Recent well liked threads
VENEZUELA: ANATOMY OF AN ECONOMIC HITJOB—The story of how our favorite ethnic oligarchs stole Venezuela for their international empire, but made it look like it was for our "American Empire" in the process.
Q: Was the Venezuelan action good for America? Well, IMO that's the wrong question. The right question is: Was it was better for Our Greatest Ally or for us on a relative basis? I'll lay out the timeline, then explain my answer to this question.
TIMELINE
In June 2014, the price of oil plummeted, hitting Venezuela's main revenue source.
In 2015, Venezuelan bonds, based on that oil, officially became distressed. Paul Singer's Elliott Management began buying these bonds at a discount, which were then trading at 50-70 cents on the dollar.
By 2016, BlackRock was also buying these distressed bonds.
In May 2017, Goldman Sachs purchased $2.8 Billion of these bonds at 31 cents on the dollar.
In August 2017, Trump begins placing sanctions on Venezuela. He will increase the sanctions again in 2018, 2019 & 2020.
By the end of 2017, as a result of the sanctions, the distressed Venezuelan bonds go into default.
December 2017, Venezuela announced the Petro (a state-backed cryptocurrency tied to oil reserves) as a sanctions-bypass tool. The regime also began BTC mining operations.
2018–2020: Gold-to-Bitcoin Swaps. Venezuela exported 73 tons ($2.7 billion) of Orinoco gold to countries like Turkey and the UAE. The proceeds were converted into BTC at the then current prices of ~$5,000–$10,000, forming the initial BTC reserve. BTC was also used for imports from Iran and Turkey.
2019–2022, Venezuela began subsidizing electricity, making it a BTC mining hub, which saw Chinese BTC operations move in.
May 2021, Robert Pincus is appointed by a US judge as Special Master to oversee the auction of PDV Holdings (Venezuelan oil) to pay off the bond debt.
2023–2025: Venezuela's Oil-to-USDT-to-Bitcoin Pivot. State oil firm PDVSA demanded payments in Tether (USDT) for exports (up to 80% by late 2025) to evade frozen accounts. Tether holdings were converted to BTC. Total holdings swell to $60 Billion.
In 2024, Special Master Robert Pincus recommends Venezuelan oil assets be sold to Paul Singer's Amber Energy.
November 2025, the US judge approves the sale of PDV/Citgo to Paul Singer's Amber Energy for $5.9 Billion, over the objections of Venezuela which appealed the ruling. Amber Energy will pay $2.1 Billion to bond holders.
SUMMARY & ANALYSIS
FOR NOTICERS: (Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Paul Singer, Robert Pincus....) need I go on?
With the help of zion-Don & the hijacked US military, israel-first jewish billionaires will get the long-awaited payout on their distressed investment gamble and seize control of Venezuela's oil, while the US Gov will take the strategic BTC reserve. It's unclear so far the ultimate fate of that BTC, but I'm sure the Crypto-Bros who bankrolled Trump's 2024 campaign will be very happy. And I'm sure plenty will find its way to Blackrock, helping it strengthen its grip over the financial system. The Silicon Valley tech bros will also now get to plunder other Venezuelan mineral resources to build & power their tech at a discount, and increase their relative power over us little guys, too.
With full access to and control over Venezuelan oil, israel and the zog'd out USGov are poised to make another run at Iran while simultaneously grabbing OPEC by the balls and further stressing China's access to oil (which buys 89% of Iran's oil & 45% of Venezuela's).
I think we see now why the israel-first crowd & Netanyahu were so happy about this action. Not to mention that Venezuela was firmly anti-zionist while being an important trading partner with Iran, helping both of them evade sanctions. This has helped Iran check israeli power in the middle east.
The main benefits to this intervention look to accrue to jewish & Zionist billionaires, financiers, tech oligarchs, israel, and other zionist-aligned people & entities. Does strengthening and enriching those powers help America-First Americans? Is giving Silicon Valley even more relative power good or bad for America-First sovereignty? Is making Blackrock more powerful good for us?
Yes, it does help to preserve the petro-dollar, which in the short term helps regular Americans. But the petrodollar play feels like it's just the bribing of Americans, so that we won't object to our own country being occupied and plundered by the same people plundering Venezuela. Does the petrodollar help us regain our sovereignty, or does it just keep us complacent? And doesn't it also help our Overseers who also deal in dollars and dominate the worldwide financial system? Whom does it help more on a relative basis? Aren't we just making our Masters stronger relative to us, further bolstering their grasp over us?
Are we really building "American Empire?" Or are we parasitizing America to build the international jewish empire and Greater israel? Which will then allow them to dominate us even harder than they already do?
IMO, they're playing on our collective American Ego and creature comforts to sleepwalk us into their digital control grid, Project Stargate, CBDC, AI, social credit, surveillance, police state.
