Recent well liked threads
1/🚨On September 11, 2015, Margaret Chan — Director General of the WHO — delivered the opening address at a conference secretly funded, directed, and operationally controlled by Jeffrey Epstein.
The proof has been sitting in the federal archive for 2 months.
No outlet has touched it.
Until today. 🧵👇
The proof has been sitting in the federal archive for 2 months.
No outlet has touched it.
Until today. 🧵👇
2/ Inside the federal archive: EFTA02676303.
The internal name: "The Rothschild Conference on Health and Security."
🔗EFTA02676303.justice.gov/epstein/files/…
The public name at the UN: "Preparing for Pandemics."
🔗EFTA02702398 justice.gov/epstein/files/…
The funder's name was stripped before the doors opened.
4 pages. Free to read.
The internal name: "The Rothschild Conference on Health and Security."
🔗EFTA02676303.justice.gov/epstein/files/…
The public name at the UN: "Preparing for Pandemics."
🔗EFTA02702398 justice.gov/epstein/files/…
The funder's name was stripped before the doors opened.
4 pages. Free to read.
3/ The concept note names its partners as co-equals:
WHO. ICRC. UNHCR. MSF.
"The Edmond de Rothschild Foundations and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation."
The Gates Foundation had declined to fund it 6 months earlier.
Their name is in the document anyway.
WHO. ICRC. UNHCR. MSF.
"The Edmond de Rothschild Foundations and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation."
The Gates Foundation had declined to fund it 6 months earlier.
Their name is in the document anyway.
for a while i've had a slight fear that the bluetooth from my airpods could be frying my brain
this weekend i pulled the raw data from a $30m government study of 1,679 mice blasted with cell phone radiation and reanalyzed it
what i found was...not what I expected?
🧵
this weekend i pulled the raw data from a $30m government study of 1,679 mice blasted with cell phone radiation and reanalyzed it
what i found was...not what I expected?
🧵
for 2 years 820 mice & 859 rats lived in specially designed metal enclosures that scatter radiofrequency signals uniformly, so every animal gets a consistent whole-body dose
they were exposed to .9 – 1.9 GHz radiation, 9 hours a day
for context:
- this is the same radiofrequency used in your phone's 2G/3G signal – and is similar to the 2.4 GHz frequency used in bluetooth
- the intensity of radiation is roughly 100x more powerful than that emitted by something like airpods and 10x a cell phone
they were exposed to .9 – 1.9 GHz radiation, 9 hours a day
for context:
- this is the same radiofrequency used in your phone's 2G/3G signal – and is similar to the 2.4 GHz frequency used in bluetooth
- the intensity of radiation is roughly 100x more powerful than that emitted by something like airpods and 10x a cell phone
so what happened in the study?
THE RADIATED MICE LIVED SIGNIFICANTLY LONGER
they had a 53% LOWER risk of death (HR=.475, p=0.003) than the mice dosed with no radiation!!!
THE RADIATED MICE LIVED SIGNIFICANTLY LONGER
they had a 53% LOWER risk of death (HR=.475, p=0.003) than the mice dosed with no radiation!!!
Pope Leo asked me to meet him in a private audience at the Vatican today
I presented him with documents and evidence detailing decades of abuse inside Opus Dei and urged him to launch a full independent investigation into the group
A THREAD 🧵
I presented him with documents and evidence detailing decades of abuse inside Opus Dei and urged him to launch a full independent investigation into the group
A THREAD 🧵
He invited me after learning of the allegations made in my book OPUS, which he described as “a rigorous piece of work”
We spent more than forty minutes talking – just the two of us – and he asked a series of informed questions
We spent more than forty minutes talking – just the two of us – and he asked a series of informed questions
The book is the result of years of research, hundreds of hours talking with members – and access to secret internal documents
I detail evidence of child grooming, enslavement, human trafficking, breaching the seal of confession - and much much more
a.co/d/0dgXKVkS
I detail evidence of child grooming, enslavement, human trafficking, breaching the seal of confession - and much much more
a.co/d/0dgXKVkS
If you think processed foods are bad, wait until you see what LED light is doing to you.
LED bulbs flood your cells with toxic blue light; making you tired, fat, wrecking your sleep, and aging you faster.
The science is disturbing (and the solution is simple): 🧵
LED bulbs flood your cells with toxic blue light; making you tired, fat, wrecking your sleep, and aging you faster.
The science is disturbing (and the solution is simple): 🧵
Modern LED bulbs save energy but flood us with unnatural blue light with zero UV, red, or infrared.
Everything in nature thrives in sunlight, including humans.
LED gives you light malnutrition.
Everything in nature thrives in sunlight, including humans.
