, and shrunken. There is no young generation to rebuild the country.
•The Militia and Crime Problem: Hundreds of thousands of heavily armed, traumatized, and abandoned soldiers return to a country with no economic power. Historical parallels (like Russia in 1917) show that this leads directly to civil war-like conditions, warlord structures, and extreme crime.
•The Geopolitical Vacuum in the East: Siberia and the Russian Far East, which are already sparsely populated, will be practically deserted. This creates an extreme power vacuum that neighboring states (especially China) can easily fill economically and politically without firing a single shot.
Martin Uhr: You call that an extreme scenario; I see it as a realistic scenario because I currently see no basis for an early end to the war. As an extreme scenario, I see the continuation of the war for another 3 years and a total loss of around 3 million Russian men before Russia collapses.
Google Gemini: If we take your definition and analyze this new extreme scenario—a continuation of the war for another three years with a total loss of 3 million Russian men before a state collapse—we enter the realm of demographic and structural system failure.
A loss of 3 million young men means the factual wiping out of around 20% of the entire core male population between the ages of 20 and 40. Here is how this leads to the collapse you mentioned:
The Path into Economic Collapse
•The Collapse of the Civilian Economy: If tens of thousands of men are sent to the front monthly over years, businesses must close. It's no longer just specialists who are missing, but simply everyday labor. Buses won't run, power plants cannot be maintained, and harvests will rot in the fields.
•The Unaffordable War Economy: To cope with 3 million casualties, the state must pay immense sums for soldiers' pay, invalid pensions, and survivor compensations. At the same time, tax revenues from the civilian economy break away. This leads to hyperinflation and state bankruptcy.
•Erosion of Resource Extraction: Even Russia's vital oil and gas extraction in Siberia will collapse. These industries require physically fit men and complex technology under extreme climatic conditions. Neither will be available in this scenario.
The Demographic Death Blow
•Halving a Generation: The age group of 20-to-35-year-olds today is already historically small in Russia. If 3 million men of this group die or are severely mutilated (along with the millions who fled abroad), this generation is biologically almost completely wiped out.
•The Total Absence of Births: The birth rate would fall to a low never before seen globally (perhaps 0.7 or 0.8 children per woman). There are simply no couples left. This means that the total population in the following decades will not just shrink, but implode—a decline to under 100 million inhabitants by mid-century becomes realistic.
The Post-War Collapse: The Scenario After the Upheaval
If the system collapses under this weight after 3 years, the situation differs fundamentally from previous historical crises (like the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991):
•No Demographic Cushion Left: In 1991, the Soviet population was young and growing. After a collapse in this scenario, the population is old, traumatized, and shrunken. There is no young generation to rebuild the country.
•The Militia and Crime Problem: Hundreds of thousands of heavily armed, traumatized, and abandoned soldiers return to a country with no economic power. Historical parallels (like Russia in 1917) show that this leads directly to civil war-like conditions, warlord structures, and extreme crime.
•The Geopolitical Vacuum in the East: Siberia and the Russian Far East, which are already sparsely populated, will be practically deserted. This creates an extreme power vacuum that neighboring states (especially China) can easily fill economically and politically without firing a single shot.
Martin Uhr: Putin will not end this war voluntarily. However, he has protected himself extremely well against being deposed. Furthermore, the war machine manages to recruit 35,000 new soldiers per month for the front. In this starting position, how many months do you forecast Russia will at least continue to wage war?
Google Gemini: Based on the conditions you mentioned and current economic data, it can be predicted that Russia can continue the war at this level for at least another 12 to 18 months (i.e., until late 2027). From that point onward, however, the situation transforms from a purely military question into a question of internal stability.
Here is why:
1. Why Putin Can Hold Out for at Least 12 to 18 Months
•Financial Reserves: Russia has fully shifted its economy to war production. Despite sanctions, significant revenues continue to flow from the sale of oil and gas (primarily to India and China). Economists estimate that liquid funds in Russia's National Wealth Fund and ongoing revenues are sufficient to cover the current budget deficit for at least 1.5 years.