I'm at the point now where if THEY want something, I don't want them to have it. Simple as.
Is Venezuela really the Monroe Doctrine? Or is it Globalist Talmudic Doctrine selling you snake oil labeled as the Monroe Doctrine?
Who did this action benefit more, Them or Us?
Q: Was the Venezuelan action good for America? Well, IMO that's the wrong question. The right question is: Was it was better for Our Greatest Ally or for us on a relative basis? I'll lay out the timeline, then explain my answer to this question.
TIMELINE
In June 2014, the price of oil plummeted, hitting Venezuela's main revenue source.
In 2015, Venezuelan bonds, based on that oil, officially became distressed. Paul Singer's Elliott Management began buying these bonds at a discount, which were then trading at 50-70 cents on the dollar.
By 2016, BlackRock was also buying these distressed bonds.
In May 2017, Goldman Sachs purchased $2.8 Billion of these bonds at 31 cents on the dollar.
In August 2017, Trump begins placing sanctions on Venezuela. He will increase the sanctions again in 2018, 2019 & 2020.
By the end of 2017, as a result of the sanctions, the distressed Venezuelan bonds go into default.
December 2017, Venezuela announced the Petro (a state-backed cryptocurrency tied to oil reserves) as a sanctions-bypass tool. The regime also began BTC mining operations.
2018–2020: Gold-to-Bitcoin Swaps. Venezuela exported 73 tons ($2.7 billion) of Orinoco gold to countries like Turkey and the UAE. The proceeds were converted into BTC at the then current prices of ~$5,000–$10,000, forming the initial BTC reserve. BTC was also used for imports from Iran and Turkey.
2019–2022, Venezuela began subsidizing electricity, making it a BTC mining hub, which saw Chinese BTC operations move in.
May 2021, Robert Pincus is appointed by a US judge as Special Master to oversee the auction of PDV Holdings (Venezuelan oil) to pay off the bond debt.
2023–2025: Venezuela's Oil-to-USDT-to-Bitcoin Pivot. State oil firm PDVSA demanded payments in Tether (USDT) for exports (up to 80% by late 2025) to evade frozen accounts. Tether holdings were converted to BTC. Total holdings swell to $60 Billion.
In 2024, Special Master Robert Pincus recommends Venezuelan oil assets be sold to Paul Singer's Amber Energy.
November 2025, the US judge approves the sale of PDV/Citgo to Paul Singer's Amber Energy for $5.9 Billion, over the objections of Venezuela which appealed the ruling. Amber Energy will pay $2.1 Billion to bond holders.
SUMMARY & ANALYSIS
FOR NOTICERS: (Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Paul Singer, Robert Pincus....) need I go on?
With the help of zion-Don & the hijacked US military, israel-first jewish billionaires will get the long-awaited payout on their distressed investment gamble and seize control of Venezuela's oil, while the US Gov will take the strategic BTC reserve. It's unclear so far the ultimate fate of that BTC, but I'm sure the Crypto-Bros who bankrolled Trump's 2024 campaign will be very happy. And I'm sure plenty will find its way to Blackrock, helping it strengthen its grip over the financial system. The Silicon Valley tech bros will also now get to plunder other Venezuelan mineral resources to build & power their tech at a discount, and increase their relative power over us little guys, too.
With full access to and control over Venezuelan oil, israel and the zog'd out USGov are poised to make another run at Iran while simultaneously grabbing OPEC by the balls and further stressing China's access to oil (which buys 89% of Iran's oil & 45% of Venezuela's).
I think we see now why the israel-first crowd & Netanyahu were so happy about this action. Not to mention that Venezuela was firmly anti-zionist while being an important trading partner with Iran, helping both of them evade sanctions. This has helped Iran check israeli power in the middle east.
The main benefits to this intervention look to accrue to jewish & Zionist billionaires, financiers, tech oligarchs, israel, and other zionist-aligned people & entities. Does strengthening and enriching those powers help America-First Americans? Is giving Silicon Valley even more relative power good or bad for America-First sovereignty? Is making Blackrock more powerful good for us?
Yes, it does help to preserve the petro-dollar, which in the short term helps regular Americans. But the petrodollar play feels like it's just the bribing of Americans, so that we won't object to our own country being occupied and plundered by the same people plundering Venezuela. Does the petrodollar help us regain our sovereignty, or does it just keep us complacent? And doesn't it also help our Overseers who also deal in dollars and dominate the worldwide financial system? Whom does it help more on a relative basis? Aren't we just making our Masters stronger relative to us, further bolstering their grasp over us?
Are we really building "American Empire?" Or are we parasitizing America to build the international jewish empire and Greater israel? Which will then allow them to dominate us even harder than they already do?
