Recent well liked threads
This is the REAL Barack Hussein Obama II. He will go down as one of the most evil Manchurian candidates in history. You may think you know who this man is, I assure you don’t. A tool of the global elites, CIA and radical Islam, his goal was to destroy America.
There’s a reason his Washington, D.C. residence is a quick 5 minute walk from The Islamic Center of Washington D.C..
There’s a reason his Washington, D.C. residence is a quick 5 minute walk from The Islamic Center of Washington D.C..
Despite Barack Obama’s public image as an advocate for change, his connections, including his mother's association with USAID and the Ford Foundation (both noted for CIA ties), indicate deep links to intelligence networks. His early life, including a mysterious year during college, aligns with a pattern of potential recruitment by intelligence agencies.
Community organizing was a key aspect of Obama’s career, and it overlaps with intelligence methods used for political destabilization. Historical examples, like the toppling of Yugoslavia, illustrate how similar strategies were employed by the U.S. in international politics.
MAGA is quite literally a psyop created by PSYGROUP, a company founded by ex Israeli intelligence unit 8200 Joe Zamel and Roy Burstien. The operation was called "Project Rome" and was funded by MBS using a convicted pedofile they brought to the White house 13 times as the bagman.
Donald Trump Jr. met with UAE and Saudi intermediary George Nader (pedophile), Blackwater founder Erik Prince, and Joel Zamel in Trump Tower to pitch a social media manipulation campaign called "Project Rome"
The proposal included infiltrating target audiences with AI generated social-media avatars, spreading misleading information through websites meant to mimic news portals, opposition infiltration, and manipulation of social media algorithms.
1/ THREAD on the impact of the Ukraine combat on the Russian capacity to fight the emerging warfare style, described by Ruslan Pukhov, director of the Moscow-based Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST). Main points below: kommersant.ru/doc/8380069 x.com/sambendett/sta…
2/ "The events of the war in Ukraine have demonstrated a fundamentally new form of large-scale military conflict, characterized by a shift from the "mechanized warfare" of the industrial era to "drone warfare," or "digital" ("information") warfare of the post-industrial era."
3/ "In fact, we are now witnessing a new revolution in military affairs – the "drone revolution," and it is clear that this revolution will continue to develop and deepen, as the possibilities for expanding "drone warfare" clearly outweigh the possibilities and prospects for overcoming it."
Thread No : 74 - Kajal x Nisha
Inko 1 Week lo Nisha Birthday ani Kaju oka Family Vacation (Maldives) plan chesindhi.
Kaju : Flight Tickets & Hotel rooms anni book chesesaanu, ee vacation full gaa enjoy cheyyaali.
Nisha : Bava definitely vasthaadu kadha, asale bava always busy
Inko 1 Week lo Nisha Birthday ani Kaju oka Family Vacation (Maldives) plan chesindhi.
Kaju : Flight Tickets & Hotel rooms anni book chesesaanu, ee vacation full gaa enjoy cheyyaali.
Nisha : Bava definitely vasthaadu kadha, asale bava always busy
Kaju : Avanni nenu chusukuntaanu le, naaku odhiley. Sare kaani Ee Birthday ki neeku em gift kaavalo cheppu.
Nisha : Em adigina isthaava akka?
Kaju : Adhente alaa antaav, you know how much i love you right, naa bangaraanivi nuvvu em kaavaalanna isthaanu, cheppu em kaavaali?
Nisha : Em adigina isthaava akka?
Kaju : Adhente alaa antaav, you know how much i love you right, naa bangaraanivi nuvvu em kaavaalanna isthaanu, cheppu em kaavaali?
Nisha : Akka....Adhi...
Kaju : Ehe cheppu
Nisha : Naaku Bava modda kaavaali
(Kaju shock aindhi)
Kaju : 😲 Em antunnave, ilaanti gift adigaaventi?
