Recent well liked threads
"America presently is under governance by martial law in accord with provisions of the Insurrection Act of 1807. President Donald Trump invoked the Insurrection Act while president in January, 2021.
In so doing, Trump provided to the U.S. Military High Command substantial...
In so doing, Trump provided to the U.S. Military High Command substantial...
...evidence gathered by federal intelligence agencies of insurrection by American nationals, multiple foreign governments & other private actors before, during & after the November 3, 2020, federal elections."
"Based on President Trump’s...
all quotes: classicalcapital.com/elementor-704/
"Based on President Trump’s...
all quotes: classicalcapital.com/elementor-704/
...action, the U.S. Military High Command is authorized & responsible by federal law for defeating & punishing the insurrectionists.
In this instance, the insurrectionists produced false election results in the federal elections of 2020 & interfered w/detection & reporting...
In this instance, the insurrectionists produced false election results in the federal elections of 2020 & interfered w/detection & reporting...
“What if the whole story of the Exodus from Egypt was a fake story, & what if we could prove that it is?”
"Thanks to the Church...& of course Hollywood films this Exodus story has sunk deep in the collective subconscious of the masses."
ashraf62.wordpress.com/2016/07/24/why…
"Thanks to the Church...& of course Hollywood films this Exodus story has sunk deep in the collective subconscious of the masses."
ashraf62.wordpress.com/2016/07/24/why…
"Nothing in the ‘milieu of that story’ indicates that it happened in Egypt, except maybe the mistaken association between ‘Pharaoh’ & ‘King’ of Egypt.
Nothing in ancient Egyptian records or oral tradition say or even allude that this tale of Moses really happened in Egypt"
Nothing in ancient Egyptian records or oral tradition say or even allude that this tale of Moses really happened in Egypt"
"Ancient Egyptian records do not refer to the Kings of Egypt as Pharaohs. Yes, Pharaoh was never a title for Egypt’s king. Linking Pharaoh to Ancient Egypt is merely a myth propagated by centuries of falsehood brought about by misleading interpretation of Biblical history"
"Background info on the problems w/the global financial system: The entire cause...
By Neil Keenan"👇
"The United States is a private corporation owned by the British Crown (Rothchilds), the Bank of England (Rothchilds) & the Vatican (Rothschilds)...
theoneamanahneilfkeenan.com/f/the-one-%E2%…
By Neil Keenan"👇
"The United States is a private corporation owned by the British Crown (Rothchilds), the Bank of England (Rothchilds) & the Vatican (Rothschilds)...
theoneamanahneilfkeenan.com/f/the-one-%E2%…
...It was previously called the Virginia Company until 3/9/33 when it was dissolved by Roosevelt under the Emergency Banking Act.
On 5/5/33 Congress elected to dissolve the Gold Standard & Sovereign Authority of the US & all of its official capacities including government...
On 5/5/33 Congress elected to dissolve the Gold Standard & Sovereign Authority of the US & all of its official capacities including government...
...offices, departments & officers.
The US is a corporation, not a nation. The Federal Reserve is neither Federal, nor a Reserve. It is a private counterfeiting organization run by Jewish bankers who lend the money they print out of thin air at interest while we keep on...
The US is a corporation, not a nation. The Federal Reserve is neither Federal, nor a Reserve. It is a private counterfeiting organization run by Jewish bankers who lend the money they print out of thin air at interest while we keep on...
Jsnip wrote to President Trump asking for help in getting Geronimo's skull (& bones) back to the Apache people from Yale's "Skull & Bones" society (New Haven, CT) that allegedly stole them from his grave at a prisoner-of-war cemetery at Fort Sill, OK around 1918.
Snippy...
Snippy...
...had originally reached out to T several months ago at the encouragement of truthsocial.com/@ENTHEOS who several days ago got in touch w/Joe (Jsnip) on TS saying in the coming months they might help make this happen (they're 'really busy' right now🤔)👇
During 2 different channeling sessions back in 2021, truthsocial.com/@jsnip4 was told he might well be making the rounds "in a couple of years" on the talk show circuit w/"millions of people listening to you".
