#ProjectEngine
#BuildInPublic

Status Check. Three key tasks, different vibes.

🎯 Finalise 18 CTA steps
🛡️ Safety Check & "Soft Launch"
🔊 Audience Outreach

Finalisation
🏁 End of a long road
🤓 Simpler, snappier UX
🫂 Readying community spaces and pathways

🧵👇

Safety Check
🤖 Technical work, a hack into the unknown
🔥 Common sense decisions made prior to reduce potential risks
⚠️ Essential, unavoidable

Launch
🚀 What does a soft launch mean for this tech?

Audience
❤️ Love this stage. Too much?

🧵👇

💊 Likely need regular "medication", assessments to check progress and detach
⏱️ No sense yet of timescales, but daily posting recommended
🤖 Will need AI to step up a lot here
💪 Human connection is the hardest work

🧵✋

🧵Russian assault troops breached Kozacha Lopan, but they couldn't assemble. The drones made massing impossible. Putin built an army for a war where quantity equaled control. That battlefield no longer exists. 1/🇷🇺🇺🇦🧵

2/ The front is an absolute kill zone. Russian logistics have deteriorated to using FPV drones to drop tiny supply parcels to stranded men. Ukraine’s answer? Heavy ground robots armed with Browning M2 machine guns.

3/ To sustain this obsolete strategy, Russia is hallucinating soldiers through paperwork. Conscripts get three hours of driving practice instead of 72, pass a corrupt exam, and are immediately fed into infantry meat grinders.

For decades, Brazil’s unreasonable acts, policies, and practices have harmed U.S. commerce, including by unfairly advantaging Brazil’s producers over their American competitors and by restricting access to one of the world’s top export markets. For example:

Illegal Deforestation: Brazil’s deforestation practices make it more difficult for the U.S. logging industry to compete fairly in global markets. A staggering 91% of deforestation in the Amazon was illegal harvesting between 2023 and 2024. Illegally sourced timber products contribute to distorted global prices, resulting in the devaluation of U.S. wood products, with illegally sourced timber estimated to reduce legally sourced timber prices by 7% to 16%.

There is also evidence that some sub-central levels of Brazil’s government are taking steps to eliminate or roll back tax and other public- and private-sector incentives designed to discourage deforestation.

Read the below 🧵 for more non-reciprocal, pervasive trade practices.

Digital Trade: Brazilian courts have issued secret orders directing U.S. technology companies, including X, Meta, and Google, to remove certain political content, suspend accounts belonging to U.S. residents, and prohibit the platforms from disclosing these orders to profile owners.

To enforce compliance, Brazilian courts have also subjected U.S. technology companies to daily non-compliance fines or required them to cease operations in Brazil.

Unfair, Preferential Tariffs: Brazil provides preferential treatment on over a thousand tariff lines for Mexico and hundreds of tariff lines for India at tariff rates between 10 and 100 percent lower than the rate that applies to U.S. exports in those same sectors.

I am getting really bullish on the big three cloud businesses $AMZN $MSFT and $GOOG.

1. Software is going to become 99% cheaper to make.
2. Thus, there will be way more software. More niche software for ever more specific uses.
3. And thus, there will be way more software companies / companies that built their own in house software.
4. Software companies are going to be smaller than before.
5. Thus, they won't ever have the scale to launch their own in house, global cloud hardware.
6. Because they are smaller. they will have less negotiating leverage with the giant cloud providers.
7. They will also be more sticky, since small companies have a relatively higher switching cost.
8. Companies are going to prioritize not giving away their work flows and unique data to the AI model companies. The giant cloud companies can operate as a sort of firewall for them, once they develop the process/technology ($MSFT's CEO is talking about this already).

The key bear argument is the same one I've thought for 2019:

This business could become far more competitive. It doesn't exactly make sense that this should be a hardcore oligopoly. Why can't another few great ones sprout up over 10 years, exactly? And if they do, that will be a terrrible headwind to margins.

And in case it's not clear, I've been wrong since 2019...

Dear fellas, while you're screaming at coud in the death pit over Fedorov and drawing your cardboard to support Fedorov on Maidan 3.0 tomorrow (which I will participate in, because I love him too) - here are a few things to know before another rhetorical apocalypse.
🧵

1. THE LAW. (IS BORING)

Article 115 of the Constitution of Ukraine. Short version:

— The PM's resignation legally kills the ENTIRE cabinet. Every minister. Simultaneously.
— There is no "replace only the PM" button. Never was.
— The outgoing cabinet keeps governing in acting mode until the new one is voted in. No vacuum.

