Agora, Claude pode construir seu canal do YouTube como a equipe de estratégia do MrBeast, de graça.
Aqui estão 7 dicas do Claude que levarão seu canal do zero a US$ 10.000 👇
(Economize antes que seus concorrentes o façam)
1/ ENCONTRE SEU NICHO NO YOUTUBE
Aja como um estrategista do YouTube que identifica nichos de alto CPM e baixa concorrência antes que fiquem saturados.
Analise os 10 principais nichos do YouTube e entregue uma lista classificada para alguém que está começando do zero.
1. Identifique 10 nichos com alto CPM, baixa concorrência e demanda perene. 2. Para cada nicho: CPM médio, dificuldade do conteúdo, caminhos de monetização além do AdSense. 3. Atribua um conceito de canal de 3 palavras para cada nicho. 4. Classifique por pontuação de oportunidade — CPM ponderado pelo nível de concorrência.
- Não inclua nichos saturados, a menos que o CPM justifique a concorrência.
- Pelo menos 2 caminhos de monetização além do AdSense por nicho.
- A classificação deve ser explícita — não "todos são boas opções".
2/ CONSTRUA A IDENTIDADE DO SEU CANAL
Aja como um estrategista de marca que constrói identidades de canal do YouTube que se destacam em nichos saturados.
Crie uma identidade de canal completa que torne meu canal imediatamente distinto dos criadores existentes.
1. Pergunte sobre meu nicho antes de começar 2. Gere 5 opções de nome para o canal — memoráveis e que possam ser associadas à marca 3. Escreva um slogan — uma frase que diga aos espectadores exatamente o que eles encontrarão 4. Defina o perfil do público-alvo com suas frustrações específicas 5. Construa 4 pilares de conteúdo distintos 6. Identifique meu mecanismo único — o diferencial que nenhum criador existente possui
- O mecanismo único deve ser defensável — não apenas um tom diferente
- Os pilares de conteúdo não devem se sobrepor
- O slogan deve ser impactante teste
Researchers sent the same resume to an AI hiring tool twice. Same qualifications. Same experience. Same skills. One version was written by a real human. The other was rewritten by ChatGPT.
The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time.
A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B.
Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself.
GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won.
Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective.
It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect.
Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance.
99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time.
If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars.
Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.
1/Same person. Same resume. Same skills.
One version written by a human. One rewritten by GPT-4o.
GPT-4o picked its own version 97.6% of the time.
Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. GPT-4-turbo hit 93%.
Every major model running on hiring platforms today prefers AI writing over real humans by more than 20 to 1.
2/The first reaction is always "the AI just prefers better writing."
The researchers tested this directly. They had real humans grade the resumes for clarity and quality. Then they ran the experiment again, controlling for actual writing quality.
The bias survived. GPT-4o still picked its own writing 81.9% of the time even when the human resume was objectively better.
Quote from the paper: each AI "consistently selected its own generated summary over the human-written alternative, even in cases where human annotators judged the human-written summary to be higher quality."
The AI is not picking better writing. It is picking writing that sounds like itself.
Akkord statt Heilung
– Wie das System Ärzte und Zahnärzte zum Raubbau zwingt
🦷 Die Praxis als Fließband:
Ob Hausarzt oder Zahnarzt
der ambulante Sektor unterliegt derselben zerstörerischen Logik wie die Pflege.
Medizinische Versorgungszentren (MVZ) in der Hand von Finanzinvestoren kaufen Praxen auf, um sie auf maximale Rendite zu trimmen.
⚙️ Taktung schlägt Qualität:
In investorengeführten Strukturen zählt die „Fallzahl“.
Wer sich Zeit für Patienten nimmt oder aufwendige Infektionsschutz-Protokolle lebt,
gilt als „unwirtschaftlich“.
Der Arzt wird vom Heiler zum Durchlauf-Manager degradiert
I’m being physically trailed and impeded by these two, Heidi and Bill, among other supposed “security” personnel, at the Epstein Survivors / Virginia Roberts Giuffre memorial happening right now in DC. On a weekend that’s supposed to be about celebrating Freedom of the Press 😂
Epstein Survivors and their henchmen now have a special protocol in place to pounce the instant I’m spotted, so they can form a mobile human barricade and block me from moving freely about the event! Even the Park Police were amazed at the spectacle. At least I got one of these
🌀 La entropía es la ley más importante del universo.