LED gives you light malnutrition.
Neurosurgeon Dr. Jack Kruse discovered that blue light "poisons" your mitochondria by disrupting the enzyme that makes energy.
It's like putting the wrong fuel in your engine.
It's like putting the wrong fuel in your engine.
Πώς επηρεάζουν οι εξελίξεις στο #Ιράν 🇮🇷 την #Ελλάδα 🇬🇷;
1/4
1/4
Πρώτον η μεγαλύτερη επίπτωση είναι ενεργειακή και πληθωριστική. Η παράλυση του Ορμούζ έχει εκτινάξει τις τιμές ενέργειας. Αυτό σημαίνει ακριβότερες μεταφορές ==> ακριβότερες εισαγωγές καυσίμων ==> αύξηση τιμών στο εμπόριο. 2/4
Δεύτερον, η κρίση δημιουργεί πίεση στην ελληνική εξωτερική πολιτική να ισορροπήσει ανάμεσα στις συμμαχικές υποχρεώσεις και στην αποφυγή εμπλοκής. Ωστόσο η Ελλάδα δήλωσε, ότι δε θα συμμετάσχει σε στρατιωτικές επιχειρήσεις στο Στενό του Ορμούζ. 3/4
BREAKING: Claude now has live access to real-time stock quotes and options chain data
You can pull prices, scan option chains, check Greeks, and view your portfolio without leaving the chat
Here's how to connect the (free) API step by step:
You can pull prices, scan option chains, check Greeks, and view your portfolio without leaving the chat
Here's how to connect the (free) API step by step:
Step 1: Open a free Public account
If you don't already have one, sign up here:
No commissions. No payment for order flow. Stocks, options, and crypto.
You need the account because it gives you free API access to live market data - that's what we're connecting to Claude.pqr3ntrk.com/HLB2JH/225JFQ/
If you don't already have one, sign up here:
No commissions. No payment for order flow. Stocks, options, and crypto.
You need the account because it gives you free API access to live market data - that's what we're connecting to Claude.pqr3ntrk.com/HLB2JH/225JFQ/
Step 2: Download Claude Desktop
Go to and install the desktop app (Mac or Windows).
This is different from Claude in your browser. The desktop app supports MCP servers, which is what gives Claude the ability to connect to external tools and live data.
You need a paid Claude plan ($20/month Pro works).claude.ai/download
Go to and install the desktop app (Mac or Windows).
This is different from Claude in your browser. The desktop app supports MCP servers, which is what gives Claude the ability to connect to external tools and live data.
You need a paid Claude plan ($20/month Pro works).claude.ai/download
Bart De Wever: From the diamond deal in Moscow to the trailblazer for Russian state interests.
🧵1/19
🧵1/19
In my thread, I already reported on Bart De Wever's travels and questionable contacts to Russia (2018 and 2020). During the 2018 trip, a 'new, expanded cooperation agreement' was signed and this is precisely the focus of the following report.
🧵2/19
🧵2/19
The Russian corporation ALROSA, the world's largest diamond mining company, and the Belgian AWDC (Antwerp World Diamond Centre) signed an expanded cooperation agreement in Moscow on April 24th, 2018. In 2021, this agreement was officially renewed and extended for the „coming years“ to „further consolidate the market leadership of both partners“.
🧵3/19
🧵3/19
World War III: The Fatal Mistake In Iran /🧵
... and why nothing can stop this war except the defeat of the United States.
Introduction: Salami Tactics
Imagine a heavy roll of salami, sitting on a table. It's usually a substantial amount of meat, and not something you can eat in one sitting. In fact, to properly dine on a piece of salami, you should slice it thinly and make a sandwich out of it. Gradually, salami slice after salami slice, the roll will disappear. But at no time except at the end of the roll, do you feel such a substantial amount of meat will run out.
This is the classic "salami tactic" concept, and the same idea applies to every aspect of life and war. Let us start with something that should be immediately familiar to any professional.
Office bullying can be modelled through salami slicing. Imagine a slight against you — very small, not enough to make you retaliate. Everyone prefers a comfortable peace, after all. You might even rationalise it as a mistake. But then it happens again and again, with each move it perhaps slices deeper into your personal space or rights.
But with each slice, your standing is lowered to the point where you're faced with the same dilemma: It's cheaper to let it slide and hope it doesn't happen again. Before you know it, you've been completely undermined and removed from the picture with miserable prospects for the future.
This is the most basic form of what is usually termed coercive gradualism, or gradualist tactics supporting a grand strategy. In RAND parlance, "threshold stretching and exploitation". In fact, this is exactly what started this war with Iran which is bound to expand as all means by which it can end have already been destroyed.