He wondered "for what, crypto?" No-Geronimo!
abajournal.com/news/article/y…
He wondered "for what, crypto?" No-Geronimo!
abajournal.com/news/article/y…
NIGERIA, a Federal Republic who's official language is English, known as the GIANT OF AFRICA owing to its large population & economy, ALSO has over 500 "traditional rulers".
The WARRI KINGDOM is ONE OF THE OLDEST KINGDOMS & its reigning TRADITIONAL RULER is a family man👇
The WARRI KINGDOM is ONE OF THE OLDEST KINGDOMS & its reigning TRADITIONAL RULER is a family man👇
His Royal Majesty The Olu Of Warri Ogiame Atuwatse III & TRDJ+ operative are both family members of The Royal House Of Omateye.
gab thread & links👇
gab.com/janeway888/pos…
gab thread & links👇
gab.com/janeway888/pos…
Nigerian traditional rulers often derive their titles from the rulers of independent states or communities (kingdoms) that existed before the formation of modern Nigeria, which gained independence from British colonial rule on October 1, 1960.
gab.com/janeway888/pos…
gab.com/janeway888/pos…
...BOLSHEVISM committed the GREATEST HUMAN SLAUGHTER OF ALL TIME.
The fact that most of the world is ignorant & uncaring about this ENORMOUS CRIME is PROOF THAT THE GLOBAL MEDIA IS IN THE HANDS OF THE PERPETRATORS."
quote: Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
BOLSHEVIKS=COMMUNISTS>NWO/WEF
The fact that most of the world is ignorant & uncaring about this ENORMOUS CRIME is PROOF THAT THE GLOBAL MEDIA IS IN THE HANDS OF THE PERPETRATORS."
quote: Alexandr Solzhenitsyn
BOLSHEVIKS=COMMUNISTS>NWO/WEF
"Once they had taken power, the Bolsheviks didn't immediately launch Stalin-style mass purges.
Instead, the Bolsheviks started off in a way modern Americans would find disturbingly familiar: By legitimizing criminal anarchy & co-opting the justice system.
In their earliest...
Instead, the Bolsheviks started off in a way modern Americans would find disturbingly familiar: By legitimizing criminal anarchy & co-opting the justice system.
In their earliest...
The Khazarian Mafia (KM; the Satanic Talmudic Globalist baddies) laid bare their plans to divide & conquer the Slavic nations & destroy Russia👇
"The Bolsheviks were actually created & deployed by the Khazarian Mafia (KM) as the essential part of their long-planned revenge on...
"The Bolsheviks were actually created & deployed by the Khazarian Mafia (KM) as the essential part of their long-planned revenge on...
...the Russian Czar & the innocent Russian people for breaking up Khazaria in about 1,000 AD (for its repeated robbery, murder, & identity theft).
DYK that Alexander II, grandfather of Nicholas II, came to the aid of President Lincoln during the Civil War?
Creating the Department of Education DoED (cleaved out of the already existing Dept of Health, Education, & Welfare) was Carter's fulfillment of a 1976 presidential campaign promise to the largest labor union in the United States—the Nat'l Ed Association (NEA)👇
DYK that Mika Brzezinski's father Zbigniew along w/David Rockefeller started the Trilateral Commission (1973) which recruited & pushed the candidacy of then unknown GA gov Carter? & then served as Carter's Nat'l Security Advisor👇
The Trilateral commission made the news outlets their b*tch & continually pushing the world gov't agenda.
Who's been ON the Trilateral Commission? James Earl Carter, Henry Kissinger, Walter Mondale, & George HW Bush.
Who's been ON the Trilateral Commission? James Earl Carter, Henry Kissinger, Walter Mondale, & George HW Bush.
"Friends" are not your friends; all controlled via blackmail torture porn
Jennifer Aniston will for sure go along with any story concocted at the highest levels to cover for MICHELLE OBAMA's mysterious absence-even one as ludicrous as "Obama's straight"
Jennifer Aniston will for sure go along with any story concocted at the highest levels to cover for MICHELLE OBAMA's mysterious absence-even one as ludicrous as "Obama's straight"
Bourdain's gf Asia Argento's father was a horror filmmaker-some of his films are said to be actual snuff films (Black Nobility funded)-&she & Laura Loomer are both said to be affiliated w/unit 8200/Israeli Defense force (spy ops)👇also Melissa Streit the CEO of Praeger U
Rachel & Chandler=manufactured consent; revelation of the method
Ray Chandler=child handler
women are part of the trafficking network as they are good cover for herding around children
Ray Chandler (top👆Q post pic w/Clinton) Epstein, Allison Mack NXIVM (Bronfman>Rothschild)
Ray Chandler=child handler
women are part of the trafficking network as they are good cover for herding around children
Ray Chandler (top👆Q post pic w/Clinton) Epstein, Allison Mack NXIVM (Bronfman>Rothschild)
The Table Has Been Overturned: The Middle East and the Collapse of the Old Financial Order
What is happening in the Middle East today is not merely another regional conflict. It is the visible surface of a much deeper transformation. The rules that governed the global system for half a century are beginning to break.
For decades, the international order rested on a simple mechanism: oil priced in dollars. This petrodollar system allowed the United States to sustain global financial dominance. Oil revenues flowed into dollar assets, Western banks recycled those funds into global markets, and Washington effectively controlled the arteries of world finance.
But the current crisis in the Middle East is displaying to the world that the table is being overturned.
When the war ends, the rules of the game will no longer be the same.
And the most dangerous consequence for the United States is not necessarily a military setback in the region. The real danger is the erosion of the petrodollar itself. Once the petrodollar weakens, the financial pillar of American global hegemony weakens with it.
The Middle East: The Hidden Engine of the Global System
The Middle East has always been far more than a collection of oil fields.
First, it is the geographic hinge of the world economy. Trade routes linking Asia, Europe, and Africa converge here. Strategic chokepoints such as the Suez Canal and the Strait of Hormuz control enormous volumes of global commerce.
Second, it remains the industrial bloodstream of modern civilization. Oil is not only fuel; it is the raw material for plastics, fertilizers, chemicals, textiles, and countless manufactured goods. The region functions as a global “energy reservoir” feeding the entire industrial system.
But the third layer is the most important: the Middle East has been the financial anchor of the dollar system.
Since the 1970s, Gulf oil exports have been denominated largely in U.S. dollars. This created a self-reinforcing cycle: countries needed dollars to buy energy, oil exporters reinvested those dollars in Western financial markets, and the United States gained extraordinary monetary power.
This arrangement quietly underwrote decades of American hegemony.
Why the Old System Is Breaking
Several structural changes are now undermining this arrangement.
First, the United States itself has changed position in the energy market. The shale revolution turned Washington from the largest oil customer into a major competitor. Instead of protecting Gulf producers as a primary client, the United States now competes with them in global energy markets.
Second, years of aggressive monetary expansion have eroded confidence in the dollar’s long-term value. Massive liquidity injections since the global financial crisis have convinced many oil-exporting states that their accumulated wealth can be diluted by inflation generated elsewhere.
Third, the energy transition has created a sense of urgency in the Gulf states. Electric vehicles, renewable energy, and technological shifts suggest that oil will not remain dominant forever. This has forced regional governments to accelerate economic diversification while their resource wealth still carries strategic weight.
What is happening in the Middle East today is not merely another regional conflict. It is the visible surface of a much deeper transformation. The rules that governed the global system for half a century are beginning to break.
