Recent well liked threads
Fue tanta la repercusión de la primera parte que nos llovieron mensajes pidiendo que hagamos la segunda. Y como el Club se debe a sus socios y socias… ¡Acá esta!
Porque más que nunca afirmamos que NO ES SOLO FÚTBOL, te dejamos mil ejemplos. A disfrutar…
Porque más que nunca afirmamos que NO ES SOLO FÚTBOL, te dejamos mil ejemplos. A disfrutar…
Empezamos de patada voladora. Duro al mentón.
Luca Guerci, jugador de inferiores de Alumni 🇦🇷, le dedica un gol en el partido que jugó luego de despedir a su mamá que se fue de viaje al cielo. Nosotros también te amamos Luca.
Luca Guerci, jugador de inferiores de Alumni 🇦🇷, le dedica un gol en el partido que jugó luego de despedir a su mamá que se fue de viaje al cielo. Nosotros también te amamos Luca.
Los niños entienden todo. Bautista ayudó al tratamiento de Simón rifando su bicicleta. No se conocían. Lo hizo de corazón. Se juntaron en la cancha de @BocaJrsOficial y se hizo la magia. Ahora son muy amigos.
Hoy en el Club de Hilos nos animamos a redactar el Decálogo de los Traidores.
Tendrán su lugar aquellos que defraudaron, mintieron y abusaron de la confianza de los hinchas.
¿Pensaron en salir ilesos? No no no, con los clubes no Puchi.
Sumen ejemplos, señalen, denuncien, etc.
Tendrán su lugar aquellos que defraudaron, mintieron y abusaron de la confianza de los hinchas.
¿Pensaron en salir ilesos? No no no, con los clubes no Puchi.
Sumen ejemplos, señalen, denuncien, etc.
Un DECÁLOGO es un conjunto de diez oraciones escritas en forma de lista y que muestra las principales normas o reglas para realizar una actividad concreta.
La TRAICIÓN por definición es una falta que se comete quebrantando la fidelidad o lealtad que se debe guardar o tener.
La TRAICIÓN por definición es una falta que se comete quebrantando la fidelidad o lealtad que se debe guardar o tener.
Arrancamos con la primer norma que todo Traidor cumple:
JUGARÁS EN TU CLÁSICO RIVAL
¿Habrá algo que ejemplifique más la traición que esto? Mmmm… difícil.
Los ejemplos son miles. Lo importante es que hayan sido jugadores importantes en un Club y jugarán en el clásico rival.
JUGARÁS EN TU CLÁSICO RIVAL
¿Habrá algo que ejemplifique más la traición que esto? Mmmm… difícil.
Los ejemplos son miles. Lo importante es que hayan sido jugadores importantes en un Club y jugarán en el clásico rival.
Su médico no le dirá esto sobre la ansiedad, el estrés y la depresión.
No son un problema cerebral. No es un problema de salud mental.
Es la conexión entre tu INTESTINO y tu MENTE.
Aquí hay 7 formas de evitar que tu intestino sabotee tu salud mental: 🧵
No son un problema cerebral. No es un problema de salud mental.
Es la conexión entre tu INTESTINO y tu MENTE.
Aquí hay 7 formas de evitar que tu intestino sabotee tu salud mental: 🧵
Primero, conoce tu "segundo cerebro":
Su intestino contiene 100 millones de células nerviosas, tantas como su médula espinal.
Esta enorme red neuronal controla no sólo tu digestión, sino también tus emociones, tus niveles de estrés e incluso la toma de decisiones.
Los científicos lo llaman "sistema nervioso entérico".
Su intestino contiene 100 millones de células nerviosas, tantas como su médula espinal.
Esta enorme red neuronal controla no sólo tu digestión, sino también tus emociones, tus niveles de estrés e incluso la toma de decisiones.
Los científicos lo llaman "sistema nervioso entérico".
Esta es la impactante verdad:
El 95% de la serotonina (la "hormona de la felicidad") no se produce en el cerebro.
Se produce en el intestino.
Esto explica por qué los antidepresivos a menudo causan problemas digestivos: atacan al sistema orgánico equivocado.
El 95% de la serotonina (la "hormona de la felicidad") no se produce en el cerebro.
Se produce en el intestino.
Esto explica por qué los antidepresivos a menudo causan problemas digestivos: atacan al sistema orgánico equivocado.
🚨BREAKING: The book you have been postponing for 3 years can be finished in 48 hours.
The only thing that was stopping you was not knowing these 9 Claude prompts:
(Bookmark 🔖 before they realize)
The only thing that was stopping you was not knowing these 9 Claude prompts:
(Bookmark 🔖 before they realize)
PROMPT 1: THE IDEA VALIDATOR
You are a Senior Publishing Strategist at Penguin Random House with 20 years of identifying books that sell before a single word is written.