This isn't the first time this has happened, in fact, another war was started by the exact same mistake. Let us discuss that first before moving on to the current war that is raging and expanding horizontally (geographically) and vertically (in terms of escalation).
Which war am I talking about exactly? You see, that war was World War II.
... and why nothing can stop this war except the defeat of the United States.
Introduction: Salami Tactics
Imagine a heavy roll of salami, sitting on a table. It's usually a substantial amount of meat, and not something you can eat in one sitting. In fact, to properly dine on a piece of salami, you should slice it thinly and make a sandwich out of it. Gradually, salami slice after salami slice, the roll will disappear. But at no time except at the end of the roll, do you feel such a substantial amount of meat will run out.
This is the classic "salami tactic" concept, and the same idea applies to every aspect of life and war. Let us start with something that should be immediately familiar to any professional.
Office bullying can be modelled through salami slicing. Imagine a slight against you — very small, not enough to make you retaliate. Everyone prefers a comfortable peace, after all. You might even rationalise it as a mistake. But then it happens again and again, with each move it perhaps slices deeper into your personal space or rights.
But with each slice, your standing is lowered to the point where you're faced with the same dilemma: It's cheaper to let it slide and hope it doesn't happen again. Before you know it, you've been completely undermined and removed from the picture with miserable prospects for the future.
This is the most basic form of what is usually termed coercive gradualism, or gradualist tactics supporting a grand strategy. In RAND parlance, "threshold stretching and exploitation". In fact, this is exactly what started this war with Iran which is bound to expand as all means by which it can end have already been destroyed.
This isn't the first time this has happened, in fact, another war was started by the exact same mistake. Let us discuss that first before moving on to the current war that is raging and expanding horizontally (geographically) and vertically (in terms of escalation).
Which war am I talking about exactly? You see, that war was World War II.
Special Study Case: World War II
The treaty of Versailles which formally ended WWI was unfair to Germany. It restricted the size of its army and navy then cut away much of its territory. It was so unstable a situation that restricted what should be a great power to a miserable existence. Along with the corrosive influence of the anti-German degenerate Weimar regime, the rise of Hitler was inevitable.
Hitler wanted one thing: To make Germany great again. For that, he needed its army in the best shape and its territory expanded to its natural size.
After raising his army, Hitler went to work reversing the content of this treaty, beginning at the most natural point: [1] Moving his soldiers into the Rhineland in 1936. This was to be a DMZ between Germany and other European states. At the time, Britain was the enforcer of the treaty and the Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin saw this as a correction of an unfair treaty.
Hitler's Ambassador-at-Large and soon to be Foreign Minister Ribbentrop, saw the information from the event in a different way: The UK saw an incremental move by Germany and decided it was not worth going through another disastrous war to stop it. Remilitarizing the Rhineland was an important move for Germany's rearmament as it allowed Germany to fortify its western front.
This enabled it to focus on the south and the east...
The next move by Hitler was to unify Germany and Austria [2]. Today this is depicted as an annexation (The Sound of Music certainly makes it seem like such a thing). Nevertheless, the UK accepted this. There was no protest in Austria and it was largely bloodless. Opposing it could be construed as opposing Austrian's right to self-determination.
Just six months later, on September 1938, Hitler demanded the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia [3]. Chamberlain was a little concerned to say the least. England and France took this seriously, and kicked off the Munich conference. Hitler was told that he may have the Sudetenland but he must not make any more territorial demands. This was a signaled threshold, but without any kind of promise of action. It was declared a "peace for our time" by Chamberlain.
But Ribbentrop saw it differently. He had just violated the terms of the treaty of Versailles numerous times without action from the UK. Almost like clockwork, six months later, Germany took all of Czechoslovakia [4].
That was the final threshold for the UK. Chamberlain immediately issued a guarantee to Poland that the UK will enter a war with Germany should its sovereignty be impinged. Ribbentrop saw this as a bluff and in fact Germany invaded Memel in Lithuania (a German territory captured by allies in WWI) just days after Czechoslovakia [5]. No foreign policy statement was made by any party.
The stage was set for the second biggest mistake in human history. I will argue later, that the mistake made on the 28th of February is even worse.
Invasion of Poland
Exactly six month after taking Czechoslovakia, Hitler and Stalin jointly invaded Poland. The excuse was a false flag, the famous Gleiwitz radio incident. Given the steady timing of each invasion, it would have been unreasonable to believe it wasn't a premeditated excuse for war.
This acquisition would have secured the entire eastern flank of Germany, preparing the western front for eventual invasion. But the UK wasn't going to allow this invasion to take place without responding. King George the VI fulfilled the promise made by his prime minister and declared war on Germany just two days later.