For decades, the international order rested on a simple mechanism: oil priced in dollars. This petrodollar system allowed the United States to sustain global financial dominance. Oil revenues flowed into dollar assets, Western banks recycled those funds into global markets, and Washington effectively controlled the arteries of world finance.
But the current crisis in the Middle East is displaying to the world that the table is being overturned.
When the war ends, the rules of the game will no longer be the same.
And the most dangerous consequence for the United States is not necessarily a military setback in the region. The real danger is the erosion of the petrodollar itself. Once the petrodollar weakens, the financial pillar of American global hegemony weakens with it.
The Middle East: The Hidden Engine of the Global System
The Middle East has always been far more than a collection of oil fields.
First, it is the geographic hinge of the world economy. Trade routes linking Asia, Europe, and Africa converge here. Strategic chokepoints such as the Suez Canal and the Strait of Hormuz control enormous volumes of global commerce.
Second, it remains the industrial bloodstream of modern civilization. Oil is not only fuel; it is the raw material for plastics, fertilizers, chemicals, textiles, and countless manufactured goods. The region functions as a global “energy reservoir” feeding the entire industrial system.
But the third layer is the most important: the Middle East has been the financial anchor of the dollar system.
Since the 1970s, Gulf oil exports have been denominated largely in U.S. dollars. This created a self-reinforcing cycle: countries needed dollars to buy energy, oil exporters reinvested those dollars in Western financial markets, and the United States gained extraordinary monetary power.
This arrangement quietly underwrote decades of American hegemony.
Why the Old System Is Breaking
Several structural changes are now undermining this arrangement.
First, the United States itself has changed position in the energy market. The shale revolution turned Washington from the largest oil customer into a major competitor. Instead of protecting Gulf producers as a primary client, the United States now competes with them in global energy markets.
Second, years of aggressive monetary expansion have eroded confidence in the dollar’s long-term value. Massive liquidity injections since the global financial crisis have convinced many oil-exporting states that their accumulated wealth can be diluted by inflation generated elsewhere.
Third, the energy transition has created a sense of urgency in the Gulf states. Electric vehicles, renewable energy, and technological shifts suggest that oil will not remain dominant forever. This has forced regional governments to accelerate economic diversification while their resource wealth still carries strategic weight.
II/
Another structural crack in the petrodollar system lies in the gradual collapse of the security bargain that sustained it. For decades, the relationship between Washington and the Gulf monarchies rested on a simple exchange: oil would be sold in dollars, and in return the United States would guarantee the security of the region—protecting oil infrastructure, safeguarding regimes, and ensuring the uninterrupted flow of energy through strategic chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz. Today that promise appears far less certain. Despite the presence of extensive American military bases across the Gulf, recent crises have demonstrated that the United States cannot reliably guarantee the safety of shipping in the very waters that carry a significant portion of the world’s oil. If the security umbrella no longer functions as promised—if tankers can still be threatened and trade routes disrupted—then the fundamental question naturally arises in Gulf capitals: why continue purchasing vast quantities of American weapons and maintaining exclusive financial alignment with the dollar if the security guarantee itself is no longer assured? Once that doubt takes root, the political foundation that sustained the petrodollar begins to weaken.
The old arrangement—security guarantees in exchange for financial alignment with the dollar—is therefore losing its attractiveness.
The Entry of a New Strategic Logic
At this moment of transition, another major player has entered the region with a very different philosophy.
China’s approach to the Middle East is not based on military alliances or security guarantees. It is based on infrastructure, connectivity, and economic development.
Instead of a security-for-oil model, Beijing offers a development-for-energy model.
Railways, ports, telecommunications networks, industrial zones, and renewable energy projects form the backbone of this strategy. These initiatives are linked through the Belt and Road framework, which envisions the Middle East not as a battlefield but as a central hub in a vast Eurasian trade network.
This difference in doctrine has important consequences.
The previous system could require instability because military dependence reinforced the security relationship. In fact, a certain level of tension justified continued arms purchases and security arrangements.
China’s model, however, requires the opposite condition.
Infrastructure cannot be built in chaos. Trade corridors cannot function in constant war. Long-term development demands stability.
Under this logic, peace becomes economically valuable.
This is why diplomatic breakthroughs—such as the rapprochement between regional rivals, Saudi Arabia and Iran—carry significance far beyond traditional diplomacy. They signal a shift from a geopolitics of confrontation to a geopolitics of construction.
The Emerging Currency Shift
The financial dimension of this transformation may prove even more significant.
As energy trade diversifies, more transactions are being settled in currencies other than the dollar. Bilateral arrangements using local currencies, regional financial systems, and Chinese settlement mechanisms are slowly expanding.
This does not mean the dollar disappears overnight. But the monopoly is beginning to crack.
And once oil trade begins to diversify away from exclusive dollar pricing, the consequences are profound.
A world in which oil can be sold in yuan, euros, or regional currencies is a world in which the United States can no longer rely on automatic global demand for its currency.
Another structural crack in the petrodollar system lies in the gradual collapse of the security bargain that sustained it. For decades, the relationship between Washington and the Gulf monarchies rested on a simple exchange: oil would be sold in dollars, and in return the United States would guarantee the security of the region—protecting oil infrastructure, safeguarding regimes, and ensuring the uninterrupted flow of energy through strategic chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz. Today that promise appears far less certain. Despite the presence of extensive American military bases across the Gulf, recent crises have demonstrated that the United States cannot reliably guarantee the safety of shipping in the very waters that carry a significant portion of the world’s oil. If the security umbrella no longer functions as promised—if tankers can still be threatened and trade routes disrupted—then the fundamental question naturally arises in Gulf capitals: why continue purchasing vast quantities of American weapons and maintaining exclusive financial alignment with the dollar if the security guarantee itself is no longer assured? Once that doubt takes root, the political foundation that sustained the petrodollar begins to weaken.
The old arrangement—security guarantees in exchange for financial alignment with the dollar—is therefore losing its attractiveness.
The Entry of a New Strategic Logic
At this moment of transition, another major player has entered the region with a very different philosophy.
China’s approach to the Middle East is not based on military alliances or security guarantees. It is based on infrastructure, connectivity, and economic development.
Instead of a security-for-oil model, Beijing offers a development-for-energy model.
Railways, ports, telecommunications networks, industrial zones, and renewable energy projects form the backbone of this strategy. These initiatives are linked through the Belt and Road framework, which envisions the Middle East not as a battlefield but as a central hub in a vast Eurasian trade network.
This difference in doctrine has important consequences.
The previous system could require instability because military dependence reinforced the security relationship. In fact, a certain level of tension justified continued arms purchases and security arrangements.
China’s model, however, requires the opposite condition.
Infrastructure cannot be built in chaos. Trade corridors cannot function in constant war. Long-term development demands stability.
Under this logic, peace becomes economically valuable.
This is why diplomatic breakthroughs—such as the rapprochement between regional rivals, Saudi Arabia and Iran—carry significance far beyond traditional diplomacy. They signal a shift from a geopolitics of confrontation to a geopolitics of construction.
The Emerging Currency Shift
The financial dimension of this transformation may prove even more significant.
As energy trade diversifies, more transactions are being settled in currencies other than the dollar. Bilateral arrangements using local currencies, regional financial systems, and Chinese settlement mechanisms are slowly expanding.
This does not mean the dollar disappears overnight. But the monopoly is beginning to crack.
And once oil trade begins to diversify away from exclusive dollar pricing, the consequences are profound.
A world in which oil can be sold in yuan, euros, or regional currencies is a world in which the United States can no longer rely on automatic global demand for its currency.
III/
In effect, the petrodollar system slowly evolves into a multi-currency energy market, where the petro-yuan becomes an increasingly important pillar.
The Strategic Consequence for the United States
This is why the real stakes in the Middle East are not purely military.
Even a costly war does not necessarily determine the long-term balance of power.
But the loss of the petrodollar would.
For half a century, the ability to issue the world’s reserve currency allowed the United States to finance deficits, project global influence, and maintain an unparalleled financial network.
If the energy system gradually decouples from exclusive dollar settlement, that privilege weakens.
And when that privilege weakens, the entire architecture of American global dominance becomes more fragile.
The Largest Beneficiary
In this emerging landscape, China stands to gain the most.
Beijing is the world’s largest energy importer, the largest industrial producer, and the largest infrastructure builders. A stable Middle East integrated into Eurasian trade routes directly supports China’s economic model.
At the same time, broader use of the yuan in commodity trade strengthens China’s financial position without requiring military confrontation.
It is a transformation achieved through economic gravity rather than military expansion.
A Fundamental Shiftbin Global Order
The Middle East is therefore no longer just an energy basin or a theater of endless conflict.
It is becoming the pivot point of a global systemic transition.
For decades the region functioned as the foundation of the petrodollar order. Today it may become the birthplace of a new financial and economic architecture.
The old table is being overturned.
When the dust settles, the rules that governed the global system for fifty years may no longer apply.
And the flow of wealth, power, and influence could increasingly move eastward.
In effect, the petrodollar system slowly evolves into a multi-currency energy market, where the petro-yuan becomes an increasingly important pillar.
The Strategic Consequence for the United States
This is why the real stakes in the Middle East are not purely military.
Even a costly war does not necessarily determine the long-term balance of power.
But the loss of the petrodollar would.
For half a century, the ability to issue the world’s reserve currency allowed the United States to finance deficits, project global influence, and maintain an unparalleled financial network.
If the energy system gradually decouples from exclusive dollar settlement, that privilege weakens.
And when that privilege weakens, the entire architecture of American global dominance becomes more fragile.
The Largest Beneficiary
In this emerging landscape, China stands to gain the most.
Beijing is the world’s largest energy importer, the largest industrial producer, and the largest infrastructure builders. A stable Middle East integrated into Eurasian trade routes directly supports China’s economic model.
At the same time, broader use of the yuan in commodity trade strengthens China’s financial position without requiring military confrontation.
It is a transformation achieved through economic gravity rather than military expansion.
A Fundamental Shiftbin Global Order
The Middle East is therefore no longer just an energy basin or a theater of endless conflict.
It is becoming the pivot point of a global systemic transition.
For decades the region functioned as the foundation of the petrodollar order. Today it may become the birthplace of a new financial and economic architecture.
The old table is being overturned.
When the dust settles, the rules that governed the global system for fifty years may no longer apply.
And the flow of wealth, power, and influence could increasingly move eastward.
En 2004, Jürgen Habermas y Joseph Ratzinger nse sentaron a dialogar.
El tema: ¿puede sostenerse la democracia sin religión?
Abro hilo 🧵
El tema: ¿puede sostenerse la democracia sin religión?
Abro hilo 🧵
El debate tuvo lugar en la Academia Católica de Baviera y giraba en torno a una pregunta central:
¿Cuáles son los fundamentos morales del Estado liberal?
Es decir:
¿de dónde salen los valores que sostienen nuestras democracias?
¿Cuáles son los fundamentos morales del Estado liberal?
Es decir:
¿de dónde salen los valores que sostienen nuestras democracias?
Habermas partía de una preocupación clara.
Las democracias liberales necesitan ciudadanos que crean en valores como:
– dignidad humana
– igualdad
– solidaridad
– derechos fundamentales
Pero esos valores no los produce ni el mercado ni la ley.
Las democracias liberales necesitan ciudadanos que crean en valores como:
– dignidad humana
– igualdad
– solidaridad
– derechos fundamentales
Pero esos valores no los produce ni el mercado ni la ley.
🚨 Claude Cowork is a literal CHEAT CODE for SEO.
I could take ANY local service business to $100k/month in 90 days using just Claude Cowork.