Nisha : Avunu akka, naaku okkasaari aina bava tho denginchukovaali ani undhi.
Kaju : Ehe cheppu
Nisha : Naaku Bava modda kaavaali
(Kaju shock aindhi)
Kaju : 😲 Em antunnave, ilaanti gift adigaaventi?
Nisha : Avunu akka, naaku okkasaari aina bava tho denginchukovaali ani undhi.
THE SIX VERSES OF HEALING
Abul Qasim al-Qushayri (author of Al-Risala al-Qushayriyya) said that one time his son fell really ill: "We did everything but could not find a solution, until I became completely despondent. Then I saw the Prophet ﷺ in a dream and he asked me,
Abul Qasim al-Qushayri (author of Al-Risala al-Qushayriyya) said that one time his son fell really ill: "We did everything but could not find a solution, until I became completely despondent. Then I saw the Prophet ﷺ in a dream and he asked me,
'Where are you regarding the verses of shifa?' I woke up then thought about it and found them to be six. This [ruqya] immediately worked and the boy was returned full of health." The verses are listed below;
Ruqya can be done by reciting the verses or by placing one's hand over the pain and reciting them. Or by reciting them over water then blowing on the water and drinking it or pouring the water over the pain. Or by writing them and wearing it in a pouch.
1/23
This is WILD.
A *HUGE* fuck-up in the Trump DoJ strategy means Luigi will:
* Not face the death penalty
* Technically NOT even face a formal "murder" charge AT ALL?!
All because Pam Bondi cared more about political theatrics than the law.
Let me explain:
This is WILD.
A *HUGE* fuck-up in the Trump DoJ strategy means Luigi will:
* Not face the death penalty
* Technically NOT even face a formal "murder" charge AT ALL?!
All because Pam Bondi cared more about political theatrics than the law.
Let me explain:
2/23
In the State of New York, the charge of murder is § 125.25.
It:
* Does NOT allow for a death penalty
* Does not allow life without parole
* Charges 15 - 25 years.
LWOP (life without parole) requires § 125.27, it requires one of these aggravating factors:
In the State of New York, the charge of murder is § 125.25.
It:
* Does NOT allow for a death penalty
* Does not allow life without parole
* Charges 15 - 25 years.
LWOP (life without parole) requires § 125.27, it requires one of these aggravating factors:
3/23
Last January, when Trump took power, he signed EO 14164, requiring the DoJ to pursue the death penalty where possible.
He specifically made a media push about the Luigi Mangione case.
Last January, when Trump took power, he signed EO 14164, requiring the DoJ to pursue the death penalty where possible.
He specifically made a media push about the Luigi Mangione case.
🧵 THREAD: DOJ ADMITTED WHAT HAPPENED IN THE EPSTEIN CASE — IN ITS OWN FILES
Today DOJ released new Epstein materials under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Two documents matter immediately — because they are DOJ auditing itself.
📄 EFTA01726257.pdf
📄 EFTA01726367.pdf
Both are Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) reports.
Today DOJ released new Epstein materials under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Two documents matter immediately — because they are DOJ auditing itself.
📄 EFTA01726257.pdf
📄 EFTA01726367.pdf
Both are Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) reports.
2/
📄 EFTA01726257.pdf
DOJ OPR Executive Summary (Nov 2020)
This is DOJ’s official admission of how the Epstein case was handled — and mishandled — by federal prosecutors.
📄 EFTA01726257.pdf
DOJ OPR Executive Summary (Nov 2020)
This is DOJ’s official admission of how the Epstein case was handled — and mishandled — by federal prosecutors.
3/ DOJ confirms a federal indictment already existed.
“In May 2007, the AUSA submitted… a draft 60-count indictment against Epstein.” 📄 EFTA01726257, pp. 2–3
This permanently destroys the claim that there wasn’t enough evidence.
