(1/28) 🚨⚠️ Virology is a Sham — Explained for Every Attention Span
I’ve tailored this thread to all attention spans—from 10-word memes for goldfish brains to 25,000-word papers for chads—and everything in between.
Pick length that suits you and see why virology’s a scam. 🧵👇
(2/28) Virology is a Sham — Explained for Every Attention Span
“He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.”
3/28: 20 words
4/28: 30 words @APWK
5/28: 40 words
6/28: 45 words @DrWojakMD
7/28: 50 words @AndrewKaufmanMD
8/28: 50 words @drtomcowan
9/28: 55 words Dr. Mark Bailey
10/28: 70 words Dr. Stefan Lanka
11/28: 70 words Dr. Stefan Lanka
12/28: 100 words
13/28: 130 words Dr. Jordan Grant
14/28: 140 words
15/28: 200 words
16/28: 250 words
17/28: 300 words
18/28: 300 words
19/28: 500 words @potusastrologer
20/28: 550 words @Alec_Zeck
21/28: 600 words
22/28: 3000 words Dr. Stefan Lanka
23/28: 4000 words Dr. Stefan Lanka
24/28: 5000 words @Alec_Zeck @JacobDiazTheUV Dr. Jordan Grant @MikeDonio @ViroLIEgy
25/28: 14,000 words Dr. Mark Bailey, Dr. John Bevan-Smith
26/28: 21,000 words Dr. Stefan Lanka
27/28: 25,000 words Dr. Mark Bailey
(3/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 20 words
The future of journalism? Credentialed members of the NYC press corps came to Luigi Mangione’s hearing today to support the defendant they’re purportedly reporting on and to promote jury nullification “to the most cucked and submissive population in all of human history”
“I’m saying fuck Brian Thompson. I don’t give a flying fuck he died,” says Ashley Rojas, wearing her press badge provided by @NYCMayorsOffice. Lena Weissbrot adds that Thompson’s teenage sons “are better off without him” and should “enjoy the blood money.”
Take a minute and see the Thread of Propagandist COCKROACH JANATA PARTY
A Page created few days back has now crossed 600k+ followers , saying they're NEUTRAL,
But the irony is they are getting support from Opposition and they're spreading Propaganda against BJP
Digging down more , I found on 18th May , almost every News Media Agency started posting articles ,
Question is why on same day , almost same time also
A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.
So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.
What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.
Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.
The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.
Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.
The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.
The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.
Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.
She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.
1/ 🧵
After the @nytimes “dog rape” story, we examined “human stories” Nick Kristof has published on Gaza.
What we found is alarming.
Sources presented as credible and apolitical supporting terrorism, don’t match descriptions – or may not exist.
Did Kristof verify any of this?
2/ Take Mohamed Abu Jafar.
In one column, Kristof holds him up as the kind of Palestinian who preserves a shared humanity, citing him as an example of those “who press for reconciliation and peace,” and in another calling him a “wise” Palestinian from Jenin whose 16‑year‑old brother was shot dead by Israeli forces – and even has him saying “the only practical option… is working for peace.”
A tragic story – and a quote Kristof reuses as his moral anchor. But Abu Jafar’s own Facebook tells a very different story: glorifying “martyrs,” posts about armed terrorists and “resistance,” praising attacks and celebrating jihad and martyrdom.
This is the man readers are told embodies wisdom and is “working for peace.”
3/ Kristof never tells readers one crucial fact: Abu Jafar’s brother was not killed in the current war.
In another NYT piece, the brother’s death date is given as 2002. Abu Jafar also appears to post his grave on Facebook, identifying him as a “martyr” of the Al-Aqsa Intifada.
But none of that context appears in Kristof’s columns. Instead, readers are left with the impression of a fresh tragedy – while a man who openly glorifies “martyrdom” is presented as a voice of “shared humanity” and “peace.”
