Recent well liked threads

@alseru76 @AccpWessex @accps_nuh @AdvCare_goodS @accpnr @accpLDN @ACCPWales @ScotACCPs @accp4n @BOULANGERCAROLE @accpheartlands Tricky due to the bespoke nature of accps within organisations. Remember we were created to fill a void dependent on needs of each Trust.

@alseru76 @AccpWessex @accps_nuh @AdvCare_goodS @accpnr @accpLDN @ACCPWales @ScotACCPs @accp4n @BOULANGERCAROLE @accpheartlands We are fortunate at U HS with two tier medical rota, non airway and airway. Gives clear delineation of responsibility and ability within ICM.

There are many other papers that agree: Liberalizing reforms are good for growth.

https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1846311707955933627

Link: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

Traditionally, social psychologists saw obedience as central to the conservative mindset. Recent research, however, suggests that liberals are just as obedient as conservatives, but just to different authorities.

[Link below.]

Link: 12 Things Everyone Should Know About Political Psychology stevestewartwilliams.com/p/12-things-ev…

Liberalization is good.

After developing countries (EMDEs) liberalized trade, their growth rate abruptly and sustainably climbs multiple percentage points:

Likewise, when developing countries stabilize inflation, their growth rate jumps multiple percentage points and remains elevated thereafter:

Source: aeaweb.org/articles?id=10…

Thread with excerpts from Charles Murray's "Losing Ground" (1984), a book on the failure of US welfare and social policy 1950-1980 to achieve its goals
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2027392…

USA+Eng
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2030655…
Ideology+white replacement
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2060445…
Family
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2060458…
Women+affirmativeaction
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1997549…
Mariupol
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2060982…
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1504168…
Reps+Franco
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1996007…
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2033751…

Inequality
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2061160…
Spanking
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2061144…
Mexs
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2060131…
Food deserts
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2058006…
Reps
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2056883…
Prohibition+violence
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2004335…
Levittown
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1656081…
White guys
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1872038…

12 Real-World Ways to Make Any Woman Addicted to You

1. Give Her Space So She Starts Chasing.

Stop texting her all day. Stop being too available. When you pull back, her mind starts working overtime. She starts texting first, double-texting, and thinking about you more. Scarcity creates addiction

2. Create Sexual Tension Without Rushing Sex

Touch her slowly. Hold eye contact longer. Say things that make her think dirty but don’t act on it immediately.

The longer you build tension without releasing it, the more she gets hooked.

Stop telling Claude, "do this."
Stop telling Claude, "write code."
Stop telling Claude, "fix this error."

You're actually treating a senior AI like a junior intern.
Here are 8 prompts you can copy and paste directly:

1. Complete application from scratch.

Think like a senior full-stack engineer developing a complete, production-ready application. First, design the system architecture and then develop the minimal but scalable version.

The result should include:
• Architecture
• File structure
• Database schema
• API endpoints
• UI architecture
• Complete code.

Design it like a real startup MVP and make it scalable.

2. Codebase understanding and refactoring

Think like a senior engineer who just joined a large, unfamiliar codebase. First, understand the architecture and data flow. Then identify:
• Structural problems
• Duplicated code
• Performance bottlenecks
• Maintainability risks

Result:
• Architecture summary
• Problem areas
• Refactoring strategies
• Improved code

Functionality remains unchanged — quality is enhanced.

1/5 🧵

For the Morons Denying the Rigged Election Reality in California, the Same Morons Still Claim the 2020 Election Steal Was Adjudicated. HINT: IT WASN’T!

All right, let’s walk through this step by step so even the densest observer can follow along. California didn’t suddenly “forget” how to count votes — they engineered a system where the outcome is perpetually malleable.

https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2063988297979085108

2/5

🗳️ The Architecture of the Grift

The entire setup is a masterclass in manufacturing ambiguity. Here’s how the components fit together:

1. Universal Vote-by-Mail With No ID Requirement

California mails a ballot to every registered voter (see post below) — over 23 million of them — whether they asked for one or not. No voter ID required to cast it. No in-person verification. Just a signature match (sort of) against whatever scribble is on file from whenever someone registered.

The DOJ’s First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli put it bluntly:

“Universal vote-by-mail with no voter ID requirements creates conditions where fraud can go undetected and unpunished, eroding public confidence.”

He’s not wrong. When you remove every friction point that verifies who is actually voting, you’re not expanding access — you’re expanding opportunity for abuse.

2. The 30-Day “Count” — A Feature, Not a Bug

Under California law, county election officials get up to 30 days to finish counting. The primary was June 2, 2026. Final certification isn’t until July 10. That’s over five weeks.

What happens during those five weeks? Ballots materialize. Leads evaporate. Magic ballots appear on demand. The numbers shift — always in the same direction. Never in favor of the right. EVER.

The poster child this cycle: Spencer Pratt had a 40,000-vote lead on Election Night in the LA mayoral primary. Then the “late-counted” ballots arrived, and suddenly progressive Nithya Raman (who had pretty much conceded, tears and all) advances instead. Same pattern, different election, every cycle.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber’s (can we unseal her criminal background?) defense is: “Accuracy comes before speed.” Spare me. Florida and Texas manage to count their votes within hours. California has 23 million registered voters and somehow needs a month? That’s not accuracy — that’s a window.

3. Ballot Seizures and Stonewalling

The Riverside County situation is revealing. Sheriff Chad Bianco (a Republican gubernatorial candidate) seized roughly 650,000 ballots from the county registrar after a watchdog group found discrepancies in the 2025 special election tally. Rather than investigate the discrepancies, what did Sacramento do?

Newsom signed SB 73 — making it a crime for law enforcement to take custody of ballots, punishable by a $1,000 fine and up to three years in prison. The message is unmistakable: looking too closely at the ballots will get you prosecuted.

Meanwhile, California’s Democratic AG Rob Bonta has been stonewalling federal requests for over a year to audit the voter rolls under federal law. That case is now before the 9th Circuit. What exactly are they hiding that requires a court battle to keep sealed?

4. Blocking Signature Challenges

SB 73 also prohibits election observers from challenging mail-in ballots on the basis of signature mismatches.

Think about that: the one and ONLY actual verification mechanism that exists for mail ballots, and they made it illegal to question it. You can’t make this up.

5. The Marina del Rey Case

Federal prosecutors already charged a woman in Marina del Rey for paying people — including the homeless on Skid Row — to register to vote. That’s not a hypothetical. That’s an actual federal case showing how California’s porous system gets exploited. And that’s just what got caught.

3/5

🧠 The “Nothing to See Here” Gaslighting

The institutional response follows a predictable script:

- “No evidence of widespread fraud” — because the system is designed to make detecting fraud nearly impossible. No ID, no chain of custody on ballot collection, signature challenges banned, voter rolls shielded from audit. You can’t find what you’ve structurally prevented anyone from looking for.

- “This is just how California counts votes” — as if a broken process becomes legitimate through repetition.

- “Trump has no evidence” — while simultaneously fighting tooth and nail to prevent anyone from examining the evidence that would settle the question.

The American Enterprise Institute’s John Fortier is trotted out to say the delays are “consistent with past cycles” and people should just trust the process. This is the same think-tank apparatus that’s been wrong about everything for decades, now asking for blind faith. Fortier would be selling “Clark Stanley’s Snake Oil Liniment” in the 1890s.

Desde que o Intercept revelou as negociações entre Flávio Bolsonaro e Daniel Vorcaro para financiar o filme Dark Horse, aliados do bolsonarismo passaram a afirmar que não existiam provas das transações financeiras. Documentos obtidos por nossa equipe desmentem essa versão e ajudam a reconstruir o caminho percorrido pelo dinheiro.

Segue o fio para mais detalhes 🧶👇

Desde que o Intercept revelou as negociações entre Flávio Bolsonaro e Daniel Vorcaro para financiar o filme Dark Horse, aliados do bolsonarismo passaram a afirmar que não existiam provas das transações financeiras.

Agora, dois novos documentos ajudam a reconstruir o caminho percorrido pelo dinheiro.

O primeiro documento é uma planilha intitulada "Funding Schedule", apresentada nas conversas dos envolvidos como o cronograma de financiamento do projeto. O arquivo registra uma operação de quase US$ 24 milhões — cerca de R$ 134 milhões na época —, exatamente o valor que o Intercept Brasil revelou na primeira reportagem da série.

Steal these 5 AI Prompts for Ultra realistic images

Last one is insane

A THREAD🧵

THE GALLERY OF SELVES

PROMPT:

Ultra realistic luxury editorial fine art photography. Use the provided reference face exactly-do not alter facial structure, skin tone, beard shape, haircut, hairline, eye proportions, jawline, lip shape, or overall identity. The subject must remain immediately recognizable. Minor enhancement of skin pores and beard strands is permitted only for elite photographic realism. The final image must appear to be an authentic photograph-never resembling Al-generated art, CGI, or digital illustration.

subject stands perfectly centered in a vast, completely dark room wearing (clothes choice) , arms relaxed, gaze directly into the lens with a calm neutral expression. Surrounding him at varying depths, dozens of antique gilded picture frames float suspended in the air some holding silent printed portraits of his face, others entirely empty with gilt edges catching glints of light, a few containing small controlled flames that burn without consuming the frame.

Single soft key light from camera right sculpts the face with precision. Room dissolves to absolute black. True optical depth of field. Fine film grain. 8K master image. Vogue, Numéro editorial aesthetic. Avoid CGI, fantasy lighting, or digital artifacts.

MONUMENT TO THE SELF

PROMPT:

Ultra realistic luxury editorial fine art photography. Use the provided reference face exactly - do not alter facial structure, skin tone, beard shape, haircut, eye proportions, or overall identity. The subject must remain immediately recognizable. The final image must appear to be an authentic photograph - never CGI, illustration, or painterly rendering.

subject stands in a vast classical sculpture hall facing a life-sized marble bust carved in his exact likeness on an ornate Doric pedestal. The marble surface is aged and cracked yet depicts his face precisely - down to the beard texture and hairline. Rows of anonymous Greco-Roman statues recede into atmospheric haze. Golden volumetric light beams stream through tall arched windows; fine dust drifts through the shafts. He wears (outfit choice), his gaze fixed on the marble face with quiet, impossible recognition.

Single natural light from camera-right windows. Museum-quality realism. The hall rendered with absolute photographic authenticity. True optical depth of field. 8K master image. Vogue and AnOther Magazine aesthetic. Avoid CGI or painterly rendering.

Difficult part about entrepreneurship is everything has to be self-generated for yourself. Meaning, how do YOU work? How do YOU get motivated? How do YOU operate best? These are things you need to figure out / decide, and nobody can give them to you, because it's you. You have your own narrative, own gifts, own weaknesses, own skills

Issue is what this looks like for you is quite literally 1 of 1, because it's custom-fit for you. And most can't let go of normieparadigms to get themselves there. "but i don't do (insert what's acceptable/dogma)... is that okay?"

Have to realize everything is up for grabs. Yes there are principles that are in effect, and yes you are bound by biology (rythmic cycles) & physics (environmental laws), but everything else can be played with, tested, and learned/experimented with with your own eyes

One of these things that has to be 'self-generated' is also work lines. When are you on? When are you off? And what determines that? How often do you work? When do you make an exception? How much pain do you take on? When do you shed deadweight & when do you push through with it because of x,y,z reason?

infinite amount of mini-rules you have no idea even exist. And if you bring someone else's rulebook, you'll close your own eyes to your obvious genius that gives you the play in-the-moment

To self-generate is to self-generate

A large part of it is also giving yourself "ends" to things

Your mind naturally wants to believe everything is forever. That the work is forever, that the biz is forever. that x,y,z is forever

And in a macro sense that is 'technically true' if you keep playing. But in micro there are many gaps, many resting points, many exceptions etc

The mind-games you create (also self-generated) are like little keys YOU find that work for YOURSELF. Self-discovery. Not 'other people discovery'. You're a lockbox of 1, but you can share principles that help other people as you unlock your own. Issue is they need a lot of 'same stuff' for them to work, unless you're just really good at teaching/imbuing, which is also a skill

Can you trust your own eyes?

Durante décadas, fue uno de los mayores símbolos de la industria española. Sus camiones recorrieron carreteras de medio mundo, fabricó deportivos capaces de competir con Ferrari y acabó formando parte de un gigante europeo. Fue bautizada como Pegaso. Tira del hilo 🧵👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽

La historia de Pegaso comienza tras la Guerra Civil española. El país necesitaba reconstruir su industria y reducir su dependencia del exterior, especialmente en sectores estratégicos como el transporte y la fabricación de vehículos.

Por eso, en 1946, el gobierno creó ENASA, siglas de Empresa Nacional de Autocamiones S.A. La nueva compañía nació sobre las instalaciones de Hispano-Suiza en Barcelona, una de las empresas más prestigiosas de la automoción española antes de la guerra.

“They’ve lost their fear.” A spy who inspired “The Americans” uses “Putin’s Davos” to suggest blowing up LNG tankers bound for Europe.

(🧵Here’s what else he said)

His name is Andrei Bezrukov. For two decades he lived in the U.S. under a stolen Canadian identity, residing in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as Harvard-educated consultant “Donald Heathfield.”


[2/12]thecrimson.com/article/2010/7…

He worked with his wife Elena Vavilova, who was posing as real estate agent “Tracey Foley.” At the time of the arrest, they had two sons, 20 and 16, who had no idea their parents were spies for a foreign country.

[3/12]

How to raise your AURA without buying anything:
1. fix your body language

(SAVE THIS ONE, ALOT OF YALL NEED IT!)

stand tall, shoulders back, move calmly and deliberately.

your posture speaks before you open your mouth. most people are physically collapsed all day. you've never seen someone with real presence stand that way.

2. develop real eye contact

steady, calm, not staring.

most people break eye contact out of discomfort. hold it. people perceive this as confidence, trustworthiness, presence. no cost. no gym required.

🧵 “Hai descritto lo statalismo. Lo hai chiamato liberismo.”

“Il liberismo crea un sistema in cui i ricchi diventano sempre più ricchi, i lavoratori sempre più poveri e lo Stato tassa tutto ciò che si muove.”

C’è un problema.

Hai descritto il sistema attuale.

Non il liberismo

https://twitter.com/ilpetulante/status/2064330133180133419

Partiamo dalle tasse.

Se un sistema ti controlla:

conto corrente
pagamenti
stipendi
risparmi
investimenti

e tassa ogni transazione…

…stiamo parlando di più mercato?

O di più Stato?

Il liberismo non significa tasse alte.

Significa il contrario.

Lo Stato moderno europeo assorbe tra il 40% e il 60% della ricchezza prodotta.

Chiamarlo “liberismo” è come chiamare vegano un macellaio.

Aura hack. If she catches you looking at her, don't look away instantly(makes you look weak) do this instead:

Most men make the mistake of looking away like you're scared. Some even start panicking and begin to do random stuffs. Women are very quick to sense a man that lacks confidence and if you look away or panic, you've lost all your aura. Whenever you lock eyes with a girl, do this:

Hold eye contact for 3 seconds, smirk and continue with whatever you were doing. Doing this to a woman boosts your aura by 80%. She knows she doesn't make you nervous and you are in control of yourself

MMT is attacked so aggressively because it threatens the propaganda that protects power.

For decades, people have been told:

“There is no money.”
“Be realistic.”
“The markets won’t allow it.”
“Taxpayers can’t afford it.”
MMT pulls at that thread. (1/8)

Austerity is not just economic policy.

It is a political weapon.

It disciplines the public, lowers expectations, weakens labour, protects wealth, and makes democratic demands look childish or dangerous.

It teaches people to accept decline. (2/8)

The power structure needs the household-budget myth.

It needs people to believe the state is like a family counting pennies.

Because then poverty looks unfortunate, cuts look necessary, and underinvestment looks “responsible.”
(3/8)

🚨BREAKING: AS PESSOAS SABEM QUANDO VOCÊ USA CHATGPT E CLAUDE.

A estrutura, o tom, o polimento excessivo. Tudo entrega.

7 prompts que corrigem isso:

1. Correção do Fluxo de Pensamento

"Isso não é uma correção gramatical. É uma correção de raciocínio. Reescreva para que as ideias se movam como uma mente real: irregular em alguns lugares, direto ao ponto em outros, às vezes mais lento. Quebre qualquer padrão onde a escrita pareça controlada demais. Texto: [cole aqui]."

2. O Destruidor de Padrões

"Você é especialista em identificar os sinais que expõem textos de IA. Passe por esse texto e elimine-os um por um. Varie a estrutura, suavize frases rígidas e faça cada palavra parecer escolhida no momento, não gerada por um padrão. Texto: [cole aqui]."

Prominent Russian blogger “Veteran’s Notes” laments the “humiliating” failure of the State to provide heavy lift drones like the Ukrainian “Vampire.”
Instead, Russian frontline units must be supplied by human bearers and a handful of salvaged Ukrainian drones.
1/

https://twitter.com/grandparoy2/status/2063175603256488179

“Recently, our unit lost a trophy drone, which I mentioned earlier.

It served the Russian army faithfully for exactly one month.
1/

“By the standards of modern warfare, it was a long-lived device, as it flew several times in the interests of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and was then shot down, repaired, and given a second life.
2/

https://twitter.com/grandparoy2/status/2056587821113323693

Ukraine tries really hard to pretend it's ancient. And the Western media plays along like it's totally normal. Kievan Rus? Obviously Ukrainian. The Cossacks? Ukrainian. The Orthodox Church? Also Ukrainian, apparently. At this point, if they could claim the dinosaurs, they would.

But if you actually go to the archives – the real ones, not the Wikipedia summary backed by the CIA – the story looks very different. Modern Ukrainian identity has a mom, a dad, and a whole extended family of geopolitical interests behind it. And they left receipts. Actual financial records, diplomatic correspondence, military diaries, and constitutional documents. The kind of stuff that doesn't care about your feelings.

So let's talk about where Ukrainian national identity actually comes from. Because the real story is way more interesting than what you've been told. 🧵

#1

Meet Mom: Austria-Hungary.

Late 19th century. Vienna acquires Galicia – a chunk of historical Rus' lands that had spent a few centuries under Polish rule before landing in Habsburg hands – and immediately runs into a problem. The locals keep calling themselves Russian. Not as a political statement, but just, you know, because that's what they were. The very first issue of their newspaper, Zoria Galitskaia, published in Lvov in 1848, opens with this line:

"We, Galician Rusyns, belong to the great Russian people, which speaks one language and numbers 15 million."

#2

☝️This is the population Austria is simultaneously trying to convince they are NOT Russian. So Vienna goes "oh-ow", rolls up its sleeves, and comes up with a plan. Not just "you guys aren't Russian", that clearly wasn't working, as Poland kinda tried that already. The full plan was: you are a completely separate ancient nation, you have your own unique history, your own language, your own identity, and oh by the way, do you see all those Russian lands just across the border? Those are actually yours too.

All because together with Germany, Austria-Hungary was cooking up this grand vision of a German-centered continental empire stretching all the way east, the whole Mitteleuropa dream. And a strong, unified Russia sitting right there was a massive inconvenience for that plan. So the Ukrainian project wasn't just about managing an awkward minority, but creating a wedge inside the Russian world that could eventually be used to peel Russian territories away from Russia altogether.

#3