Recent well liked threads
1/ Dr. Michelle Au (Georga House Rep- District 50- Johns Creek) delivered the House Minority Report opposing SB 440—arguing ivermectin should not even be part of the discussion, citing lack of evidence and potential toxicity.
But if “science” is the standard in Georgia lawmaking, it must be applied consistently:
Why is uncertainty tolerated for novel products authorized under emergency conditions—while discussion of low-cost, repurposed generics is shut down outright?
That’s not a scientific standard. That’s a policy choice. #GAPol
@JonBurnsGA @GaHouseGOP @GaHouseHub @ChuckEfstration @soohong @JamesDBurchett @GinnyEhrhart @EmoryDunahooJr @rep_karen @blhdds @RepSharonCooper @turntotodd @RepTreyKelley @TylerPaulSmith @DavidClarkGA
@LtGovJonesGA @GASenateGOP @GASenatePress @jasonanavitarte @FOP9GEORGIA @TheJohnAlbers @Kaykirkpatrick7 @VoteClintDixon @rickafd924 @BoHatchett @smcneel @StricklandForGA @BillCowsert @BlakeTillery @GoochForGeorgia @DolezalForGA @sen_brass
But if “science” is the standard in Georgia lawmaking, it must be applied consistently:
Why is uncertainty tolerated for novel products authorized under emergency conditions—while discussion of low-cost, repurposed generics is shut down outright?
That’s not a scientific standard. That’s a policy choice. #GAPol
@JonBurnsGA @GaHouseGOP @GaHouseHub @ChuckEfstration @soohong @JamesDBurchett @GinnyEhrhart @EmoryDunahooJr @rep_karen @blhdds @RepSharonCooper @turntotodd @RepTreyKelley @TylerPaulSmith @DavidClarkGA
@LtGovJonesGA @GASenateGOP @GASenatePress @jasonanavitarte @FOP9GEORGIA @TheJohnAlbers @Kaykirkpatrick7 @VoteClintDixon @rickafd924 @BoHatchett @smcneel @StricklandForGA @BillCowsert @BlakeTillery @GoochForGeorgia @DolezalForGA @sen_brass
👆👆👆👆👆
Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP
@CartlandDavid
“It is psychologically impossible for some doctors to come to the internal recognition that COVID-19 mRNA injections have been a disastrous mistake for their own health, and for the health of their family and their patients.”
@P_McCulloughMD
Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP
@CartlandDavid
“It is psychologically impossible for some doctors to come to the internal recognition that COVID-19 mRNA injections have been a disastrous mistake for their own health, and for the health of their family and their patients.”
@P_McCulloughMD
"AI content doesn't rank."
Wrong.
I built a full local business site using Claude.
366K impressions in 3 months.
5-10 qualified leads a week in a high-ticket niche.
Here's EXACTLY how I did it:
Wrong.
I built a full local business site using Claude.
366K impressions in 3 months.
5-10 qualified leads a week in a high-ticket niche.
Here's EXACTLY how I did it:
First - Google doesn't care if AI wrote your content.
They care if it's useful, relevant, and trustworthy.
The sites getting slapped are publishing raw AI slop with zero strategy behind it.
That's not what we're doing here.
They care if it's useful, relevant, and trustworthy.
The sites getting slapped are publishing raw AI slop with zero strategy behind it.
That's not what we're doing here.
Step 1: Get your service pages up from day 1.
Not blog posts. SERVICE PAGES.
These go in your main navigation. They target your money keywords. They convert visitors into leads.
Most people launch with a homepage and an "about" page. That's a waste of a crawl.
Not blog posts. SERVICE PAGES.
These go in your main navigation. They target your money keywords. They convert visitors into leads.
Most people launch with a homepage and an "about" page. That's a waste of a crawl.
A retired marriage counselor revealed what makes wives lose respect and attraction to the husband they once chased.
He said: "It's usually 8 silent behaviors men repeat daily."