No la conoce casi nadie. Pero lo explica todo: por qué se enfría el café ☕, por qué envejecemos, por qué las civilizaciones caen 🏛️.
Empieza con física. Acaba con filosofía. Hilo 🧵👇
📐 La entropía mide el desorden de un sistema.
🛏️ Tu habitación ordenada: entropía baja. Pocas formas de tenerla así.
💥 Tu habitación después de una semana: entropía alta. Millones de formas de tenerla así.
El universo prefiere el desorden. Estadísticamente, siempre gana.
⏳ La 2ª ley dice que la entropía siempre aumenta.
☕ El café cede calor al aire. Nunca al revés.
💨 El humo se dispersa. Nunca se concentra solo.
🥚 El huevo roto no se recompone.
BREAKING: AI can now create dividend portfolios that can generate $100,000 in passive income a year — for free.
Here are 12 powerful Perplexity prompts With which you will find safe + growing dividend stocks.
Save this thread. 🧵
1. The Berkshire Hathaway Dividend Stock Screener
"You are Warren Buffett evaluating dividend stocks for Berkshire Hathaway's $300B+ equity portfolio — selecting only companies with such durable competitive advantages that they can pay and grow their dividends for the next 50 years without interruption.
I need a complete dividend stock screening analysis that separates safe compounders from dividend traps.
Screen:
- Consecutive dividend increases: how many years in a row has this company raised its dividend (25+ = Aristocrat, 50+ = King)
- Dividend growth rate: annualized dividend growth over 3, 5, and 10 years (I want 7%+ to outpace inflation)
- Payout ratio from earnings: percentage of net income paid as dividends (below 60% is safe, above 75% is danger)
- Payout ratio from free cash flow: percentage of FCF paid as dividends (more reliable than earnings-based ratio)
- Revenue stability: has revenue grown in at least 8 of the last 10 years without major drops
- Earnings consistency: has EPS grown in at least 8 of the last 10 years without wild swings
- Debt-to-EBITDA: can the company pay off all debt within 3 years of EBITDA (low leverage = safer dividend)
- Interest coverage: EBIT divided by interest expense above 5x (debt payments easily covered before dividends)
- Economic moat: does this company have pricing power, switching costs, or scale advantages that protect future profits
- Dividend safety score: rate 1-10 based on all factors with a clear safe, watch, or danger classification
Format as a Buffett-style dividend safety report with a scorecard, red flag checklist, and a buy/hold/avoid recommendation.
The stock: [ENTER TICKER SYMBOL OF THE DIVIDEND STOCK YOU WANT EVALUATED]"
2. The Vanguard Dividend Growth Portfolio Architect
"You are a senior portfolio strategist at Vanguard who designs dividend growth portfolios for retirees and pre-retirees — portfolios built to generate rising income every year that keeps pace with inflation without ever touching the principal.
I need a complete dividend growth portfolio built from scratch with specific stocks, allocations, and income projections.
Architect:
- Portfolio strategy: dividend growth (rising income) vs high yield (maximum current income) — which fits my situation
- Sector diversification: allocate across all 11 sectors so no single industry can cut my income stream
- Stock selection: 15-25 specific dividend stocks with ticker, current yield, 5-year dividend growth rate, and payout ratio
- Allocation weights: exact percentage and dollar amount for each position based on my total investment
- Yield-on-cost projection: what my portfolio yield will grow to in 5, 10, and 20 years if dividends keep growing at current rates
- Current annual income: total dividend income from day one at my investment amount
- Income growth forecast: projected annual income in year 5, year 10, and year 20 assuming historical dividend growth continues
- Reinvestment strategy: should I reinvest dividends (DRIP) now and switch to income later, or take cash from day one
- Tax-efficient placement: which dividend stocks go in taxable, IRA, or Roth accounts for minimum tax drag
- Rebalancing rules: when to trim winners, add to laggards, and replace any stock that cuts or freezes its dividend
Format as a Vanguard-style portfolio construction document with holdings table, sector allocation, and a 20-year income growth projection.
My situation: [ENTER YOUR TOTAL INVESTMENT AMOUNT, AGE, WHEN YOU NEED THE INCOME, AND YOUR TARGET ANNUAL DIVIDEND INCOME]"
Free speech advocate, Dr. Frances Widdowson, known for challenging the Aboriginal industry, was just arrested at Lethbridge University. RebelNews.com
RIDICULOUS!
