๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ an royalatte f1 au, ๐ธ๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฃ๐บ ๐ข๐ข๐ญ๐ค๐บ๐ฆ๐ด.
i. DISCLAIMER
before we begin, a gentle reminder that this story exists in its own little universe.
everything that happens in this au is purely fictional and has no connection to real-life events, current situations, political issues, geological conditions, race results.โ
ii. DISCLAIMER
championship standings, or anything happening outside this story.
if reality says otherwise, this au respectfully chooses to ignore it. thank you, and enjoy the chaos.
Voy a explicar, de forma muy simplificada, pero sin banalizar, en quรฉ consiste el "virtual unwrapping", es decir, las tรฉcnicas que se usan para "desenrollar virtualmente" los papiros de Herculano y permitir su lectura.
EL PROBLEMA: cuando los investigadores han tratado de desenrollar los rollos de papiro que quedaron calcinados en Herculano por la erupciรณn del Vesubio del aรฑo 79 d.C. (cosa que llevan haciendo de mil maneras desde el siglo XVIII) el papiro se rompe inevitablemente.
Esto no ocurre porque los que manejan sean unos manazas, naturalmente, sino por las condiciones en que han llegado los papiros. Unas veces se fragmentan en trozos lo suficientemente grandes para conservarlos y leerlos con diversas tรฉcnicas y mucha, muchรญsima paciencia.
I think a fairly large part of it is that math is just really boring to 99% of the population. And math gets more boring the higher level you get. And math is somewhat uniquely hard to get good at if you don't find it interesting
It's boring and tedious. I recall tutoring combinatorics in high school and telling my 7th grade student "just list out all 24 combinations" and he's like wtf, no, that's so much writing. Like, if you just did it, you'd understand the formula!
But most people just would rather play minecraft than write out all groups of 3 out of 5 or whatever. So you don't really get it
What's also unique and interesting about math is, even if you really want to be a good student, at some point you hit a wall if you don't enjoy it
๐This brings up a reality about Supergirl or other traditional female comic book heroes like Wonder Woman, Black Widow, Rogue, or Scarlet Witch (I'm picking on characters that have been around in comics since at least the 60s) that people today don't like to talk about openly.
Female superheroes were designed specifically for the teenage male gaze - who, unlike today, didn't have ready access to free pornography. Female superheroes were marketed as sexy or attractive first - and as "heroes" more peripherally. That's why female superheroes were created. They **weren't** created to appeal to a comic book audience that demanded girlbosses and etc. They were born as cheesecake.
So, you take that kind of IP, that kind of traditional audience appeal dynamic, and then in the modern world turn it over to the hands of increasingly-female execs with expensive Wharton or Columbia business school educations and feminoid sensibilities and the now leftoid-dominated Hollywood crowd.
So you end up with a drunk, angry, uglified Supergirl where, while the actress is conventionally attractive - you get the feeling that the moviemakers did everything they possibly could to turn off their traditional male audience from liking anything about her - they are clearly uncomfortable with the idea that males could find the character of "Supergirl" attractive so they tried to wring that out of their depiction of her wherever possible.
You didn't get that vibe from the Wonder Woman movie with Gal Gadot in 2017 (which I liked) or even more recently with Black Widow (2021), which I was a bit bored by - although it held my interest (both of these latter movies were very financially successful).
1/ Just collecting together my threads and YouTube video on the (pretty awful and quite strange) draft Conversion Bill, (I suspect there will be more and I'll add them here). First, here's my initial reaction to the general shape of the bill:
2/ Here's my YouTube analysis of the bill which is basically that last thread but narrated with a deep dive into some of the more obviously silly and wide provisions:
3/ This bill contains no statutory defences or care outs for parents or free speech, (this is very odd in a criminal statute to have literally no defences) - that bothers me quite a bit and explain why here:
The hiplet posts by men are obviously tongue in cheek but women respond by angrily ranting into camera or with defiant slutty poses. Then men in the replies say "umm it's just a preference, hiplet, why do you even care??" and the women get even madder.