Everyone dies. Everyone has ~98.5% chance to respawn in some position and ~25.7% chance to respawn in the same chair with a stamina boost (numbers scientifically vibed, mechanics 100% real — receipts at the end).

So no, nobody "fired Fedorov."
The Constitution fired everybody.

2. THE CONFLICT. ALLEGEDLY.

The Fedorov–Syrskyi CONFLICT is real. Allegedly.

The Economist reports (multiple anonymous sources; officially unconfirmed — both men publicly deny a personal conflict)

HOWEVER! ☝️🤓
(This is why I write this thread in the first place)

"Dismissed over the conflict" only works as a cause if six months ago nobody could predict him doing Fedorov things to the old system. Everybody could. The conflict isn't a plot twist. It's the job description. Everyone knew EXACTLY what they were installing in January. Fedorov's entire brand is squeezing the guts out of every institution he touches — that's WHY he got the job.

If the goal were removing ONE minister, a point dismissal by a single Rada vote was always available — exactly how Reznikov went in 2023. Nuking the entire government to disguise one firing would be the least efficient conspiracy in recorded history.

The man was reportedly offered the PM chair itself. Declined. You don't purge people by promoting them.

SO

Please, at least stop representing this as Whoever-vs-Fedorov and "The Death of All Hopes." It was an unavoidable staff swap. Fedorov is NOT the reason — he's a side effect.

The only people who genuinely need the "Ukraine's government is collapsing" story live in a country that hasn't changed management since 1999.

Don't do their job for free. 🇺🇦

For a few minutes on a mountain, three disciples saw Jesus as He actually is.

Not the carpenter. Not the traveling teacher.

His face shining like the sun. His clothes blinding white. Moses and Elijah standing beside Him. The voice of God speaking from a cloud.

It's one of the most breathtaking scenes in the Gospels and one of the most overlooked.

Here's what actually happened, and what it means. 🧵

The setup — Matthew 17:1–2.

Jesus takes Peter, James, and John up a high mountain, away from the others.

"And he was transfigured before them, and his face shone like the sun, and his clothes became white as light."

The Greek word is μεταμορφόω (metamorphoō) — a transformation from within.
The glory wasn't shining onto Him.
It was radiating out of Him.

For a moment, the veil lifted.
The disciples saw the divine glory that had been there all along, hidden beneath ordinary flesh.

This wasn't Jesus becoming something new.
It was Jesus revealing what He always was.

Then two figures appear, talking with Him: Moses and Elijah. (17:3)

This is not random.
It's deeply deliberate.

Moses represents the Law.
Elijah represents the Prophets.

Together, "the Law and the Prophets" was shorthand for the entire Old Testament.

And here they both stand, conversing with Jesus — the One they had both pointed toward all along.

The message is unmistakable: Jesus is not a break from the Scriptures that came before.

He is their fulfillment.
Everything Moses and Elijah represented converges on Him.

It’s his decision to make and he has made it. But for change to take place at this moment, it needs to be for the better. Long range and mid range drone strikes in large numbers had better continue. Procurement had better continue to improve. If his new guy is a great . . . /1

. . . man-manager and can sort out the conscription and improve the conditions for those serving to make it an attractant for those that are not, super. But if improvements start to falter, attrition rates go up and busification doesn’t disappear entirely, then . . ./2

. . . the change will be seen as one of the worst decisions of the President’s entire career. At a time like this, when 🇷🇺 position in this war is diminishing in every category, and the DefMin was responsible for several of the improvements, any change had better be for . . ./3

LEAKED: The Canadian government's 'Ministry of Truth'

A heavily redacted internal memo from Industry Minister Mélanie Joly’s department contemplates “legal action” against individuals posting what the government deems as “false or misleading information” on platforms including Facebook, X, and LinkedIn.

The 35-page document dated March 31, titled “Misinformation and Disinformation Strategy,” was obtained through access-to-information requests and first reported by Blacklock’s Reporter. It outlines a shift from reactive responses to proactive prevention and early detection of content that could undermine “the integrity of and public trust in government information.”