After learning Widdowson had a scheduled coffee meeting planned with a student, Lethbridge University’s faculty department sent out this statement deeming @FrancesWiddows1 a health and safety threat.
Meanwhile, no arrest, or health and safety risk detected for former chief, Charlene Belleau, who openly discussed how great it would be for her people to r ❌ pe and torture widdowson, during a UBC Faculty of Medicine event.
If you're thinking about using gen-AI to "write" books, this 🧵 is for you.
I’m a highly experienced editor who’s been in the biz a long time. Recently I’ve had manuscripts come to me where the author has used gen-AI – not for writing, I’ve been assured, but for
“structuring” or "organising" or “refining”.
Turned out these manuscripts had structural problems. But that wasn’t the issue. Many manuscripts have structural problems.
The issue was that there was no way to *fix* the structural problems.
🚨 BREAKING: Claude can now help you build a full AI-powered YouTube channel — like a $10K/month creator agency.
For free.
Here are 7 prompts to go from 0 → monetized channel in 90 days 👇
Prompt 1 — Niche & Positioning
Analyze the top 10 YouTube niches with high CPM, low competition, and strong evergreen demand. For each, include: average CPM, content difficulty, monetization paths beyond AdSense, and a 3-word channel concept.
Prompt 2 — Channel Identity
I’m starting a YouTube channel about [NICHE]. Create a full channel identity: 5 channel name ideas, a tagline, target audience persona, 4 content pillars, and a unique mechanism that sets me apart from existing creators.
Nagpur 45°. Ahmedabad 44°. Prayagraj 43°. Delhi 42°. The entire country is a single dark red mass. This is not a heatwave. This is a country that was told its forests were fine.
And this is April. Not May. Not June. The hottest months have not even arrived yet.
The past few days have been hell. So I did what I always do when something bothers me. I went looking for answers.
What I found was a policy con job that has been running for over two decades.
But before I explain what happened, let's clear some definitions.
A garden is not a forest. An orchard is not a forest. A plantation is not a forest.
A forest is a living system. Soil, water, fungi, insects, birds, mammals, decades of accumulated complexity, specific to its land and climate. It cannot be designed. It cannot be harvested. It regulates water, cools land, shelters hundreds of species. It takes decades to become what it is.
You can plant a forest. But it will take decades to become one.
In 2001, India's forests were disappearing. The Indian state, led by the Vajpayee government, faced a choice. Protect what remained, or change what the numbers said.
It chose the numbers.
The Forest Survey of India quietly changed the definition of what a forest means. Any land with 10% tree canopy cover and more than one hectare in area was now a forest. Your mango orchard. A coconut plantation in Tamil Nadu. A tea garden in Assam. Lodhi Garden in Delhi.
All forests, on paper.
The FSI will tell you that 10% canopy cover follows international norms. The FAO also uses 10% as its threshold. But the FAO's definition comes with a crucial exclusion that India's FSI quietly dropped.
The FAO explicitly states that fruit tree plantations, oil palm plantations, olive orchards, and agroforestry systems are not forests. The World Bank says the same. India adopted the number but discarded the exclusion.
It took the cover of international legitimacy while gutting the standard that gave it meaning.
The government will also tell you this was never hidden. That it was publicly stated in every report, disclosed in Parliament. That is technically true. But a disclosure buried in a technical government document is not transparency. It is the appearance of transparency.
I did not know any of this until I went looking. Neither do most Indians whose forests, whose land, whose air this directly concerns. The con is not in what was hidden from experts. It is in what was never explained to the people it was done to.
This is not a technicality. This is the con.
It was a trick as old as power itself. If you cannot fix the problem, fix the measurement.
For ten years after 2001, Congress governed India. Two terms, two environment ministers, including Jairam Ramesh, one of the more serious ones. They saw the numbers. They knew what the numbers meant.
They did nothing.
Because the lie was convenient. India looked good in international climate negotiations. The fiction of a greening India served everyone in power, so everyone in power kept it. Congress did not create this lie. It simply chose, year after year, to live inside it.
The BJP is different.
When they returned to power in 2014, they came with something Congress never had. An absolute majority, and no coalition compulsions. They did not merely inherit the lie. They built on it. And in 2023, they legislated it.