The UK knew Germany would eventually invade France, ally with Italy and possibly even the USSR. It didn't want to wait until it could no longer fight Germany, but went to war immediately when its threshold was crossed.
This set in motion the most miserable episode in human memory, and catastrophes that we are still dealing with today.
Hitler's Savage Look
As England's declaration of war crackled over the radio and an official telegram was received from the British embassy, translated by Hitler's chief translator Paul-Otto Schmidt, Hitler was quite shocked. A war with England, at least at this stage, was not part of his plan. He wanted to salami slice his way into Europe, and prepare himself to a fait accompli victory later. A war completely destroyed all of his plans for a great Germany.
Schmidt recounts Hitler's immediate reaction after this news: He turned towards Ribbentrop with a savage look that spoke of betrayed trust and asked him in a snappy manner: "What now?".
The treaty of Versailles which formally ended WWI was unfair to Germany. It restricted the size of its army and navy then cut away much of its territory. It was so unstable a situation that restricted what should be a great power to a miserable existence. Along with the corrosive influence of the anti-German degenerate Weimar regime, the rise of Hitler was inevitable.
Hitler wanted one thing: To make Germany great again. For that, he needed its army in the best shape and its territory expanded to its natural size.
After raising his army, Hitler went to work reversing the content of this treaty, beginning at the most natural point: [1] Moving his soldiers into the Rhineland in 1936. This was to be a DMZ between Germany and other European states. At the time, Britain was the enforcer of the treaty and the Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin saw this as a correction of an unfair treaty.
Hitler's Ambassador-at-Large and soon to be Foreign Minister Ribbentrop, saw the information from the event in a different way: The UK saw an incremental move by Germany and decided it was not worth going through another disastrous war to stop it. Remilitarizing the Rhineland was an important move for Germany's rearmament as it allowed Germany to fortify its western front.
This enabled it to focus on the south and the east...
The next move by Hitler was to unify Germany and Austria [2]. Today this is depicted as an annexation (The Sound of Music certainly makes it seem like such a thing). Nevertheless, the UK accepted this. There was no protest in Austria and it was largely bloodless. Opposing it could be construed as opposing Austrian's right to self-determination.
Just six months later, on September 1938, Hitler demanded the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia [3]. Chamberlain was a little concerned to say the least. England and France took this seriously, and kicked off the Munich conference. Hitler was told that he may have the Sudetenland but he must not make any more territorial demands. This was a signaled threshold, but without any kind of promise of action. It was declared a "peace for our time" by Chamberlain.
But Ribbentrop saw it differently. He had just violated the terms of the treaty of Versailles numerous times without action from the UK. Almost like clockwork, six months later, Germany took all of Czechoslovakia [4].
That was the final threshold for the UK. Chamberlain immediately issued a guarantee to Poland that the UK will enter a war with Germany should its sovereignty be impinged. Ribbentrop saw this as a bluff and in fact Germany invaded Memel in Lithuania (a German territory captured by allies in WWI) just days after Czechoslovakia [5]. No foreign policy statement was made by any party.
The stage was set for the second biggest mistake in human history. I will argue later, that the mistake made on the 28th of February is even worse.
Invasion of Poland
Exactly six month after taking Czechoslovakia, Hitler and Stalin jointly invaded Poland. The excuse was a false flag, the famous Gleiwitz radio incident. Given the steady timing of each invasion, it would have been unreasonable to believe it wasn't a premeditated excuse for war.
This acquisition would have secured the entire eastern flank of Germany, preparing the western front for eventual invasion. But the UK wasn't going to allow this invasion to take place without responding. King George the VI fulfilled the promise made by his prime minister and declared war on Germany just two days later.
The UK knew Germany would eventually invade France, ally with Italy and possibly even the USSR. It didn't want to wait until it could no longer fight Germany, but went to war immediately when its threshold was crossed.
This set in motion the most miserable episode in human memory, and catastrophes that we are still dealing with today.
Hitler's Savage Look
As England's declaration of war crackled over the radio and an official telegram was received from the British embassy, translated by Hitler's chief translator Paul-Otto Schmidt, Hitler was quite shocked. A war with England, at least at this stage, was not part of his plan. He wanted to salami slice his way into Europe, and prepare himself to a fait accompli victory later. A war completely destroyed all of his plans for a great Germany.
Schmidt recounts Hitler's immediate reaction after this news: He turned towards Ribbentrop with a savage look that spoke of betrayed trust and asked him in a snappy manner: "What now?".
WWIII: The Project For the New American Century
PNAC was a think tank project founded by Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan, students of Strauss. These largely liberal men called themselves neoconservatives and quickly found support from a republican party trying to reinvent itself after the victories of the cold war and the grand finale of Desert Storm.