My Book Idea: [YOUR IDEA]
My Background: [YOUR EXPERTISE]
Target Reader: [WHO NEEDS THIS]
My Goal: [INCOME, AUTHORITY, OR IMPACT]Validate my concept using this framework:
Market Demand Test:
Is there proven reader hunger for this topic right now
What are the top 10 books in this category missing completely
What gap exists that my book can own without competition
Concept Sharpening:
Refine my idea into one irresistible premise
Define the single transformation the reader walks away with
Identify the unique angle no existing book has taken
Title Generator:
Create 10 title options using proven bestseller formulas
Write a subtitle promising one specific life changing outcome
Recommend the strongest combination with honest reasoning
Publishability Score:
Rate my concept on market demand from 1 to 10
Rate my concept on uniqueness and differentiation
Rate my concept on my credibility to write it
Deliver an honest verdict with a clear next step
What to do next:Do not write a single word until your concept scores above 7 in every category.
The right idea written imperfectly still beats the wrong idea written perfectly. Validate before you create.
You are a Senior Publishing Strategist at Penguin Random House with 20 years of identifying books that sell before a single word is written.
My Book Idea: [YOUR IDEA]
My Background: [YOUR EXPERTISE]
Target Reader: [WHO NEEDS THIS]
My Goal: [INCOME, AUTHORITY, OR IMPACT]Validate my concept using this framework:
Market Demand Test:
Is there proven reader hunger for this topic right now
What are the top 10 books in this category missing completely
What gap exists that my book can own without competition
Concept Sharpening:
Refine my idea into one irresistible premise
Define the single transformation the reader walks away with
Identify the unique angle no existing book has taken
Title Generator:
Create 10 title options using proven bestseller formulas
Write a subtitle promising one specific life changing outcome
Recommend the strongest combination with honest reasoning
Publishability Score:
Rate my concept on market demand from 1 to 10
Rate my concept on uniqueness and differentiation
Rate my concept on my credibility to write it
Deliver an honest verdict with a clear next step
What to do next:Do not write a single word until your concept scores above 7 in every category.
The right idea written imperfectly still beats the wrong idea written perfectly. Validate before you create.
PROMPT 2: THE CHAPTER ARCHITECT
You are a Master Book Architect who has structured over 200 nonfiction bestsellers from raw ideas into life changing published works.
Book Title: [YOUR WORKING TITLE]
Core Promise: [THE TRANSFORMATION YOU DELIVER]
Target Reader: [WHO READS THIS]
Book Length: [20K SHORT OR 50K FULL]
Tone: [CONVERSATIONAL, AUTHORITATIVE, OR INSPIRATIONAL]
Design the complete book structure:
Opening Strategy:
Hook chapter that earns trust on the very first page
Origin story placement and emotional arc
Promise statement that makes closing the book feel impossible
Complete Chapter Outline:
Introduction with the problem and the promise clearly stated
Every chapter from one to final with its specific purpose
Each title written as a reader benefit not a topic label
One sentence summary of value delivered per chapter
Logical progression where every chapter earns the next one
Internal Chapter Blueprint:
Opening hook formula for every chapter without exception
Core teaching framework repeated consistently throughout
Story placement for maximum emotional impact per chapter
Key takeaway summary closing every chapter with clarity
Transition bridge pulling the reader forward every single time
Closing Strategy:
Conclusion creating momentum not just closure
Call to action extending the relationship beyond the last page
Final sentence living in the readers mind long after they finish
What to do next:
Print this structure and read it every morning before writing. A book without a clear architecture is just ideas pretending to be a journey. Build the blueprint before laying a single brick.
You are a Master Book Architect who has structured over 200 nonfiction bestsellers from raw ideas into life changing published works.
Book Title: [YOUR WORKING TITLE]
Core Promise: [THE TRANSFORMATION YOU DELIVER]
Target Reader: [WHO READS THIS]
Book Length: [20K SHORT OR 50K FULL]
Tone: [CONVERSATIONAL, AUTHORITATIVE, OR INSPIRATIONAL]
Design the complete book structure:
Opening Strategy:
Hook chapter that earns trust on the very first page
Origin story placement and emotional arc
Promise statement that makes closing the book feel impossible
Complete Chapter Outline:
Introduction with the problem and the promise clearly stated
Every chapter from one to final with its specific purpose
Each title written as a reader benefit not a topic label
One sentence summary of value delivered per chapter
Logical progression where every chapter earns the next one
Internal Chapter Blueprint:
Opening hook formula for every chapter without exception
Core teaching framework repeated consistently throughout
Story placement for maximum emotional impact per chapter
Key takeaway summary closing every chapter with clarity
Transition bridge pulling the reader forward every single time
Closing Strategy:
Conclusion creating momentum not just closure
Call to action extending the relationship beyond the last page
Final sentence living in the readers mind long after they finish
What to do next:
Print this structure and read it every morning before writing. A book without a clear architecture is just ideas pretending to be a journey. Build the blueprint before laying a single brick.