Department managers admit that they already monitor official social media channels and media outlets daily for “comments and recurring inaccuracies,” the memo states. Social media is flagged as the main vector where “misinformation related to the department’s mandate” is likely to spread. The memo acknowledges risks that enforcement could backfire by amplifying the very content targeted or provoking public backlash, but the Liberals would likely utilize pervasive propaganda techniques to counter that too.

Naturally, the department itself would assess whether posts are “factually incorrect, misleading or out of context” and any punishment is described as “proportionate,” requiring senior-level sign-off. This essentially positions the government as the arbiter of truth, which is unsurprising given that Minister Joly has advocated for measures against supposed ‘online disinformation’ for years.

As heritage minister in 2018, she pressed web platforms to counter hate speech. In 2023, as foreign affairs minister, she co-launched a UN Global Declaration on Information Integrity.

Under the disgraced former prime minister Justin Trudeau, Canada repealed Section 181, the “False News Offence,” of the Criminal Code in 2019. This followed a Supreme Court decision that ruled the offence violated freedom of expression.

Despite the Liberals’ claims that stronger measures are needed to combat misinformation, Canada already has an extensive legal and regulatory framework addressing the deliberate spread of harmful falsehoods. Federal and provincial statutes, broadcasting regulations, civil remedies, and professional standards provide mechanisms to address hate propaganda, defamatory libel, fraud, and content that promotes hatred or discrimination.

What is far less clear is whether those standards are applied equally. Governments and publicly funded broadcasters rarely face comparable scrutiny or legal consequences when officials make inaccurate or misleading public claims.

For example, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau asserted that the 2022 Freedom Convoy protests were primarily financed by American interests, a claim that was completely fabricated. In fact, GoFundMe President Juan Benitez explicitly stated in his opening remarks to the Public Safety Committee in March 2022 that approximately 88% of the funds raised and 86% of convoy donors were from Canada.

Likewise, official messaging surrounding the modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccines often emphasized their benefits while actively downplaying the unknowns, limitations, and risks.

The same concerns extend beyond the pandemic. Public narratives surrounding suspected unmarked graves at former residential school sites have frequently relied on ground-penetrating radar that have yet to be confirmed through excavation or other forensic evidence despite years of investigation and millions in taxpayer funds.

At the provincial level, Ontario Premier Doug Ford defended millions of taxpayer dollars spent on the government's "Protect Ontario" advertising campaign during the Canada–U.S. tariff dispute. When questioned by independent journalist Tina Yazdani, Ford argued that without such campaigns, "the only choice [the public has] is to listen to the media," making it clear that the government utilizes public funds to shape their perception.

A government confident in its record responds to criticism with transparency, evidence, and open debate, not by expanding censorship powers or threatening legal action against dissenting voices. Proposals that grant governments broader authority to police everyday online speech risk shifting the focus away from protecting public discourse and toward controlling it, a textbook feature of authoritarian regimes.

REPORT by @TamaraUgo:

Full story: rebelne.ws/4w93Wl7

Take action: .StopTheCensorship.ca

10 books to master the psychology of selling:

1) Gap Selling by Keenan

2) Never Split the Difference by Chris Voss

3) SPIN Selling by Neil Rackham

🧵

💸 The Taliban Cash Pipeline: What They Don't Want You Connecting

The post below put its finger on something real, and Grok's sanitized answer is exactly the kind of institutional fog machine that keeps this thing going. Let me walk you through what's actually happening here, because the facts are worse than most people realize — and the distinction Grok is making collapses under even modest scrutiny.

📋 The Bill That Can't Get a Vote

The legislation in question is S.226 — the No Tax Dollars for Terrorists Act, introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) back in January 2025.

What does it actually demand? Not much that should be controversial:

•State Department must develop and implement a strategy to discourage foreign countries and NGOs from financially supporting the Taliban

•State must report to Congress on which countries and NGOs are funding the Taliban

•A full accounting of U.S.-funded direct cash assistance programs in Afghanistan

•Disclosure of Taliban influence over Da Afghanistan Bank (the Afghan central bank)

It passed through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee under Chairman Jim Risch in late January 2026. But it's been sitting since then. No floor vote. No urgency.