•Successful Recruitment: As long as the system is able to maintain the number of 35,000 new recruits per month through extremely high one-time payments and salaries, the army can replace front-line losses one-for-one.
•Total Regime Protection: Putin has massively expanded and financially privileged the security apparatus (FSB, Rosgvardia). A coup from above or a popular uprising from below is thus made nearly impossible in the short term.
2. Why the Limit is Reached After 18 Months (The Tipping Point)
Even if recruitment works and Putin sits securely in the saddle, the entire system hits insurmountable physical and economic walls after about 1.5 years:
•Exhausting Soviet Stockpiles: Russia lives militarily largely off its substance. It modernizes old Soviet tanks and artillery barrels from massive depots. Satellite imagery shows that at current loss rates, these stockpiles will run critically low in about 12 to 18 months (mid-to-late 2027).
•Overheating of the Economy: Unemployment in Russia is at a historic low due to recruitment and the flight of labor. This is dangerous: there are no free workers left. The civilian economy loses the battle for labor against the military, leading to uncontrollable inflation.
•The "Cannibalization Effect": To finance the war, the Kremlin drastically cuts spending on infrastructure, healthcare, and education. After another 18 months, this leads to severe systemic failures in the hinterland—such as the collapse of heating systems in winter or the decay of the rail network. (🧵 2 of X)
Google Gemini: Based on the conditions you mentioned and current economic data, it can be predicted that Russia can continue the war at this level for at least another 12 to 18 months (i.e., until late 2027). From that point onward, however, the situation transforms from a purely military question into a question of internal stability.
Here is why:
1. Why Putin Can Hold Out for at Least 12 to 18 Months
•Financial Reserves: Russia has fully shifted its economy to war production. Despite sanctions, significant revenues continue to flow from the sale of oil and gas (primarily to India and China). Economists estimate that liquid funds in Russia's National Wealth Fund and ongoing revenues are sufficient to cover the current budget deficit for at least 1.5 years.
•Successful Recruitment: As long as the system is able to maintain the number of 35,000 new recruits per month through extremely high one-time payments and salaries, the army can replace front-line losses one-for-one.
•Total Regime Protection: Putin has massively expanded and financially privileged the security apparatus (FSB, Rosgvardia). A coup from above or a popular uprising from below is thus made nearly impossible in the short term.
2. Why the Limit is Reached After 18 Months (The Tipping Point)
Even if recruitment works and Putin sits securely in the saddle, the entire system hits insurmountable physical and economic walls after about 1.5 years:
•Exhausting Soviet Stockpiles: Russia lives militarily largely off its substance. It modernizes old Soviet tanks and artillery barrels from massive depots. Satellite imagery shows that at current loss rates, these stockpiles will run critically low in about 12 to 18 months (mid-to-late 2027).
•Overheating of the Economy: Unemployment in Russia is at a historic low due to recruitment and the flight of labor. This is dangerous: there are no free workers left. The civilian economy loses the battle for labor against the military, leading to uncontrollable inflation.
•The "Cannibalization Effect": To finance the war, the Kremlin drastically cuts spending on infrastructure, healthcare, and education. After another 18 months, this leads to severe systemic failures in the hinterland—such as the collapse of heating systems in winter or the decay of the rail network. (🧵 2 of X)
Martin Uhr: That is the realistic scenario for me. 18 more months of war with a total loss of over 2 million men. Now we reach the point where material and funds are exhausted. What happens now?
Google Gemini: When this critical point is reached in about 18 months, the Russian regime faces a mathematical and physical wall. The system shifts into a dramatic crisis and survival mode:
1. Militarily: The Transition to a "War of Attrition"
•Loss of Offensive Power: Without heavy tanks and artillery barrels, the Russian army can no longer launch major attacks. Tactics shift entirely to defending previously occupied territories.
•Replacement with "Cheap Weapons": Instead of tanks, Russia relies almost exclusively on masses of drones, glide bombs, and unprotected infantry waves ("meat assaults"). The casualty rate of soldiers paradoxically rises even further, while military territorial gains drop to zero.
•Total Dependence on Abroad: Russia becomes a military beggar. It must import finished weapon systems from North Korea, Iran, or via covert routes from China, making Russia extremely exploitable.