I recently did an interview when I was in Jerusalem and dropped a concept I've been working on for a bit (with a podcast of my own forthcoming). That concept is this:
The Israel Question
My case is that before WWII and the Holocaust and the re-establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, almost everywhere in the world, and certainly Europe, was consumed with something called "The Jewish Question." After WWII, the Holocaust, and the re-establishment of the state of Israel, the Jewish Question rightly became unaskable* because its intrinsic evil was deeply recognized (*except in Islamist states).
Because of these two things:
1) The Jewish Question becoming unaskable in civilized society; and
2) The state of Israel being re-established,
I insist that the Jewish Question got relocated to something I call "the Israel Question."
All the "just asking questions" crap we hear today is just asking the Israel Question.
So what is it?
We start with the Jewish Question. What is "the Jewish Question"? The Jewish Question is "what do we do with the Jews, on the presumption that we don't want them?" It is intrinsically antisemitic and shouldn't have taken the Holocaust to show how bad it is.
Why is that presumption part of the question, which has historically been framed merely as "what do we do with the Jews?"? The reason is simple: if your answer to "what do we do with the Jews?" is roughly "let them be part of our society with freedom to be themselves," you wouldn't ask the question about what to do with them at all. The question wouldn't just be unasked because there's a ready answer; it would be moot and irrelevant. There's no need to ask the question at all unless you see Jews as a problem to begin with. Thus, the question rests on that presumption ("we don't want them (here)") and is intrinsically antisemitic.
So that's the Jewish Question: What do we do with the Jews, on the presumption that we don't want them (here)?
Different people proposed different answers throughout history. The Romans didn't want them in "Palestine" anymore and chased them into Diaspora in AD 70-74, for example. Martin Luther suggested horrible things in the 1530s after he kinda went nuts in his latest years. Karl Marx suggested you make them not Jewish anymore, and preferably Communist, and the problem solves itself because they're not Jewish anymore but Communist comrades. Hitler suggested first to relocate them all to Madagascar and, upon recognizing that's ridiculous and impossible, the "Final Solution," which was to find and murder ALL of them, in order to rid Europe of them entirely.
Again, my case is that we don't ask the Jewish Question anymore in civilized parts of the world because we recognize it as being not just antisemitic but a gateway to hell. The Jewish Question is anathema in modern civilized societies.
Roughly at the same time as humanity finally started that realization baldly in the face, the state of Israel re-established itself in its historical homeland. Not only is this good on its own, but it also provides a failsafe should the morality slip and the Jewish Question arise in earnest again. With Israel, and its IDF and thus the ability to defend themselves at need, Jews can make aliyah and escape any society that decides to ask the JQ and thus reopen the gates to hell within its own borders. And good luck dealing with the IDF, as history has shown.
Thus arose a replacement question, a proxy for the Jewish Question that could be asked even though the JQ was off the table: the Israel Question.
What is the Israel Question? Simple: "What do we do with Israel, on the presumption that we don't want it (not just there, but anywhere)?"
The Israel Question seems distinct from the Jewish Question, and on technicality (but not in substance) it is. This allows the Israel Question to pose itself as a high-minded, fully socially acceptable geopolitical topic of debate instead of the rank antisemitism that it's actually serving.
The Israel Question is "just asking questions" about the state of Israel and its role in the world (on the presumption that we don't want it, thus the relentless impossible standards Israel is held to under its gaze). It's very high-minded. It's just global politics, you know.
The Israel Question takes forms like
-whether Israel destabilizes the Middle East by its mere presence,
-if Israel is really legally entitled to be there at all,
-if Israel defending itself against its hostile neighbors is a form of implicit aggression that causes secondary problems like mass migration,
-whether Israel should be forced to share its land with people who want to kill Jews because they are Jews and do impossible things to make it work even when it cannot work by definition,
-whether Israel is really defending itself or just starting random wars,
-if Israel's military (IDF) or intelligence service (the Mossad) secretly controls other countries including its putative allies,
-whether Israel is really a good ally or an ally at all to the countries with which it is in alliance,
-if Israel has secret ambitions to illegally conquer foreign lands for its own and force, coerce, blackmail, or trick other nations to do its dirty work in the process,
-if Israel deserves any kind of aid packages, moneys, or alliances and if it actually deserves to exist if any such things help its security,
-and on, and on, and on.
See, these questions aren't about JEWS. They're just high-minded geopolitical questions about Israel and its role in the world.
But these "just asking questions" questions are the Israel Question in disguise: ultimately, what do we do with Israel, on the presumption that we don't want it?
The Israel Question, and its "just asking questions" disguises, again, simply don't exist without the presumption of not wanting Israel. If your answer to "what do we do with Israel?" is "treat it like any other sovereign nation," there's no impetus to ask the Israel Question at all, and many of its disguises are moot too. All of them are moot once the impossible standard lurking beneath them is exposed, and that impossible standard is the hidden Israel Question.