“In May 2007, the AUSA submitted… a draft 60-count indictment against Epstein.” 📄 EFTA01726257, pp. 2–3
This permanently destroys the claim that there wasn’t enough evidence.
We’re live-threading the newly released Epstein files in real time.
Every document. Every admission. Every receipt.
We won’t stop until it all adds up.
Follow us, this is where the records get read.
Every document. Every admission. Every receipt.
We won’t stop until it all adds up.
Follow us, this is where the records get read.
Some people flagged this 2019 Jeffrey Epstein email exchange because it's about the owner of the Patriots. But see who it's WITH: Brad Karp, the chairman of Paul, Weiss. And Karp was still chair when Paul, Weiss became the first law firm to cave to Trump's demands in 2025. 1/
Brad Karp ordered Paul, Weiss to settle with Trump just six days after getting his crazy demands. The New Yorker, baffled, thought the issue might be that a Paul, Weiss partner had worked for Robert Mueller. But maybe it's all even simpler and stupider. 2/
web.archive.org/web/2025110502…
web.archive.org/web/2025110502…
Just last month Brad Karp was asked about his relationship to Epstein. He denied any relationship and said he knew Epstein only as a legal adversary. Guess it's time to call him up at Paul, Weiss and ask those questions again. (h/t @chrisgeidner) 3/
law.com/americanlawyer…
law.com/americanlawyer…
Sovereign Nodes: A Covenant-Federated Architecture for Nonviolent Civic Decentralization
Modern governance systems fail less because of bad intent than because industrial administrative machinery is being applied to human-scale life. Large centralized institutions are asked to regulate intimate behavior, resolve personal harms, and deliver justice in contexts where anonymity is high, incentives are bureaucratic, and responsibility is diffused. The result is familiar. Serious offenses are under-prosecuted, victims are exhausted by process, everyday life is over-regulated, and legitimacy erodes. These failures are structural rather than moral. When institutions are optimized for throughput, liability management, and procedural closure, they become intrusive in low-stakes domains and unreliable in high-stakes ones.
Humans did not evolve to live under constant remote administration. They evolved to coordinate, resolve disputes, and enforce norms at social scales where context is shared, reputation persists, and accountability is immediate. When governance is distant from lived reality, it loses the ability to distinguish real harm from mere nonconformity. It also loses the local feedback loops that identify predation early, contain violence before it cascades, and restore trust without endless process. A sovereign node architecture begins from this observation and builds outward without attempting to abolish the state or replace national defense. It proposes a division of labor by scale in which the primary unit of civil life is local and voluntary, while cross-community arbitration and interoperability are handled above the node, and federated constraints exist to keep local power from drifting into captivity or factional rule.
A sovereign node is a Dunbar-scale community organized around shared property or infrastructure and voluntary membership. Authority inside the node derives entirely from covenant. The node is not a nation-state, not a territorial sovereign, and not a captive community. It does not claim ultimate authority over people by virtue of geography. It claims authority over membership, access to shared space, and adjudication of rights violations among consenting members. This is covenant jurisdiction, meaning a clearly enumerated mandate grounded in consent to govern participation in the community, enforce pre-law rights, and adjudicate disputes and offenses within defined bounds.
The covenant that governs the node is intentionally minimal. It functions as a kernel rather than a constitution. It contains pre-law rights such as bodily integrity and consent, protection from violence, coercion, fraud, and theft, freedom of association and exit, basic property boundaries, and due process. It defines jurisdiction boundaries by making clear that the node may not regulate lifestyle, belief, speech, or private behavior absent demonstrable harm. It specifies process primitives such as notice, evidence disclosure, impartial adjudication, the right to an advocate, written findings, and an appeal path. It includes anti-bloat constraints designed to prevent slow expansion of authority by interpretation. Amendments require supermajority agreement across the federation and temporal cooling periods, and cannot convert the covenant into lifestyle governance. The covenant exists to define what cannot be violated, not to fill life with rules.
Continued below.