Every man should hear this…
He said: "It's usually 8 silent behaviors men repeat daily."
Every man should hear this…
1. The Slow Leak of Personal Standards.
He used to care.
He dressed like he still wanted to be noticed.
He moved like a man who still wanted to be desired.
Then somewhere along the way, he stopped.
The effort faded. The edges softened.
The man she once admired began to disappear into comfort.
This is not about vanity. It is about what his decline communicates: "I no longer think I need to earn your gaze.
I assume you'll want me no matter how I show up."
Attraction does not respond to assumption. It responds to evidence.
He used to care.
He dressed like he still wanted to be noticed.
He moved like a man who still wanted to be desired.
Then somewhere along the way, he stopped.
The effort faded. The edges softened.
The man she once admired began to disappear into comfort.
This is not about vanity. It is about what his decline communicates: "I no longer think I need to earn your gaze.
I assume you'll want me no matter how I show up."
Attraction does not respond to assumption. It responds to evidence.
2. The Abdication of Emotional Leadership.
When tension rises, he goes quiet.
When she is stirred, he becomes defensive.
When hard conversations need to happen, he waits for her to start them.
She becomes the one who confronts, who manages, who steers the emotional ship.
Over time, she stops seeing him as her shelter.
She starts seeing him as another person she has to manage.
She did not sign up to lead. She signed up to be led by someone worthy of her trust.
When tension rises, he goes quiet.
When she is stirred, he becomes defensive.
When hard conversations need to happen, he waits for her to start them.
She becomes the one who confronts, who manages, who steers the emotional ship.
Over time, she stops seeing him as her shelter.
She starts seeing him as another person she has to manage.
She did not sign up to lead. She signed up to be led by someone worthy of her trust.
We ran GPT-5.4 (xhigh) on our tasks. Its time-horizon depends greatly on our treatment of reward hacks: the point estimate would be 5.7hrs (95% CI of 3hrs to 13.5hrs) under our standard methodology, but 13hrs (95% CI of 5hrs to 74hrs) if we allow reward hacks.
In our measurements, whenever a model succeeds on a task by reward-hacking, we consider the attempt a failure. Following this same policy, we arrived at a point estimate of 5.7hrs (95% CI of 3hrs to 13.5hrs) for GPT-5.4’s time horizon.
However, in our GPT-5.4 evaluation we noticed its runs were producing reward hacks unusually often. A quick test suggested that using a different prompt might cause it to produce more legitimate successes instead of reward hacks.
i co-wrote the Anthropic engineering blog on Claude Managed Agents, and wanted to share some thoughts on agent harnesses + infrastructure for long-horizon tasks ... 🧵
anthropic.com/engineering/ma…
anthropic.com/engineering/ma…
1/ Claude can perform tasks over increasingly long time-horizons. newer models (Mythos) will push this further. with Claude Managed Agents, we needed to design infrastructure that can support long-horizon work.
2/ we also needed a way to update the agent harness: each harness encodes assumptions about what Claude can't do. those assumptions go stale as Claude gets more capable, and can even hobble the model.
An investigation by +972 Magazine reveals that the Israeli army's propaganda unit plays a key role in shaping media coverage of the genocide in Gaza as part of the Hasbara system.
Through deception and rewording of events, it operates a wide network of social media platforms presented as independent or fact-checking sources, while their content is fully produced by the military to support its official narrative.
Through deception and rewording of events, it operates a wide network of social media platforms presented as independent or fact-checking sources, while their content is fully produced by the military to support its official narrative.
Look at the difference.
The Iranian delegation, led by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, carried with them images of the Minab schoolchildren who were killed, along with some of their belongings, as they travelled to Islamabad.
A visible act of remembrance. A statement of solidarity.
By contrast, Lebanon’s president today could not bring himself to take even a minimal stance, no refusal, no delay, not even a symbolic gesture, in the face of the killing of his own officers & people earlier that same day, choosing instead to move forward with direct contact with the Israeli side through his ambassador in Washington.