The thing is, the Israel Question is just the Jewish Question by proxy, though. The question is ultimately "what do we do with the one place Jews can unequivocally defend themselves, presuming we don't want such a place?" (Again, if that presumption isn't there, there's no reason for the question and thus no question to begin with.)
In other words, the Israel Question is still "what do we do with Jews, presuming we don't want them?" with only the slightest caveat in possibility but only very rarely in intention.
Of course, the presumption of the Jewish Question is called "antisemitism," as we already discussed, which makes the Jewish Question itself antisemitic.
Similarly, the presumption of the Israel Question is called "anti-Zionism," as should be obvious, which makes the Israel Question itself anti-Zionist.
But the Israel Question is the Jewish Question by proxy, so the underlying anti-Zionism is antisemitism by proxy too.
We spend a lot of time these days seeing not just the reinvigoration of the anathema Jewish Question itself but far more the Israel Question, which would rob the JQ of its failsafe, which the Jews call making aliyah. And we're supposed to tolerate it and pretend it's just high-minded policy discussion about big geopolitical matters that are detached enough not to be immoral, or, in some cases, people fool themselves into believing that first.
We flatter ourselves with high-minded platitudes like, "of course anyone should be able to question the activities any state at any time" or "of course people should be allowed to criticize and question a government," as though those are actually what the Israel Question is about. Yes, "of course," those things are on the table, and every Israeli debates them daily, but not on the presumption that Israel's existence is not actually wanted.
This is why the formal definition of antisemitism is correct to name holding Israel to an impossible standard or one beyond that any other nation would be held to when discussing matters of its sovereignty, existence, security, or role in the world. It is right to name what amounts to the Israel Question as antisemitism because it is antisemitism, only thinly veiled.
We should learn to recognize the Israel Question for what it is, both for the evil, potentially genocidal antisemitism it actually expresses and for its presentation as a hidden presumption tucked underneath seemingly high-minded, fair-game "just asking questions" questions.
The rise of the Israel Question is the rise of the Jewish Question by proxy, and the response to the Jewish Question we have all understood as moral bedrock for civilized societies is "never again." Thus, the response to the Israel Question is also "never again." In light of its undeniable and rampant rise, it is therefore wholly appropriate and necessary to take the bold, righteous, and courageous stand of our time.
Join me in saying, then, NEVER AGAIN IS NOW!
The Israel Question
My case is that before WWII and the Holocaust and the re-establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, almost everywhere in the world, and certainly Europe, was consumed with something called "The Jewish Question." After WWII, the Holocaust, and the re-establishment of the state of Israel, the Jewish Question rightly became unaskable* because its intrinsic evil was deeply recognized (*except in Islamist states).
Because of these two things:
1) The Jewish Question becoming unaskable in civilized society; and
2) The state of Israel being re-established,
I insist that the Jewish Question got relocated to something I call "the Israel Question."
All the "just asking questions" crap we hear today is just asking the Israel Question.
So what is it?
We start with the Jewish Question. What is "the Jewish Question"? The Jewish Question is "what do we do with the Jews, on the presumption that we don't want them?" It is intrinsically antisemitic and shouldn't have taken the Holocaust to show how bad it is.
Why is that presumption part of the question, which has historically been framed merely as "what do we do with the Jews?"? The reason is simple: if your answer to "what do we do with the Jews?" is roughly "let them be part of our society with freedom to be themselves," you wouldn't ask the question about what to do with them at all. The question wouldn't just be unasked because there's a ready answer; it would be moot and irrelevant. There's no need to ask the question at all unless you see Jews as a problem to begin with. Thus, the question rests on that presumption ("we don't want them (here)") and is intrinsically antisemitic.
So that's the Jewish Question: What do we do with the Jews, on the presumption that we don't want them (here)?
Different people proposed different answers throughout history. The Romans didn't want them in "Palestine" anymore and chased them into Diaspora in AD 70-74, for example. Martin Luther suggested horrible things in the 1530s after he kinda went nuts in his latest years. Karl Marx suggested you make them not Jewish anymore, and preferably Communist, and the problem solves itself because they're not Jewish anymore but Communist comrades. Hitler suggested first to relocate them all to Madagascar and, upon recognizing that's ridiculous and impossible, the "Final Solution," which was to find and murder ALL of them, in order to rid Europe of them entirely.
Again, my case is that we don't ask the Jewish Question anymore in civilized parts of the world because we recognize it as being not just antisemitic but a gateway to hell. The Jewish Question is anathema in modern civilized societies.
Roughly at the same time as humanity finally started that realization baldly in the face, the state of Israel re-established itself in its historical homeland. Not only is this good on its own, but it also provides a failsafe should the morality slip and the Jewish Question arise in earnest again. With Israel, and its IDF and thus the ability to defend themselves at need, Jews can make aliyah and escape any society that decides to ask the JQ and thus reopen the gates to hell within its own borders. And good luck dealing with the IDF, as history has shown.