👇
Modern governance systems fail less because of bad intent than because industrial administrative machinery is being applied to human-scale life. Large centralized institutions are asked to regulate intimate behavior, resolve personal harms, and deliver justice in contexts where anonymity is high, incentives are bureaucratic, and responsibility is diffused. The result is familiar. Serious offenses are under-prosecuted, victims are exhausted by process, everyday life is over-regulated, and legitimacy erodes. These failures are structural rather than moral. When institutions are optimized for throughput, liability management, and procedural closure, they become intrusive in low-stakes domains and unreliable in high-stakes ones.
Humans did not evolve to live under constant remote administration. They evolved to coordinate, resolve disputes, and enforce norms at social scales where context is shared, reputation persists, and accountability is immediate. When governance is distant from lived reality, it loses the ability to distinguish real harm from mere nonconformity. It also loses the local feedback loops that identify predation early, contain violence before it cascades, and restore trust without endless process. A sovereign node architecture begins from this observation and builds outward without attempting to abolish the state or replace national defense. It proposes a division of labor by scale in which the primary unit of civil life is local and voluntary, while cross-community arbitration and interoperability are handled above the node, and federated constraints exist to keep local power from drifting into captivity or factional rule.
A sovereign node is a Dunbar-scale community organized around shared property or infrastructure and voluntary membership. Authority inside the node derives entirely from covenant. The node is not a nation-state, not a territorial sovereign, and not a captive community. It does not claim ultimate authority over people by virtue of geography. It claims authority over membership, access to shared space, and adjudication of rights violations among consenting members. This is covenant jurisdiction, meaning a clearly enumerated mandate grounded in consent to govern participation in the community, enforce pre-law rights, and adjudicate disputes and offenses within defined bounds.
The covenant that governs the node is intentionally minimal. It functions as a kernel rather than a constitution. It contains pre-law rights such as bodily integrity and consent, protection from violence, coercion, fraud, and theft, freedom of association and exit, basic property boundaries, and due process. It defines jurisdiction boundaries by making clear that the node may not regulate lifestyle, belief, speech, or private behavior absent demonstrable harm. It specifies process primitives such as notice, evidence disclosure, impartial adjudication, the right to an advocate, written findings, and an appeal path. It includes anti-bloat constraints designed to prevent slow expansion of authority by interpretation. Amendments require supermajority agreement across the federation and temporal cooling periods, and cannot convert the covenant into lifestyle governance. The covenant exists to define what cannot be violated, not to fill life with rules.
Continued below.
👇
1) A node becomes more than a local association when it joins a federation. Federation authority is derived from voluntary compact among nodes and is limited to enforcing covenant primitives, guaranteeing exit, maintaining recognition, and providing cross-node adjudication and review, without governing ordinary life inside nodes and without general police power over daily behavior. Recognition is the practical mechanism. In a functioning federation, recognition determines whether judgments are honored across nodes, whether contracts are enforceable across boundaries, whether reputation persists rather than resetting at the next community, whether mobility and trade are frictionless, and whether shared infrastructure and mutual aid are available. Severe penalties remain legitimate only under mandatory appellate review and process audit as a condition of continued recognition.
Federation enforcement must be legible and predictable. It is grounded in enumerated tripwires rather than discretionary politics. Denial of exit, systematic due process violations, retaliatory violence, concealment of grave offenses, refusal to submit to mandatory review, and use of enforcement to regulate lifestyle rather than prevent harm are the kinds of covenant breaches that trigger federated action. When a node violates covenant primitives, the federation can require remediation, impose heightened review conditions, quarantine the node by withdrawing recognition of its judgments and cutting off interoperability, or expel it entirely. These sanctions are nonviolent and powerful because they remove the benefits of federation membership and prevent bad nodes from free-riding on network trust.