The objection that transparency would "reveal where the money is going" tells you everything. That's not a bug — that's the feature. The last thing the apparatus wants is a paper trail connecting American cash to Taliban-controlled entities. Because that paper trail already exists in SIGAR's own reports, and it's damning.

🏦 Follow the SIGAR Trail

This is where Grok's "humanitarian aid through UN agencies" line falls apart. The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) — the U.S. government's own watchdog — has documented the following:

What SIGAR Found

What It Means

~$40 million per week in cash has arrived in Afghanistan near-weekly since the Taliban takeover

That's roughly $2 billion per year flowing into Taliban-controlled territory

The U.S. is the largest single donor behind this cash pipeline

"Humanitarian" branding doesn't change whose money it is
Da Afghanistan Bank is under direct Taliban control with no safeguards against money laundering or terrorism financing

The central bank receiving the cash is run by the same people we're supposedly not funding

At least $10.9 million in confirmed payments from U.S.-funded partners to Taliban-controlled entities in taxes, duties, and utilities

SIGAR admits this is "likely only a fraction" of the true amount

UN agencies receiving U.S. funds do not track or disclose payments made to Taliban entities

The opacity is structural, not accidental

John Sopko, the SIGAR chief, testified to Congress that the U.S. had allocated $8 billion for Afghanistan since the withdrawal. The UN handed over $2.9 billion in cash to Afghanistan, and the Taliban-controlled central bank literally posted photographs of the cash deliveries on social media — arrival dates, shipment amounts, photos of bundled cash being unloaded at Kabul Airport and deposited into vaults.

You can't claim this is "not funding the Taliban" when the Taliban is posting Instagram-worthy photos of your cash deliveries.

https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2077368404382543904

🔗 Where the Money Actually Goes

The "humanitarian aid" framing requires you to believe that cash entering a financial system fully controlled by a designated terrorist organization somehow doesn't benefit that organization. Here's why that's absurd:

1. The Taliban's own budget tells the story. Leaked budget documents show nearly half of Taliban revenue goes to defense, interior affairs, and intelligence — the exact ministries responsible for supporting terrorist networks.

2. The fungibility problem. Even if every dollar were intended for food and medicine (it isn't), cash is fungible. Every dollar of aid that covers basic governance frees up a dollar the Taliban would have spent on those things to instead fund security services, weapons, and terrorist proxies.

3. The tax pipeline. NGOs and UN agencies pay taxes, duties, and fees to the Taliban regime to operate. One implementing partner estimated that only 30–40% of donor funds actually reach the population after layers of taxes, fees, bribery, and extortion. The other 60–70%? It's feeding the regime's coffers.

4. The TTP connection. The UN Security Council's own Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team has documented — repeatedly — that the Taliban provides sustained financial and logistical support to the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a UN-sanctioned Al Qaeda affiliate. They've documented approximately 6,000 TTP fighters sheltered inside Afghan territory with training camps, safe houses, and freedom of movement, resulting in over 600 TTP attacks on Pakistani soil in a single year.

5. The Syria-to-Afghanistan pipeline. A July 2026 Jamestown Foundation assessment flagged that Syria's counterterrorism operations are triggering a strategic relocation of experienced foreign fighters toward Afghanistan. Russian assessments claim 8,500–9,000 Uzbek, Tajik, Turkmen, Uyghur, and North Caucasian terrorists have already shifted from Syria to Afghanistan through Al Qaeda-linked networks.

So the chain is: U.S. taxpayer dollars → UN cash shipments → Taliban-controlled central bank → Taliban budget (half security/intelligence) → TTP/Al Qaeda training camps → dead Pakistanis.
That's not a conspiracy. That's SIGAR plus the UN's own monitoring team.

🎭 Grok's "Distinction" Is the Whole Problem

Grok's response — "humanitarian aid reaches Afghans through UN agencies and NGOs" and "cash shipments help maintain liquidity for aid operations" — is exactly the institutional narrative that keeps this going. Here's why it's disingenuous:

"The US does not directly fund or deliver cash to the Taliban."
Technically true in the narrowest possible sense. The U.S. gives money to the UN → the UN flies pallets of cash to Kabul → the Taliban-controlled central bank receives and distributes it → the Taliban taxes everything that moves → the Taliban's budget funds its security apparatus → that apparatus shelters terrorist networks.