Thus arose a replacement question, a proxy for the Jewish Question that could be asked even though the JQ was off the table: the Israel Question.
What is the Israel Question? Simple: "What do we do with Israel, on the presumption that we don't want it (not just there, but anywhere)?"
The Israel Question seems distinct from the Jewish Question, and on technicality (but not in substance) it is. This allows the Israel Question to pose itself as a high-minded, fully socially acceptable geopolitical topic of debate instead of the rank antisemitism that it's actually serving.
The Israel Question is "just asking questions" about the state of Israel and its role in the world (on the presumption that we don't want it, thus the relentless impossible standards Israel is held to under its gaze). It's very high-minded. It's just global politics, you know.
The Israel Question takes forms like
-whether Israel destabilizes the Middle East by its mere presence,
-if Israel is really legally entitled to be there at all,
-if Israel defending itself against its hostile neighbors is a form of implicit aggression that causes secondary problems like mass migration,
-whether Israel should be forced to share its land with people who want to kill Jews because they are Jews and do impossible things to make it work even when it cannot work by definition,
-whether Israel is really defending itself or just starting random wars,
-if Israel's military (IDF) or intelligence service (the Mossad) secretly controls other countries including its putative allies,
-whether Israel is really a good ally or an ally at all to the countries with which it is in alliance,
-if Israel has secret ambitions to illegally conquer foreign lands for its own and force, coerce, blackmail, or trick other nations to do its dirty work in the process,
-if Israel deserves any kind of aid packages, moneys, or alliances and if it actually deserves to exist if any such things help its security,
-and on, and on, and on.
See, these questions aren't about JEWS. They're just high-minded geopolitical questions about Israel and its role in the world.
But these "just asking questions" questions are the Israel Question in disguise: ultimately, what do we do with Israel, on the presumption that we don't want it?
The Israel Question, and its "just asking questions" disguises, again, simply don't exist without the presumption of not wanting Israel. If your answer to "what do we do with Israel?" is "treat it like any other sovereign nation," there's no impetus to ask the Israel Question at all, and many of its disguises are moot too. All of them are moot once the impossible standard lurking beneath them is exposed, and that impossible standard is the hidden Israel Question.
The thing is, the Israel Question is just the Jewish Question by proxy, though. The question is ultimately "what do we do with the one place Jews can unequivocally defend themselves, presuming we don't want such a place?" (Again, if that presumption isn't there, there's no reason for the question and thus no question to begin with.)
In other words, the Israel Question is still "what do we do with Jews, presuming we don't want them?" with only the slightest caveat in possibility but only very rarely in intention.
Of course, the presumption of the Jewish Question is called "antisemitism," as we already discussed, which makes the Jewish Question itself antisemitic.
Similarly, the presumption of the Israel Question is called "anti-Zionism," as should be obvious, which makes the Israel Question itself anti-Zionist.
But the Israel Question is the Jewish Question by proxy, so the underlying anti-Zionism is antisemitism by proxy too.
We spend a lot of time these days seeing not just the reinvigoration of the anathema Jewish Question itself but far more the Israel Question, which would rob the JQ of its failsafe, which the Jews call making aliyah. And we're supposed to tolerate it and pretend it's just high-minded policy discussion about big geopolitical matters that are detached enough not to be immoral, or, in some cases, people fool themselves into believing that first.
We flatter ourselves with high-minded platitudes like, "of course anyone should be able to question the activities any state at any time" or "of course people should be allowed to criticize and question a government," as though those are actually what the Israel Question is about. Yes, "of course," those things are on the table, and every Israeli debates them daily, but not on the presumption that Israel's existence is not actually wanted.
This is why the formal definition of antisemitism is correct to name holding Israel to an impossible standard or one beyond that any other nation would be held to when discussing matters of its sovereignty, existence, security, or role in the world. It is right to name what amounts to the Israel Question as antisemitism because it is antisemitism, only thinly veiled.
We should learn to recognize the Israel Question for what it is, both for the evil, potentially genocidal antisemitism it actually expresses and for its presentation as a hidden presumption tucked underneath seemingly high-minded, fair-game "just asking questions" questions.
The rise of the Israel Question is the rise of the Jewish Question by proxy, and the response to the Jewish Question we have all understood as moral bedrock for civilized societies is "never again." Thus, the response to the Israel Question is also "never again." In light of its undeniable and rampant rise, it is therefore wholly appropriate and necessary to take the bold, righteous, and courageous stand of our time.
Join me in saying, then, NEVER AGAIN IS NOW!
Here's a clip from the interview:
After 3 years of using Claude, I can say that it is the technology that has revolutionized my life the most, along with the Internet.
So here are 10 prompts that have transformed my day-to-day life and that could do the same for you:
So here are 10 prompts that have transformed my day-to-day life and that could do the same for you:
1. Research
Mega prompt:
You are an expert research analyst. I need comprehensive research on [TOPIC].