The keystone of the entire system is exit. Exit is inviolable. Any person may leave a node at any time and withdraw consent to membership. No node may use physical restraint as a means of retention or governance. Exit means the right to depart membership and leave the shared space under normal conditions. Temporary restraint is legitimate only to stop immediate harm or prevent an imminent rights violation, and it must be time-bounded and subject to rapid adjudicative review. Exit is a rights primitive because it is the simplest and strongest anti-tyranny mechanism available to human communities. When exit is protected, abusive leadership loses leverage because members can walk away. Retention-based cult dynamics break because captivity is forbidden. Exit grounds legitimacy in consent rather than fear, and it ensures that most failures degrade into voluntary separation rather than coercive domination.
Local courts and local enforcement are the means by which rights are protected at Dunbar-scale. At that scale justice can function better than in large systems because context is known, anonymity is low, and restitution is meaningful. Local enforcement exists to protect rights and maintain boundaries inside shared space. It stops violence, separates parties, provides immediate protection for victims and witnesses, enforces court orders, and secures the conditions for fair process. It may detain a person temporarily when necessary to prevent immediate harm, under strict procedural limits and prompt review. Its mandate is harm-based and enumerated. Most disputes and moderate harms are resolved through restitution, repair, access restrictions, mediation, or temporary exclusion.
Federation enforcement must be legible and predictable. It is grounded in enumerated tripwires rather than discretionary politics. Denial of exit, systematic due process violations, retaliatory violence, concealment of grave offenses, refusal to submit to mandatory review, and use of enforcement to regulate lifestyle rather than prevent harm are the kinds of covenant breaches that trigger federated action. When a node violates covenant primitives, the federation can require remediation, impose heightened review conditions, quarantine the node by withdrawing recognition of its judgments and cutting off interoperability, or expel it entirely. These sanctions are nonviolent and powerful because they remove the benefits of federation membership and prevent bad nodes from free-riding on network trust.
The keystone of the entire system is exit. Exit is inviolable. Any person may leave a node at any time and withdraw consent to membership. No node may use physical restraint as a means of retention or governance. Exit means the right to depart membership and leave the shared space under normal conditions. Temporary restraint is legitimate only to stop immediate harm or prevent an imminent rights violation, and it must be time-bounded and subject to rapid adjudicative review. Exit is a rights primitive because it is the simplest and strongest anti-tyranny mechanism available to human communities. When exit is protected, abusive leadership loses leverage because members can walk away. Retention-based cult dynamics break because captivity is forbidden. Exit grounds legitimacy in consent rather than fear, and it ensures that most failures degrade into voluntary separation rather than coercive domination.
Local courts and local enforcement are the means by which rights are protected at Dunbar-scale. At that scale justice can function better than in large systems because context is known, anonymity is low, and restitution is meaningful. Local enforcement exists to protect rights and maintain boundaries inside shared space. It stops violence, separates parties, provides immediate protection for victims and witnesses, enforces court orders, and secures the conditions for fair process. It may detain a person temporarily when necessary to prevent immediate harm, under strict procedural limits and prompt review. Its mandate is harm-based and enumerated. Most disputes and moderate harms are resolved through restitution, repair, access restrictions, mediation, or temporary exclusion.
2) For grave harms such as rape, severe abuse, or murder, the node treats the act as a fundamental breach of the covenant and as a criminal offense within node jurisdiction. The response prioritizes immediate safety, separation, preservation of evidence, and due process adjudication under standards appropriate to the severity of the charge. Procedural burdens scale with the gravity of potential punishment, and severe penalties trigger mandatory external review through federated mechanisms to prevent local capture and factional justice. Where guilt is established, the node imposes consequences consistent with covenant law and federated constraints. These consequences are not symbolic and are not limited to exclusion alone. The scope of punishment is defined by legitimacy, proportionality, and procedural integrity, bounded by enumerated covenant authority and federated review.