IMO, they're playing on our collective American Ego and creature comforts to sleepwalk us into their digital control grid, Project Stargate, CBDC, AI, social credit, surveillance, police state.
I'm at the point now where if THEY want something, I don't want them to have it. Simple as.
Is Venezuela really the Monroe Doctrine? Or is it Globalist Talmudic Doctrine selling you snake oil labeled as the Monroe Doctrine?
Who did this action benefit more, Them or Us?
2/ Hi friends, please consider contributing to my legal defense against Kash Patel's girlfriend. Help me keep the lights on.
Ana akım diyetetik dünyası, fruktoz (meyve şekeri) fobisi yaratarak meyvelerin karaciğeri yağlandırdığını, insülin direncine yol açtığını ve kilo aldırdığını iddia ederken; tıp ve beslenme endüstrisi insanları meyveler yerine "kompleks karbonhidratlar" denilen nişastalara ++
(tam tahıllar, yulaf, esmer pirinç) yönlendirir.
Meyveler, insan metabolizması için gezegendeki en güvenli, tiroidi en çok hızlandıran, stresi en hızlı kapatan ve hücresel enerji (ATP ve CO2) üretimini maksimize eden kusursuz gıdalardır.
Meyvelerin neden tahıllardan ve ++
Meyveler, insan metabolizması için gezegendeki en güvenli, tiroidi en çok hızlandıran, stresi en hızlı kapatan ve hücresel enerji (ATP ve CO2) üretimini maksimize eden kusursuz gıdalardır.
Meyvelerin neden tahıllardan ve ++
nişastalardan üstün olduğunu sizlere anlatayım.
Bitkiler kendilerini böceklere ve memelilere karşı korumak zorundadır. Bu nedenle bitki, en ölümcül toksinlerini (Çoklu Doymamış Yağlar/PUFA, enzim inhibitörleri, lektinler ve fitik asit) soyunu devam ettirecek olan tohumlarına ++
Bitkiler kendilerini böceklere ve memelilere karşı korumak zorundadır. Bu nedenle bitki, en ölümcül toksinlerini (Çoklu Doymamış Yağlar/PUFA, enzim inhibitörleri, lektinler ve fitik asit) soyunu devam ettirecek olan tohumlarına ++
All the Set piece, Corner and Penalty takers from every country for WORLD CUP FANTASY ✅
A THREAD 🧵
A THREAD 🧵
Group A
1. Czechia
•Penalties: Patrik Schick
•Free kicks: Vaclav Cerny, Pavel Sulc
•Corners: Vaclav Cerny, Pavel Sulc
2. Mexico
•Penalties: Raul Jimenez
•Free kicks: Luis Chavez, Hirving Lozano
•Corners: Luis Chavez, Hirving Lozano
3. South Africa
•Penalties: Tehobo Mokoena
•Free kicks: Oswin Appollis
•Corners: Oswin Appollis
4. South Korea
•Penalties: Son Heung-min
•Free kicks: Lee Kang-in, Son Heung-min
•Corners: Lee Kang-in, Son Heung-min
1. Czechia
•Penalties: Patrik Schick
•Free kicks: Vaclav Cerny, Pavel Sulc
•Corners: Vaclav Cerny, Pavel Sulc
2. Mexico
•Penalties: Raul Jimenez
•Free kicks: Luis Chavez, Hirving Lozano
•Corners: Luis Chavez, Hirving Lozano
3. South Africa
•Penalties: Tehobo Mokoena
•Free kicks: Oswin Appollis
•Corners: Oswin Appollis
4. South Korea
•Penalties: Son Heung-min
•Free kicks: Lee Kang-in, Son Heung-min
•Corners: Lee Kang-in, Son Heung-min
Group B
1. Bosnia-Herzegovina
•Penalties: Edin Dzeko, Haris Tabakovic
•Free kicks: Amar Dedic, Benjamin Tahirovic
•Corners: Amar Dedic, Benjamin Tahirovic
2. Canada
•Penalties: Jonathan David
•Free kicks: Alphonso Davies
•Corners: Alphonso Davies
3. Qatar
•Penalties: Akram Afif
•Free kicks: Akram Afif
•Corners: Akram Afif
4. Switzerland
•Penalties: Granit Xhaka
•Free kicks: Granit Xhaka
•Corners: Rubén Vargas
1. Bosnia-Herzegovina
•Penalties: Edin Dzeko, Haris Tabakovic
•Free kicks: Amar Dedic, Benjamin Tahirovic
•Corners: Amar Dedic, Benjamin Tahirovic
2. Canada
•Penalties: Jonathan David
•Free kicks: Alphonso Davies
•Corners: Alphonso Davies
3. Qatar
•Penalties: Akram Afif
•Free kicks: Akram Afif
•Corners: Akram Afif
4. Switzerland
•Penalties: Granit Xhaka
•Free kicks: Granit Xhaka
•Corners: Rubén Vargas
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu’s “office of lgbtq advancement” is holding a “trans period pride” event to discuss menstrual equity & the experiences of transgender menstruators
The office received nearly $1 million in taxpayer funding this year
This is real
What a time to be alive
The office received nearly $1 million in taxpayer funding this year
This is real
What a time to be alive
UPDATE: library canceled
UPDATE: event will be held at a secret location with police presence
Oscar & DeMille Decoding
1.