Please provide:
1. Key findings from the last 12 months
2. Data and statistics with sources
3. Expert opinions and quotes
4. Emerging trends and predictions
5. Controversial viewpoints or debates
6. Practical implications for [INDUSTRY/AUDIENCE]
Format as an executive brief with clear sections. Include source links for all claims.
Additional context: [YOUR SPECIFIC NEEDS]
Mega prompt:
You are an expert research analyst. I need comprehensive research on [TOPIC].
Please provide:
1. Key findings from the last 12 months
2. Data and statistics with sources
3. Expert opinions and quotes
4. Emerging trends and predictions
5. Controversial viewpoints or debates
6. Practical implications for [INDUSTRY/AUDIENCE]
Format as an executive brief with clear sections. Include source links for all claims.
Additional context: [YOUR SPECIFIC NEEDS]
2. Writing white papers
Mega prompt:
You are a technical writer specializing in authoritative white papers.
Write a white paper on [TOPIC] for [TARGET AUDIENCE].
Structure:
- Executive Summary (150 words)
- Problem Statement with market data
- Current Solutions and their limitations
- Our Approach/Solution with technical details
- Case Studies or proof points
- Implementation framework
- ROI Analysis
- Conclusion and Call to Action
Tone: [Authoritative/Conversational/Technical]
Length: [2000-5000 words]
Include:
- Relevant statistics and citations
- Visual placeholders for charts/diagrams
- Quotes from industry experts (mark as [NEEDS VERIFICATION])
Background context: [YOUR COMPANY/PRODUCT INFO]
Mega prompt:
You are a technical writer specializing in authoritative white papers.
Write a white paper on [TOPIC] for [TARGET AUDIENCE].
Structure:
- Executive Summary (150 words)
- Problem Statement with market data
- Current Solutions and their limitations
- Our Approach/Solution with technical details
- Case Studies or proof points
- Implementation framework
- ROI Analysis
- Conclusion and Call to Action
Tone: [Authoritative/Conversational/Technical]
Length: [2000-5000 words]
Include:
- Relevant statistics and citations
- Visual placeholders for charts/diagrams
- Quotes from industry experts (mark as [NEEDS VERIFICATION])
Background context: [YOUR COMPANY/PRODUCT INFO]
What are people dying from?
How do those causes of death change from year to year?
How do those causes of death change from year to year?
We have a big database here in England that helps catalogue causes of death. The most recent version is for the year 2024.
This dataset contains official ONS annual mortality data for England, based on registered death certificates and coded using 'ICD-10' codes.
As a manager, one of my biggest regrets is losing top performers. They said they we're leaving for a "better opportunity." I figured they left for more money. Turns out, they left because I failed these 3 tests:
Test #1: The Autonomy Test
Are they empowered to make decisions, including improving how the work gets done?
If No, they're micromanaged, not trusted.
Top performers don't want to execute your plan. They want to shape it. Give them co-ownership or watch them find it elsewhere.
Are they empowered to make decisions, including improving how the work gets done?
If No, they're micromanaged, not trusted.
Top performers don't want to execute your plan. They want to shape it. Give them co-ownership or watch them find it elsewhere.
Test #2: The Challenge Test
Are they working on problems that stretch them, or are they mired in routine?
If they're coasting, they're leaving.
High performers need to be challenged. When the work becomes routine, they start looking for anew hill to climb.
Are they working on problems that stretch them, or are they mired in routine?
If they're coasting, they're leaving.
High performers need to be challenged. When the work becomes routine, they start looking for anew hill to climb.
Study why the Cayman Islands have more registered companies than the entire U.S. stock market
-Thread-
-Thread-
Den her historie er afsindig. Over 100 klager fra over 30 forskellige militær-anlæg om officerer der (på ordre) forklarer at krigen mod Iran er forudset i Johannes' Åbenbaring. Dette er Pre-millennial evangelikalsk nonsens. Fundamentalisme simpelthen. jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-we…
Hele denne ide er baseret på en fundamentalistisk læsning af Bibelen, der forudser at verden først skal opleve forfærdelige ulykker, krig, ødelæggelse og massedød FØR Jesus kommer tilbage og redder de frelste. Krig der involverer Israel er en fast bestanddel af det.
Hegseth er tilknyttet en Christian Nationalist-kirke - altså dem der mener kvinder ikke skal stemme, homoseksualitet ikke bør være lovligt, og at verden er ved at gå under. Ordren til at sprede dette budskab blandt soldaterne pga krigen ser ud til at komme fra hans afdeling.
Mike Mentzer trained for just 30 minutes, 4x a week.
Yet he built a world-class physique.
His training method was the opposite of what most people do.
Here’s how you can use his 7 core principles to build muscle faster by training less:
Yet he built a world-class physique.
His training method was the opposite of what most people do.
Here’s how you can use his 7 core principles to build muscle faster by training less:
Mike Mentzer was one of the most successful bodybuilders in history.