Their argument can be surmised as such (even though they would never put it in these terms): The world was enjoying peace, but an America without enemies and without conflicts could not realize its own power. What they desired was an enabling act, much like Hitler's numerous false flags, that set America into a motion of war. Then rearmament, nuclear weapons and missile defenses could be put up.
[Of course, as we know today they had a different goal: They wanted to make Israel Great Again, and in the process, get rid of America as people knew it transforming it into something entirely different and subservient to Israel. I will not cover this subject in this thread, however.]
After getting their men into power, Dick Cheyney, Donald Rumsfeld and George Bush, they got exactly what they wanted with the September 11 false flag. Their immediate course of action was to invade Afghanistan after framing Osama Bin Laden and his organization (a key ally of the US against the Soviet Union). The world was largely hoodwinked. The US received support from virtually every single person in the world, even in the streets of Tehran there was nothing but sympathy and support. Even I supported the US, quite strongly too. My uncle worked in one of the world trade centers (though thankfully he was out of state on that day).
The US invaded Afghanistan and defeated the Taliban by gaining support from all neighboring nations, Iran and using the full force of NATO, Australia and New Zealand as well as the northern alliance. It did not take long for the US to win.
Before the dust even settled, the US began making the case for invading Iraq. The excuse? Weapons of mass destruction. Meanwhile, the US had created a new class of weapons, low-yield minimal residual radiation nuclear weapons initially intended for Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP) or bunker busters. It also started to fund construction of all kinds of missile defenses, the reason for which was not clear to outsiders.*
Seven Nations in Five Years
Right after the dust from Afghanistan was settling, Wesley Clark reported that more wars were planned. To quote him directly:
"We are going to take out 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing it off with Iran"
And quelle surprise, while the sequence didn't go to plan, nor the timing, every single country on the list was attacked or taken over in some manner.
Iraq War (2003-2007)
The Iraq war was different. No one with a brain bought the WMD excuse. Besides, how can Iraq even deliver this? This war was pushed by Benjamin Netanyahu who guaranteed "positive reverberations" in the middle east should it be carried out and result in knocking out Saddam Hussein. Curiously, this same man "predicted" the destruction of the world trade center in 1996 and multiple times after that.
The world was split but the US found some support. France stayed out of the war. The UK and other parties joined in. This wasn't as easy as Afghanistan. The US used a weapon of mass destruction on the Baghdad Airport to force a victory, a fact recounted by both American and Iraqi sources and made undeniable by certain evidence, such as the wounds on one particular boy... but never mind the details.
[* But would be clearer if you understood the insider perspective of 9/11. I will leave that subject for my final thread however and it will not be covered here.]
PNAC was a think tank project founded by Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan, students of Strauss. These largely liberal men called themselves neoconservatives and quickly found support from a republican party trying to reinvent itself after the victories of the cold war and the grand finale of Desert Storm.
Their argument can be surmised as such (even though they would never put it in these terms): The world was enjoying peace, but an America without enemies and without conflicts could not realize its own power. What they desired was an enabling act, much like Hitler's numerous false flags, that set America into a motion of war. Then rearmament, nuclear weapons and missile defenses could be put up.
[Of course, as we know today they had a different goal: They wanted to make Israel Great Again, and in the process, get rid of America as people knew it transforming it into something entirely different and subservient to Israel. I will not cover this subject in this thread, however.]
After getting their men into power, Dick Cheyney, Donald Rumsfeld and George Bush, they got exactly what they wanted with the September 11 false flag. Their immediate course of action was to invade Afghanistan after framing Osama Bin Laden and his organization (a key ally of the US against the Soviet Union). The world was largely hoodwinked. The US received support from virtually every single person in the world, even in the streets of Tehran there was nothing but sympathy and support. Even I supported the US, quite strongly too. My uncle worked in one of the world trade centers (though thankfully he was out of state on that day).
The US invaded Afghanistan and defeated the Taliban by gaining support from all neighboring nations, Iran and using the full force of NATO, Australia and New Zealand as well as the northern alliance. It did not take long for the US to win.
Before the dust even settled, the US began making the case for invading Iraq. The excuse? Weapons of mass destruction. Meanwhile, the US had created a new class of weapons, low-yield minimal residual radiation nuclear weapons initially intended for Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP) or bunker busters. It also started to fund construction of all kinds of missile defenses, the reason for which was not clear to outsiders.*
Seven Nations in Five Years
Right after the dust from Afghanistan was settling, Wesley Clark reported that more wars were planned. To quote him directly:
"We are going to take out 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing it off with Iran"
And quelle surprise, while the sequence didn't go to plan, nor the timing, every single country on the list was attacked or taken over in some manner.
Iraq War (2003-2007)
The Iraq war was different. No one with a brain bought the WMD excuse. Besides, how can Iraq even deliver this? This war was pushed by Benjamin Netanyahu who guaranteed "positive reverberations" in the middle east should it be carried out and result in knocking out Saddam Hussein. Curiously, this same man "predicted" the destruction of the world trade center in 1996 and multiple times after that.
The world was split but the US found some support. France stayed out of the war. The UK and other parties joined in. This wasn't as easy as Afghanistan. The US used a weapon of mass destruction on the Baghdad Airport to force a victory, a fact recounted by both American and Iraqi sources and made undeniable by certain evidence, such as the wounds on one particular boy... but never mind the details.
[* But would be clearer if you understood the insider perspective of 9/11. I will leave that subject for my final thread however and it will not be covered here.]
@Antiochus191 @UnrollHelper Στά μείον ο πόλος του τουρισμού θά δεχθεί μεγάλο ταρακουνημα. Ήδη όι ακυρώσεις είναι πολλές. Όμως ή δυστοπία επενδύσεων στις χώρες Περσικού ίσως δόσει δυνατότητα ειδικά στο real estate στην Ελλάδα.
Η Ελλάδα ευθυγράμμισηκε με ΗΠΑ Ισραήλ.
Η Ελλάδα ευθυγράμμισηκε με ΗΠΑ Ισραήλ.
@Antiochus191 @UnrollHelper Δεν είναι ή ώρα νά μιλήσουμε για τά σύν ή ρίσκα. Είναι μεγάλη ιστορία. Αυτό που θά πω είναι εύχομαι νά ξέρουμε τί ζητάμε και να έχουμε ζητήσει. Δεν είναι προστασίας το ζητούμενο αλλά δρόμος ισχύος σέ ελληνική χέρια
🔥🔥🔥Breaking! War on the Rocks (WOTR) has some additional amazing partnerships and connections. Even leading to ex CIA staffers John Brennan, Paul Pope, Stephen Slick, and David Petraeus!
After Trumps 2016 win, John Brennan didn’t just disappear into TV land. No, he stayed involved with the vast network of the University of Texas, his Alma mater. Where a SOCOM individual, identified as a British asset, once wrote the Global Disinformation Index. Yeah you are about to see the University of Texas quite differently.
The above mentioned British asset, according to a whistleblower, was told by Obama to prevent Trump from winning again.
Where War On The Rocks comes in, is the Texas National Security Network and its Texas National Security Review.
The Texas National Security Network is vast and is essentially at least 22 entities or more enveloping the University of Texas Campus’s and orgs.
A few noteworthy examples:
- Intelligence Studies Project
- Strauss Center
- Clements Center
- University of Texas, Austin
- Texas National Security Review (WOTR)
- Etc
* University of Texas is Brennans Alma mater.
Ryan Evans (WOTR):
“As Founder and Editor-in-Chief of War on the Rocks, Ryan Evans summarizes, “think of us as the Washington-based action arm of the Texas National Security Network.”
Very interesting 🤔
♦️WOTR series part 2
War on the Rocks is partnered with the Texas National Security network to create the Texas National security Review.
In fact, the Texas National Security Network flat out CLAIMS TO SPONSOR War On The Rocks!
So, who all works with Ryan Evans of War On The Rocks at the Texas National Security Review?
- Ryan Evans (WOTR)
- David Petraeus ex CIA Dir
- James G. Stavridis, admiral
- Kathleen Hicks, senior vice president, Henry A. Kissinger Chair, and dir of the International Security Program at CSIS
- David shed, Defense Intelligence Enterprise workforce
Recall the Intelligence Studies Project is part of the Texas National Security Network. Here’s some of the staff at the Intelligence Studies Project:
- John Brennan ex cia
- Paul Pope ex cia
- Stephen Slick ex CIA
“Brennan is a Senior Advisor to the University’s Intelligence Studies Project (ISP) – a novel partnership between UT’s Clements Center for National Security and Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law.”
(Texas National Security Network is actually co-directed by the Clements Center and Strauss Center.)
4. Interesting side notes - John Brennan is a senior advisor at the International Institute of Strategic Studies headquartered in LONDON! Which is ran by the CLEMENTS and STRAUSS CENTERS!
Many of the War On The Rocks staff are from Kings College in London!
Ryan Evan’s was Kings College and OPCON/TACON to the British-led Task Force Helmand.
5. Texas Security Network leaders:
- Stephen Slick, Dir Intelligence Studies Project - CIA
- Bobby Chesney, Dir Strauss Center
- William Inboden
Executive Director - Clements Center
5. UT Austin’s Intelligence Studies Project and the Texas National Security Network announce the inaugural Texas Intelligence Academy (TIA), an intensive academic.
Students selected for the first TIA cohort will be housed in the District of Columbia and study at the UT System’s Archer Center one block from the White House.
6. So you can see the commingling here’s an event held at the University of Texas at Austin.
“Paul (Pope) is joined by John Brennan, former CIA director, retired Adm. William McRaven, former commander of the Special Operations Command, Farah Pandith, author and former National Security Council and State Department official, and Nicholas Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director. This talk took place at the University of Texas at Austin and was sponsored by the Intelligence Studies Project, the LBJ School of Public Affairs, the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law, and the Clements Center for National Security.”
All facts to be sourced.
After Trumps 2016 win, John Brennan didn’t just disappear into TV land. No, he stayed involved with the vast network of the University of Texas, his Alma mater. Where a SOCOM individual, identified as a British asset, once wrote the Global Disinformation Index. Yeah you are about to see the University of Texas quite differently.
The above mentioned British asset, according to a whistleblower, was told by Obama to prevent Trump from winning again.
Where War On The Rocks comes in, is the Texas National Security Network and its Texas National Security Review.
The Texas National Security Network is vast and is essentially at least 22 entities or more enveloping the University of Texas Campus’s and orgs.
A few noteworthy examples:
- Intelligence Studies Project
- Strauss Center
- Clements Center
- University of Texas, Austin
- Texas National Security Review (WOTR)
- Etc
* University of Texas is Brennans Alma mater.
Ryan Evans (WOTR):
“As Founder and Editor-in-Chief of War on the Rocks, Ryan Evans summarizes, “think of us as the Washington-based action arm of the Texas National Security Network.”
Very interesting 🤔
♦️WOTR series part 2
War on the Rocks is partnered with the Texas National Security network to create the Texas National security Review.
In fact, the Texas National Security Network flat out CLAIMS TO SPONSOR War On The Rocks!
So, who all works with Ryan Evans of War On The Rocks at the Texas National Security Review?
- Ryan Evans (WOTR)
- David Petraeus ex CIA Dir
- James G. Stavridis, admiral
- Kathleen Hicks, senior vice president, Henry A. Kissinger Chair, and dir of the International Security Program at CSIS
- David shed, Defense Intelligence Enterprise workforce
Recall the Intelligence Studies Project is part of the Texas National Security Network. Here’s some of the staff at the Intelligence Studies Project:
- John Brennan ex cia
- Paul Pope ex cia
- Stephen Slick ex CIA
“Brennan is a Senior Advisor to the University’s Intelligence Studies Project (ISP) – a novel partnership between UT’s Clements Center for National Security and Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law.”
(Texas National Security Network is actually co-directed by the Clements Center and Strauss Center.)
4. Interesting side notes - John Brennan is a senior advisor at the International Institute of Strategic Studies headquartered in LONDON! Which is ran by the CLEMENTS and STRAUSS CENTERS!
Many of the War On The Rocks staff are from Kings College in London!
Ryan Evan’s was Kings College and OPCON/TACON to the British-led Task Force Helmand.
5. Texas Security Network leaders:
- Stephen Slick, Dir Intelligence Studies Project - CIA
- Bobby Chesney, Dir Strauss Center
- William Inboden
Executive Director - Clements Center
5. UT Austin’s Intelligence Studies Project and the Texas National Security Network announce the inaugural Texas Intelligence Academy (TIA), an intensive academic.
Students selected for the first TIA cohort will be housed in the District of Columbia and study at the UT System’s Archer Center one block from the White House.
6. So you can see the commingling here’s an event held at the University of Texas at Austin.
“Paul (Pope) is joined by John Brennan, former CIA director, retired Adm. William McRaven, former commander of the Special Operations Command, Farah Pandith, author and former National Security Council and State Department official, and Nicholas Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director. This talk took place at the University of Texas at Austin and was sponsored by the Intelligence Studies Project, the LBJ School of Public Affairs, the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law, and the Clements Center for National Security.”
All facts to be sourced.
To begin, I’m going to cross reference Part One which involves the War On The Rocks spinoff, Breakrock Knowledge Inc.
Let’s begin with the Texas National Security Network (TNSN) which sponsors War On The Rocks (WOTH). WOTR is also partnered with the Texas National Security Review.
It prioritizes accessibility for national security professionals.
♦️TNSN operates an array of programs intended to support security-relevant research.
These include:
“THE TEXAS NATIONAL SECURITY REVIEW
The Texas National Security Review (“TNSR”) will be a path-breaking journal launching later this year. It will publish peer-reviewed policy-relevant scholarship that is timely, draws on a variety of disciplines, and prioritizes accessibility for national security professionals. It is produced in close partnership with the influential foreign and defense policy blog War on the Rocks, which the Network sponsors.”
archive.is/1Bp26
It prioritizes accessibility for national security professionals.