De VRT beweert de studie vrij te geven. Ik lees enkel een rechtvaardiging die eigenlijk betekent dat hun steekproef waardeloos was of de dat nu claimen. En geen studie maar een powerpointpresentatie over de analyse. Daar zitten wel nog de PBH in. /1
Zoek in de pdf op PBH of "personen van buitenlandse herkomst". U zal schrikken. Over de vraagstelling kan je ook bedenkingen maken. Normaal moet je gesloten vragen stellen voor een betrouwbaar onderzoek. /2
In wetenschappelijk onderzoek gebruik je meestal open vragen voor kwalitatief onderzoek en gesloten vragen voor kwantitatief onderzoek.
De VRT maakte een kwantitatief dat ze presenteren als kwalitatief na deductieve analyse. /3
"The Psychology of Money" by Morgan Housel. Chala mandi chestunna aa common mistakes ni nuvvu repeat cheyakudadu ante, mee mindset ni change cheskovali.
Wealth gurinchi nee POV ni marche 10 powerful lessons
Mee financial attitude emi random ga vachindi kadu.
Actually, meeru puttinappude adi form ayipoyindi.
1970 lo putara? Meeru teenage lo unnappudu S&P 500 10x peragadam chusaru, so meelo market meeda oka love untadi.
1950 lo putara? Market emi peragaka povadam chusaru, so meelo market ante doubt untadi.
Market okkate, but experience batti wiring totally different.
Ide mee Financial DNA.
Warren Buffett net worth: $84.5 billion.
Andulo $81.5 billion aayana age 65 daataka earned chesindhe.
Aayana success ki reason oka genius IQ or special insider info kadu.
Reason entante, aayana age 10 loney investing start chesaru.
Compounding anedi chala smart ga unde vallaki reward ivvadu. Adi patience tho wait chese vallaki matrame rewards istundi.
Why are they even in different parties? The only issue they seem to care about is the imaginary Space Jews with their invisible Jew-rays. Go make that the basis of your own 3rd party, and let non-insane get back to arguing over Social Security budgets and whatnot
"Boy did I pick the wrong century to be alive" - Lyndon LaRouche, roasting in hell
I bear partial responsibility for the entire Naval Woke College debate. I’ve been hammering them for years.
Let me tell you why…. 🧵
Strap in, it’s a LONG story.
Go all the way back to the start of the Trump 1.0 administration.
Actually, go back further. Go back to Obama.
The Navy is NOT in charge of shipbuilding. They are in charge of ship buying.
The DOT is in charge of shipyards. Specifically @DOTMARAD. And USCG handles shipyard regulations.
Internationally, the United Nations @IMOHQ is in charge. But MARAD is the only major agency in the United States chartered to promote an American industry. So Obama had to subvert it.
Obama went out of his way to play dumb on all maritime matters. But here’s the thing: he grew up in Hawaii. It is impossible to grow up on an island and not understand shipping.
He wanted to turn the oceans into a collectivist wonderland run by Marxists.
Here is how he did it.
First, he installed the failed governor of Mississippi, Ray Mabus, as Secretary of the Navy.
Then he installed the worst USCG Commandant the nation has ever seen: Admiral Papp, who promoted Senior Executive Service officers aligned with UN globalists.
Papp’s SES pushed the UN to further adopt climate change and DEI. He landed his top USCG JAG a job leading the IMO and made sure the elected Secretary General was little more than a figurehead.
The problem: the UN has zero authority to regulate warships. So Papp had Mabus simply order the Navy to accept USCG shipbuilding rules that were, in fact, UN standards.
Then Mabus pushed hard on projects he knew would fail: LCS, Zumwalt, and a massive initiative to convert every Navy ship to run on used French fry oil.
He also forced thousands of change orders onto new aircraft carriers.
Doubling down on failed designs while welcoming UN-approved inspectors into American shipyards was a one-two punch.
Bad ships, plus crushing red tape, would cripple the most powerful Navy in the world.
But the UN one-world-government scheme requires more than weakening the strongest. You also have to elevate the weakest.
Chinese shipbuilding was growing, but their workmanship was a disgrace. They could only build simple vessels: coal bulkers and the like.
So Obama dispatched an American NGO to Chinese shipyards to teach them everything we know. Not just any NGO. The most profitable nonprofit in America.