2. Economically: The "War Communism" Dictatorship
•Forced Labor and Planned Economy: When the market and money no longer work, the state resorts to force. Businesses are nationalized. Women, youth, and elderly people are legally obligated to work in armaments factories.
•Rationing and Scarcity Economy: Consumer goods, food, and fuel are rationed for the civilian population. There are coupons for bread, meat, or gasoline because all available material flows to the front.
•Radical Decay of Infrastructure: Since there is no money and no men left for repairs, severe failures occur in the hinterland. Power grids collapse, heating fails widespread in winter, and the transport system weakens.
3. Socially: The Explosion of Internal Tensions
•The Uprising of the Regions: The 2 million losses do not hit rich major cities like Moscow or St. Petersburg, but poor republics (e.g., in Siberia or the Caucasus) and ethnic minorities. If economic support breaks down there, anger at the Moscow center grows massively.
•The Return of the Invalids: Hundreds of thousands of severely injured, amputated, and psychologically traumatized men return to a society that can no longer care for them, leading to a wave of crime, alcoholism, and social neglect.
4. Politically: Preparing for the Upheaval
•The "Elite Collapse": When money is devalued and material is lacking, the elite realizes that the war can no longer be won. Loyalty to Putin begins to crumble.
•The Unavoidable End: At this point, the regime is forced to freeze the war or offer negotiations—not out of insight, but because the physical capacity to wage war has vanished. This is the moment of post-war upheaval. (🧵 3 of X)
Google Gemini: When this critical point is reached in about 18 months, the Russian regime faces a mathematical and physical wall. The system shifts into a dramatic crisis and survival mode:
1. Militarily: The Transition to a "War of Attrition"
•Loss of Offensive Power: Without heavy tanks and artillery barrels, the Russian army can no longer launch major attacks. Tactics shift entirely to defending previously occupied territories.
•Replacement with "Cheap Weapons": Instead of tanks, Russia relies almost exclusively on masses of drones, glide bombs, and unprotected infantry waves ("meat assaults"). The casualty rate of soldiers paradoxically rises even further, while military territorial gains drop to zero.
•Total Dependence on Abroad: Russia becomes a military beggar. It must import finished weapon systems from North Korea, Iran, or via covert routes from China, making Russia extremely exploitable.
2. Economically: The "War Communism" Dictatorship
•Forced Labor and Planned Economy: When the market and money no longer work, the state resorts to force. Businesses are nationalized. Women, youth, and elderly people are legally obligated to work in armaments factories.
•Rationing and Scarcity Economy: Consumer goods, food, and fuel are rationed for the civilian population. There are coupons for bread, meat, or gasoline because all available material flows to the front.
•Radical Decay of Infrastructure: Since there is no money and no men left for repairs, severe failures occur in the hinterland. Power grids collapse, heating fails widespread in winter, and the transport system weakens.
3. Socially: The Explosion of Internal Tensions
•The Uprising of the Regions: The 2 million losses do not hit rich major cities like Moscow or St. Petersburg, but poor republics (e.g., in Siberia or the Caucasus) and ethnic minorities. If economic support breaks down there, anger at the Moscow center grows massively.
•The Return of the Invalids: Hundreds of thousands of severely injured, amputated, and psychologically traumatized men return to a society that can no longer care for them, leading to a wave of crime, alcoholism, and social neglect.
4. Politically: Preparing for the Upheaval
•The "Elite Collapse": When money is devalued and material is lacking, the elite realizes that the war can no longer be won. Loyalty to Putin begins to crumble.
•The Unavoidable End: At this point, the regime is forced to freeze the war or offer negotiations—not out of insight, but because the physical capacity to wage war has vanished. This is the moment of post-war upheaval. (🧵 3 of X)
Ever feel like you're searching for spiritual truth in all the wrong places?
In 1948, Ralph M. Lewis published "The Sanctuary of Self", it didn't offer dogmas or stone temples. Instead, it pulled back the curtain on the ultimate temple: your own consciousness.