♦️TNSN operates an array of programs intended to support security-relevant research.
These include:
“THE TEXAS NATIONAL SECURITY REVIEW
The Texas National Security Review (“TNSR”) will be a path-breaking journal launching later this year. It will publish peer-reviewed policy-relevant scholarship that is timely, draws on a variety of disciplines, and prioritizes accessibility for national security professionals. It is produced in close partnership with the influential foreign and defense policy blog War on the Rocks, which the Network sponsors.”
archive.is/1Bp26
Донбас 2026.
На початку чергової “літньої” кампанії на Донеччині та на порозі двох років постійної роботи на Покровському напрямку, не зайве подивитися в якій точці ми знаходимось. 1
На початку чергової “літньої” кампанії на Донеччині та на порозі двох років постійної роботи на Покровському напрямку, не зайве подивитися в якій точці ми знаходимось. 1
Практично захопивши Покровськ і Мирноград, росіяни отримали зручну базу для організації подальшого наступу як на захід, так і на північ. Базу для пунктів управління, пілотів, РЕБ, логістики тощо. 2
Крім щільної житлової забудови та розблокування прямої дороги з Новогродівки у Мирноград, під контролем окупантів опинилися десятки промислових об’єктів з капітальною забудовою, бетонними укриттями. Шахти, заводи, штольні тощо. Про це я писав у попередньому тексті. 3
@benwehrman 💯👇🏻
@benwehrman Too sad that the proof is in German, but still very interesting. 👇🏻
1/🚨 Peter Thiel just called the Giving Pledge an "Epstein-adjacent, fake Boomer club."
Federal documents show he wasn't being provocative.
Epstein literally designed a business plan to help Bll Gates capture tens of billions of dollars of Giving Pledge money — in his own words, with Bates numbers.
Here's what the files show 🧵👇
Federal documents show he wasn't being provocative.
Epstein literally designed a business plan to help Bll Gates capture tens of billions of dollars of Giving Pledge money — in his own words, with Bates numbers.
Here's what the files show 🧵👇
2/💰 Feb 17, 2011. Epstein to JPMorgan — three months after the Giving Pledge launched:
"They all have a tax advisor, but have no real clue on how to give it away."
$60+ billion pledged. No mechanism to deliver it.
Epstein saw the gap. He intended to fill it. [EFTA00904740] justice.gov/epstein/files/…
"They all have a tax advisor, but have no real clue on how to give it away."
$60+ billion pledged. No mechanism to deliver it.
Epstein saw the gap. He intended to fill it. [EFTA00904740] justice.gov/epstein/files/…
3 / He told Gates directly what the vehicle was for:
"You can save taxes. A DAF with you is the pinnacle of their giving lives. The leverage is as great as increasing govt spending."
Not philanthropy. A theory of power — charity-sized impact with zero democratic accountability. [EFTA01003196] justice.gov/epstein/files/…
"You can save taxes. A DAF with you is the pinnacle of their giving lives. The leverage is as great as increasing govt spending."
Not philanthropy. A theory of power — charity-sized impact with zero democratic accountability. [EFTA01003196] justice.gov/epstein/files/…
UN ANÁLISIS DE LA GUERRA DE UCRANIA DESDE UNA PERSPECTIVA PERONISTA - ACTUALIZACIÓN SEMANAL: 08 - 15/03/2026 - PERONISMO Y DEFENSA
Rusia busca derrotar a la OTAN en ucrania
Resúmenes anteriores:
Repito esto sobre la perspectiva peronista para quien
Rusia busca derrotar a la OTAN en ucrania
Resúmenes anteriores:
Repito esto sobre la perspectiva peronista para quien
recién empieza a leerme.
Esta perspectiva se encuentra explicada en el libro Conducción Militar de Perón y se enfoca en:
#1 Obtener enseñanzas para la conducción militar
#2 Promover el interés ciudadano de la defensa y evitar que sea un conocimiento de nicho de los militares.
Esta perspectiva se encuentra explicada en el libro Conducción Militar de Perón y se enfoca en:
#1 Obtener enseñanzas para la conducción militar
#2 Promover el interés ciudadano de la defensa y evitar que sea un conocimiento de nicho de los militares.
Es decepcionante que siendo Perón militar todavía nos corran dentro del peronismo con el pacifismo de la izquierda perfumada que dice que no hay que comprar armas porque hay “chicos con hambre”, cuando es hasta el propio compañero Lula que nos aclara la importancia de la defensa.