On January 20, 2022, Pakistan's GDP grew by Rs 8.1 trillion overnight. Not a single factory opened. Not a single additional tax was collected. Public debt, frozen at Rs 39.9 trillion, did not change by a single rupee. But the debt-to-GDP ratio fell from 83.5% to 71.8%, instantly.
This is a thread about the institution behind that number, and why it urgently needs to be better funded. ๐งต
The Pakistan Bureau of Statistics is the most consequential institution most Pakistanis never think about. It computes GDP, tracks inflation, counts us in the census, and tells us how many people are poor, what they earn, and how they spend.
Every IMF negotiation, every monetary policy decision, and every poverty programme in this country is built on PBS data. When the numbers are imprecise, so is the policy that follows from them.
This thread is built on seven consecutive years of official budget documents, Demands for Grants Vol. III, from FY2018-19 through FY2026-27, extracted line by line across all 35 PBS offices nationwide. The pattern you are about to see is not the story of a bad year or two. It is structural.
Everyone is reading the Supreme Court's Roundup decision as a fight about glyphosate. Much of MAHA called it a betrayal.
The more I studied the opinion, the more I concluded it is not really about glyphosate at all. ๐งต
The justices did not weigh epidemiology. They did not rule on whether glyphosate causes cancer. They did not pick IARC or EPA as the better science.
They answered a narrow legal question with enormous consequences.
The question: when EPA approves a pesticide label under FIFRA, can a state jury later decide the manufacturer should have warned more strongly?
The Court's answer was largely no. EPA-approved labels now preempt most state failure-to-warn claims.
I'm a cardiologist. Let me tell you what I see in my practice that breaks my heart more than any clogged artery.
A patient walks in carrying five diagnoses โ obesity, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, fatty liver, and gout โ on seven medications. Each prescribed by a different specialist. Each treating one symptom. None of them talking to each other.
Nobody told this patient the five diagnoses are one disease.
They are five faces of the same metabolic dysfunction. And the root is almost always the same: chronically elevated insulin driving fat storage, inflammation, and organ damage simultaneously.
Medicine gave this patient a bigger bucket under every leak instead of fixing the roof.
Here's the roof. And how to fix it.
In 2025, the ICD-10 coding system โ the official classification used by every hospital and insurance company in America โ added a new code: E11.A. Type 2 diabetes in remission. Medicine now officially recognizes that type 2 diabetes is not a permanent, progressive sentence. It can be reversed.
The DiRECT trial in the UK achieved 46% diabetes remission at one year through intensive dietary intervention. A 2025 Indian study of 2,384 patients achieved 31% remission. A 2024 trial in Pacific Islanders achieved 23% remission โ with some patients entering remission without significant weight loss, proving the mechanism is metabolic, not just weight-driven.
This is not theoretical. It's published, replicated, and now coded in the medical system. Your doctor can document your reversal.
Here's the protocol I walk patients through โ step by step.
๐ฆ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ ๐ญ: ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐น๐ถ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐.
For the first 30-60 days, eliminate the foods that spike insulin repeatedly throughout the day: added sugars, sugary drinks, refined carbohydrates (bread, pasta, rice, cereals, pastries), ultra-processed foods, and excess alcohol.
This isn't about calories. It's about insulin. Every spike locks fat inside fat cells, drives fat storage in the liver, raises blood pressure, elevates uric acid, and fuels systemic inflammation. Remove the constant trigger and your body stops being in defense mode.
Cravings peak around days 3-7 and then drop dramatically. Most patients report a clarity of mind by week two that they haven't felt in years.
๐ฆ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ ๐ฎ: ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ณ๐ผ๐ผ๐ฑ.
Every meal: generous protein (30-50g), non-starchy vegetables (half the plate), healthy fats for satiety (olive oil, avocado, eggs, nuts, butter). Protein at every meal is non-negotiable โ it stabilizes blood sugar, preserves muscle mass, and keeps you full for hours.