Every year there are four major award ceremonies for entertainment, literally called the "Big Four" but the most famous of them has a mysterious difference compared to the other three.
I'm going to try and solve that mystery in this thread...
1.
Every year there are four major award ceremonies for entertainment, literally called the "Big Four" but the most famous of them has a mysterious difference compared to the other three.
I'm going to try and solve that mystery in this thread...
2.
Grammy = Gramophone (Origin of Music Recording)
Emmy = Named after Origin of TV Broadcasting
Tony = Named After Recently Deceased Trailblazing Female Co-Founder of American Theater Wing
Oscar = Mystery
3 have a logical origin given what the award is for, but not the 4th.
Grammy = Gramophone (Origin of Music Recording)
Emmy = Named after Origin of TV Broadcasting
Tony = Named After Recently Deceased Trailblazing Female Co-Founder of American Theater Wing
Oscar = Mystery
3 have a logical origin given what the award is for, but not the 4th.
3.
Instead of an origin you'll find endless articles in newspapers on rumors as to how it became "Oscar" most often because a girl said it kind of looked like her uncle.
This bizarre anecdote is repeated across countless articles for decades.
Clearly there's a comm to decode.
Instead of an origin you'll find endless articles in newspapers on rumors as to how it became "Oscar" most often because a girl said it kind of looked like her uncle.
This bizarre anecdote is repeated across countless articles for decades.
Clearly there's a comm to decode.
🚨READ IT
The Justice Department just secured a superseding indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center, and it reveals some new bombshells
🧵1/20
dailysignal.com/2026/04/26/spl…
The Justice Department just secured a superseding indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center, and it reveals some new bombshells
🧵1/20
dailysignal.com/2026/04/26/spl…
Reminder: the SPLC raises money by claiming it exists to "dismantle white supremacy," but DOJ says the SPLC was actually propping up the hate it told donors it aimed to destroy. SPLC paid "field sources," whom SPLC says were merely informants.
🧵2/20
🧵2/20
Yet the field sources used the SPLC's $ to:
1⃣Attend extremist rallies
2⃣Host rallies
3⃣Grow existing chapters
4⃣Create new chapters
5⃣Recruit individuals
6⃣Donate to extremist leaders
7⃣Purchase cross-burning material
8⃣Create racist paraphernalia
9⃣Pay living expenses
🧵3/20
1⃣Attend extremist rallies
2⃣Host rallies
3⃣Grow existing chapters
4⃣Create new chapters
5⃣Recruit individuals
6⃣Donate to extremist leaders
7⃣Purchase cross-burning material
8⃣Create racist paraphernalia
9⃣Pay living expenses
🧵3/20
Google installed a 4GB AI model on your computer without asking.
No warning. No permission screen. No uninstall button you can find.
27 million Chrome users woke up with Gemini Nano on their devices and didn't know it.
Here's how to check if you're one of them and what to do about it: 🧵
No warning. No permission screen. No uninstall button you can find.
27 million Chrome users woke up with Gemini Nano on their devices and didn't know it.
Here's how to check if you're one of them and what to do about it: 🧵
1/What happened?
Recent reports found that Google Chrome has been downloading Gemini Nano, Google's on-device AI model, onto eligible devices.
The model can occupy roughly 4GB of storage and powers features such as writing assistance and other AI capabilities inside Chrome.
Critics argue users weren't clearly informed before the download occurred. (Malwarebytes)
Recent reports found that Google Chrome has been downloading Gemini Nano, Google's on-device AI model, onto eligible devices.
The model can occupy roughly 4GB of storage and powers features such as writing assistance and other AI capabilities inside Chrome.
Critics argue users weren't clearly informed before the download occurred. (Malwarebytes)
2/ Check if Chrome downloaded it.
Windows:
%LOCALAPPDATA%\Google\Chrome\User Data
Mac:
~/Library/Application Support/Google/Chrome/
Look for a folder called:
OptGuideOnDeviceModel
If it's there, Chrome has likely downloaded Gemini Nano. (Malwarebytes)
Windows:
%LOCALAPPDATA%\Google\Chrome\User Data
Mac:
~/Library/Application Support/Google/Chrome/
Look for a folder called:
OptGuideOnDeviceModel
If it's there, Chrome has likely downloaded Gemini Nano. (Malwarebytes)
I am hooked on Dynamic Workflows!
The idea of generating harnesses on the fly is so compelling that I reverse-engineered it for my agent orchestrator.
And then I built a monitoring dashboard (as an HTML artifact) to track tasks, metrics, and reports.
I can now use and monitor dynamic workflows in my agent orchestrator with coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, Pi, and even my own custom-built @dair_ai agent.
This is clearly the future of working with agents to accomplish complex, long-running tasks.
Some use cases I'm having success with:
- Branching deep research tasks (with verification)
- Parallel deep research tasks
- Session mining of all my agent sessions
- Bug hunting
- Triaging
- Fact-checking
- LLM councils
- AI simulations
- Data synthesis
- Evals generation
... and many others
Dynamic workflows, like agent skills, feel like an important primitive to not only get the most out of agents but also incorporate dynamic behaviors and important components like cooperation and verification.
There is so much exploration ground here. The exciting part is that this is not limited to coding tasks; it extends to business use cases and many other technical domains like science and research.
The idea of generating harnesses on the fly is so compelling that I reverse-engineered it for my agent orchestrator.
And then I built a monitoring dashboard (as an HTML artifact) to track tasks, metrics, and reports.
I can now use and monitor dynamic workflows in my agent orchestrator with coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, Pi, and even my own custom-built @dair_ai agent.
This is clearly the future of working with agents to accomplish complex, long-running tasks.
Some use cases I'm having success with:
- Branching deep research tasks (with verification)
- Parallel deep research tasks
- Session mining of all my agent sessions
- Bug hunting
- Triaging
- Fact-checking
- LLM councils
- AI simulations
- Data synthesis
- Evals generation
... and many others
Dynamic workflows, like agent skills, feel like an important primitive to not only get the most out of agents but also incorporate dynamic behaviors and important components like cooperation and verification.
There is so much exploration ground here. The exciting part is that this is not limited to coding tasks; it extends to business use cases and many other technical domains like science and research.
During the process of reverse-engineering dynamic workflows for my agent orchestrator (what you see in the clip), it suddenly hit me how important it is to own the orchestrator and harness.
This might be the first instance/proof, as far as I know, of dynamic workflows effectively working outside the Claude Code ecosystem.
I believe Codex and other coding agents will soon realize that this primitive (like agent skills) needs to live in their ecosystem as well.
I don't need to wait for them. I have tested it with my version of dynamic workflows, and Codex works great with this. Pi also works amazingly well. But what you see on the clip is an experimental nano-like (@karpathy style) coding agent I built for @dair_ai. This means that even the simplest of agents can leverage this primitive.
This might be the first instance/proof, as far as I know, of dynamic workflows effectively working outside the Claude Code ecosystem.
I believe Codex and other coding agents will soon realize that this primitive (like agent skills) needs to live in their ecosystem as well.
I don't need to wait for them. I have tested it with my version of dynamic workflows, and Codex works great with this. Pi also works amazingly well. But what you see on the clip is an experimental nano-like (@karpathy style) coding agent I built for @dair_ai. This means that even the simplest of agents can leverage this primitive.
This is too good to keep to myself. I will be sharing more on how I am using dynamic workflows and how and why I built my own version of it:
academy.dair.ai/events/cmpzo9k…
academy.dair.ai/events/cmpzo9k…
BREAKING: Canada's Parliamentary Budget Officer released its latest Economic and Fiscal Outlook today, projecting deeper deficits than the government forecast and raising serious questions about the sustainability of Ottawa's fiscal plan. 👇🧵 (1/6)
The PBO projects the federal deficit will nearly double this fiscal year, from $36.3B (1.2% of GDP) in 2024-25 to $72.0B (2.2% of GDP) in 2025-26. Even by 2030-31, the deficit is still projected at $58.2B, with no return to balance anywhere in the projection window. (2/6)
The watchdog projects annual deficits will run $4.6B deeper per year than what the government forecast in its own Spring Economic Update, driven by lower personal income tax revenues and higher-than-expected program spending. (3/6)
A 50 hombres felizmente casados se les hizo una pregunta:
"¿Qué te hace seguir profundamente enamorado de tu esposa después de tantos años?"
La mayoría esperaba respuestas sobre belleza.
Sobre s€xo.
Sobre atracción.
Pero casi ninguno respondió esto.
Sus respuestas fueron sorprendentemente parecidas.
Aquí está lo que estos hombres dijeron...
↓↓↓
"¿Qué te hace seguir profundamente enamorado de tu esposa después de tantos años?"
La mayoría esperaba respuestas sobre belleza.
Sobre s€xo.
Sobre atracción.
Pero casi ninguno respondió esto.
Sus respuestas fueron sorprendentemente parecidas.
Aquí está lo que estos hombres dijeron...
↓↓↓
1. Paz.
Fue la respuesta más repetida.
No pasión.
No emoción.
Paz.
Y esto sorprendió porque...
↓↓↓
Fue la respuesta más repetida.
No pasión.
No emoción.
Paz.
Y esto sorprendió porque...
↓↓↓
Muchos dijeron que la paz que una mujer aporta a una casa acaba siendo más valiosa que cualquier otra cosa.
Porque la vida ya trae suficientes problemas.
Trabajo.
Dinero.
Responsabilidades.
Y entonces...
↓↓↓
Porque la vida ya trae suficientes problemas.
Trabajo.
Dinero.
Responsabilidades.
Y entonces...
↓↓↓
Most Christians pray.
Very few pray the way the Bible actually describes.
The gap between what we do and what Scripture teaches about prayer is wider than almost any other area of the Christian life.
Here are the things the Bible says clearly about prayer that most of us quietly ignore.
A thread. 🧵
Very few pray the way the Bible actually describes.
The gap between what we do and what Scripture teaches about prayer is wider than almost any other area of the Christian life.
Here are the things the Bible says clearly about prayer that most of us quietly ignore.
A thread. 🧵
1. The Bible says prayer should be persistent, not polite.
Luke 18:1 — Jesus told a parable "to the effect that they ought always to pray and not lose heart."
The parable: a widow who hammers a corrupt judge day and night until he grants her request.
Jesus holds her up as the model.
Not quiet resignation.
Not one respectful request.
Relentless, shameless, returning persistence.
Most of us pray once, hear nothing, and conclude the answer is no.
The Bible calls that losing heart, not faith.
Luke 18:1 — Jesus told a parable "to the effect that they ought always to pray and not lose heart."
The parable: a widow who hammers a corrupt judge day and night until he grants her request.
Jesus holds her up as the model.
Not quiet resignation.
Not one respectful request.
Relentless, shameless, returning persistence.
Most of us pray once, hear nothing, and conclude the answer is no.
The Bible calls that losing heart, not faith.
2. The Bible says unanswered prayer often has a specific reason.
James 4:2–3 — "You do not have because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions."
Two reasons. Both ignored.
First: we simply don't ask. Prayer is assumed, not practiced.
Second: we ask for things that serve our comfort, not God's purposes.
The goal of prayer is not to bend God's will toward ours.
It is to align our desires with His until what we want and what He wants become the same thing.
James 4:2–3 — "You do not have because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions."
Two reasons. Both ignored.
First: we simply don't ask. Prayer is assumed, not practiced.
Second: we ask for things that serve our comfort, not God's purposes.
The goal of prayer is not to bend God's will toward ours.
It is to align our desires with His until what we want and what He wants become the same thing.
🔥🔥🔥 Obama exposed! I just realized that Obama’s Ushahidi and the State Depts Global Engagement Center (GEC) were partners. This is a great finding considering my past Ushahidi exposure and now realizing that they worked with THREE State Dept programs.
This is part one of the Bad Kitteh Global Engagement Center Epiphany Series.
So, Ushahidi and the State dept’s GEC censorship folks were partners. Tsk tsk.. Let me give you an easy to understand timeline. But first let me remind you, that as I add new stuff I need to combine it with the old.
♦️Pre 2016 election:
- 2009 Ushahidi partners with State Dept’s USAID
- Oct 1, 2012 - Ushahidi Partners with the State Departments Open Government Hub (OGH).
*Note - OGH director, Nada Zohdy, was the Obama Fndn global network lead. And also was on the board at a color revolution org called Rhize. A Serbian Otpor ( defined resistance) founder and Rhize both visited the OGH.
- Date Unknown - Ushahidi partners with the State Dept’s Global Engagement Center.
*Interesting side note - David Bray was involved with the Ushahdi, European Union, USAID, and GEC partnership for an African Tech Challenge. Both he and Sara J Terp were from the Atlantic Council Geo Tech Center and from the CTI League Files scandal. Sara J Terp was also from Ushahidi.
- Jan 8, 2016 - Obama High Level Tech meeting held and they had Russiagate involved folks there. See attached thread for the name list.
- Jan 8, 2016 - Michael D. Lumpkin became the Special Envoy and Coordinator of the GEC.
- Feb 2016 - Follow up High Level Tech meetings with Obama staffers who are also Ushahidi’s New knowledge:
A) Renee Diresta
B) Jonathan Morgan
- March 14, 2016 Obama Executive Order 13721 officially creates the GEC although work was already started.
- March 2016, Rep Chris Murphy, an admitted resistance member, co-sponsored legislation to make the GEC Congressionally official. Robert Portman was the main sponsor.
- Nov 2016 - Ushahidi monitors the 2016 election
♦️Post 2016 election:
A) Obama tells Ushahidi’s Sara J Terp to make certain Trump never wins again. (As per Michael Shellenbergers whistleblower.)
B) Nov 15, 2016 - Soros personally holds first Resistance meeting at the Mandarin Oriental hotel.
C) Nov 21, 2016 - Erin Mazursky, a Ushshidi message board member, elsewhere suggests running a color revolution on Trump.
Erin Mazursky was the founder of the color revolution org, Rhize. And she worked the Obama campaign and worked in a USAID youth program under him.
D) Dec 2016 - Ushahidi/New Knowledge, Renee Diresta, starts a global group to manage resistance data. Notably Indivisibles.
E) Dec 2016 - Obama signs bill for the official establishment of the GEC.
E) Early 2017 - Ushahidi/New Knowledge’s Jonathan Morgan works on the Hamilton68 Russian Bot Hoax.
♦️Key early GEC employees and hire dates for this specifically:
- Michael Lumpkin 01/08/16
- Meagen LaGraffe 03/14/16
- Richard Stengel - 03/18/16 or earlier. Webpage archive updated with GEC on this date.
95% of this data is in my earlier work. The attached thread has tons! Sources for new info to follow.
This was only part 1. Stay tuned!
This is part one of the Bad Kitteh Global Engagement Center Epiphany Series.
So, Ushahidi and the State dept’s GEC censorship folks were partners. Tsk tsk.. Let me give you an easy to understand timeline. But first let me remind you, that as I add new stuff I need to combine it with the old.
♦️Pre 2016 election:
- 2009 Ushahidi partners with State Dept’s USAID
- Oct 1, 2012 - Ushahidi Partners with the State Departments Open Government Hub (OGH).
*Note - OGH director, Nada Zohdy, was the Obama Fndn global network lead. And also was on the board at a color revolution org called Rhize. A Serbian Otpor ( defined resistance) founder and Rhize both visited the OGH.
- Date Unknown - Ushahidi partners with the State Dept’s Global Engagement Center.
*Interesting side note - David Bray was involved with the Ushahdi, European Union, USAID, and GEC partnership for an African Tech Challenge. Both he and Sara J Terp were from the Atlantic Council Geo Tech Center and from the CTI League Files scandal. Sara J Terp was also from Ushahidi.
- Jan 8, 2016 - Obama High Level Tech meeting held and they had Russiagate involved folks there. See attached thread for the name list.
- Jan 8, 2016 - Michael D. Lumpkin became the Special Envoy and Coordinator of the GEC.
- Feb 2016 - Follow up High Level Tech meetings with Obama staffers who are also Ushahidi’s New knowledge:
A) Renee Diresta
B) Jonathan Morgan
- March 14, 2016 Obama Executive Order 13721 officially creates the GEC although work was already started.
- March 2016, Rep Chris Murphy, an admitted resistance member, co-sponsored legislation to make the GEC Congressionally official. Robert Portman was the main sponsor.
- Nov 2016 - Ushahidi monitors the 2016 election
♦️Post 2016 election:
A) Obama tells Ushahidi’s Sara J Terp to make certain Trump never wins again. (As per Michael Shellenbergers whistleblower.)
B) Nov 15, 2016 - Soros personally holds first Resistance meeting at the Mandarin Oriental hotel.
C) Nov 21, 2016 - Erin Mazursky, a Ushshidi message board member, elsewhere suggests running a color revolution on Trump.
Erin Mazursky was the founder of the color revolution org, Rhize. And she worked the Obama campaign and worked in a USAID youth program under him.
D) Dec 2016 - Ushahidi/New Knowledge, Renee Diresta, starts a global group to manage resistance data. Notably Indivisibles.
E) Dec 2016 - Obama signs bill for the official establishment of the GEC.
E) Early 2017 - Ushahidi/New Knowledge’s Jonathan Morgan works on the Hamilton68 Russian Bot Hoax.
♦️Key early GEC employees and hire dates for this specifically:
- Michael Lumpkin 01/08/16
- Meagen LaGraffe 03/14/16
- Richard Stengel - 03/18/16 or earlier. Webpage archive updated with GEC on this date.
95% of this data is in my earlier work. The attached thread has tons! Sources for new info to follow.
This was only part 1. Stay tuned!
Here’s Ushahidi and the State Dept Global Engagement Center partnering.
Google AI told me Ushahidi was likely handling data for the entire Tech Challenge series.
U.S. – Africa Tech Challenge
Part I: April 28, 29 2021
Part II: May 11, 12 2021
The U.S. Department of State’s Global Engagement Center’s two-part U.S. – Africa Tech Challenge will take place, virtually, in April and May 2021. The GEC’s Tech Challenges are hosted around the world and seek to highlight non-U.S. technologies for counter propaganda and disinformation use. The GEC and its foreign partners invite foreign-based technologists to demonstrate their capabilities in real-time during the Tech Challenge, with winners awarded grants to implement a tool, locally, to address misinformation and disinformation challenges in the region. The Tech Challenge is hosted by the GEC, in collaboration with U.S. Embassy Nairobi, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) , the Intergovernmental Authority on Development, the European Union, Twitter, Ushahidi, Park Advisors and Disinfo Cloud, and Informa.
archive.is/ehJBS
Google AI told me Ushahidi was likely handling data for the entire Tech Challenge series.
U.S. – Africa Tech Challenge
Part I: April 28, 29 2021
Part II: May 11, 12 2021
The U.S. Department of State’s Global Engagement Center’s two-part U.S. – Africa Tech Challenge will take place, virtually, in April and May 2021. The GEC’s Tech Challenges are hosted around the world and seek to highlight non-U.S. technologies for counter propaganda and disinformation use. The GEC and its foreign partners invite foreign-based technologists to demonstrate their capabilities in real-time during the Tech Challenge, with winners awarded grants to implement a tool, locally, to address misinformation and disinformation challenges in the region. The Tech Challenge is hosted by the GEC, in collaboration with U.S. Embassy Nairobi, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) , the Intergovernmental Authority on Development, the European Union, Twitter, Ushahidi, Park Advisors and Disinfo Cloud, and Informa.
archive.is/ehJBS
It looks like the GEC TET YouTube channel still has videos present. They are just unlisted.
Anywho, I’ve already proven the Global Engagement Center (GEC) worked with the CTI League Files folks.
Here’s another, this time David Bray. And here he is working with Ushahidi too (see above post). Recall his cohort, Sara J Terp, actually came from Ushahidi.
Anywho, I’ve already proven the Global Engagement Center (GEC) worked with the CTI League Files folks.
Here’s another, this time David Bray. And here he is working with Ushahidi too (see above post). Recall his cohort, Sara J Terp, actually came from Ushahidi.
The last time Lynda ran she was easily the winner until an “oopsie” flipped the results and discovered about 6k more votes than expected.
Is the EPC establishment dependent on the fraudulent election system TinaPeters.us exposed?
Strange how all those 8(?) challenged elections were right around 67/34. As a reflection of confidence, a hand-count (paid for by challengers), the establishment joined with Jena Griswold to fight the hand-count all the way to the COSC.
When a machine recount was finally authorized, the candidates were each given about 48hours to raise $25k …
Which included a rep from dominion charging $10k/week to monitor the process from another room… for machines that are forbidden from having wifi connectivity.
Is the EPC establishment dependent on the fraudulent election system TinaPeters.us exposed?
Strange how all those 8(?) challenged elections were right around 67/34. As a reflection of confidence, a hand-count (paid for by challengers), the establishment joined with Jena Griswold to fight the hand-count all the way to the COSC.
When a machine recount was finally authorized, the candidates were each given about 48hours to raise $25k …
Which included a rep from dominion charging $10k/week to monitor the process from another room… for machines that are forbidden from having wifi connectivity.
The last time Lynda ran she was easily the winner until an “oopsie” flipped the results and discovered about 6k more votes than expected.
Is the EPC establishment dependent on the fraudulent election system TinaPeters.us exposed?
Strange how all those 8(?) challenged elections were right around 67/34. As a reflection of confidence, a hand-count (paid for by challengers), the establishment joined with Jena Griswold to fight the hand-count all the way to the COSC.
When a machine recount was finally authorized, the candidates were each given about 48hours to raise $25k …
Which included a rep from dominion charging $10k/week to monitor the process from another room… for machines that are forbidden from having wifi connectivity.
Is the EPC establishment dependent on the fraudulent election system TinaPeters.us exposed?
Strange how all those 8(?) challenged elections were right around 67/34. As a reflection of confidence, a hand-count (paid for by challengers), the establishment joined with Jena Griswold to fight the hand-count all the way to the COSC.
When a machine recount was finally authorized, the candidates were each given about 48hours to raise $25k …
Which included a rep from dominion charging $10k/week to monitor the process from another room… for machines that are forbidden from having wifi connectivity.
(15833+6946)/.95=
23,978
~24,000 votes expected.
What was the final?
23,978
~24,000 votes expected.
What was the final?
It's not a mistake when a man harms multiple women. When men harm women without seeking some kind of intervention, they want to harm women.
Look, a lot of us can imagine human darkness, right? Your worst moment. Maybe you wanted to hurt another person. Imagine taking that person's arm so hard it bruised them. What would you feel? I think most of us would feel something. Like, "Shit. I just hurt a person."
If you're a man, imagine doing that to a smaller person. Someone you know you can hurt. Imagine the look on their face--especially if you trusted them--when you did it. Is that just a mistake you would wave away? Or is that a mistake that would haunt you?