(For legal reasons, I can’t name them.)
That NGO pulled the best naval architects, marine engineers, and inspectors out of American yards and sent them to China.
They are still there today.
But what about MARAD? It is mandated, by law, to advance American maritime interests.
He simply didn’t appoint anyone for years. He installed a junior congressional aide with a history of poor performance as acting administrator for most of his first term.
(In his second term, when Navy shipbuilding efforts started crashing and burning, Mabus put a submarine O5 in the job.)
Ships and shipyards are heavily unionized, so the AFL-CIO Marxists made sure no one complained.
And Obama figured out that the GOP hates the Jones Act so every time a based mariner or shipbuilder complained just remind them how the Republicans want to steal their jobs.
Simultaneously you get Democrat friends in the Senate to support the number one JA and Merchant Marine hater: John McCain
If anyone complains about Navy shipbuilding you point them to all the ways Dems are cooperating with McCain
McCain who was undermining the shipyards and commercial maritime base.
Now, how do you keep the Navy itself from screaming bloody murder?
First, you double down on submarines, which cannot police the oceans the way surface ships can. UN rules were kept out of Electric Boat.
Second, you push hard on joint warfare. You send your best and brightest officers not to sea, but to the desert, to serve as support elements for the Army.
You pull in reservists like @PeteButtigieg and @RepGoodlander.
1/5
You do everything you can to land book deals, podcasts, and movie roles for Navy SEALs fighting on dry land.
Dial up every Navy activity ashore. Dial down everything at sea.
The final blow: commercial fishermen were not happy. And they are a loud constituency.
Kneecapping them was easy. All Obama had to do was designate 553 million acres of ocean as National Monuments and watch the industry collapse.
You also had to divide and conquer. Alaska has the most powerful commercial fishing lobby by far, so you don’t “protect” those fisheries, and you get McCain to make their governor his running mate.
This was the easiest part of the whole operation. He styled himself a modern-day Teddy Roosevelt, and the GOP signed off without a fight.
So what does any of this have to do with War Colleges?
I was naive to most of this when Trump was elected. All I knew was that the Naval War College had become incredibly powerful in steering naval policy under Mabus.
War colleges train future admirals and generals. They plant ideas and policies in officers’ heads before those officers ever pin on Rear Admiral.
I knew they were going woke. I knew Tom Nichols was off the rails. I did not know how deep the corruption ran.
All I knew at the time was how powerful they had become.
So Trump gets elected in 2016, and we finally have a chance to reform MARAD. But the Navy admirals won’t let go.
The narrative: the Navy was locked in a zero-sum fight for shipbuilding funding against the US Merchant Marine (run by MARAD at DOT) and the USCG.
The Navy saw the US Merchant Marine as a threat, not an ally. They refused to let us run our own agency. A Navy guy had to be in charge.
But DOT Secretary Elaine Chao wanted to save shipyards. So she cut a compromise: the Navy could pick the Merchant Marine Commandant to run MARAD, but he had to be a Merchant Marine Academy grad.
Elaine was married to Mitch McConnell. The Navy couldn’t say no.
They settled on Rear Admiral Mark Buzby.
Buz came in swinging. He reorganized the Merchant Marine Reserve. He funded a fleet of new training ships. He recruited top talent to run each academy. He saved Philly Shipyard.
I did a lot of work behind the scenes to help Buz.
Buz’s next big project was to restore our maritime highways: the rivers and waterways we need to reindustrialize.
Trucks are great for an import economy. They cannot carry enough weight to rebuild steel mills, shipyards, and the rest of heavy manufacturing. You need rail. You need barges.
I launched a startup at Buzby’s request and poured my personal time and money into the problem.
Then the New York Times ran a hit piece on Elaine Chao’s ties to Chinese maritime interests.
I won’t get into the details. I’m not here to defend or trash the McConnell-Chao family.
They are a complicated bunch, and I could write a book on the great and terrible things they have done.
The point is this: the Dems all follow the New York Times. So the unions and the rest of the maritime coalition had to back away from Chao’s maritime initiative.