No calorie counting needed at the start. When you remove the processed foods that hijack appetite signaling, most people naturally eat less without trying โ because their leptin and ghrelin systems start working properly again.
๐ฆ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ ๐ฏ: ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐.
Two to three meals only. No grazing. No snacking. Eat within an 8-10 hour window โ first meal around noon, last meal by 8 PM.
This gives your body long stretches in a low-insulin state โ the fat-burning, liver-clearing, insulin-sensitizing mode that never activates when you eat six small meals throughout the day. Time-restricted eating improves insulin sensitivity independently of what you eat โ published in multiple controlled trials.
Start at 12 hours. Shrink to 10. Then 8 when it feels natural. This is not deprivation โ it's metabolic rest.
๐ฆ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ ๐ฐ: ๐๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ ๐บ๐๐๐ฐ๐น๐ฒ.
Muscle is the largest glucose disposal organ in your body. It is your metabolic insurance policy. A 2025 meta-analysis confirmed that combined aerobic and resistance training improves body composition, lipid metabolism, glucose metabolism, and physical function in type 2 diabetes.
Minimum effective protocol: strength training 3 times per week โ squats, push-ups, rows, deadlifts โ plus 7,000-10,000 daily steps. A 10-15 minute walk after meals is especially powerful for blood sugar control โ multiple studies show it significantly blunts post-meal glucose spikes.
Do this consistently and your body becomes a glucose-processing machine. Insulin sensitivity improves with every session.
Promethean Actionโs reach reflects a larger shift: military shadow-sharing, psyop podcasts, special-operations podcasts, alt-media, and Q-era conflict all moved audiences from passive trust to active skepticism.
The earliest layer was internal. Military and special-operations circles built a vocabulary around influence, persuasion, and perception control before civilians used those terms.
Ukrainian forces struck the Slavyansk oil refinery in Russiaโs Krasnodar Krai.
The refinery's annual processing capacity is more than 4 million tonnes of oil. The facility is part of Russia's energy rear and is involved in supplying the Russian armed forces. 1/
Additional footage of the aftermath of the Ukrainian strike on Russiaโs Slavyansk oil refinery. Several fuel storages are burning. 2/
Ukrainian forces continue to attack Russia's Slavyansk oil refinery. Several fuel storages are burnin and large plumes of smoke keep rising. 3/
HPV-related health problems are falling โ but why?
Some antivaccine voices insist the vaccine deserves little credit, and claim changing sexual behavior explains the trend instead.
This short thread looks at the evidence in probabilistic terms:
โข direct vaccine effects
โข herd immunity
โข behavioral change
The pattern is not random โ and it strongly favors vaccination as the primary driver.
1/ Some antivaccine accounts are now arguing:
โHPV-related health problems are falling, but itโs not the vaccine. Itโs changing sexual behavior.โ
That explanation is possible in a weak, partial sense.
But as the main explanation?
It fails several basic causal tests.
The HPV vaccine explanation fits the evidence far better because the declines are:
โข strongest for vaccine-covered HPV typesโจโข strongest in vaccinated birth cohortsโจโข larger where vaccine coverage is higherโจโข seen first in HPV infection and genital wartsโจโข later seen in cervical precancer and cervical cancerโจโข also seen indirectly in some unvaccinated groups, consistent with herd effects
That is not the fingerprint of generic behavior change.
That is the fingerprint of vaccination.
2/ A useful way to think about this is probabilistic.
What best explains the widespread decline in HPV-related disease?
Direct HPV vaccine effect: very likely the dominant explanation.
Vaccine-driven herd immunity: very likely an important amplifier.
Changing sexual behavior: plausible as a minor contributor in some settings, but unlikely to be the primary driver.
Why?
Because behavior change would not selectively reduce the specific HPV types targeted by vaccines. It would not predict the sharpest declines in cohorts vaccinated before sexual exposure. And it would not naturally create a coverage-response relationship across countries and programs.