It's been two years since Taehyung married into the Jeon family, two years since his husband looked at him on their wedding day with eyes as cold as ice.
"It's not you I wanted to marry."
He knew Jeongguk wasn't obliged to love him. He understood that their union was merely a business deal between their families.
Still, he'd been taught to be a good omega, to care for his alpha, even if he didn't love him.
So, he cooked, cleaned the house, did the laundry, and never complained.
Even on that fateful night, when Jeongguk stumbled into the apartment, body hot and wound up tight, pheromones wild with the start of his rut, Taehyung took care of him too.
All Themes List. For example:
- Depopulation
- Myocarditis, Clots
- Vaids, Turbo Cancer
- Death Spreading Chemicals
- Beautiful Skies+Clouds+Trails
- Foodforests and Foodgardens
- Deflate the Parasitic System
- Taken: Children of The State
- Taken: Child Rapists and Killers
...
Topic List for Depopulation with Covid "Vaccines" Bioweapons
Alle Thema's Lijst. Bv.:
- Depopulatie
- Myocarditis, Klonters
- Vaids, Turbo Kanker
- Giftige Chemicaliën
- Mooie Hemels+Wolken+Sporen
- Voedselbossen en -tuinen
- Deflateer het Parasitaire Systeem
- Taken:Kinderen van de Staat
- Taken:Kind Verkrachters+Moordenaars
- Racisme
...
Hard to overstate the significance of the US cooling on India, which for five decades deluded itself that New Delhi was 'a fellow democracy and bulwark against China'.
Here is the long history of India playing American administrations like a fiddle🎻 - 🧵/
1. Since independence, India has had one friend and ally consistently throughout - the Soviet Union, then Russia. No Indian bilateral relationship is closer.
2. In the middle of the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, conflict broke out between India and China (a war India started) 2/
2...The US sided with India, hoping to tease India away from a Soviet/PRC axis. India said "thank you for the support" and immediately went back to BAU with the Soviets.
3. Later, the US pushed to relax export controls with non-aligned countries, after India feigned interest 3/
SIMA 2 is our most capable AI agent for virtual 3D worlds. 👾🌐
Powered by Gemini, it goes beyond following basic instructions to think, understand, and take actions in interactive environments – meaning you can talk to it through text, voice, or even images. Here’s how 🧵
Advanced reasoning 🧠
We trained SIMA 2 to achieve high-level goals in a wide array of games – allowing it to perform complex reasoning and independently plan how to accomplish tasks.
It acts like a collaborative partner that can explain its intentions and answer questions about its behavior.
Generalization ☂️
SIMA 2 is now far better at carrying out detailed instructions, even in worlds it's never seen before.
It can transfer learned concepts like “mining” in one game and apply it to “harvesting” in another – connecting the dots between similar tasks.
It even navigated unseen environments created in real-time by our Genie 3 model.
🔥 THE [TRAITOR] THRESHOLD | Why Trump Nuked [MTG] — And Why This Was NOT Kayfabe 🔥
🔥 Trump didn’t “troll” [MTG]. Trump EXCOMMUNICATED her — and the difference changes EVERYTHING. 🔥
The DeSantis drama was Kabuki Theater.
The Elon rift was an ego flex.
But this?
This is something else entirely.
Because WHAT IF everything you thought was “political drama” was actually strategic code, and the real message wasn’t in what Trump said, but in who he said it about?
And WHAT HAPPENS WHEN the Leader of the Free World uses a word he’s only deployed a handful of times in eight years…
…and every single time he used it, someone’s career — or life — in politics effectively ended?
Let’s talk: Trump vs. [MTG].
Is it KAYFABE?
I don’t think so.
Unpopular opinion? Maybe.
What I’m about to share might ruffle a few feathers… and I’m good with that.
I could be wrong, but I’m wide open to being challenged, corrected, or proven dead right.
Maybe you’ll nod along, maybe you’ll want to fight me in the comments — either way, give me five minutes.
Because I’m not here to tell you what to think; I’m here to point out a pattern that’s been staring us in the face.
If you see it differently, say so.
If you see it on an even deeper level, I genuinely want to hear it.
Let’s hash it out in the comments. Deal?
And before we go any further…
some of you may remember the thread I wrote this past summer on the
Trump vs. Elon KAYFABE.
If you haven’t read it yet, go check it out now. 🔻
You’ ll need that context to fully grasp what I’m about to show you next.
Now…
WHAT IF I told you the word Trump used is the Nuclear Launch Code he reserves for ONE category of people in the ENTIRE Political Universe…
…and that category is the one NO ONE ever comes back from?