The article did even more damage to McConnell, who already had a rocky relationship with Trump. MAGA turned on Mitch, sparking a war still raging today, with Mitch blocking the SAVE Act and Thune retaliating by blocking the SHIPS Act.
At the same time, the so-called West Point Mafia (WPN) was taking over the Trump administration. The Army Corps of Engineers controls the marine highways, and the Army would have to pay for Buz’s plan.
Pompeo, Esper, Milley (Princeton, but loyal to the club), and the rest of the WPA wanted that money flowing to defense contractors and consultants. Not to reindustrialization that would have strengthened the Navy.
2/5
By the midterms, the Trump administration, under the WPM, was tearing itself apart and lost Congress.
Another powerful West Point graduate, Jack Reed, took McCain’s old gavel at the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The WPA didn’t just block Chao and Buz. They sold off most of the Army’s watercraft fleet at auction and turned the Army Corps of Engineers into paperwork pushers who now subcontract almost everything to whichever private firm spends the most on lobbyists.
Certain shipyards complained. They were handed more submarine contracts as a consolation prize and told to build out consulting businesses and digital products instead of ships.
The only person who put up a fight was Trump himself. He tasked his most loyal advisor, along with the NSC and NEC, to find solutions the White House could drive on its own.
O’Brien at the NSC pushed hard. He was cornered at every turn by Milley’s Joint Chiefs and SECDEF Esper.
Esper had already engineered a coup to force the Secretary of the Navy to resign, replacing him with a string of feckless acting secretaries.
The NEC and Navarro both worked hard to save shipbuilding. They had very different ideas.
Navarro was a China hawk. He wanted to unite the core maritime constituents to fight the CCP together. To do that, he had to win over the Jones Act lobby.
Kevin Hassett at NEC wanted to pull internal levers to give heavy industry a boost. In his view, that meant suspending the Jones Act.
There is more to this story, of course. Both men are patriots who tried to do the right thing. Both were aligned on saving shipyards.
But the WPM used the Jones Act to drive a wedge between Hassett and Navarro.
It didn’t ultimately work. Both men are back together in Trump 2.0. At the time, though, it made anything maritime they tried to do agonizing.
Then 2020 happened.
Retired Navy admirals wanted a Navy guy running DOT. The WPM wanted a land war veteran. The Obama crowd wanted a Marxist aligned with the UN.
They settled on a Navy Intelligence reservist: Pete Buttigieg.
Pete is politically savvy. He knew the maritime issues, especially the Jones Act, were political kryptonite.
And everyone was at each other’s throats, demanding action as shipbuilding, the Navy, the USCG, and the Merchant Marine all started collapsing in readiness.
But Obama gave him the playbook: do nothing.
Ignore MARAD.
Ignore the Navy.
Ignore the USCG.
When Congress hands you $1.1 trillion to fix infrastructure, just don’t do any maritime projects.
Let the UN take over and quietly build out a massive UN Carbon Tax that will fund UN DEI, climate programs, and Marxism for decades.
Don’t even help the White House.
When they ask for Merchant Marine ships to support the Gaza Pier, send one that’ll catch fire. When the Baltimore Bridge collapses and Biden puts you in charge, pass it off to the broken Army Corps of Engineers. When the Houthis fire on US Merchant Marine ships, don’t say a word. Not even a tweet.
But this thread isn’t about that criminal neglect by Mayor Pete.
It’s about the Naval Woke College.
While hundreds of thousands were killed, enslaved, or fled, a significant Jewish population never left. They shifted from Judea north to the Galilee, where Jewish scholars compiled the Mishna and the Jerusalem Talmud—the very foundations of Rabbinic Judaism.
Over the next 1,500 years, through Byzantine rule, Arab conquests, Crusades & Ottoman rule, indigenous Jews remained, dressed like their neighbors, spoke Arabic as their primary language, understood local laws & fiercely maintained their Jewish identity and religious practices.
They came to be known as the Musta'arabim (meaning "those who live among the Arabs" or "Arabized Jews"). When waves of Sephardic Jews arrived after the Spanish Expulsion in 1492, they documented encountering this well-established, native Jewish population.