The Forest Conservation Amendment Act of 2023 removed legal protection from "deemed forests." Forests that existed outside the official definition but were ecologically real.
Forests that Adivasi communities had lived in and depended on for generations. Forests that cooled land, held water, sheltered species. They were not on the right list. Since the amendment, forest destruction on Adivasi land has accelerated.
The people who knew these forests best, who had protected them longest, now watch them being cleared. Legally.
CONT++
The 2001 change inflated the numbers. The 2023 change cleared the ground.
Together they form a complete project. First make the destruction invisible, then make it legal.
India today is one of the hottest regions on earth. Heatwaves that once struck the arid northwest now reach coastal cities, places that had never known this kind of heat. In 2024, India recorded its hottest year since 1901.
This is not a mystery. Forests cool land. They hold moisture in the soil and release it back into the air as coolness.
A living forest is not just a carbon sink. It is a cooling system, a water system, a climate system embedded in the ground beneath your feet.
When you destroy forests, land heats up. When you destroy forests and pretend you haven't, no corrective action is ever taken.
The data says everything is fine. The policy says everything is fine. Meanwhile the temperature rises.
Deforestation is not the only reason India is burning. Global warming, reckless urbanisation, failing monsoons. These are all real and all compounding. But forests were India's partial buffer against all of them. And that buffer was first faked on paper, then stripped away in law.
It is worth noting that Kerala, Karnataka, parts of the northeast, have seen genuine recovery of forest cover. But that recovery reflects the will of state governments, not central policy. It happened despite Delhi, not because of it.
There is a particular kind of governance that does not solve problems. It solves the appearance of problems. It changes the definition of drought instead of finding water. It changes the definition of poverty instead of reducing it. It changes the definition of a forest instead of saving one.
In 2001, the Forest Survey of India changed what a forest means. In 2023, the BJP changed what a forest deserves. Between these two acts lies two decades of rising heat, disappearing biodiversity, and a population told that its natural inheritance was intact while it was being steadily consumed.
A garden is not a forest. An orchard is not a forest. A plantation is not a forest.
And a government that cannot tell the difference, or worse, one that can and doesn't care, is not a government that will save you from the heat it helped create.
The California computer scientist, 31, accused of opening fire at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner isn’t just any would-be killer — he is an elite-trained engineer from Caltech, where students with perfect SAT scores gain admission.
And now — in a new @FoxNews Digital story with my colleague @pmd_reports — I’ve unearthed a video of him from 2017 speaking publicly about…yes, creating brakes for wheelchairs to make life easier for seniors.
2/ Allen is accused of rushing a Secret Service checkpoint at the Washington Hilton and opening fire on a federal officer.
Authorities say he now faces federal charges:
– Using a firearm during a crime of violence
– Assault on a federal officer
3/ But his backstory is what stands out.
Allen wasn’t a drifter.
He was:
— A mechanical engineer from the CalTech
— A former student researcher at NASA’s elite Jet Propulsion Laboratory
— A computer scientist with an advanced masters degree
At Caltech, Allen built:
– Offensive and defensive robotic systems
– Physics-based simulations
He graduated in 2017.
That year, he developed a shooter-style game called “First Law” — a physics-based space combat role-playing shooter game.
Later, he released another complex game, “Bohrdom,” on Steam.
He worked at C2 Education — where smart kids who want to get into CalTech get tutoring — and earned a master’s degree in computer science from California State University Dominguez Hills in 2025.
He was publicly recognized as “Teacher of the Month” in late 2024.
On paper, his trajectory reads as stable, even successful.
Federal records show he also made a small political donation during the 2024 election cycle to Kamala Harris.
President Donald Trump described Allen as a “lone wolf” and a “very sick person.”
This isn’t just about what happened at the Washington Hilton.
It’s about understanding the pathway:
— from elite technical training
— to game design
— to alleged real-world violence
Read the full investigation by @pmd_reports + me @FoxNews Digital.
If you have a tip, send me a DM or write to asra.nomani@fox.com.