But frens 🐸…
before we take another step…
go ahead and grab your COVFEFE ☕️ and get COMFY AF…
because we’re about to
connect•some•serious•dots•••••
…shall we? 😎
🧵1/
🔥 With DeSantis & Elon — Trump Was SIGNALING Competition, Not Condemnation 🔥
Now that we’ve looked at Trump’s own words, let’s break down exactly why he used language this extreme…
…and why it matters.
So let’s set the record straight for all the NORMIES in the back row:
Let’s be real…
Trump NEVER called:
→ DeSantis a “TRAITOR”
→ Elon a “TRAITOR”
→ Massie, McConnell, Christie — even at their PEAK CLOWNERY — NEVER got “TRAITOR.”
He mocked, jabbed, clowned, and politically neutered [THEM]…
…but he didn’t label [THEM] TREASON-ADJACENT.
Why?
Because those clashes were KAYFABE Rivalries, NOT Constitutional Indictments.
DeSantis?
He challenged Trump.
Trump had to break his momentum.
But Trump ALWAYS left the door cracked open.
Elon?
They had the “bromance breakup” Kayfabe…
…but Trump still respects what Elon built.
Those were:
→ Ego Battles
→ Dominance Displays
→ Leadership Tests
→ “Who owns the room?” Contests
→ Campaign Season Chest-Thumping
No existential BETRAYAL.
No moral [TREASON].
No moment where he said:
“You turned on the Republic.”
In KAYFABE, the other guy still gets to walk away.
In [TREASON] territory… he doesn’t.
And if you think that was just Trump swatting away another challenger…
look at what he did next…
🧵2/
🔥Trump Used LANGUAGE He Reserves for the DOOM LIST🔥
Let me say this clearly…
Trump has a VERY short vocabulary set reserved for the truly DAMNED…
…the people he believes didn’t just oppose him, but BETRAYED the REPUBLIC:
→ “TRAITOR”
→ “DISGRACE”
→ “ENEMY WITHIN”
→ “RINO SCUM”
→ “ROT”
→ “POISON”
He doesn’t use all of these words on everyone…
…but anyone who gets even ONE of them is already on Political Death Row.
And [MTG]?
She didn’t just get one.
She got the rarest, heaviest, and most lethal word in the entire set:
“TRAITOR.”
Historically, Trump has only deployed these NUCLEAR labels on people he openly categorized as BETRAYERS of the movement and the Nation:
→ Mike [PENCE]
→ Liz [CHENEY]
→ Adam [KINZINGER]
→ Mitch [McCONNELL]
→ John [BOLTON]
→ The Intel SWAMP RATS at the [DOJ] and [FBI] who tried to overthrow him
“FOR THOSE IN RIO LINDA…”
This isn’t the:
“we had a rivalry,”
“we had a disagreement,”
or “we irritated each other online” list.
This is the “you betrayed the Republic” list…
…the category Trump reserves ONLY for the ones who crossed the ONE line you NEVER cross and NEVER come back from.
These are NOT Kayfabe rivals.
[THEY] are NOT competitors.
[THEY] are NOT challengers.
[THEY] are the Benedict Arnolds of our era…
…the people Trump believes VIOLATED the single sacred requirement of the movement:
LOYALTY to the REPUBLIC and to WE THE PEOPLE.
Putting Marjorie Taylor Greene in THAT category is NOT Kayfabe.
DEJA de decirle a ChatGPT "Hazme una presentación".
MAL Prompt = MAL Resultado.
Usa estos prompts y flipa:
1. El Constructor de Presentación Completa
Prompt:
Actúa como un creador de presentaciones de clase mundial. Crea una presentación completa, diapositiva por diapositiva sobre el tema: [inserta tema]. Incluye slides de título, puntos clave, ejemplos, datos, metáforas, sugerencias visuales y un cierre con llamado a la acción. Estructúrala como una presentación nivel TED con flujo narrativo.
2. La Presentación de Investigación Profunda
Prompt:
Crea una presentación completa sobre [inserta tema] usando investigación profunda. Incluye estadísticas reales, casos de estudio, citas de expertos, insights prácticos y ejemplos. Haz cada slide educativa, atractiva y respaldada por fuentes creíbles. Proporciona referencias al final.
If you really want to understand how Congress still thinks about India, don’t look at their speeches.
Look at this single moment: Sonia Gandhi personally handing the Indira Gandhi Peace Prize to Michelle Bachelet- a former UN rights chief whose reports on Kashmir were so one-sided that New Delhi rejected them line by line.
This wasn’t a tribute. It was Congress reaffirming exactly which global ecosystem it aligns with, and exactly which voices it chooses to honour.