The Iranian delegation, led by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, carried with them images of the Minab schoolchildren who were killed, along with some of their belongings, as they travelled to Islamabad.
A visible act of remembrance. A statement of solidarity.
By contrast, Lebanon’s president today could not bring himself to take even a minimal stance, no refusal, no delay, not even a symbolic gesture, in the face of the killing of his own officers & people earlier that same day, choosing instead to move forward with direct contact with the Israeli side through his ambassador in Washington.
2/2 What we are witnessing is a stark contrast in posture.
On one hand, Iran has taken an unwavering position. It delayed engagement, set clear preconditions, & made it known that no negotiations would proceed without a ceasefire in Lebanon. Whether one agrees or disagrees with its politics, it has demonstrated a willingness & resolve to draw a line & stand by it.
On the other, Lebanon enters talks from a position of visible weakness, offering little leverage & making concessions before negotiations have even begun.
This is further underscored by Israel’s own words. Its ambassador in Washington has already clarified that the objective is to discuss a peace agreement with Lebanon, not a ceasefire with Hezbollah.
In other words, negotiations are being framed around long-term arrangements while the war itself continues.
The contradiction is clear. A peace discussion that does not require an immediate halt to the violence.
A war continuing alongside a peace track.
On one hand, Iran has taken an unwavering position. It delayed engagement, set clear preconditions, & made it known that no negotiations would proceed without a ceasefire in Lebanon. Whether one agrees or disagrees with its politics, it has demonstrated a willingness & resolve to draw a line & stand by it.
On the other, Lebanon enters talks from a position of visible weakness, offering little leverage & making concessions before negotiations have even begun.
This is further underscored by Israel’s own words. Its ambassador in Washington has already clarified that the objective is to discuss a peace agreement with Lebanon, not a ceasefire with Hezbollah.
In other words, negotiations are being framed around long-term arrangements while the war itself continues.
The contradiction is clear. A peace discussion that does not require an immediate halt to the violence.
A war continuing alongside a peace track.
Des journalistes en principe sérieux peuvent partager des saloperies. Ainsi, Georges Malbrunot - dont j'avais relevé depuis longtemps la sympathie pour l'Iran - reprend ici une fake news tirée d'un site complotiste et antisioniste radical : thread à dérouler.
1/5 Voici le lien original sur le post de Malbrunot.
2/5 Ex brillante ministre des Affaires Étrangères, Tzipi Livni a certes travaillé dans ses jeunes années pour le Mossad mais ne l'a jamais dirigé, premier mensonge.
Bueno, un resumen de la situación en Hungr de cara a las elecciones de mañana:
- obviamente hay un hartazgo más que evidente en una parte importante de la población contra el gobierno de Fidesz. Fidesz lleva gobernando 16 años, muchos jóvenes ni siquiera han conocido otra cosa.
- obviamente hay un hartazgo más que evidente en una parte importante de la población contra el gobierno de Fidesz. Fidesz lleva gobernando 16 años, muchos jóvenes ni siquiera han conocido otra cosa.
Muchos tienen la impresión de que Fidesz hace y deshace a su antojo (es que lo hace). Los caballeros de la NER (la NER, son las siglas del "Sistema de Colaboración Nacional", algo así como el marco ideológico de Fidesz, vamos que lo los caballeros de la NER se usa para referirse
al círculo más cercano a Orbán, que es la élite que controla el poder y la economía en Hungría), bueno, como digo, los caballeros de la NER se han enriquecido y se han repartido el pastel de la economía. Además hay que añadir numerosos escándalos de todo tipo, desde corrupción
Top Stanford students have a secret NotebookLM workflow.
They never re-read a book.
They upload the PDF in NotebookLM, run 6 prompts, and extract more insight in 20 minutes than most readers get from finishing it twice.
It took me 3 weeks to figure out exactly what they were doing.
Here it is:
They never re-read a book.
They upload the PDF in NotebookLM, run 6 prompts, and extract more insight in 20 minutes than most readers get from finishing it twice.
It took me 3 weeks to figure out exactly what they were doing.
Here it is:
1. The Core Argument Extractor
Every book has one central argument everything else serves.
Most readers finish the whole thing and can't state it in two sentences.
Paste this first:
"Read this entire book and identify the single central argument the author is making. Not the topic. The argument the specific claim they are trying to convince me is true. State it in two sentences maximum. Then identify the 3 to 5 key sub-arguments that support the central claim. For each sub-argument: what evidence or reasoning does the author use to support it, and how strong is that evidence on a scale of anecdote to empirical proof?"
If you can't state a book's central argument in two sentences after finishing it, you haven't finished it.
You've just been present for it.
This prompt makes sure you actually have it.
Every book has one central argument everything else serves.
Most readers finish the whole thing and can't state it in two sentences.
Paste this first:
"Read this entire book and identify the single central argument the author is making. Not the topic. The argument the specific claim they are trying to convince me is true. State it in two sentences maximum. Then identify the 3 to 5 key sub-arguments that support the central claim. For each sub-argument: what evidence or reasoning does the author use to support it, and how strong is that evidence on a scale of anecdote to empirical proof?"
If you can't state a book's central argument in two sentences after finishing it, you haven't finished it.
You've just been present for it.
This prompt makes sure you actually have it.
2. The Assumption Auditor
Every author has a worldview baked into every book they write.
Most of those assumptions are never stated because the author doesn't realize they're making them.
They feel like facts because they feel obvious to the person writing.
"Identify every significant assumption this author makes that they never explicitly state or defend. What does the author take for granted about human nature, about how organizations work, about what people want, about how change happens? For each unstated assumption: is it well-supported by evidence outside this book, is it contested by credible thinkers in related fields, or is it simply the author's worldview presented as universal truth? Which assumption, if wrong, would most undermine the book's central argument?"
The best books survive this prompt with most of their argument intact.
The overrated ones collapse at assumption two or three.
Running this tells you exactly how much of what you just read was insight versus ideology.
Every author has a worldview baked into every book they write.
Most of those assumptions are never stated because the author doesn't realize they're making them.
They feel like facts because they feel obvious to the person writing.
"Identify every significant assumption this author makes that they never explicitly state or defend. What does the author take for granted about human nature, about how organizations work, about what people want, about how change happens? For each unstated assumption: is it well-supported by evidence outside this book, is it contested by credible thinkers in related fields, or is it simply the author's worldview presented as universal truth? Which assumption, if wrong, would most undermine the book's central argument?"
The best books survive this prompt with most of their argument intact.
The overrated ones collapse at assumption two or three.
Running this tells you exactly how much of what you just read was insight versus ideology.
10 Reasons That Make You Unattractive
1- The Boring Man
1- The Boring Man
The "boring man" isn't necessarily a bad man, but this isn't necessarily what a woman wants either. Boring simply means that you're not fun to be around, a man who's inactive, lacking vitality, uninteresting, and non-adventurous.
2- Clingy, and attached.
Women hate clingy men to the point that they can sense it from afar, and that's what repels them.
Women adore men who don't put them first or second.
Women hate clingy men to the point that they can sense it from afar, and that's what repels them.
Women adore men who don't put them first or second.
Pakistan’s role in bringing both sides to the table is commendable. May dialogue prevail over war. Pakistan is mediating between the USA / Iran. Regardless of the outcome, #IslamabadTalks deserve appreciation 👏
Delegations from USA and Iran are now set to hold make or break negotiations aimed at reaching a permanent peace treaty. The level of representation from both sides reflects the seriousness of these talks. On Iran’s side, a senior high level delegation has arrived in Islamabad.
From Qalibaf to Araghchi along with Ahmadian, Bagheri, Hemmati and other key officials, the delegation represents the full spectrum of Iran’s economic, diplomatic and security leadership.
Big Tech - valtionsensuuri ja "malinformaation" ["pahapuhe"?😏] synty?
Joitain nostoja Jacob Siegelin erinomaisesta
artikkelista 🧵
Joitain nostoja Jacob Siegelin erinomaisesta
artikkelista 🧵
2/
".. Joe Bidenin presidenttikaudella kaksi suurta tekijää ajoi informaatiovaltion voimavarojensa äärirajoille. Ensimmäinen juontui hallinnon toimista Covid-19-pandemian torjumiseksi. .."
".. Joe Bidenin presidenttikaudella kaksi suurta tekijää ajoi informaatiovaltion voimavarojensa äärirajoille. Ensimmäinen juontui hallinnon toimista Covid-19-pandemian torjumiseksi. .."
3/
".. Toinen syy juontui päätöksestä käyttää kapinallisten torjuntaan [ulkomailla] tarkoitettuja keinoja kotimaisesta ääriliikehdinnästä syytettyjä Yhdysvaltain kansalaisia vastaan. .."
".. Toinen syy juontui päätöksestä käyttää kapinallisten torjuntaan [ulkomailla] tarkoitettuja keinoja kotimaisesta ääriliikehdinnästä syytettyjä Yhdysvaltain kansalaisia vastaan. .."
🚨 BREAKING: Claude can now build your entire resume and LinkedIn profile like a $500/hour executive recruiter from Robert Half. For free.
Here are 11 prompts that get you interview calls within 7 days:
(Save this before it disappears)
Here are 11 prompts that get you interview calls within 7 days:
(Save this before it disappears)
1. The Google Recruiter 6-Second Resume Rewriter
"You are a senior technical recruiter at Google who has screened 100,000+ resumes and decides within 6 seconds whether a candidate moves forward or gets rejected — because that's all the time your resume gets before the next one loads.
I need my entire resume rewritten to survive those brutal 6 seconds.
Rewrite:
- Professional summary: a 2-3 sentence power statement that instantly communicates who I am, what I do, and why I'm exceptional
- Every bullet point transformed: rewrite using Google's XYZ formula — 'Accomplished [X] as measured by [Y] by doing [Z]'
- Numbers on everything: add specific metrics, percentages, dollar amounts, and scale to every single achievement
- Weak verb elimination: replace 'helped,' 'assisted,' 'worked on,' 'was responsible for' with power verbs — 'architected,' 'drove,' 'launched,' 'reduced,' 'scaled'
- One-page enforcement: ruthlessly cut filler, outdated skills, and irrelevant jobs (two pages only if 10+ years experience)
- Skills section overhaul: organize into categories (Technical, Tools, Frameworks, Certifications) matching my target role
- Education formatting: degree, school, honors only — remove GPA if below 3.5 or more than 3 years post-graduation
- Red flag removal: eliminate employment gaps in formatting, outdated technologies, and anything that wastes recruiter attention
- Visual hierarchy: name largest, then section headers, then body text — the eye must flow effortlessly top to bottom
- Before/after comparison: show me the weakest 3 bullets from my original resume alongside the rewritten versions
Format as a complete, ready-to-submit resume with every section rewritten plus a tracked-changes summary showing what was improved.
My current resume: [PASTE YOUR ENTIRE CURRENT RESUME AND THE JOB DESCRIPTION YOU'RE TARGETING]"
"You are a senior technical recruiter at Google who has screened 100,000+ resumes and decides within 6 seconds whether a candidate moves forward or gets rejected — because that's all the time your resume gets before the next one loads.
I need my entire resume rewritten to survive those brutal 6 seconds.