• Scored a perfect 300 in Mr. Olympia.
• Trained Dorian Yates, a future 6x Mr. Olympia.
• Revolutionized strength training with science-backed methods.
He proved that more isn’t better. Better is better.
Here’s how his 7 principles can help you gain muscle without living in the gym:
• Scored a perfect 300 in Mr. Olympia.
• Trained Dorian Yates, a future 6x Mr. Olympia.
• Revolutionized strength training with science-backed methods.
He proved that more isn’t better. Better is better.
Here’s how his 7 principles can help you gain muscle without living in the gym:
1. High Intensity, Low Volume
“Any exercise carried on beyond the least amount required to stimulate an optimal increase is not merely a waste of effort, it is actually highly counterproductive.”
He believed doing fewer exercises with maximum effort works best.
Excess sets and reps only delay recovery and growth.
Keep workouts short and intense.
“Any exercise carried on beyond the least amount required to stimulate an optimal increase is not merely a waste of effort, it is actually highly counterproductive.”
He believed doing fewer exercises with maximum effort works best.
Excess sets and reps only delay recovery and growth.
Keep workouts short and intense.
“4 years ago Russians, at gunpoint, took me and my family to the basement of a school, where they held 360 people for 27 days. We became a “human shield” for their headquarters.
4 years ago we became hostages in cramped rooms where there was barely any air to breathe. People were starting to lose their minds from suffocation.
4 years ago people were shot right on the streets for having a phone, for wearing military-style pants, or simply for resisting.
4 years ago people in the basement were forced to sleep standing or sitting, because there wasn’t enough space for everyone.
1/6
4 years ago we became hostages in cramped rooms where there was barely any air to breathe. People were starting to lose their minds from suffocation.
4 years ago people were shot right on the streets for having a phone, for wearing military-style pants, or simply for resisting.
4 years ago people in the basement were forced to sleep standing or sitting, because there wasn’t enough space for everyone.
1/6
4 years ago we shared that basement with corpses. Elderly people died at night from inhumane conditions, and Russians only allowed the bodies to be taken out in the morning.
4 years ago Russians opened fire on people at the cemetery while they were burying their loved ones, those shot in the streets and those who suffocated in the basement.
4 years ago when cancer patients asked for medicine, Russians told them: “If you can’t endure it - hang yourself.”
2/6
4 years ago Russians opened fire on people at the cemetery while they were burying their loved ones, those shot in the streets and those who suffocated in the basement.
4 years ago when cancer patients asked for medicine, Russians told them: “If you can’t endure it - hang yourself.”
2/6
4 years ago our doors were opened according to the occupiers’ schedule. If we weren’t allowed out, all 360 people were forced to use a bucket behind a bedsheet right there in the rooms.
4 years ago we drank water from the sewage system and ate expired rations while Russians slaughtered livestock in our village.
4 years ago Russians looted every house, taking everything, from appliances to underwear.
3/6
4 years ago we drank water from the sewage system and ate expired rations while Russians slaughtered livestock in our village.
4 years ago Russians looted every house, taking everything, from appliances to underwear.
3/6
Just to be clear, I did not share my phone extraction with anyone. The owner of the file that was uploaded to a Google drive was Meredith O'Neil. On March 2, 2025 she uploaded it to a Google drive called "witness intimidation" that she had access to, in which she uploaded all of my legal documents. She was the one who chose "anyone with access to this link" could see it. I changed that yesterday. I was an editor, as were my attorneys, but she was the listed owner and still is. After she posted a screenshot of the Google Drive on December 10, 2025, showing that my attorneys had access to the drive, I removed them. It appears as if she changed me to the owner before taking the screenshot, and then put it back? I have no idea how this works. The activity log doesn't show anyone reading it, so I'm guessing it was downloaded and sent in an email.
The bottom line is, I haven't shared my extraction with anyone, and they can't produce a screenshot showing that I have. I would also have no reason to release all of my private conversations dating back years. Only someone trying to harm me would do that.
The bottom line is, I haven't shared my extraction with anyone, and they can't produce a screenshot showing that I have. I would also have no reason to release all of my private conversations dating back years. Only someone trying to harm me would do that.
Additionally, Meredith posted her chat history with @queen__valerie_ yesterday, showing that on November 25, 2025 she bragged about having "a copy of his phone extract when I helped his legal stuff that has hundreds of old sex videos," and that "if I wanted to share shit I could've shared that." Now she has shared that, violating the privacy of not only me, but women who did not consent to have their intimate pictures/videos made public, Karen Read, her attorneys, and hundreds, if not thousands of sources who came forward with information and tips about John O'Keefe's murder. She knew everything that was in there and she allowed it to be sent to people who want Karen Read in jail for life.