Bachelet didn’t appear out of thin air. She rose through the same transnational activist networks that overlap heavily with Soros-funded civil-society groups across Latin America and Europe.
As Chilean President, she even decorated George Soros with a state honour for his “contribution to democracy”, a relationship that tells you exactly where her ideological anchors sit.
And when she reached the , India found itself constantly battling narratives that echoed those very networks.
So why does Congress honour her? Because this isn’t a one-off decision.
The Indira Gandhi Peace Prize chaired by Sonia Gandhi and controlled by the Indira Gandhi Memorial Trust has repeatedly been awarded to figures who, in crucial moments, took positions that cut against India’s interests.
Kofi Annan, who later chaired a Soros-funded organisation. Lula da Silva, whose government voted against India at the IAEA when India desperately needed support. Leymah Gbowee, who publicly criticised CAA/NRC.
And Mohammad Yunus whose brief involvement in Bangladesh’s 2007 caretaker period unfolded alongside severe political turmoil, street clashes, and a military-backed crackdown. Today he’s embroiled in fresh legal battles at home, accused of financial irregularities and labour-law violations by his own government.
En este hilo voy a compartir mi análisis de «experiencia ciudadana» sobre este trámite digital que tarde o temprano todos tenemos que cursar.
¡Vamos allá! 🧵👇
1️⃣ Abro un navegador y busco «cita previa para renovar el DNI». Aterrizo en citapreviadnie.es. Un sitio que parece oficial. No lo digo por los emblemas institucionales, sino por el diseño estilo «Microsoft Frontpage 1998».
Lo primero que me llama la atención es que el ¿botón? para iniciar el trámite sea el enlace más discreto de la página, abajo y en pequeño.
No es que sea un drama, pero bueno, seguimos.
Dejando a un lado la estética cutre, comienzo a leer y encuentro la redacción intrincada y confusa.
El título dice que el trámite es para la «solicitud, consulta o anulación» de cita previa del DNI o pasaporte. Pero la siguiente línea habla de «obtención o renovación». Es decir, el trámite parece servir para cinco acciones:
—Solicitar
—Consultar
—Anular
—Obtener
—Renovar
Los tres primeros, de la cita previa. Los otros dos, del DNI o pasaporte.
Pero el título habla de «DNI», mientras que el primer párrafo, en cambio, de «DNIe». No sé si es un error o que aquí no puedo pedir cita para el DNIe. Si así fuera, ¿dónde podría?
Un poco más abajo pone «Se recuerda a todos los ciudadanos que deben acudir a su cita puntualmente». Vale, pero eso no es importante ahora. Dime eso cuando haya obtenido mi cita, no antes. Es más fácil que lo tenga en cuenta si me lo pones en la cita que si me lo dices al principio del trámite.
Pone también «Recuerden también consultar en dnielectronico.es, en el menú […] los requisitos necesarios para […]» Hmmm... vale; entendido. Así que hay dos portales:
1/21 Fil 🧶: que faire quand un homme de 60 ans en bonne santé consulte en décembre 2025 pour savoir s'il va bien (traduction : faites-moi un check-up) ?
Adam Cifu répond : sensible-med.com/p/do-doctors-h…
2/21 Adam Cifu, en introduction, nous parle du dernier essai concernant le vaccin antipneumococcique chez l'adulte.
C'est un essai contrôlé randomisé Prevenar 13 vs placebo avec comme critère principal la survenue de premiers épisodes de pneumopathiesnejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Wenn Putins Propaganda lockt -
▶️ Deutsche Auswanderer nach Russland
Während Putin Krieg führt und sich immer stärker von Europa abschottet, lockt seine Propaganda eine kleine, aber wachsende Zahl von Deutschen nach Russland.
Sie kehren Deutschland den Rücken: aus Frust über Politik und Gesellschaft, aus ideologischer Überzeugung oder aus Sehnsucht nach "traditionellen Werten".
Angeführt von einer gut vernetzten Szene in Russland und Deutschland rekrutieren Organisationen wie "Welcome to Russia" –
initiiert von der ehemaligen Spionin Maria Butina – gezielt Auswanderer aus dem Westen.
"frontal" zeigt, wie diese Netzwerke funktionieren, welche Versprechen sie machen – und wie das Leben der deutschen Einwanderer in Russland tatsächlich aussieht.
Publicly listed companies have decades of financials, long-term customers, seasoned management teams, and tried-and-tested business models. Yet, investors still get it wrong.
Today, powerful algorithms trade these stocks 24 hours a day, reacting instantly to everything from wars and weather to elections and tweets.
Because boycotting American products is the very least we Europeans can do right now to return the favor, here's a thread of US brands to avoid, split up by category for your convenience.🧵