Calling this "not direct funding" is like saying you didn't feed a bear because you threw the sandwich to a middleman who handed it to the bear while the bear was holding his arm. The distinction is legal fiction.

"This is not US government funding of the Taliban regime."
When SIGAR itself says there are no functioning safeguards to prevent Taliban capture of these funds, and when the Taliban-controlled central bank is posting photos of cash deliveries on social media, and when U.S.-funded partners have paid at least $10.9 million directly to Taliban entities (with SIGAR admitting that's a fraction of the true figure) — at what point does "not funding the Taliban" become a lie you're telling yourself?

🔍 Amrullah Saleh's Allegations

Former Afghan Vice President Amrullah Saleh has been the most vocal figure exposing this, and his claims have been remarkably specific:

•January 13, 2026: $45 million in cash delivered to the Taliban in Kabul at approximately 2 p.m. local time

•February 9, 2026: $40 million transferred via a Tashkent-based cargo carrier called SkyGuard, using a chartered flight from Sharjah that didn't appear in public flight-tracking systems

•July 7, 2026: Another $25 million in cash delivered directly to the Taliban

Saleh's February allegation included specific operational details: the airline was established in 2025, it operates as a subsidiary of a U.S. firm identified as "Air Seal," the plane landed at 0900 and departed at 1100, and the flight was deliberately kept off public tracking systems.

Are these claims "unverified" by U.S. officials? Of course they are.

The State Department stopped publicizing cash shipment details in mid-2023 specifically because of criticism. You can't claim something didn't happen when you deliberately stopped documenting it and refuse to investigate.

Saleh's broader point is what matters: "If this money is not for the Taliban, why is it transferred secretly and handed over to them?"
That's the question S.226 tries to answer. And the Senate won't let it come to a vote.

🎯 The Bottom Line

The No Tax Dollars for Terrorists Act doesn't even cut off funding — it just demands transparency about where the money is going. And the Senate can't even pass that.

Consider what that means:

•$3.7+ billion in U.S. aid has flowed to Afghanistan since the Taliban takeover

•$40 million per week continues flowing

•SIGAR has documented 19 instances of waste, fraud, and abuse since 2008, totaling at least $24 billion in wasted taxpayer dollars

•The Taliban central bank posts photos of cash deliveries

•The UN doesn't track where the money goes once it enters the Taliban banking system

•The Taliban budget prioritizes security and intelligence over public welfare

•UN monitors confirm TTP and Al Qaeda training camps on Taliban-governed territory

And the Senate's response to a bill that would simply require reporting on where the money goes is to bury it in committee.
Grok can draw its polite distinctions about "humanitarian aid" and "banking system liquidity." But when the U.S. government's own inspector general says the money can't be tracked, the Taliban is posting photos of it, and a bill demanding basic transparency can't get a vote — you don't need to be Amrullah Saleh to connect those dots.

The people who served in Afghanistan know exactly what they're looking at. They fought an enemy that's now being kept on life support by the same government that sent them to war. That's not a policy failure. That's a betrayal.

Israel the Jewish State wrote, "Stunning Figure: U.S. security aid to Israel, which stands at $3.3 billion a year, is often viewed as one-way. In practice, however, it is one of the most profitable investments for the American economy.
1)

According to a report by journalist Ariel Kahana, conservative calculations show that the budget transferred to Israel generates at least $15 billion for the U.S. economy.
2)

Broader and more generous estimates claim that the U.S. earns around $48 billion a year from its aid to Israel.

Beyond the direct financial return, Israel serves as the most effective showcase for the American weapons industry.
3)

Here's how I did this

1. ID bulk sketchy green card submissions. @LayoffAI has a great website that shows H1-B filings by company and county

2. Go to your county and examine the list of H1-B filers. Skip the big sponsors (IBM, etc.) and focus on odd names with smaller #s

https://twitter.com/CaudilloDahl/status/2077453597974139318

3. Go to Google Maps and search for the company within the map area of your county only. If it's out of a house, or a very small office space, you have a hit. Now, you're going to find out about the company

4. (Be sure to screenshot everything as well as copy links to a doc)

5. Search engine fun - capture every URL into your doc which comes up and collect info. There will be corporate sites, obsolete sites which direct to a new company, etc. Collect that info and research those offshoots

6. There will be social media, news puff pieces, links. Get em