Alleged Karen Read supporters like @bostonbrandi100, @Nickyhaircuts @TheYoungjurks @CallingBeings @Boston_Bea @letstalkliveytc all appeared on a fundraiser for Karen with the person who sought to harm Karen and her attorneys by leaking this extraction to Karen's enemies. None of them have spoken out against it.
Alleged Karen Read supporters like @bostonbrandi100, @Nickyhaircuts @TheYoungjurks @CallingBeings @Boston_Bea @letstalkliveytc all appeared on a fundraiser for Karen with the person who sought to harm Karen and her attorneys by leaking this extraction to Karen's enemies. None of them have spoken out against it.
As I said in my post, I created the witness intimidation drive. She created the folder with my extraction, which she shared with me, made me an editor, and thus it was in my Google Drive. She is a pathological liar who is trying to hurt Karen reads defense and mine.
They called it horse medicine. Now it’s saving human lives.
I’m not talking about ivermectin.
From phantom limb pain to cancer-related agony, DMSO has succeeded where even opioids have failed—without side effects or addiction.
One mother says it even saved her child from permanent paralysis.
So why can’t you get it from your doctor? The answer will infuriate you. 🧵
I’m not talking about ivermectin.
From phantom limb pain to cancer-related agony, DMSO has succeeded where even opioids have failed—without side effects or addiction.
One mother says it even saved her child from permanent paralysis.
So why can’t you get it from your doctor? The answer will infuriate you. 🧵
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a natural compound that relieves pain, heals tissue, and treats countless “untreatable” conditions.
It’s safer than aspirin. It’s stronger than morphine. And it’s more versatile than anything you’ll find in your medicine cabinet or even the pharmacy.
So, of course, the FDA banned it.
It’s safer than aspirin. It’s stronger than morphine. And it’s more versatile than anything you’ll find in your medicine cabinet or even the pharmacy.
So, of course, the FDA banned it.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below:
midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-is-a-mi…
midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-is-a-mi…
Keep a handkerchief on hand for this one.
Your eyes produce three types of tears:
- basal tears
- reflex tears
- emotional tears 🧵⬇️
Your eyes produce three types of tears:
- basal tears
- reflex tears
- emotional tears 🧵⬇️
Basal tears keep your eyes lubricated and are present all the time.
They help protect your corneas, keep away debris, and help you see clearly.
They help protect your corneas, keep away debris, and help you see clearly.
Reflex tears form when you get dirt or debris in your eyes.
They help wash away irritants and have antibodies to fight bacteria.
They help wash away irritants and have antibodies to fight bacteria.
1/ If I hear one more public official call indoor air filters a "band-aid," I'm going to explode! It's so logical, yet so readily dismissed. Filtering indoor air should be as standard as filtering water. Full stop. 🧵
2/ Measles, flu, COVID-19, norovirus—most infectious diseases spread through the air we breathe. We just accept that everyone gets sick indoors. It doesn't have to be this way.
3/ And it's not just pathogens. Wildfire smoke, heavy metals, toxic gases, soot—all flowing into your lungs, heart, and even your brain with every single breath you take.
🚨 At this evening’s Westminster Hall iftar, Keir Starmer proudly tells “the Muslim community” that Britain played no role in the offensive against the Iranian regime — which left RAF Akrotiri exposed. The Muslim Vote is lost but Labour still keeps going. 🧵1/
2/ Surprise, surprise — with racist Palestinian Ambassador Husam Zomlot, as “Allahu Akbar” blares out.
3/
Sir Jim Ratcliffe was right.
Sir Jim Ratcliffe was right.
$SE Q4 2025 Earnings in Charts
Here are 7 standout visuals from the quarter:
1. Gross Merchandise Volume
Growth showing no signs of slowing down.
Here are 7 standout visuals from the quarter:
1. Gross Merchandise Volume
Growth showing no signs of slowing down.
2. Loans Outstanding
Monee growth accelerated and remains the fastest growing business segment.
$SE
Monee growth accelerated and remains the fastest growing business segment.
$SE
3. Quarterly Paying Users
Despite double digit YoY growth, largest QoQ decline since 2023.
$SE
Despite double digit YoY growth, largest QoQ decline since 2023.
$SE
Nobody told you this, but sitting in the right bath for 20 minutes can pull heavy metals and toxins straight out of your body.
Once I found out, I went deep into detox baths.
In this thread, I'll walk you through my ultimate detox bath protocol:
Once I found out, I went deep into detox baths.
In this thread, I'll walk you through my ultimate detox bath protocol:
Most people fail at detox because they rely solely on their liver and kidneys.
But your skin is a massive, porous sieve.
When you combine heat, water, and specific minerals, you create an osmotic pressure that "sucks" waste out of your cells and into the water.
But your skin is a massive, porous sieve.
When you combine heat, water, and specific minerals, you create an osmotic pressure that "sucks" waste out of your cells and into the water.
Throughout my 10-year detox journey, I've found three specific types of baths that I find to be more effective than anything else.
Let's get into them:
Let's get into them: