Recent well liked threads
Start here - Thread #1
The thing about Oral History is you either forget, exaggerate, or want to hide the truth.
PTSD will do that
A mega thread of the reality of the Indians, Europeans, Settlers, and Colonialists
The thing about Oral History is you either forget, exaggerate, or want to hide the truth.
PTSD will do that
A mega thread of the reality of the Indians, Europeans, Settlers, and Colonialists
This isn't about villains or heroes, but the truth of science, and humans in their time
Let's go
Indigenous have not been on "turtle island" from time immemorial
DNA proves immigration from Asia and North Eurasia before that
North American Indians are related to Europeans
Let's go
Indigenous have not been on "turtle island" from time immemorial
DNA proves immigration from Asia and North Eurasia before that
North American Indians are related to Europeans
The term "Turtle Island" is just trendy
Iroquois talked of the Great Turtle, not Turtle Island
Turtle Island was a 70's book written by a hippy which began its use mainstream
Its seems hypocritical for North West Indigenous to talk of turtle island, as their deity is the Raven
Iroquois talked of the Great Turtle, not Turtle Island
Turtle Island was a 70's book written by a hippy which began its use mainstream
Its seems hypocritical for North West Indigenous to talk of turtle island, as their deity is the Raven
A recent scientific paper explored the impact of mass SARS-CoV-2 infections on Lymphocytes (crucial to the body’s immune system).
I noticed the authors had shared the data behind their charts in the Appendix Supplementary materials, so I built a quick dataviz project.
🧵
I noticed the authors had shared the data behind their charts in the Appendix Supplementary materials, so I built a quick dataviz project.
🧵
Above, I’ve re-cast the data behind their Figures 3 and 5 in terms of % change from the baseline. Hopefully this is useful to help compare the subsets, whose results vary in scale.
🧵
🧵
I added interactive filter controls and a trend line (dashed pink). You can use those to explore for example the trends in the last 12 months measured in the paper, for the CD3, 4 & 8 series.
🧵
🧵
Is There Such a Thing as Christian Witchcraft or Manipulation?
1. The Uncomfortable Question That Cuts Too Close to Home
Most Christians recoil at the suggestion that witchcraft could ever have a place in the church. They imagine witchcraft as a caricature—pointed hats, cauldrons, pentagrams, and occult ceremonies performed by people who despise God and embrace darkness. The average believer never considers that the same spirit at work in those obvious occult practices can slip undetected into Christian environments when its methods are disguised with spiritual language. Yet the Bible forces this uncomfortable reality upon us when it declares that witchcraft is one of the “works of the flesh” (Galatians 5:20), placing it in the same category as idolatry, hatred, wrath, and adultery. In Scripture, witchcraft is not merely the practice of pagan sorcery—it is the flesh asserting its will against God, the human heart attempting to influence outcomes by control, manipulation, intimidation, and emotional pressure rather than by submission to the Holy Ghost. If witchcraft is a work of the flesh, then any believer walking in the flesh becomes capable of participating in its spirit, even while sitting in church, even while carrying a Bible, and even while speaking the vocabulary of Christianity.
This makes the question unavoidable: Can Christians, knowingly or unknowingly, engage in witchcraft? Not the occultic kind—though apostasy has taken many there—but the subtle, psychological, emotional, and spiritual manipulation that mirrors the very nature of rebellion against God. When Samuel confronted Saul and said, “rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft” (1 Samuel 15:23), he was not speaking poetically. He was giving heaven’s definition. He was saying that rebellion, manipulation, and control are spiritual cousins of occult influence. Witchcraft in God’s eyes is not merely about charms and spells; it is about a heart that refuses God’s authority and attempts to control others in His place. And if churches are honest, this question strikes far closer to home than anyone wants to admit, because manipulation, emotional coercion, spiritual intimidation, and pressure tactics are found not only in cults and false religions but in Baptist pews, Pentecostal pulpits, and evangelical counseling rooms. Witchcraft is not always loud and spectacular; sometimes it whispers through soft phrases, religious tones, and subtle attempts to control.
2. Biblical Witchcraft: A Definition Much Wider Than Occult Practices
Most Christians define witchcraft too narrowly because they only see its external trappings. But Scripture presents witchcraft as a principle long before it shows up as a practice. Witchcraft appears whenever human beings attempt to control others through fleshly force, psychological leverage, or spiritual intimidation. When Samuel equated rebellion with witchcraft, he was showing that witchcraft is any attempt to replace God’s authority with one’s own. It is self-will asserting itself in defiance of God, using means that God never authorized. Thus, witchcraft occurs whenever someone manipulates, coerces, pressures, or intimidates to achieve an outcome that should be left to the Holy Spirit’s influence. It is an attempt to bypass God and exert control. While pagan witchcraft uses spells, talismans, and rituals, religious witchcraft uses guilt, fear, Scripture taken out of context, emotional pressure, and spiritual language designed to bring others into submission to human will rather than divine truth.
The Bible gives examples of this spirit in diverse characters. Balaam manipulated spiritual truth for personal gain. Jezebel used fear and emotional domination to bend others to her desires. Simon the sorcerer desired spiritual power for influence and recognition (Acts 8:18–20). Diotrephes “loved to have the preeminence” (3 John 9) and used his position to control, exclude, and pressure others. These individuals did not always
1. The Uncomfortable Question That Cuts Too Close to Home
Most Christians recoil at the suggestion that witchcraft could ever have a place in the church. They imagine witchcraft as a caricature—pointed hats, cauldrons, pentagrams, and occult ceremonies performed by people who despise God and embrace darkness. The average believer never considers that the same spirit at work in those obvious occult practices can slip undetected into Christian environments when its methods are disguised with spiritual language. Yet the Bible forces this uncomfortable reality upon us when it declares that witchcraft is one of the “works of the flesh” (Galatians 5:20), placing it in the same category as idolatry, hatred, wrath, and adultery. In Scripture, witchcraft is not merely the practice of pagan sorcery—it is the flesh asserting its will against God, the human heart attempting to influence outcomes by control, manipulation, intimidation, and emotional pressure rather than by submission to the Holy Ghost. If witchcraft is a work of the flesh, then any believer walking in the flesh becomes capable of participating in its spirit, even while sitting in church, even while carrying a Bible, and even while speaking the vocabulary of Christianity.