A complete architecture must also prevent impunity when local governance fails, when a node becomes compromised, or when offenders attempt to evade consequences by fleeing to the gaps between communities. In ordinary operation, nodes adjudicate even grave crimes under their own covenant courts, and the federation does not replace that role. To address failure conditions rather than normal governance, the federation maintains a narrow enforcement mandate aimed specifically at grave covenant crimes. This class of offenses is enumerated and fixed at the covenant level, and any change to it requires supermajority agreement and cooling periods, ensuring the mandate cannot expand into ordinary life. When enumerated triggers are met, such as node refusal of process, expulsion from the federation, systematic corruption of adjudication, or credible evidence of severe pre-law violations, the federation may assume jurisdiction over individuals rather than communities. This mandate is bounded to a short class of severe offenses, initiated under high evidentiary thresholds, executed through formal process and independent adjudication, and subject to mandatory review. A federation member node may not offer refuge to a person under active federated process for an enumerated grave offense without risking loss of recognition and interoperability, preventing exit from becoming a predation escape hatch.
The external kinetic backstop in this architecture exists only to preserve the integrity of exit when people are being held or coerced and to support the federation’s limited enforcement mandate against grave covenant violators when local process has been subverted and the network’s integrity is at stake. Any such action must be individualized, evidence-based, procedurally constrained, appealable, and non-expansionary. It is not occupation, collective punishment, or an open-ended mandate to govern. It is a minimal rights-enforcement backstop designed to prevent captivity and prevent impunity without recreating centralized lifestyle authority.
This system is not centralized authority in disguise because its power is negative rather than positive. It tells nodes what they cannot do, not how they must live. It is reactive rather than proactive, federated rather than vertical, withdrawable rather than permanent. Governance remains local and voluntary. Constraint remains minimal and shared.
A complete architecture must also prevent impunity when local governance fails, when a node becomes compromised, or when offenders attempt to evade consequences by fleeing to the gaps between communities. In ordinary operation, nodes adjudicate even grave crimes under their own covenant courts, and the federation does not replace that role. To address failure conditions rather than normal governance, the federation maintains a narrow enforcement mandate aimed specifically at grave covenant crimes. This class of offenses is enumerated and fixed at the covenant level, and any change to it requires supermajority agreement and cooling periods, ensuring the mandate cannot expand into ordinary life. When enumerated triggers are met, such as node refusal of process, expulsion from the federation, systematic corruption of adjudication, or credible evidence of severe pre-law violations, the federation may assume jurisdiction over individuals rather than communities. This mandate is bounded to a short class of severe offenses, initiated under high evidentiary thresholds, executed through formal process and independent adjudication, and subject to mandatory review. A federation member node may not offer refuge to a person under active federated process for an enumerated grave offense without risking loss of recognition and interoperability, preventing exit from becoming a predation escape hatch.
The external kinetic backstop in this architecture exists only to preserve the integrity of exit when people are being held or coerced and to support the federation’s limited enforcement mandate against grave covenant violators when local process has been subverted and the network’s integrity is at stake. Any such action must be individualized, evidence-based, procedurally constrained, appealable, and non-expansionary. It is not occupation, collective punishment, or an open-ended mandate to govern. It is a minimal rights-enforcement backstop designed to prevent captivity and prevent impunity without recreating centralized lifestyle authority.
This system is not centralized authority in disguise because its power is negative rather than positive. It tells nodes what they cannot do, not how they must live. It is reactive rather than proactive, federated rather than vertical, withdrawable rather than permanent. Governance remains local and voluntary. Constraint remains minimal and shared.
‼️A new war may be starting in Ethiopia 🇪🇹 ‼️
Only 3 years after the ceasefire of the devastating Tigray war (600 000 dead), a new war is on the verge in northern Ethiopia
This time, Sudan🇸🇩 Erytrea🇪🇷 Somalia🇸🇴 the UAE🇦🇪 Egypt🇪🇬 and others may be implicated.
🧵THREAD🧵1/17 ⬇️
Only 3 years after the ceasefire of the devastating Tigray war (600 000 dead), a new war is on the verge in northern Ethiopia
This time, Sudan🇸🇩 Erytrea🇪🇷 Somalia🇸🇴 the UAE🇦🇪 Egypt🇪🇬 and others may be implicated.
🧵THREAD🧵1/17 ⬇️
What we are calling the "Pretoria Peace Deal" now seems closer than never to belong to the past.
Already, 5 months after the deal between Tigray and Ethiopia (november 2nd 2022), a new war was starting, this time in Amhara, Ethiopia second most populated region.
Already, 5 months after the deal between Tigray and Ethiopia (november 2nd 2022), a new war was starting, this time in Amhara, Ethiopia second most populated region.
The war in Tigray lasted 3 years. It saw the Ethiopian National Defense Forces (ENDF), the Amhara special forces and Eritrean troops occupy most of Tigray before being humiliated by a massive TPLF counter-offensive.
The war ended in status quo, on the border of the state.
The war ended in status quo, on the border of the state.
Twenty-some years ago, I had this older friend, Fay. She was mid-50s, funny, well read, threw great parties. She'd had a stretch of bad luck: a surgery, a few years of unemployment. Then she gained a bunch of weight. She lived alone with her 2 cats but desperately wanted a man.🧵
The thing was, her bar was high. He had to be over six feet tall and have a professional job, making enough money to travel Europe (and take her). Also, he had to be handsome and fit - which she didn't see as problematic.
"Can a fat woman not have preferences?" she would ask.
"Can a fat woman not have preferences?" she would ask.
During a period when I lived out of town I would sometimes stay with her when I returned to MSP. She could be very kind. But her schedule confounded me. She rose around 9, had coffee, emailed & Facebooked, then took a 2-hour nap after lunch.
NAKED. She was adamant about this...
NAKED. She was adamant about this...
🚨WHY LEMON WAS CHARGED
Can we please stop lying around here? Here's the grand jury indictment laying out why Don Lemon was charged.
At the pre-op briefing Chauntyll Louisa Allen briefed Lemon and the other conspirators about where and what they were doing.
On camera, Nekima Armstrong tells Lemon—who knows the location but is hiding it from his audience—that they're going to "disrupt business as usual" at what we later learned was Cities Church.
Lemon said he would see her there.
dailysignal.com/2026/01/30/don…
🧵1/7
Can we please stop lying around here? Here's the grand jury indictment laying out why Don Lemon was charged.
At the pre-op briefing Chauntyll Louisa Allen briefed Lemon and the other conspirators about where and what they were doing.
On camera, Nekima Armstrong tells Lemon—who knows the location but is hiding it from his audience—that they're going to "disrupt business as usual" at what we later learned was Cities Church.
Lemon said he would see her there.
dailysignal.com/2026/01/30/don…
🧵1/7
When did the disruption start? As the pastor was beginning his sermon.
The agitators "oppressed, threatened, and intimidated the Church's congregants and pastors by physically occupying most of the main aisle and rows of chairs near the front of the Church, engaging in menacing and threatening behavior (for some) chanting and yelling loudly at the pastor and congregants, and/or physically obstructing them as they attempted to exit and/or move about within the church."
🧵2/7
The agitators "oppressed, threatened, and intimidated the Church's congregants and pastors by physically occupying most of the main aisle and rows of chairs near the front of the Church, engaging in menacing and threatening behavior (for some) chanting and yelling loudly at the pastor and congregants, and/or physically obstructing them as they attempted to exit and/or move about within the church."
🧵2/7
In this indictment, we learn that it was William Kelly ("DaWoke Farmer") who shouted at a little kid, "Do you know your parents are Nazis? They're going to burn in hell."
When Don Lemon observed others leaving the service, he described people as "frightened," "scared," and "crying," which he said was understandable because the experience was "traumatic and uncomfortable," which he said was the purpose of the invasion.
Again Lemon said "the whole point of [the operation] is to disrupt."
🧵3/7
When Don Lemon observed others leaving the service, he described people as "frightened," "scared," and "crying," which he said was understandable because the experience was "traumatic and uncomfortable," which he said was the purpose of the invasion.
Again Lemon said "the whole point of [the operation] is to disrupt."
🧵3/7
THREAD:
A few days ago, I said it plainly: the United Nations is finished.
Now the Board of Peace stands ready.
This isn’t coincidence. It isn’t luck. It’s consequence.
A few days ago, I said it plainly: the United Nations is finished.
Now the Board of Peace stands ready.
This isn’t coincidence. It isn’t luck. It’s consequence.
The old system failed because it never put people first. Its infrastructure—structural, moral, institutional—was rotten at the foundation.
Bloated bureaucracy.
Endless vetoes.
Selective outrage.
Zero accountability.
Bloated bureaucracy.
Endless vetoes.
Selective outrage.
Zero accountability.
What was once sold as a promise of global peace devolved into a theater of delay, corruption, and performative concern.
Some institutions aren’t broken in ways reform can fix. They are broken in ways that require departure.
Some institutions aren’t broken in ways reform can fix. They are broken in ways that require departure.
@RepYassAnsari @AGPamBondi You Are A Phucking Sandbag From Iran That Somehow Ended Up Where You Should Not Ever Have A Seat…!
You Are One Who Doesn’t Condemn Your Kind Of People That R@pe Young Children…!
Slaughter Them…JS
You Phucks Are Here BC You Ran From Your Own Kind…!
You Are One Who Doesn’t Condemn Your Kind Of People That R@pe Young Children…!
Slaughter Them…JS
You Phucks Are Here BC You Ran From Your Own Kind…!
@RepYassAnsari @AGPamBondi Same Goes For @Ilhan …
Somali Junk Getting Rich Of American’s Hard Earned Income That Are Taxd BC Your Kind Don’t That Kind Of Privilege In Somalia !
Again Another SandBag Here That Should Never Have A Seat Anywhere In Congress !
Her Words :
“America Does What We Say”
GTFOH
Somali Junk Getting Rich Of American’s Hard Earned Income That Are Taxd BC Your Kind Don’t That Kind Of Privilege In Somalia !
Again Another SandBag Here That Should Never Have A Seat Anywhere In Congress !
Her Words :
“America Does What We Say”
GTFOH
Gedanken zur Tageslosung für Samstag, den 31.01.2026
Losungswort
HERR, du lässest mich fröhlich singen von deinen Werken, und ich rühme die Taten deiner Hände.
Psalm 92,5
Lehrtext
Der Gelähmte sprang auf, konnte stehen und gehen und
Losungswort
HERR, du lässest mich fröhlich singen von deinen Werken, und ich rühme die Taten deiner Hände.
Psalm 92,5
Lehrtext
Der Gelähmte sprang auf, konnte stehen und gehen und
ging mit ihnen in den Tempel, lief und sprang umher und lobte Gott.
Apostelgeschichte 3,8
Die Losungen der Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine
Im Vorhof
Kann man Gott eigentlich nur loben, wenn es einem gut geht? Liest man den heutigen Lehrtext, in dem von der
Apostelgeschichte 3,8
Die Losungen der Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine
Im Vorhof
Kann man Gott eigentlich nur loben, wenn es einem gut geht? Liest man den heutigen Lehrtext, in dem von der
Heilung eines Gelähmten berichtet wird, so könnte man das meinen. Und auch das Losungswort aus Psalm 92 klingt so, als hätte der Verfasser einen Grund, fröhlich von Gottes Werken zu singen.
Was aber ist, wenn man krank ist und nicht geheilt wird?
Was aber ist, wenn man krank ist und nicht geheilt wird?