When it happens in 1-2 companies, chase the individuals. But when it’s happening in many companies, chase the system
I did exactly
After deep digging, I found the real faces behind it
My complete investigation is in this thread
1/25
The earlier criteria to find good companies was their financial but this criteria changed in 2004
The power of 18 powerful global investors
Brain of world Economic Forum
and influence of United Nations
Came together with a beautiful looking but dangerous plan
The birth of ESG
In Jan 2004, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan wrote to CEOs of 55 of world’s largest financial institutions with an unusual invitation- join a joint initiative to determine how financial markets could better integrate environmental, social, and governance (ESG)
Cole Allen, the gunman from last night’s WH Correspondents Dinner, maintained an active online presence, especially on the leftwing social media platform Bluesky where he went by the handle ColdForce.bsky.social with multiple references violence and guns.
In one post he calls President Trump the Antichrist.
In another he recommends buying guns in reaction to Trump’s DOJ exploring ways to ban firearm purchases from transgenders.
In one post he calls Trump a sociopathic mob boss and in another referred to him as a traitor with known connections to Putin, repeating a favorite leftwing Russian Hoax talking point.
He also attacks JD Vance for advocating an end to America’s funding the war in Ukraine and for his criticisms of the Pope. He seems pretty fixated on Ukraine more generally.
He also frequently interacts with Will Stancil’s Bluesky account, among others.
🚨 BREAKING: Claude can now build your entire resume and LinkedIn profile like a $500/hour executive recruiter from Robert Half. For free.
Here are 11 prompts that get you interview calls within 7 days:
(Save this before it disappears)
1. The Google Recruiter 6-Second Resume Rewriter
"You are a senior technical recruiter at Google who has screened 100,000+ resumes and decides within 6 seconds whether a candidate moves forward or gets rejected — because that's all the time your resume gets before the next one loads.
I need my entire resume rewritten to survive those brutal 6 seconds.
Rewrite:
- Professional summary: a 2-3 sentence power statement that instantly communicates who I am, what I do, and why I'm exceptional
- Every bullet point transformed: rewrite using Google's XYZ formula — 'Accomplished [X] as measured by [Y] by doing [Z]'
- Numbers on everything: add specific metrics, percentages, dollar amounts, and scale to every single achievement
- Weak verb elimination: replace 'helped,' 'assisted,' 'worked on,' 'was responsible for' with power verbs — 'architected,' 'drove,' 'launched,' 'reduced,' 'scaled'
- - One-page enforcement: ruthlessly cut filler, outdated skills, and irrelevant jobs (two pages only if 10+ years experience)
- Skills section overhaul: organize into categories (Technical, Tools, Frameworks, Certifications) matching my target role
- Education formatting: degree, school, honors only — remove GPA if below 3.5 or more than 3 years post-graduation
- Red flag removal: eliminate employment gaps in formatting, outdated technologies, and anything that wastes recruiter attention
- Visual hierarchy: name largest, then section headers, then body text — the eye must flow effortlessly top to bottom
- Before/after comparison: show me the weakest 3 bullets from my original resume alongside the rewritten versions
Format as a complete, ready-to-submit resume with every section rewritten plus a tracked-changes summary showing what was improved.
My current resume: [PASTE YOUR ENTIRE CURRENT RESUME AND THE JOB DESCRIPTION YOU'RE TARGETING]"
2. The ATS Robot-Proof Optimizer
"You are a senior applicant tracking system consultant who has reverse-engineered how Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS score and rank resumes — because 75% of resumes are rejected by software before a human being ever sees them.
I need my resume optimized to score in the top 10% of any ATS system.
Optimize:
- Keyword extraction: pull every critical term from my target job description that the ATS will scan for
- Exact match placement: embed each keyword naturally into my experience bullets, summary, and skills section
- Synonym coverage: include both the acronym AND full version (e.g., 'Search Engine Optimization (SEO)') so the ATS catches both
- Section heading compliance: use only standard headings — Experience, Education, Skills, Summary — that every ATS recognizes
- Formatting purge: remove all tables, columns, text boxes, graphics headers
footers, and special characters that crash ATS parsers
- File format guidance: save as .docx for ATS submission (most compatible) and .pdf only when applying directly to a human
- Date format consistency: use the same Month Year format throughout so the parser calculates tenure correctly
- Job title alignment: match my title wording to the target role's language without fabricating experience
- Skills taxonomy: list hard skills the ATS scans for above soft skills it usually ignores
- ATS match score estimate: rate my optimized resume from 1-100 against the specific job description
Format as an ATS-optimized resume with a keyword match report showing every term added and where it was placed.
My target: [PASTE YOUR CURRENT RESUME AND THE EXACT JOB DESCRIPTION YOU'RE APPLYING FOR]