This makes the question unavoidable: Can Christians, knowingly or unknowingly, engage in witchcraft? Not the occultic kind—though apostasy has taken many there—but the subtle, psychological, emotional, and spiritual manipulation that mirrors the very nature of rebellion against God. When Samuel confronted Saul and said, “rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft” (1 Samuel 15:23), he was not speaking poetically. He was giving heaven’s definition. He was saying that rebellion, manipulation, and control are spiritual cousins of occult influence. Witchcraft in God’s eyes is not merely about charms and spells; it is about a heart that refuses God’s authority and attempts to control others in His place. And if churches are honest, this question strikes far closer to home than anyone wants to admit, because manipulation, emotional coercion, spiritual intimidation, and pressure tactics are found not only in cults and false religions but in Baptist pews, Pentecostal pulpits, and evangelical counseling rooms. Witchcraft is not always loud and spectacular; sometimes it whispers through soft phrases, religious tones, and subtle attempts to control.
2. Biblical Witchcraft: A Definition Much Wider Than Occult Practices
Most Christians define witchcraft too narrowly because they only see its external trappings. But Scripture presents witchcraft as a principle long before it shows up as a practice. Witchcraft appears whenever human beings attempt to control others through fleshly force, psychological leverage, or spiritual intimidation. When Samuel equated rebellion with witchcraft, he was showing that witchcraft is any attempt to replace God’s authority with one’s own. It is self-will asserting itself in defiance of God, using means that God never authorized. Thus, witchcraft occurs whenever someone manipulates, coerces, pressures, or intimidates to achieve an outcome that should be left to the Holy Spirit’s influence. It is an attempt to bypass God and exert control. While pagan witchcraft uses spells, talismans, and rituals, religious witchcraft uses guilt, fear, Scripture taken out of context, emotional pressure, and spiritual language designed to bring others into submission to human will rather than divine truth.
The Bible gives examples of this spirit in diverse characters. Balaam manipulated spiritual truth for personal gain. Jezebel used fear and emotional domination to bend others to her desires. Simon the sorcerer desired spiritual power for influence and recognition (Acts 8:18–20). Diotrephes “loved to have the preeminence” (3 John 9) and used his position to control, exclude, and pressure others. These individuals did not always
operate through occult ceremony; they operated through psychological and spiritual manipulation. The Bible calls such behavior witchcraft because its root is the same as the occult’s: attempting to wield spiritual authority without submitting to God’s Spirit. This broader definition forces Christians to see that witchcraft does not start in the occult bookstore; it starts in the rebellious heart that insists on having its own way, even when that insistence is dressed up in religious justification.
3. The Spirit of Witchcraft: Control, Domination, and Manipulation
At its core, witchcraft is about control. It is the attempt to influence another person’s choices, emotions, or spiritual direction by means that God does not sanction. Whenever a believer attempts to enforce his will upon another believer by using emotional punishment, guilt, fear, shame, silent treatment, spiritual claims, or religious authority, he is engaging in the same spirit that animates witchcraft. Witchcraft does not always appear as a demonic ritual; it often appears as a personality that refuses to take its hands off what belongs to God. Manipulation is witchcraft’s method. Domination is witchcraft’s posture. Intimidation is witchcraft’s tone. And the flesh produces these naturally whenever it is not crucified.
Paul warned the Galatians that they had been “bewitched” (Galatians 3:1), not through occult incantations, but through persuasive manipulation that drew them away from the liberty of the gospel and into a form of spiritual bondage. In Corinth, certain individuals sought to bring believers “into bondage” (2 Corinthians 11:20) by controlling their spiritual direction. In the Pastoral Epistles, Paul warned Timothy about teachers who insinuated themselves into households and manipulated vulnerable believers (2 Timothy 3:6). These were not occultists; they were religious manipulators. Witchcraft’s spirit therefore manifests whenever a believer replaces spiritual persuasion with pressure, replaces counsel with coercion, replaces leadership with lordship, or replaces prayer with attempts to engineer the will of others by force of personality. When human control takes the place of the Holy Spirit’s leading, the spirit of witchcraft has entered the room, even if the vocabulary being used is entirely Christian.
4. How Christian Environments Become Breeding Grounds for Manipulation
The modern church has created conditions where manipulation thrives because believers often confuse spirituality with emotional influence and confuse authority with control. Many Christians do not recognize manipulation because it wears the costume of concern, closeness, or conviction. Manipulative prayer often sounds pious but is aimed at enforcing the pray-er’s will rather than seeking God’s will. Emotional witchcraft arises when believers use their own reactions—tears, silence, anger, withdrawal—to pressure others into compliance. Leadership witchcraft appears when pastors or leaders use fear, shame, or threats of divine displeasure to ensure obedience, treating disagreement as rebellion and questioning as sin. Doctrinal witchcraft appears when teachers weaponize Scripture selectively to advance personal agendas, clouding the mind rather than enlightening the conscience.
These behaviors rarely announce themselves. They sneak in through the cracks of the flesh. A husband may pressure his wife through emotional withdrawal. A parent may control a child through guilt. A pastor may use the pulpit to intimidate dissenters. A counselor may steer someone to decisions that reflect the counselor’s agenda rather than God’s Word. A friend may invoke God’s name to manipulate choices. None of these individuals set out to perform witchcraft in the occult sense. But the spirit behind their behavior—control—belongs to the same category Samuel described when he said, “rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.” Rebellion rejects God’s authority and replaces it with
3. The Spirit of Witchcraft: Control, Domination, and Manipulation
At its core, witchcraft is about control. It is the attempt to influence another person’s choices, emotions, or spiritual direction by means that God does not sanction. Whenever a believer attempts to enforce his will upon another believer by using emotional punishment, guilt, fear, shame, silent treatment, spiritual claims, or religious authority, he is engaging in the same spirit that animates witchcraft. Witchcraft does not always appear as a demonic ritual; it often appears as a personality that refuses to take its hands off what belongs to God. Manipulation is witchcraft’s method. Domination is witchcraft’s posture. Intimidation is witchcraft’s tone. And the flesh produces these naturally whenever it is not crucified.
Paul warned the Galatians that they had been “bewitched” (Galatians 3:1), not through occult incantations, but through persuasive manipulation that drew them away from the liberty of the gospel and into a form of spiritual bondage. In Corinth, certain individuals sought to bring believers “into bondage” (2 Corinthians 11:20) by controlling their spiritual direction. In the Pastoral Epistles, Paul warned Timothy about teachers who insinuated themselves into households and manipulated vulnerable believers (2 Timothy 3:6). These were not occultists; they were religious manipulators. Witchcraft’s spirit therefore manifests whenever a believer replaces spiritual persuasion with pressure, replaces counsel with coercion, replaces leadership with lordship, or replaces prayer with attempts to engineer the will of others by force of personality. When human control takes the place of the Holy Spirit’s leading, the spirit of witchcraft has entered the room, even if the vocabulary being used is entirely Christian.
4. How Christian Environments Become Breeding Grounds for Manipulation
The modern church has created conditions where manipulation thrives because believers often confuse spirituality with emotional influence and confuse authority with control. Many Christians do not recognize manipulation because it wears the costume of concern, closeness, or conviction. Manipulative prayer often sounds pious but is aimed at enforcing the pray-er’s will rather than seeking God’s will. Emotional witchcraft arises when believers use their own reactions—tears, silence, anger, withdrawal—to pressure others into compliance. Leadership witchcraft appears when pastors or leaders use fear, shame, or threats of divine displeasure to ensure obedience, treating disagreement as rebellion and questioning as sin. Doctrinal witchcraft appears when teachers weaponize Scripture selectively to advance personal agendas, clouding the mind rather than enlightening the conscience.
These behaviors rarely announce themselves. They sneak in through the cracks of the flesh. A husband may pressure his wife through emotional withdrawal. A parent may control a child through guilt. A pastor may use the pulpit to intimidate dissenters. A counselor may steer someone to decisions that reflect the counselor’s agenda rather than God’s Word. A friend may invoke God’s name to manipulate choices. None of these individuals set out to perform witchcraft in the occult sense. But the spirit behind their behavior—control—belongs to the same category Samuel described when he said, “rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.” Rebellion rejects God’s authority and replaces it with
one’s own; manipulation rejects God’s influence and replaces it with human force.
5. Why God Despises Manipulation in His Name
God hates manipulation because it misrepresents Him. Witchcraft is a counterfeit of the Holy Spirit’s ministry. The Spirit leads through truth; witchcraft manipulates through pressure. The Spirit enlightens; witchcraft obscures. The Spirit convicts; witchcraft coerces. The Spirit liberates; witchcraft binds. To manipulate someone in God’s name is to compete with the Spirit of God and intrude into territory that belongs exclusively to Him. When believers use Scripture selectively to pressure others, they are not ministering—they are performing spiritual forgery. When leaders control consciences through fear, they do not strengthen the flock—they enslave it. When counselors override discernment and substitute their own desires for God’s direction, they are engaging in a subtler but equally dangerous form of witchcraft.
Because witchcraft is rooted in rebellion, it directly challenges God’s sovereignty. It attempts to bypass dependence on Him. It exalts human will over divine will. It treats people as instruments rather than souls. It corrupts spiritual authority and transforms it into domination. And worst of all, it often masquerades as spirituality. God does not merely dislike witchcraft—He denounces it. When Saul used religious excuses to justify disobedience, Samuel exposed the truth: his behavior was not merely irresponsible but spiritually poisonous. It carried the same essence as witchcraft because it elevated self above God under the cloak of religious language.
6. Jezebel: Scripture’s Archetype of Religious Manipulation
If one character embodies the spirit of religious manipulation, it is Jezebel. She manipulated Ahab with emotional dominance, manipulated Israel with religious seduction, intimidated Elijah with psychological force, and murdered innocent men to secure Naboth’s vineyard. The Bible calls her practices witchcraft (2 Kings 9:22) because she intertwined spiritual influence with personal control. She operated through intimidation, fear, seduction, and pressure—all the methods of spiritual manipulation. Her influence was not merely political; it was spiritual corruption masquerading as authority.
The New Testament continues this theme when Christ rebukes the church at Thyatira for tolerating “that woman Jezebel,” who taught and seduced believers (Revelation 2:20). Her influence was not occult ritual but religious persuasion used to manipulate consciences and corrupt the flock. Jezebel represents the fusion of religious vocabulary with manipulative behavior, which is precisely how witchcraft infiltrates Christian environments. It never comes wearing horns and a cloak; it comes wearing a church dress, quoting Scripture, and speaking in soft tones that hide a controlling spirit.
7. How Christians Fall into Manipulation Without Realizing It
Most Christians who drift into manipulative behavior never intend to do so. It begins subtly. Parents desire their children to make good decisions but begin using guilt instead of guidance. Spouses hope for unity but start using emotional pressure rather than communication. Pastors want cooperation but resort to intimidation instead of instruction. Counselors seek influence but begin asserting their will over God’s. Friends wish to help someone but begin weaponizing spiritual vocabulary to steer decisions. What begins as concern mutates into control when the believer ceases to trust God’s ability to work in another person’s life.
Manipulation often disguises itself as love. A person convinces himself that pressuring someone is for their good. He rationalizes coercion as guidance. He mistakes dominance for protection. He believes emotional punishment is a form of care. The devil does not need to introduce occult rituals into a church if he can substitute emotional techniques for the Holy Spirit’s ministry. Many Christians slip into manipulative
5. Why God Despises Manipulation in His Name
God hates manipulation because it misrepresents Him. Witchcraft is a counterfeit of the Holy Spirit’s ministry. The Spirit leads through truth; witchcraft manipulates through pressure. The Spirit enlightens; witchcraft obscures. The Spirit convicts; witchcraft coerces. The Spirit liberates; witchcraft binds. To manipulate someone in God’s name is to compete with the Spirit of God and intrude into territory that belongs exclusively to Him. When believers use Scripture selectively to pressure others, they are not ministering—they are performing spiritual forgery. When leaders control consciences through fear, they do not strengthen the flock—they enslave it. When counselors override discernment and substitute their own desires for God’s direction, they are engaging in a subtler but equally dangerous form of witchcraft.
Because witchcraft is rooted in rebellion, it directly challenges God’s sovereignty. It attempts to bypass dependence on Him. It exalts human will over divine will. It treats people as instruments rather than souls. It corrupts spiritual authority and transforms it into domination. And worst of all, it often masquerades as spirituality. God does not merely dislike witchcraft—He denounces it. When Saul used religious excuses to justify disobedience, Samuel exposed the truth: his behavior was not merely irresponsible but spiritually poisonous. It carried the same essence as witchcraft because it elevated self above God under the cloak of religious language.
6. Jezebel: Scripture’s Archetype of Religious Manipulation
If one character embodies the spirit of religious manipulation, it is Jezebel. She manipulated Ahab with emotional dominance, manipulated Israel with religious seduction, intimidated Elijah with psychological force, and murdered innocent men to secure Naboth’s vineyard. The Bible calls her practices witchcraft (2 Kings 9:22) because she intertwined spiritual influence with personal control. She operated through intimidation, fear, seduction, and pressure—all the methods of spiritual manipulation. Her influence was not merely political; it was spiritual corruption masquerading as authority.
The New Testament continues this theme when Christ rebukes the church at Thyatira for tolerating “that woman Jezebel,” who taught and seduced believers (Revelation 2:20). Her influence was not occult ritual but religious persuasion used to manipulate consciences and corrupt the flock. Jezebel represents the fusion of religious vocabulary with manipulative behavior, which is precisely how witchcraft infiltrates Christian environments. It never comes wearing horns and a cloak; it comes wearing a church dress, quoting Scripture, and speaking in soft tones that hide a controlling spirit.
7. How Christians Fall into Manipulation Without Realizing It
Most Christians who drift into manipulative behavior never intend to do so. It begins subtly. Parents desire their children to make good decisions but begin using guilt instead of guidance. Spouses hope for unity but start using emotional pressure rather than communication. Pastors want cooperation but resort to intimidation instead of instruction. Counselors seek influence but begin asserting their will over God’s. Friends wish to help someone but begin weaponizing spiritual vocabulary to steer decisions. What begins as concern mutates into control when the believer ceases to trust God’s ability to work in another person’s life.
Manipulation often disguises itself as love. A person convinces himself that pressuring someone is for their good. He rationalizes coercion as guidance. He mistakes dominance for protection. He believes emotional punishment is a form of care. The devil does not need to introduce occult rituals into a church if he can substitute emotional techniques for the Holy Spirit’s ministry. Many Christians slip into manipulative
Єбать в мене тут Санта-Барбара на поверсі...
Короче вчора трохи посварився з сусідом - заєбав курити на лєснічной, світла нема, всі ходять, смердить цигарками, і так ледве лізеш
Ну сказав, що реально викличу поліцію, а попільничку під двері висиплю
Ну він був п'яний трохи👇
Короче вчора трохи посварився з сусідом - заєбав курити на лєснічной, світла нема, всі ходять, смердить цигарками, і так ледве лізеш
Ну сказав, що реально викличу поліцію, а попільничку під двері висиплю
Ну він був п'яний трохи👇
але наче зрозумів що неправий,зранку йшов - попільнички вже не було
І тут пару годин тому стук в двері, причому такий аж піздец, крики жіночі, подумав сусідкой шось
Ага. Шось. Чувак пішов на вулицю - його спакували ТЦК :)
А винен я,бо то я навів)))
Короче вони викликали поліцію👇
І тут пару годин тому стук в двері, причому такий аж піздец, крики жіночі, подумав сусідкой шось
Ага. Шось. Чувак пішов на вулицю - його спакували ТЦК :)
А винен я,бо то я навів)))
Короче вони викликали поліцію👇
поліція приїхала, охуєвша, бо їм сказали що я типу її чоловіка забив ледь не до смерті
Ну поговорили, вияснили, подивились мої документи, трошки покрутили у віска, на вимогу "забрати цього ухилянта" відповіли, що в людини все ок з обліком
Я спустився з ними, бо крик, ор, піздец👇
Ну поговорили, вияснили, подивились мої документи, трошки покрутили у віска, на вимогу "забрати цього ухилянта" відповіли, що в людини все ок з обліком
Я спустився з ними, бо крик, ор, піздец👇
Mucha gente sigue diciendo que al Fiscal General del Estado se le ha condenado sin pruebas.
¿Queréis tener argumentos para responderles como es debido?
Os dejo este hilo 🧵
¿Queréis tener argumentos para responderles como es debido?
Os dejo este hilo 🧵
Empiezo resumiendo los hechos muy brevemente:
1. Alberto González Amador, pareja de Ayuso, tiene una empresa que recibe una denuncia por un delito fiscal.
2. Alberto, para no perjudicar a Ayuso, quiere que esto no haga ruido. Le dice a su abogado que negocie con la Fiscalía un acuerdo.
3. El abogado de Alberto manda un correo a la Fiscalía de delitos económicos donde, en cumplimiento de ese encargo, pero sin el conocimiento ni el consentimiento concreto de su cliente, reconoce los hechos. Aquí añado algo importante. Es habitual que el cliente haga un encargo y que su abogado lo ejecute como crea oportuno, sin necesidad de estar pidiéndole permiso para cada paso. Por tanto, sí es muy verosímil que Alberto desconociera el contenido específico de ese correo.
4. La Fiscalía de delitos económicos reenvía ese correo a Julián Salto, el fiscal encargado de llevar el asunto. Inciso: estos son correos absolutamente confidenciales entre un abogado y el fiscal. Está terminantemente prohibido divulgarlos.
5. El 13 de marzo de 2024, El Mundo publica una noticia donde indica que es la Fiscalía la que ha ofrecido un acuerdo a Alberto (y no Alberto quien se ha puesto en contacto con la Fiscalía para llegar a un acuerdo).
6. Para desmentir este dato, el Ministerio Fiscal activa toda su maquinaria y la pone a funcionar contra un ciudadano hasta entonces anónimo. ¿Cómo? Básicamente, así:
- Álvaro García Ortiz (Fiscal General del Estado) le dice a Pilar Rodríguez (fiscal jefe de la Fiscalía provincial de Madrid) que le pida a Julián Salto (fiscal que llevaba el caso) los correos que le había mandado el abogado de Alberto.
- A altas horas de la noche, Pilar Rodríguez le pide los correos con carácter urgente a Julián Salto. Con tanta urgencia, de hecho, que le hizo salir del partido de fútbol que estaba viendo.
- Julián Salto le envía a Pilar Rodríguez los correos.
- Pilar Rodríguez le envía a Álvaro García Ortiz los correos. Concretamente, a su cuenta de Gmail personal, porque él se lo pide.
7. Casi acto seguido, el contenido literal del correo más sensible (en el que el abogado de Alberto reconocía los hechos) aparece en la prensa. Es el famoso correo del 2 de febrero.
8. A la mañana siguiente, la nota de prensa que había ideado y diseñado Álvaro García Ortiz, que, entre otras cosas, mencionaba el correo revelado, se publicó bajo el membrete de la Fiscalía Provincial de Madrid.
1. Alberto González Amador, pareja de Ayuso, tiene una empresa que recibe una denuncia por un delito fiscal.
2. Alberto, para no perjudicar a Ayuso, quiere que esto no haga ruido. Le dice a su abogado que negocie con la Fiscalía un acuerdo.
3. El abogado de Alberto manda un correo a la Fiscalía de delitos económicos donde, en cumplimiento de ese encargo, pero sin el conocimiento ni el consentimiento concreto de su cliente, reconoce los hechos. Aquí añado algo importante. Es habitual que el cliente haga un encargo y que su abogado lo ejecute como crea oportuno, sin necesidad de estar pidiéndole permiso para cada paso. Por tanto, sí es muy verosímil que Alberto desconociera el contenido específico de ese correo.
4. La Fiscalía de delitos económicos reenvía ese correo a Julián Salto, el fiscal encargado de llevar el asunto. Inciso: estos son correos absolutamente confidenciales entre un abogado y el fiscal. Está terminantemente prohibido divulgarlos.
5. El 13 de marzo de 2024, El Mundo publica una noticia donde indica que es la Fiscalía la que ha ofrecido un acuerdo a Alberto (y no Alberto quien se ha puesto en contacto con la Fiscalía para llegar a un acuerdo).
6. Para desmentir este dato, el Ministerio Fiscal activa toda su maquinaria y la pone a funcionar contra un ciudadano hasta entonces anónimo. ¿Cómo? Básicamente, así:
- Álvaro García Ortiz (Fiscal General del Estado) le dice a Pilar Rodríguez (fiscal jefe de la Fiscalía provincial de Madrid) que le pida a Julián Salto (fiscal que llevaba el caso) los correos que le había mandado el abogado de Alberto.
- A altas horas de la noche, Pilar Rodríguez le pide los correos con carácter urgente a Julián Salto. Con tanta urgencia, de hecho, que le hizo salir del partido de fútbol que estaba viendo.
- Julián Salto le envía a Pilar Rodríguez los correos.
- Pilar Rodríguez le envía a Álvaro García Ortiz los correos. Concretamente, a su cuenta de Gmail personal, porque él se lo pide.
7. Casi acto seguido, el contenido literal del correo más sensible (en el que el abogado de Alberto reconocía los hechos) aparece en la prensa. Es el famoso correo del 2 de febrero.
8. A la mañana siguiente, la nota de prensa que había ideado y diseñado Álvaro García Ortiz, que, entre otras cosas, mencionaba el correo revelado, se publicó bajo el membrete de la Fiscalía Provincial de Madrid.
Sí, es cierto que en este caso no se tenía esa prueba directa y estelar que algunos reclaman, ese mensaje del Fiscal General del Estado enviándole el correo del 2 de febrero al periodista.
Pero si no se ha podido aportar una prueba así es sencillamente porque Álvaro García Ortiz borró todos sus whatsapps a las horas de saber que el Tribunal Supremo le iba a investigar. O sea, no hay prueba directa, porque él eliminó la posible prueba directa.
Sin embargo, esto no debe sorprendernos. Al fin y al cabo, la mayoría de los delincuentes se comportan de este modo. Tras delinquir, se encargan de borrar todo el rastro que hayan podido dejar para que no se les pueda sancionar.
Precisamente por eso, se permiten las condenas basadas en indicios. Si no, casi todos los delitos quedarían impunes. Sería facilísimo escapar de la justicia.
Aclaro algo: esto no es algo excepcional que ahora el Tribunal Supremo se haya sacado de la manga. Muchísimas veces, casi siempre, las condenas se basan en prueba indiciaria. Y no por ello son menos concluyentes. Una sentencia basada en indicios puede y suele ser solidísima.
Pero si no se ha podido aportar una prueba así es sencillamente porque Álvaro García Ortiz borró todos sus whatsapps a las horas de saber que el Tribunal Supremo le iba a investigar. O sea, no hay prueba directa, porque él eliminó la posible prueba directa.
Sin embargo, esto no debe sorprendernos. Al fin y al cabo, la mayoría de los delincuentes se comportan de este modo. Tras delinquir, se encargan de borrar todo el rastro que hayan podido dejar para que no se les pueda sancionar.
Precisamente por eso, se permiten las condenas basadas en indicios. Si no, casi todos los delitos quedarían impunes. Sería facilísimo escapar de la justicia.
Aclaro algo: esto no es algo excepcional que ahora el Tribunal Supremo se haya sacado de la manga. Muchísimas veces, casi siempre, las condenas se basan en prueba indiciaria. Y no por ello son menos concluyentes. Una sentencia basada en indicios puede y suele ser solidísima.
TOP 50 MOST INFLUENTIAL BOOKS EVER WRITTEN
1. The Bible – ✝️
2. The Quran – ☪️
3. The Communist Manifesto – 🇩🇪 Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels
4. The Republic – 🇬🇷 Plato
5. On the Origin of Species – 🇬🇧 Charles Darwin
6. 1984 – 🇬🇧 George Orwell
7. The Iliad – 🇬🇷 Homer
8. The Odyssey – 🇬🇷 Homer
9. The Bhagavad Gita – 🇮🇳 Ancient India
10. The Analects – 🇨🇳 Confucius
11. Tao Te Ching – 🇨🇳 Laozi
12. The Wealth of Nations – 🇬🇧 Adam Smith
13. The Prince – 🇮🇹 Niccolò Machiavelli
14. The Art of War – 🇨🇳 Sun Tzu
15. The Divine Comedy – 🇮🇹 Dante Alighieri
16. Don Quixote – 🇪🇸 Miguel de Cervantes
17. Hamlet – 🇬🇧 William Shakespeare
18. The Diary of Anne Frank – 🇳🇱 Anne Frank
19. Meditations – 🇮🇹/🇬🇷 Marcus Aurelius (Roman Empire)
20. The Social Contract – 🇫🇷 Jean-Jacques Rousseau
21. The Rights of Man – 🇬🇧 Thomas Paine
22. The Federalist Papers – 🇺🇸 Hamilton, Madison, Jay
23. A Brief History of Time – 🇬🇧 Stephen Hawking
24. Common Sense – 🇺🇸/🇬🇧 Thomas Paine
25. The Alchemist – 🇧🇷 Paulo Coelho
26. The Gulag Archipelago – 🇷🇺 Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
27. The Canterbury Tales – 🇬🇧 Geoffrey Chaucer
28. War and Peace – 🇷🇺 Leo Tolstoy
29. The Interpretation of Dreams – 🇦🇹 Sigmund Freud
30. The Second Sex – 🇫🇷 Simone de Beauvoir
31. Silent Spring – 🇺🇸 Rachel Carson
32. To Kill a Mockingbird – 🇺🇸 Harper Lee
33. The Wretched of the Earth – 🇬🇵 Frantz Fanon (Martinique/Algeria 🇩🇿)
34. The Souls of Black Folk – 🇺🇸 W.E.B. Du Bois
35. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy – 🇬🇧 Douglas Adams
36. Man’s Search for Meaning – 🇦🇹 Viktor Frankl
37. Leviathan – 🇬🇧 Thomas Hobbes
38. The Book of the Dead – 🇪🇬 Ancient Egypt
39. The Epic of Gilgamesh – 🇮🇶 Ancient Mesopotamia
40. Ulysses – 🇮🇪 James Joyce
41. The Catcher in the Rye – 🇺🇸 J.D. Salinger
42. The Little Prince – 🇫🇷 Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
43. Things Fall Apart – 🇳🇬 Chinua Achebe
44. Animal Farm – 🇬🇧 George Orwell
45. Les Misérables – 🇫🇷 Victor Hugo
46. The Brothers Karamazov – 🇷🇺 Fyodor Dostoevsky
47. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman – 🇬🇧 Mary Wollstonecraft
48. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions – 🇺🇸 Thomas Kuhn
49. Sapiens – 🇮🇱 Yuval Noah Harari
50. The 48 Laws of Power – 🇺🇸 Robert Greene
1. The Bible – ✝️
2. The Quran – ☪️
3. The Communist Manifesto – 🇩🇪 Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels
4. The Republic – 🇬🇷 Plato
5. On the Origin of Species – 🇬🇧 Charles Darwin
6. 1984 – 🇬🇧 George Orwell
7. The Iliad – 🇬🇷 Homer
8. The Odyssey – 🇬🇷 Homer
9. The Bhagavad Gita – 🇮🇳 Ancient India
10. The Analects – 🇨🇳 Confucius
11. Tao Te Ching – 🇨🇳 Laozi
12. The Wealth of Nations – 🇬🇧 Adam Smith
13. The Prince – 🇮🇹 Niccolò Machiavelli
14. The Art of War – 🇨🇳 Sun Tzu
15. The Divine Comedy – 🇮🇹 Dante Alighieri
16. Don Quixote – 🇪🇸 Miguel de Cervantes
17. Hamlet – 🇬🇧 William Shakespeare
18. The Diary of Anne Frank – 🇳🇱 Anne Frank
19. Meditations – 🇮🇹/🇬🇷 Marcus Aurelius (Roman Empire)
20. The Social Contract – 🇫🇷 Jean-Jacques Rousseau
21. The Rights of Man – 🇬🇧 Thomas Paine
22. The Federalist Papers – 🇺🇸 Hamilton, Madison, Jay
23. A Brief History of Time – 🇬🇧 Stephen Hawking
24. Common Sense – 🇺🇸/🇬🇧 Thomas Paine
25. The Alchemist – 🇧🇷 Paulo Coelho
26. The Gulag Archipelago – 🇷🇺 Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
27. The Canterbury Tales – 🇬🇧 Geoffrey Chaucer
28. War and Peace – 🇷🇺 Leo Tolstoy
29. The Interpretation of Dreams – 🇦🇹 Sigmund Freud
30. The Second Sex – 🇫🇷 Simone de Beauvoir
31. Silent Spring – 🇺🇸 Rachel Carson
32. To Kill a Mockingbird – 🇺🇸 Harper Lee
33. The Wretched of the Earth – 🇬🇵 Frantz Fanon (Martinique/Algeria 🇩🇿)
34. The Souls of Black Folk – 🇺🇸 W.E.B. Du Bois
35. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy – 🇬🇧 Douglas Adams
36. Man’s Search for Meaning – 🇦🇹 Viktor Frankl
37. Leviathan – 🇬🇧 Thomas Hobbes
38. The Book of the Dead – 🇪🇬 Ancient Egypt
39. The Epic of Gilgamesh – 🇮🇶 Ancient Mesopotamia
40. Ulysses – 🇮🇪 James Joyce
41. The Catcher in the Rye – 🇺🇸 J.D. Salinger
42. The Little Prince – 🇫🇷 Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
43. Things Fall Apart – 🇳🇬 Chinua Achebe
44. Animal Farm – 🇬🇧 George Orwell
45. Les Misérables – 🇫🇷 Victor Hugo
46. The Brothers Karamazov – 🇷🇺 Fyodor Dostoevsky
47. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman – 🇬🇧 Mary Wollstonecraft
48. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions – 🇺🇸 Thomas Kuhn
49. Sapiens – 🇮🇱 Yuval Noah Harari
50. The 48 Laws of Power – 🇺🇸 Robert Greene
🧵The REAL reason Tina Peters is in prison… and why nobody stopped the Venezuelan gang (TDA) takeover of U.S. neighborhoods during the Biden Regime.
🚨Buckle up🇺🇸
Two Venezuelan generals, Carvajal & Alcalá, confessed that Smartmatic wasn’t a voting company…
🚨Buckle up🇺🇸
Two Venezuelan generals, Carvajal & Alcalá, confessed that Smartmatic wasn’t a voting company…
It was a military intelligence weapon for altering elections & controlling populations.
And they said the system was exported to the U.S.
Guess who discovered the proof?
@realtinapeters
Tina preserved the ONLY complete 2020 Dominion system images in America.
And they said the system was exported to the U.S.
Guess who discovered the proof?
@realtinapeters
Tina preserved the ONLY complete 2020 Dominion system images in America.
Colorado + Dominion wiped 29,000 election files statewide.
But her copy survived.
That’s WHY they arrested her.
Not because she broke the law…
But because she DIDN’T let them break it.
But her copy survived.
That’s WHY they arrested her.
Not because she broke the law…
But because she DIDN’T let them break it.
Teaser:
Was heute vor dem Russischen Haus passiert ist, war so verstörend für mich als Demokratin und Bürgerin, dass mein Verständnis von Demokratie und Freiheit und Rechtsstaatlichkeit, das Vertrauen in unseren Staat und unsere Werte massiv erschüttert wurden ...
Mehr folgt
Was heute vor dem Russischen Haus passiert ist, war so verstörend für mich als Demokratin und Bürgerin, dass mein Verständnis von Demokratie und Freiheit und Rechtsstaatlichkeit, das Vertrauen in unseren Staat und unsere Werte massiv erschüttert wurden ...
Mehr folgt
Just the beginning ... es wurde alles noch verstörender und absurder ...
🧵🚨 THREAD: Every Major U.S. Profession Is Being Forced to Align to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 🌐📋
Doctors. Nurses. Lawyers. Engineers. Teachers. Accountants. Architects.
Their codes of ethics, practice standards, certification rules, and policy priorities now embed SDG language: without public debate or member votes.
Here are the receipts. 👇
And as always, patience as I pull this thread together:
Doctors. Nurses. Lawyers. Engineers. Teachers. Accountants. Architects.
Their codes of ethics, practice standards, certification rules, and policy priorities now embed SDG language: without public debate or member votes.
Here are the receipts. 👇
And as always, patience as I pull this thread together:
American Nursing Association (ANA) -- representing over 4 million members, states in their 2025 Code of Ethics that "Nurses and nursing organizations work toward the realization of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations (UN)"
The UN SDGs are a comprehensive political framework which endorses unfettered migration. American Medial Association policy H-65.938 endorses the UN SDG in that.
AMA represents almost 300,000 health care professionals.
AMA represents almost 300,000 health care professionals.
📢❗️WAKE-UP CALL TO OUR EUROPEAN LEADERS
Europe fails to offset US aid drop
Europe allocated only about EUR 4.2 billion in new military aid to 🇺🇦—far too little to offset the halt in US support.
>>>
kielinstitut.de/publications/n…
Europe fails to offset US aid drop
Europe allocated only about EUR 4.2 billion in new military aid to 🇺🇦—far too little to offset the halt in US support.
>>>
kielinstitut.de/publications/n…
2. At the same time, the disparities within Europe widened.
France, Germany, and the United Kingdom increased their allocations substantially but remained below the levels seen in the Nordic countries in relative terms.
Italy and Spain contributed very little.
>>>
France, Germany, and the United Kingdom increased their allocations substantially but remained below the levels seen in the Nordic countries in relative terms.
Italy and Spain contributed very little.
>>>
3. From March to June, Euirope was on its way to offset the lack of US aid.
HOWEVER, since July, total aid has decreased!
At the current rate, military aid allocations fall short of what would be needed to replace missing US support.
>>>
HOWEVER, since July, total aid has decreased!
At the current rate, military aid allocations fall short of what would be needed to replace missing US support.
>>>
💸No se duerman ‼️Muchas cosas que usas a diario se van a aumentar y eso lo vamos a resentir todooooos los mexicanos.
Mientras se discute la reforma a los aranceles, ahí les va un resumen de lo que va a subir 💲💲💲💲:
🧵🪡
Mientras se discute la reforma a los aranceles, ahí les va un resumen de lo que va a subir 💲💲💲💲:
🧵🪡
🚗Autopartes
Con alrededor de 141 productos relacionados.
ARANCELES
🟥HOY: 0 a 20%
🟥CON LA REFORMA :
7 a 50%
Con alrededor de 141 productos relacionados.
ARANCELES
🟥HOY: 0 a 20%
🟥CON LA REFORMA :
7 a 50%
👗Vestido
308 artículos que van hasta ropa interior, fajas, bragas etc …
ARANCEL
🟥HOY : 20 a 25%
🟥 CON LA REFORMA: 25 a 35%
308 artículos que van hasta ropa interior, fajas, bragas etc …
ARANCEL
🟥HOY : 20 a 25%
🟥 CON LA REFORMA: 25 a 35%
I used to say 10–15 years to be conservative.
No longer.
The eurozone is on a 3–5 year countdown.
2026–27 is now the most probable rupture window.
Here’s my exact timeline — and every force guaranteeing the end of the EU as we know it.
🧵↓
No longer.
The eurozone is on a 3–5 year countdown.
2026–27 is now the most probable rupture window.
Here’s my exact timeline — and every force guaranteeing the end of the EU as we know it.
🧵↓
The calendar (bookmark this 📌):
Q4 2025 – Q1 2026
French deficit 6.5–7 %, spreads vs Germany >150 bps. ECB quietly restarts secret bond buying.
Spring 2026
French snap elections → total parliamentary chaos. French 10-yr yields test 4–5 %.
Summer 2026
Trump tariffs hit full force (1.5 % GDP loss). Germany deep in recession. AfD largest party in eastern states.
Autumn 2026
ECB balance sheet >€10 tn. Germany threatens Eurosystem exit or “parallel accounting.” Northern revolt goes public.
2027 (2028 absolute latest)
One weekend: TARGET2 explodes, southern bank runs, ECB imposes capital controls. Euro fractures into neuro/seuro blocs or simply dies.
2030
EU still exists on paper. Single currency for 20 countries? Gone.
Q4 2025 – Q1 2026
French deficit 6.5–7 %, spreads vs Germany >150 bps. ECB quietly restarts secret bond buying.
Spring 2026
French snap elections → total parliamentary chaos. French 10-yr yields test 4–5 %.
Summer 2026
Trump tariffs hit full force (1.5 % GDP loss). Germany deep in recession. AfD largest party in eastern states.
Autumn 2026
ECB balance sheet >€10 tn. Germany threatens Eurosystem exit or “parallel accounting.” Northern revolt goes public.
2027 (2028 absolute latest)
One weekend: TARGET2 explodes, southern bank runs, ECB imposes capital controls. Euro fractures into neuro/seuro blocs or simply dies.
2030
EU still exists on paper. Single currency for 20 countries? Gone.
Why the euro is the detonator that blows the entire EU apart
It is the unbreakable chain that forces 20 wildly different economies to share one currency and one central-bank interest rate.
France (114 % debt, permanent >5 % deficits, four prime ministers in 12 months) cannot cut spending without riots.
If ECB lets France default → euro credibility dies overnight → Italy (real debt >120 %) collapses next.
If ECB prints to save them → German savers are robbed → Bundesbank mutiny → northern exit.
One crack and the whole supranational house of cards collapses.
It is the unbreakable chain that forces 20 wildly different economies to share one currency and one central-bank interest rate.
France (114 % debt, permanent >5 % deficits, four prime ministers in 12 months) cannot cut spending without riots.
If ECB lets France default → euro credibility dies overnight → Italy (real debt >120 %) collapses next.
If ECB prints to save them → German savers are robbed → Bundesbank mutiny → northern exit.
One crack and the whole supranational house of cards collapses.
We are due to be live tweeting the final hearing of clinical psychologist, Dr Anne Woodhouse (AW), before the Health and Care Professions Tribunal Service (HCPTS) Conduct and Competence Committee in relation to posts on Twitter/X from 10am this morning.
The Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) alleges that she posted/liked or permitted others to post/like Twitter/X social media posts containing gender critical content in contravention of their social media policy.
The allegations arise from one Complainant, an activist in LGBTQ+ politics.
The allegations arise from one Complainant, an activist in LGBTQ+ politics.
The police were notified of the matter, but confirmed they would not be pursuing any investigation. The HCPC have pursued a Fitness to Practice case against Dr Woodhouse since September 2022.
The posts complained of are:
The posts complained of are:
15 surprising things about the Peggie v NHS Fife ET judgment - a thread 🧵
1. Top of the pops has to be mis/partial quoting of the Supreme Court judgment in a way that badly misrepresents what it said.
1. Top of the pops has to be mis/partial quoting of the Supreme Court judgment in a way that badly misrepresents what it said.
2. It also includes a quote supposedly from the Forstater EAT judgment that actually isn’t in the judgment. And went onto say that the Supreme Court in endorsing the Forstater judgment implicitly endorsed that nonexistent quote.
3. Its use of partial language (“assigned male at birth”, "trans female” to talk about a male doctor who identifies as trans) while also bending over backwards nog to use pronouns for the male doctor (“second respondent” appears in judgment > 1k times) is weirdly inconsistent.
Woowa okhuma lulimbo lwa YouTube thoko mwa MP3 mwa mphiyo! Fast, simple ni no registration. Save high-quality audio ni listen offline ata olhupa internet. Try now 👉 yoomp3.com/vmw
@threadreaderapp unroll
We are live tweeting Day 1 of the final hearing of clinical psychologist, Dr Anne Woodhouse (AW), before the Health and Care Professions Tribunal Service (HCPTS) Conduct and Competence Committee in relation to posts on Twitter/X. The hearing recommences at 2pm
The morning session is available here:
Our Substack gives a background to the case: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/health-and-c…
SK Brann Analizi | FLOOD
Fenerbahçe, yarın akşam Norveç’in Bergen ekibi SK Brann ile deplasmanda karşılaşacak. Ben de Brann’ın son üç Avrupa Ligi maçını analiz ederek sizlere görüntülü ve detaylı bir şekilde bir çalışma hazırladım.
İzlediğim Maçlar
SK Brann – Rangers FC
Bologna FC – SK Brann
PAOK Selanik – SK Brann
#UEL #BRAvFB
Fenerbahçe, yarın akşam Norveç’in Bergen ekibi SK Brann ile deplasmanda karşılaşacak. Ben de Brann’ın son üç Avrupa Ligi maçını analiz ederek sizlere görüntülü ve detaylı bir şekilde bir çalışma hazırladım.
İzlediğim Maçlar
SK Brann – Rangers FC
Bologna FC – SK Brann
PAOK Selanik – SK Brann
#UEL #BRAvFB
Brann teknik direktörü Freyr Alexandersson, 2024 başında takımın başına geçmiş ve selefi dönemindeki “yüksek yoğunluklu oyun” anlayışını sürdürmek istediğini vurgulamış bir isimdir. Nitekim Brann sahada yüksek tempolu, önde baskı yapan bir oyun stili benimsiyor. Takım genellikle 4-3-3 formasyonuyla oynuyor. Brann’ın oyun felsefesinde önde pres ve fiziksel mücadele ön plandadır. Avrupa Ligi’ndeki istatistikleri de bunu destekliyor: Brann, maç başına ortalama 118 kilometre koşu mesafesi kat etti ve Sofascore verilerine göre Avrupa Ligi genelinde maç başına tehlike engellemede ilk sırada yer alması, savunma kompaktlığının ve tehdit başlamadan pozisyonları bozma becerisinin oldukça yüksek olduğunu gösteriyor.
Ancak bu verinin diğer yüzü, Brann’ın maçların uzun bölümlerinde rakibi kendi yarı sahasında kabul ettiğini, oyunun kontrolünü zaman zaman rakibe bıraktığını ve bu nedenle fazla savunma aksiyonu yapmak zorunda kaldığını da ortaya koyuyor. Yani Brann, tehditleri engelleme konusunda çok verimli fakat bu verimlilik, oyunu domine etmekten ziyade güçlü bir orta–derin blok savunmasına yaslanmaktan kaynaklanıyor; bu da hem savunma dayanıklılığı hem de hücum üretimi açısından çift taraflı bir etki yaratıyor. Zaten bu durum, toplu oyuna da kısmen yansımış vaziyette. Avrupa Ligi’nde %49’luk bir toplu oynama oranına sahipler. Çok düşük olmasa da bunu baskın bir oyun anlayışı olarak nitelendirmek mümkün değil.
Ancak bu verinin diğer yüzü, Brann’ın maçların uzun bölümlerinde rakibi kendi yarı sahasında kabul ettiğini, oyunun kontrolünü zaman zaman rakibe bıraktığını ve bu nedenle fazla savunma aksiyonu yapmak zorunda kaldığını da ortaya koyuyor. Yani Brann, tehditleri engelleme konusunda çok verimli fakat bu verimlilik, oyunu domine etmekten ziyade güçlü bir orta–derin blok savunmasına yaslanmaktan kaynaklanıyor; bu da hem savunma dayanıklılığı hem de hücum üretimi açısından çift taraflı bir etki yaratıyor. Zaten bu durum, toplu oyuna da kısmen yansımış vaziyette. Avrupa Ligi’nde %49’luk bir toplu oynama oranına sahipler. Çok düşük olmasa da bunu baskın bir oyun anlayışı olarak nitelendirmek mümkün değil.
Öncelikle Brann’ın genel oyun kurulumundan başlayalım. Genellikle 4-3-3 formasyonunda diziliyorlar. Orta sahanın gerisinde 18 numaralı Sörensen’i görüyoruz. Bekler çizgiye genişlemiş durumda ve özellikle kenar oyuncularının, sağ üstte 14 numaralı oyuncudan da fark edilebileceği üzere, iç koridorda konumlandığını söyleyebiliriz. Sörensen’in önünde ise merkezde sağ tarafta Kornvig, sol tarafta ise Guðmundsson yer alıyor.