Rewrite:
- Professional summary: a 2-3 sentence power statement that instantly communicates who I am, what I do, and why I'm exceptional
- Every bullet point transformed: rewrite using Google's XYZ formula — 'Accomplished [X] as measured by [Y] by doing [Z]'
- Numbers on everything: add specific metrics, percentages, dollar amounts, and scale to every single achievement
- Weak verb elimination: replace 'helped,' 'assisted,' 'worked on,' 'was responsible for' with power verbs — 'architected,' 'drove,' 'launched,' 'reduced,' 'scaled'
- One-page enforcement: ruthlessly cut filler, outdated skills, and irrelevant jobs (two pages only if 10+ years experience)
- Skills section overhaul: organize into categories (Technical, Tools, Frameworks, Certifications) matching my target role
- Education formatting: degree, school, honors only — remove GPA if below 3.5 or more than 3 years post-graduation
- Red flag removal: eliminate employment gaps in formatting, outdated technologies, and anything that wastes recruiter attention
- Visual hierarchy: name largest, then section headers, then body text — the eye must flow effortlessly top to bottom
- Before/after comparison: show me the weakest 3 bullets from my original resume alongside the rewritten versions
Format as a complete, ready-to-submit resume with every section rewritten plus a tracked-changes summary showing what was improved.
My current resume: [PASTE YOUR ENTIRE CURRENT RESUME AND THE JOB DESCRIPTION YOU'RE TARGETING]"
2. The ATS Robot-Proof Optimizer
"You are a senior applicant tracking system consultant who has reverse-engineered how Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS score and rank resumes — because 75% of resumes are rejected by software before a human being ever sees them.
I need my resume optimized to score in the top 10% of any ATS system.
Optimize:
- Keyword extraction: pull every critical term from my target job description that the ATS will scan for
- Exact match placement: embed each keyword naturally into my experience bullets, summary, and skills section
- Synonym coverage: include both the acronym AND full version (e.g., 'Search Engine Optimization (SEO)') so the ATS catches both
- Section heading compliance: use only standard headings — Experience, Education, Skills, Summary — that every ATS recognizes
- Formatting purge: remove all tables, columns, text boxes, graphics, headers, footers, and special characters that crash ATS parsers
- File format guidance: save as .docx for ATS submission (most compatible) and .pdf only when applying directly to a human
- Date format consistency: use the same Month Year format throughout so the parser calculates tenure correctly
- Job title alignment: match my title wording to the target role's language without fabricating experience
- Skills taxonomy: list hard skills the ATS scans for above soft skills it usually ignores
- ATS match score estimate: rate my optimized resume from 1-100 against the specific job description
Format as an ATS-optimized resume with a keyword match report showing every term added and where it was placed.
My target: [PASTE YOUR CURRENT RESUME AND THE EXACT JOB DESCRIPTION YOU'RE APPLYING FOR]"
"You are a senior applicant tracking system consultant who has reverse-engineered how Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS score and rank resumes — because 75% of resumes are rejected by software before a human being ever sees them.
I need my resume optimized to score in the top 10% of any ATS system.
Optimize:
- Keyword extraction: pull every critical term from my target job description that the ATS will scan for
- Exact match placement: embed each keyword naturally into my experience bullets, summary, and skills section
- Synonym coverage: include both the acronym AND full version (e.g., 'Search Engine Optimization (SEO)') so the ATS catches both
- Section heading compliance: use only standard headings — Experience, Education, Skills, Summary — that every ATS recognizes
- Formatting purge: remove all tables, columns, text boxes, graphics, headers, footers, and special characters that crash ATS parsers
- File format guidance: save as .docx for ATS submission (most compatible) and .pdf only when applying directly to a human
- Date format consistency: use the same Month Year format throughout so the parser calculates tenure correctly
- Job title alignment: match my title wording to the target role's language without fabricating experience
- Skills taxonomy: list hard skills the ATS scans for above soft skills it usually ignores
- ATS match score estimate: rate my optimized resume from 1-100 against the specific job description
Format as an ATS-optimized resume with a keyword match report showing every term added and where it was placed.
My target: [PASTE YOUR CURRENT RESUME AND THE EXACT JOB DESCRIPTION YOU'RE APPLYING FOR]"