Let's dig in 🧵
In 1948, Ralph M. Lewis published "The Sanctuary of Self", it didn't offer dogmas or stone temples. Instead, it pulled back the curtain on the ultimate temple: your own consciousness.
Let's dig in 🧵
While his father, AMORC founder H. Spencer Lewis, focused on building the order's structure, Ralph took a deep dive into psychological mysticism... He wanted to strip away superstition and hand seekers a manual for engineering their own inner awakenings.
To understand this inner sanctuary, we have to start with a tough pill to swallow: the world you see right now isn't actually "out there"... Lewis splits what we call reality into two distinct gears that trick us every single day.
An interior remodeling company has sold over $1.1M in projects from organic search over the past 7 months.
They pay us $3,500 a month for SEO. That's a 45x return on every dollar they've spent.
Here's the full breakdown.
They pay us $3,500 a month for SEO. That's a 45x return on every dollar they've spent.
Here's the full breakdown.
When they came to us, almost all their work came from referrals and paid lead platforms. Nothing from Google.
They had a solid reputation and great craftsmanship but their online presence was basically invisible. No rankings, no review momentum, and a website that was a few project photos and a phone number.
They had a solid reputation and great craftsmanship but their online presence was basically invisible. No rankings, no review momentum, and a website that was a few project photos and a phone number.
First thing we did was rebuild their site with a dedicated page for every service. Kitchen remodels, bathroom renovations, whole-home remodels, additions, each one built around the exact searches homeowners type into Google.
Then we added location pages for every city in their service area and set up their GBP with the right primary category, photos from real completed projects, and a proper service list with descriptions.
Then we added location pages for every city in their service area and set up their GBP with the right primary category, photos from real completed projects, and a proper service list with descriptions.
@VanCityVice @kingqueen3443 @MarcNixon24 Perfect spot for you to be @Nncim15
@VanCityVice @kingqueen3443 @MarcNixon24 @Nncim15 @ChrisPentecos @Nncim15 @LangleyResident @BarbaraDoduk @RegretlessBee @Cdnwatcher @Istandtoreason @facepalmchris @trustednerd @felixcruggins @CultureGuard @WaxMyBallsShow @FranLa9 @kfurneaux23 @VernThurston @JonYaniv @BCPublicWatch @villainy_scum @Hevel11
@VanCityVice @kingqueen3443 @MarcNixon24 @Nncim15 @ChrisPentecos @LangleyResident @BarbaraDoduk @RegretlessBee @Cdnwatcher @Istandtoreason @facepalmchris @trustednerd @felixcruggins @CultureGuard @WaxMyBallsShow @FranLa9 @kfurneaux23 @VernThurston @JonYaniv @BCPublicWatch @villainy_scum @Hevel11 @threadreaderapp unroll
I rather hang out with my amazing cops than Donald the vulnerable fucking WEEEEEETARD who harasses and abuses and even stalks my cops
@kingqueen3443 @ChrisPentecos @Nncim15 @LangleyResident @BarbaraDoduk @RegretlessBee @Cdnwatcher @Istandtoreason @facepalmchris @trustednerd @felixcruggins @CultureGuard @WaxMyBallsShow @FranLa9 @kfurneaux23 @VernThurston @JonYaniv @BCPublicWatch @villainy_scum @Hevel11
@kingqueen3443 @ChrisPentecos @Nncim15 @LangleyResident @BarbaraDoduk @RegretlessBee @Cdnwatcher @Istandtoreason @facepalmchris @trustednerd @felixcruggins @CultureGuard @WaxMyBallsShow @FranLa9 @kfurneaux23 @VernThurston @JonYaniv @BCPublicWatch @villainy_scum @Hevel11 @threadreaderapp unroll
Finally, I am able to say something about tariffs I wasn't able to say last year. I'll tell you why at the end of the thread.
In my view, the case for tariffs is overdetermined. There's national security reasons (you need self-sufficiency in war equipment), financial stability reasons (you don't want the net foreign asset position exploding), and an underdiscussed reason - tax policy.
There are two centuries of research on optimal tariffs. Tariffs are interesting because--unlike labor or capital taxes--foreigners bear, in the long run, a material portion of the burden of the tax. richmondfed.org/~/media/richmo…
A guy in Austin tracked every "premium" purchase he made in his apartment for 2 years.
$1,800 standing desk. $400 ergonomic chair. $200 monitor arm. $150 wireless charging stand. $120 air purifier. $90 cable management system.
Total spent: $3,200+.
His brother a furniture designer at a mid-tier brand came to visit and laughed at half of it.
"You paid for the marketing. The actual function on most of this stuff costs $15 on Amazon. I'll show you. Same job. Sometimes literally the same factory."
Two weekends later they'd replaced 9 expensive items with Amazon purchases totaling $187.
The apartment looks better than it did before.
Here's the full list 🧵
$1,800 standing desk. $400 ergonomic chair. $200 monitor arm. $150 wireless charging stand. $120 air purifier. $90 cable management system.
Total spent: $3,200+.
His brother a furniture designer at a mid-tier brand came to visit and laughed at half of it.
"You paid for the marketing. The actual function on most of this stuff costs $15 on Amazon. I'll show you. Same job. Sometimes literally the same factory."
Two weekends later they'd replaced 9 expensive items with Amazon purchases totaling $187.
The apartment looks better than it did before.
Here's the full list 🧵
1. Monitor stand $18 instead of $120.
The $120 wooden monitor stand at every design boutique is the same MDF block sold on Amazon for $18.
Search: "wood monitor riser stand."
Holds up to 50 lbs. Storage drawer underneath. Looks identical in photos.
The brother's exact line: "Furniture stores mark this up 600%. Nobody knows because nobody compares."
The $120 wooden monitor stand at every design boutique is the same MDF block sold on Amazon for $18.
Search: "wood monitor riser stand."
Holds up to 50 lbs. Storage drawer underneath. Looks identical in photos.
The brother's exact line: "Furniture stores mark this up 600%. Nobody knows because nobody compares."
1. Monitor stand $18 instead of $120.
The $120 wooden monitor stand at every design boutique is the same MDF block sold on Amazon for $18.
Search: "wood monitor riser stand."
Holds up to 50 lbs. Storage drawer underneath. Looks identical in photos.
The brother's exact line: "Furniture stores mark this up 600%. Nobody knows because nobody compares."
The $120 wooden monitor stand at every design boutique is the same MDF block sold on Amazon for $18.
Search: "wood monitor riser stand."
Holds up to 50 lbs. Storage drawer underneath. Looks identical in photos.
The brother's exact line: "Furniture stores mark this up 600%. Nobody knows because nobody compares."
In the state of Wyoming, USA, lies a real hydrological oddity. It's a small stream (creek) that is thought to be one of a just a few examples in the world. It is placed so precariously and perfectly that it's hard to believe it is able to exist.
1/n
1/n
The stream in question is called North Two Ocean Creek, and for a short duration it runs right on top of the Continental divide for North America. What makes this creek so unusual is that as it spills out onto Two Ocean Pass it bifurcates.
"So what?", you might say.
2/n
"So what?", you might say.
2/n
On the left-hand side of this bifurcation it heads east as the 'Atlantic Creek', and west as the 'Pacific Creek'.
You can probably see now where this thread is heading.
3/n
You can probably see now where this thread is heading.
3/n
1. Britain is at the precipice, the Reason we're at the precipice, is simple, The British people been Betrayed! By it's Monarchy (Windsor Crime Family) it's Parliament, all sides, it's civil service, Police, NHS, Courts, Councils, Border Force, H.M.R.C etc etc etc....Cont
2. The Forces behind this Betrayal, are working towards a Plan! They have been for hundreds of years. They tried to enact that plan during the FAKE "PLANDEMIC". They failed, but, the consequences are dire for us in Britain. Millions were coerced & Hypnotized, by the BBC....Cont
3. And others in a totally corrupt Main stream media system, to take A KNOWN GAIN OF FUNCTION ENGINEERED Bio Weapon, posing as a vaccine. The results, can be seen by all of us. It is a HORROR MOVIE, playing out on a daily basis, worse every day! As if the NHS, BIG PHARMA....Cont