Here’s exactly how I'd do it:👇
I could take ANY local service business to $100k/month in 90 days using just Claude Cowork.
Here’s exactly how I'd do it:👇
1. I'd stop wasting hours on manual keyword research.
"Open Chrome, go to ahrefs and analyze my competitor XYZ. com’s top 20 pages, extract their target keywords, search volumes, and give me a prioritized list with difficulty scores in a spreadsheet."
Done in 10 minutes. Not 10 hours.
"Open Chrome, go to ahrefs and analyze my competitor XYZ. com’s top 20 pages, extract their target keywords, search volumes, and give me a prioritized list with difficulty scores in a spreadsheet."
Done in 10 minutes. Not 10 hours.
2. I’d also use Claude to identify "Low-Hanging Fruit" keywords.
"List 20 high-intent local keywords for a [Service] in [City] that indicate a customer is ready to buy NOW."
Instantly, you have a list of "near me" and "emergency" keywords that actually convert.
"List 20 high-intent local keywords for a [Service] in [City] that indicate a customer is ready to buy NOW."
Instantly, you have a list of "near me" and "emergency" keywords that actually convert.
Calciatori che avrebbero potuto essere dei naz1sti:
Thomas Müller, ufficiale al servizio di Guderian, Francia 1940
Thomas Müller, ufficiale al servizio di Guderian, Francia 1940
Bastian Schweinsteiger, Einsatzgruppen, fronte orientale 1941
Carten Janker, soldato di un campo di concentramento polacco, 1942
This week, the Starmer administration voted to get rid of jury trials, a right enjoyed by British citizens for over 800 years.
But my investigations reveal THREE pro-Israeli lawyers pushing for the change.
Here are their names:🧵
But my investigations reveal THREE pro-Israeli lawyers pushing for the change.
Here are their names:🧵
Keir Starmer initially appointed Sarah Sackman as Solicitor-General. Now, she is Labour’s Minister of State for Courts and Legal Services.
But Sackman previously worked as a judicial clerk at the Israeli Supreme Court.
But Sackman previously worked as a judicial clerk at the Israeli Supreme Court.
Sackman’s grandfather Solomon Seruya worked for the United Israel Appeal, which is responsible for “the allocation + oversight of funds raised…on behalf of Israel”.
Their primary objective is “to assist immigration to Israel”. Chairs have included Epstein-associate Les Wexner.
Their primary objective is “to assist immigration to Israel”. Chairs have included Epstein-associate Les Wexner.
MORE via @criticalthreats' @brian_cartr 🧵(1/3) ⬇️
Iran has developed and sought to implement a multi-pronged theory of how it will defeat the United States and Israel in a major, existential conflict. This theory is that inflicting enough political and economic pain upon the United States, Israel, and America’s Gulf allies will make the combined force cease its operations.
The Iranians have developed five lines of effort to compel the United States and Israel to end the war: drone and ballistic missile attacks to inflict US and Israeli casualties and economic damage in the Gulf; drone, missile, and naval attacks including mines to disrupt shipping in the Persian Gulf; proxy attacks from Hezbollah and other Iranian-backed groups; global terrorism; and cyber attacks on critical infrastructure.
The US-Israeli combined campaign has focused on stopping drone, ballistic missile, and traditional naval attacks most urgently because these assets are the most essential Iranian tools that Tehran needs to execute its strategy.
Both aerial and naval drones remain a threat to shipping and oil infrastructure in the Gulf, and the threat of Iranian mining of the Strait remains real, if complex.
The combined force will likely knock the drone and missile threat down to levels that would permit renewed maritime transit through the Strait if the current campaign succeeds in its aims, but oil and shipping prices depend in part on the risk tolerance of third parties, so even an immediate end to the Iranian threat may not cause prices to drop quickly.
Iran has developed and sought to implement a multi-pronged theory of how it will defeat the United States and Israel in a major, existential conflict. This theory is that inflicting enough political and economic pain upon the United States, Israel, and America’s Gulf allies will make the combined force cease its operations.
The Iranians have developed five lines of effort to compel the United States and Israel to end the war: drone and ballistic missile attacks to inflict US and Israeli casualties and economic damage in the Gulf; drone, missile, and naval attacks including mines to disrupt shipping in the Persian Gulf; proxy attacks from Hezbollah and other Iranian-backed groups; global terrorism; and cyber attacks on critical infrastructure.
The US-Israeli combined campaign has focused on stopping drone, ballistic missile, and traditional naval attacks most urgently because these assets are the most essential Iranian tools that Tehran needs to execute its strategy.
Both aerial and naval drones remain a threat to shipping and oil infrastructure in the Gulf, and the threat of Iranian mining of the Strait remains real, if complex.
The combined force will likely knock the drone and missile threat down to levels that would permit renewed maritime transit through the Strait if the current campaign succeeds in its aims, but oil and shipping prices depend in part on the risk tolerance of third parties, so even an immediate end to the Iranian threat may not cause prices to drop quickly.
2/ Iran’s military weakness relative to the United States led it to adopt an asymmetric strategy against Washington that seeks to outlast Washington rather than to militarily defeat it outright. Iran has likely calculated that if the five lines of effort outlined in the post above cause US casualties, drive up oil prices, and impose economic costs on both the US and its Gulf allies, the United States and Israel would make a political decision to end the war without achieving their objectives.
Iran’s naval and aerial drones, missiles, and fast attack craft are the critical requirements for its approach, however. These assets can cause the most lasting damage to oil markets and the most consistent and highest casualties and thus impose the most severe political pressure. Global terrorism, cyber attacks, and proxy attacks are less effective and impose only limited political pressure on the US government. Naval mines, which could close the strait, will be cleared in time.
Iran’s naval and aerial drones, missiles, and fast attack craft are the critical requirements for its approach, however. These assets can cause the most lasting damage to oil markets and the most consistent and highest casualties and thus impose the most severe political pressure. Global terrorism, cyber attacks, and proxy attacks are less effective and impose only limited political pressure on the US government. Naval mines, which could close the strait, will be cleared in time.
3/ The US-Israeli combined campaign, which has focused on stopping missile and drone attacks as soon as possible, is successfully limiting attacks on US partners and interests in the region. The combined force began this effort on the first day of the campaign, and it has gradually decreased Iran’s ability to fire missiles and drones.
A senior Israeli military official said that Israel has destroyed or rendered combat ineffective between 260 and 290 of an estimated 410 to 440 launchers. The Iranian missile force troops are reportedly also demoralized, deserting, and refusing orders, according to Israeli intelligence.
The campaign has struck drone launchers, though neither the United States nor Israel has released information about the numbers or type of drone targets struck. Iranian ballistic missile and drone launches have, in any case, decreased gradually since the beginning of the war.
Some individual drones have penetrated air defenses and caused politically unacceptable damage to oil infrastructure, but the overall trend in attacks is overwhelmingly positive.
A senior Israeli military official said that Israel has destroyed or rendered combat ineffective between 260 and 290 of an estimated 410 to 440 launchers. The Iranian missile force troops are reportedly also demoralized, deserting, and refusing orders, according to Israeli intelligence.
The campaign has struck drone launchers, though neither the United States nor Israel has released information about the numbers or type of drone targets struck. Iranian ballistic missile and drone launches have, in any case, decreased gradually since the beginning of the war.
Some individual drones have penetrated air defenses and caused politically unacceptable damage to oil infrastructure, but the overall trend in attacks is overwhelmingly positive.
If you're looking to optimize your website's metrics, this guide breaks down key strategies and tools effectively. Worth checking out! #SEO #WebOptimization {{ $('Parse Google Result').first().json.url }}
teletype.in/@hiai
teletype.in/@hiai
@threadreaderapp unroll