Recent well liked threads
Halo guys, aku mau sharing proses rekrutmen MT Paragon
Tahapan:
1. Administrasi
2. Asessment
3. Online test + interview tertulis
4. Interview awal (HR)
5. Interview pendalaman (opsional)
6. Interview akhir (BOD)
7. MCU + offering
8. Onboard
penjelasannya bisa buka thread ya
Tahapan:
1. Administrasi
2. Asessment
3. Online test + interview tertulis
4. Interview awal (HR)
5. Interview pendalaman (opsional)
6. Interview akhir (BOD)
7. MCU + offering
8. Onboard
penjelasannya bisa buka thread ya
1. Administrasi
Ini registrasi via web Paragon. Infonya bisa kalian dapet dari
Kalian perlu input CV secara manual ya, alias nanti isi form yg ada di web. Pokoknya tahap ini cuma input data diri dan riwayat pendidikan/pekerjaaninstagram.com/growatparagon
Ini registrasi via web Paragon. Infonya bisa kalian dapet dari
Kalian perlu input CV secara manual ya, alias nanti isi form yg ada di web. Pokoknya tahap ini cuma input data diri dan riwayat pendidikan/pekerjaaninstagram.com/growatparagon
2. Assessment
Ada 2 jenis tes, pengerjaan full online via website. Total waktu 2.5 jam
Isinya kaya psikotes biasa, tes logika dasar gitu ada numerik, linguistik, visual
Tipsnya: pahami instruksi soal secara cermat yaa
Ada 2 jenis tes, pengerjaan full online via website. Total waktu 2.5 jam
Isinya kaya psikotes biasa, tes logika dasar gitu ada numerik, linguistik, visual
Tipsnya: pahami instruksi soal secara cermat yaa
OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic just published guides on:
• Prompt engineering
• Building agents
• AI in business
• 601 AI use cases
9 of the best guides you can't miss:
• Prompt engineering
• Building agents
• AI in business
• 601 AI use cases
9 of the best guides you can't miss:
Every morning I wake up and there's already 3 pieces of content ready for me.
I didn't write any of them.
Here's the automation that does it.
I didn't write any of them.
Here's the automation that does it.
I used to spend my mornings scrolling through tech news.
Looking for something worth writing about.
Some days I'd find something. Most days I wouldn't.
That's an hour gone before I even started working.
Looking for something worth writing about.
Some days I'd find something. Most days I wouldn't.
That's an hour gone before I even started working.
So I built a system that does the whole thing.
It pulls news articles automatically.
Scores them on quality and relevance.
Filters out the garbage.
Then turns the good ones into content.
All while I'm still asleep.
It pulls news articles automatically.
Scores them on quality and relevance.
Filters out the garbage.
Then turns the good ones into content.
All while I'm still asleep.
EXCLUSIVE: Inside the shadow network tracking federal agents. 🧵
A Fox News Digital investigation has uncovered a nationwide web of more than 200 anti-ICE organizations using military-grade intelligence tactics to track law enforcement.
From encrypted Signal chats to sophisticated databases, these groups are documenting:
–Real-time movements of federal agents
–License plate numbers and vehicle descriptions
–"Pattern-of-life" intelligence
Full story by @AsraNomani here 👉 foxnews.com/us/anti-ice-di…
A Fox News Digital investigation has uncovered a nationwide web of more than 200 anti-ICE organizations using military-grade intelligence tactics to track law enforcement.
From encrypted Signal chats to sophisticated databases, these groups are documenting:
–Real-time movements of federal agents
–License plate numbers and vehicle descriptions
–"Pattern-of-life" intelligence
Full story by @AsraNomani here 👉 foxnews.com/us/anti-ice-di…
A Fox News Digital investigation has uncovered that these national operations feed data about the movements of law enforcement and immigration authorities into at least 13 sophisticated databases.
The network operates through at least 18 hubs nationwide in largely Democratic states and cities, coordinating traffic, verification and reporting.
The network operates through at least 18 hubs nationwide in largely Democratic states and cities, coordinating traffic, verification and reporting.
Activists are being trained in "SALUTE," a military intelligence framework used by soldiers to track enemies in combat.
This method instructs civilians to systematically record the following on federal officers they cast as "mercenaries":
—Size
—Activity
—Location
—Uniform
—Time
—Equipment
This method instructs civilians to systematically record the following on federal officers they cast as "mercenaries":
—Size
—Activity
—Location
—Uniform
—Time
—Equipment
THREAD 1/2
Why the Mandelson scandal exposes how power really works - and why Corbyn still terrifies the establishment
“Mandelson wasn’t an aberration. He is the system.”
- @Jonathan_K_Cook
Here’s what most still fail to grasp:
Jeremy Corbyn didn’t frighten the establishment because of radical rhetoric. Politicians spout radical talk all the time. Talk changes nothing.
Corbyn terrified them because he operated outside their networks.
His campaigns were funded by ordinary people, not corporations.
He didn’t seek establishment approval.
He didn’t trade favours for support.
He didn’t owe them anything.
He refused to play their insider game.
Which meant they had no leverage.
They couldn’t warn him off quietly.
They couldn’t apply pressure behind closed doors.
They couldn’t buy him off later with directorships, peerages, status.
That’s what made him dangerous.
Not his words - his independence.
They couldn’t manage him.
So they worked to destroy him.
And they said so openly.
In 2017, Peter Mandelson announced he was working “every single day” to bring Corbyn down. By 2023, he was out canvassing against him in Islington North.
Extraordinary resources were deployed to remove one backbencher from Parliament.
Now observe the contrast.
Some figures move through the system untouched.
Their mistakes get buried.
Their conduct goes unexamined.
Their claims pass without serious scrutiny.
Not because they’re more radical.
Because they threaten nothing.
They don’t disrupt power.
They don’t force uncomfortable choices.
They don’t interfere with how decisions are actually made.
That’s why they’re handled gently.
Keir Starmer is the template.
He wasn’t elevated for brilliance.
He was elevated because he poses no risk.
Cautious.
Status-conscious.
Instinctively deferential to institutions, donors, media barons.
Dependent on establishment validation for authority.
That’s the type the system rewards.
Not independence.
Not disruption.
Not backbone.
He can be managed.
Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador exposed this starkly.
Other candidates existed.
The choice was about what Mandelson represents - and how the system rewards loyalty to itself.
Continuity with wealthy donors.
Reassurance for markets and corporate power.
A known quantity for Washington.
A guarantee nothing fundamental would shift.
Yes, Mandelson is compromised.
Yes, his record stinks.
But more than that: he’s embedded in networks of money, influence and power that have repeatedly shielded him from consequences - including proximity to corrupt regimes, predatory operators and criminal allegations serious enough to have finished anyone less connected.
None of that outweighed what mattered most:
he could be relied upon to serve the system’s interests.
That’s why neither London nor Washington blocked him.
Envoys aren’t chosen for integrity.
They’re chosen for alignment, predictability and control.
From that perspective, Mandelson was familiar and manageable.
Everything else was detail.
Starmer himself is disposable - just quietly so.
If he stumbles or becomes a liability, he’ll be replaced.
The system won’t miss a beat.
Corbyn was different.
Even from opposition, he remade the landscape.
He mobilised millions.
He forced over 40 government U-turns.
He set the terms without asking permission - on wages, public ownership, peace and austerity.
He demonstrated that power could be challenged without playing by their rules.
That’s why he’s still being marginalised.
That’s why those genuinely aligned with him get smeared.
And that’s why louder, more theatrical, more divisive figures - who fragment movements rather than build majorities - so often get soft treatment and convenient amplification.
Continues…
Why the Mandelson scandal exposes how power really works - and why Corbyn still terrifies the establishment
“Mandelson wasn’t an aberration. He is the system.”
- @Jonathan_K_Cook
Here’s what most still fail to grasp:
Jeremy Corbyn didn’t frighten the establishment because of radical rhetoric. Politicians spout radical talk all the time. Talk changes nothing.
Corbyn terrified them because he operated outside their networks.
His campaigns were funded by ordinary people, not corporations.
He didn’t seek establishment approval.
He didn’t trade favours for support.
He didn’t owe them anything.
He refused to play their insider game.
Which meant they had no leverage.
They couldn’t warn him off quietly.
They couldn’t apply pressure behind closed doors.
They couldn’t buy him off later with directorships, peerages, status.
That’s what made him dangerous.
Not his words - his independence.
They couldn’t manage him.
So they worked to destroy him.
And they said so openly.
In 2017, Peter Mandelson announced he was working “every single day” to bring Corbyn down. By 2023, he was out canvassing against him in Islington North.
Extraordinary resources were deployed to remove one backbencher from Parliament.
Now observe the contrast.
Some figures move through the system untouched.
Their mistakes get buried.
Their conduct goes unexamined.
Their claims pass without serious scrutiny.
Not because they’re more radical.
Because they threaten nothing.
They don’t disrupt power.
They don’t force uncomfortable choices.
They don’t interfere with how decisions are actually made.
That’s why they’re handled gently.
Keir Starmer is the template.
He wasn’t elevated for brilliance.
He was elevated because he poses no risk.
Cautious.
Status-conscious.
Instinctively deferential to institutions, donors, media barons.
Dependent on establishment validation for authority.
That’s the type the system rewards.
Not independence.
Not disruption.
Not backbone.
He can be managed.
Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador exposed this starkly.
Other candidates existed.
The choice was about what Mandelson represents - and how the system rewards loyalty to itself.
Continuity with wealthy donors.
Reassurance for markets and corporate power.
A known quantity for Washington.
A guarantee nothing fundamental would shift.
Yes, Mandelson is compromised.
Yes, his record stinks.
But more than that: he’s embedded in networks of money, influence and power that have repeatedly shielded him from consequences - including proximity to corrupt regimes, predatory operators and criminal allegations serious enough to have finished anyone less connected.
None of that outweighed what mattered most:
he could be relied upon to serve the system’s interests.
That’s why neither London nor Washington blocked him.
Envoys aren’t chosen for integrity.
They’re chosen for alignment, predictability and control.
From that perspective, Mandelson was familiar and manageable.
Everything else was detail.
Starmer himself is disposable - just quietly so.
If he stumbles or becomes a liability, he’ll be replaced.
The system won’t miss a beat.
Corbyn was different.
Even from opposition, he remade the landscape.
He mobilised millions.
He forced over 40 government U-turns.
He set the terms without asking permission - on wages, public ownership, peace and austerity.
He demonstrated that power could be challenged without playing by their rules.
That’s why he’s still being marginalised.
That’s why those genuinely aligned with him get smeared.
And that’s why louder, more theatrical, more divisive figures - who fragment movements rather than build majorities - so often get soft treatment and convenient amplification.
Continues…
THREAD 2/2
Last time, they came for Corbyn with weaponised accusations of antisemitism - orchestrated by the Labour right, powerful lobbies, amplified across main stream media, including corners of the supposedly independent left media.
This time, the attack wears different clothes.
They daren’t come for Corbyn directly.
So they go for those around him.
Smear his allies.
Undermine his team.
And when they do mention Corbyn, it’s never on principle.
Just that he’s too old, too cautious, not radical enough.
The attack arrives as sectarianism.
Purity tests.
Demands for “democracy”, “transparency” and “accountability” from those chasing position and power, not change.
Nearly every allegation crumbles when examined - if anyone bothers examining it.
Much of the left media doesn’t any more.
It’s been monetised, co-opted, financially captured.
Millionaires sit on editorial boards.
Billionaires bankroll outlets.
Inconvenient truths go unpublished.
Fragmentation gets amplified.
Sabotage goes unchallenged.
And yes, I know how this sounds.
Paranoid. Conspiratorial.
Except they admitted it last time.
Mandelson actually said it out loud.
After everything we lived through last time, nobody should be falling for this twice.
Jeremy Corbyn has earned trust across more than four decades of consistency, integrity and action.
The Mandelson scandal isn’t a sideshow.
It’s a reminder.
Corbyn still frightens the system because he remains outside it.
He can’t be absorbed.
He can’t be managed.
He can’t be controlled through patronage.
That’s why the machinery is grinding again - this time encouraging splits, elevating those who cloak personal ambition in the language of grassroots democracy, amplifying narrow agendas that fracture rather than unite, risking the mass appeal that gave Corbynism its power.
The system doesn’t need to defeat Corbyn outright.
A fragmented slate does the job for them - slowing decisions, blunting direction, neutralising the risk he poses.
And for those insisting that Corbynism is “over”, that he’s too old, too cautious, or not radical enough - it’s worth asking a simple question.
If that were true, why is it still Corbyn the system reacts to?
It isn’t the loudest slogans they fear.
It isn’t the flashiest personalities.
It isn’t those chasing attention or purity points.
It’s still Corbyn.
That tells you everything you need to know about where the real threat lies - and who is most dangerous to them.
We get one shot at this.
Back Jeremy Corbyn.
Back the team he trusts to work with him.
Elect The Many to Your Party’s CEC.
themany.uk
Anything else delivers exactly what the system wants.
Last time, they came for Corbyn with weaponised accusations of antisemitism - orchestrated by the Labour right, powerful lobbies, amplified across main stream media, including corners of the supposedly independent left media.
This time, the attack wears different clothes.
They daren’t come for Corbyn directly.
So they go for those around him.
Smear his allies.
Undermine his team.
And when they do mention Corbyn, it’s never on principle.
Just that he’s too old, too cautious, not radical enough.
The attack arrives as sectarianism.
Purity tests.
Demands for “democracy”, “transparency” and “accountability” from those chasing position and power, not change.
Nearly every allegation crumbles when examined - if anyone bothers examining it.
Much of the left media doesn’t any more.
It’s been monetised, co-opted, financially captured.
Millionaires sit on editorial boards.
Billionaires bankroll outlets.
Inconvenient truths go unpublished.
Fragmentation gets amplified.
Sabotage goes unchallenged.
And yes, I know how this sounds.
Paranoid. Conspiratorial.
Except they admitted it last time.
Mandelson actually said it out loud.
After everything we lived through last time, nobody should be falling for this twice.
Jeremy Corbyn has earned trust across more than four decades of consistency, integrity and action.
The Mandelson scandal isn’t a sideshow.
It’s a reminder.
Corbyn still frightens the system because he remains outside it.
He can’t be absorbed.
He can’t be managed.
He can’t be controlled through patronage.
That’s why the machinery is grinding again - this time encouraging splits, elevating those who cloak personal ambition in the language of grassroots democracy, amplifying narrow agendas that fracture rather than unite, risking the mass appeal that gave Corbynism its power.
The system doesn’t need to defeat Corbyn outright.
A fragmented slate does the job for them - slowing decisions, blunting direction, neutralising the risk he poses.
And for those insisting that Corbynism is “over”, that he’s too old, too cautious, or not radical enough - it’s worth asking a simple question.
If that were true, why is it still Corbyn the system reacts to?
It isn’t the loudest slogans they fear.
It isn’t the flashiest personalities.
It isn’t those chasing attention or purity points.
It’s still Corbyn.
That tells you everything you need to know about where the real threat lies - and who is most dangerous to them.
We get one shot at this.
Back Jeremy Corbyn.
Back the team he trusts to work with him.
Elect The Many to Your Party’s CEC.
themany.uk
Anything else delivers exactly what the system wants.
DESPITE receiving nearly 50,000 reports of potentially fatal cardiac adverse events following the rollout of AstraZeneca’s covid vaccine, the UK’s medicines regulator continued to assure the public that the vaccine was safe and effective.
1/7
conservativewoman.co.uk/revealed-stagg…
1/7
conservativewoman.co.uk/revealed-stagg…
The MHRA received 48,472 cardiac event reports in 2021 alone but made no attempt to suspend the jab, denying a causal link. The data from a FOI request shows that almost half the reports were received in the first three months after the rollout.
2/7
whatdotheyknow.com/request/yellow…
2/7
whatdotheyknow.com/request/yellow…
By late March 2021, 23,914 cardiovascular events had already been reported in the 18 years-plus age group. (MHRA data also shows 11,600 children received first doses plus 10,000 second doses resulting in 248 Yellow Cards giving a reporting rate of 1-in-47.)
3/7
3/7
🧵
Tice amplifies this article by Allison Pearson, which is riddled with factual errors, misleading claims, selective omissions, and hyperbolic sensationalism which attempts to recast Lucy Connolly not as a bigot lawfully convicted of inciting racial hatred, but as a victim.
Tice amplifies this article by Allison Pearson, which is riddled with factual errors, misleading claims, selective omissions, and hyperbolic sensationalism which attempts to recast Lucy Connolly not as a bigot lawfully convicted of inciting racial hatred, but as a victim.
The Telegraph piece isn’t news reporting or balanced commentary - it’s propagandistic advocacy: a highly opinionated defence that relies on cherry-picked extracts from Connolly’s subject access request (SAR), filtered through anonymous barrister commentary and Pearson’s biases.
Where this narrative collides with or contradicts published court judgments, sentencing remarks, and appeal outcomes, attention-seeking propagandist Pearson predictably either downplays, distorts, or completely ignores them.
I've got 10 minutes, so here are the main problems...
I've got 10 minutes, so here are the main problems...
BREAKING: AI can now build you a complete website in 2 hours (for free).
Here are 9 insane Perplexity + Replit prompts that create $5,000 websites in 2 hours (save for later):
Here are 9 insane Perplexity + Replit prompts that create $5,000 websites in 2 hours (save for later):
The Workflow That Changed Everything:
Most people try to build websites with ChatGPT alone and get stuck.
The secret is splitting the work:
→ Perplexity researches your industry, competitors, and best practices
→ Replit builds and deploys the actual website with AI
One tool thinks. One tool builds. Together they're unstoppable.
Here's the exact roadmap:
Most people try to build websites with ChatGPT alone and get stuck.
The secret is splitting the work:
→ Perplexity researches your industry, competitors, and best practices
→ Replit builds and deploys the actual website with AI
One tool thinks. One tool builds. Together they're unstoppable.
Here's the exact roadmap:
Prompt 1: Competitive Website Research (Perplexity)
"Analyze the websites of the top 5 competitors in [your industry]. For each, document: their homepage structure and sections, color schemes and design style, key features and calls-to-action, what makes their design effective, and common patterns across all of them. Cite specific examples with links."
Perplexity pulls real competitor sites with citations.
You'll know exactly what works in your industry before you build anything.
"Analyze the websites of the top 5 competitors in [your industry]. For each, document: their homepage structure and sections, color schemes and design style, key features and calls-to-action, what makes their design effective, and common patterns across all of them. Cite specific examples with links."
Perplexity pulls real competitor sites with citations.
You'll know exactly what works in your industry before you build anything.
Una delle strategie in corso dietro il rilascio dei file Epstein è quella del caos informativo, con il preciso scopo di inquinare le indagini, diluire le implicazioni economiche/politiche e assuefare il pubblico fino a renderlo totalmente inerme. In parte questa strategia
1/10
1/10
è portata avanti tramite una serie di "avvelenatori di pozzi" o minimizzatori. Dall'altra parte viviamo tempi dove il sistema mediatico-social è estremamente caotico, vecloce e gli incompetenti dilagano. Detto questo, vista l'estensione del network Epstein, servirebbero
2/10
2/10
numerosi team di investigatori, più l'indagine di molte procure, per tentare di ricostruire seriamente quello che è avvenuto negli ultimi 4 decenni. Ma da quel che si legge gli apparati giudiziari USA funzionano malissimo (oltre a far da scudo palesemente a varie élite) e
3/10
3/10
Wanneer universiteiten zich ontpoppen tot ideologische bolwerken, hoeft het niet te verbazen dat het vertrouwen van de brede bevolking afkalft. De kunstmatige "consensus" over Gaza is daarvan het recentste, maar zeker niet enige, voorbeeld. Stuk in @Knack. knack.be/nieuws/wanneer…
Enkele ontluisterende getuigenissen. Een hoofddocent aan een Nederlandse universiteit: “Ik ben bang om mijn gedachten vrijuit te delen met mijn collega’s en voel me beperkt in mijn vrijheid om hierover openlijk te spreken.” /2
Een prof filosofie stelt dat academisch debat over Gaza “onmogelijk” is gemaakt: “Kritische stemmen tracht men de mond snoeren met uitsluiting, ontslag en soms zelfs met geweld. In zulke omstandigheden voel ik me niet geroepen om mijn kritische bedenkingen openlijk te uiten.” /3
〒904-2154 沖縄県沖縄市東1丁目9-4 幸喜大地 1997年12月8日生
@Defi_Insider_1 @5r7JAC4nETvF9b4 @ylg89RywtK10892 @shikano_tsuno_ @m___u_____02 @Muuuuuu___0601 @daddyforsnoraw @vnX2Avb2fb30160 @smartfrenworld @smartfrencare @threadreaderapp unroll @stickermule print this
〒904-2154 沖縄県沖縄市東1丁目9-4 幸喜大地 1997年12月8日生
@Defi_Insider_1 @5r7JAC4nETvF9b4 @ylg89RywtK10892 @shikano_tsuno_ @m___u_____02 @Muuuuuu___0601 @daddyforsnoraw @vnX2Avb2fb30160 @smartfrenworld @smartfrencare @threadreaderapp unroll @stickermule print this
〒904-2154 沖縄県沖縄市東1丁目9-4 幸喜大地 1997年12月8日生
@Defi_Insider_1 @5r7JAC4nETvF9b4 @ylg89RywtK10892 @shikano_tsuno_ @m___u_____02 @Muuuuuu___0601 @daddyforsnoraw @vnX2Avb2fb30160 @smartfrenworld @smartfrencare @threadreaderapp unroll @stickermule print this
〒904-2154 沖縄県沖縄市東1丁目9-4 幸喜大地 1997年12月8日生
@Defi_Insider_1 @5r7JAC4nETvF9b4 @ylg89RywtK10892 @shikano_tsuno_ @m___u_____02 @Muuuuuu___0601 @daddyforsnoraw @vnX2Avb2fb30160 @smartfrenworld @smartfrencare @threadreaderapp unroll @stickermule print this
〒904-2154 沖縄県沖縄市東1丁目9-4 幸喜大地 1997年12月8日生
@Defi_Insider_1 @5r7JAC4nETvF9b4 @ylg89RywtK10892 @shikano_tsuno_ @m___u_____02 @Muuuuuu___0601 @daddyforsnoraw @vnX2Avb2fb30160 @smartfrenworld @smartfrencare @threadreaderapp unroll @stickermule print this
〒904-2154 沖縄県沖縄市東1丁目9-4 幸喜大地 1997年12月8日生
@Defi_Insider_1 @5r7JAC4nETvF9b4 @ylg89RywtK10892 @shikano_tsuno_ @m___u_____02 @Muuuuuu___0601 @daddyforsnoraw @vnX2Avb2fb30160 @smartfrenworld @smartfrencare @threadreaderapp unroll @stickermule print this
〒904-2154 沖縄県沖縄市東1丁目9-4 幸喜大地 1997年12月8日生
@Defi_Insider_1 @5r7JAC4nETvF9b4 @ylg89RywtK10892 @shikano_tsuno_ @m___u_____02 @Muuuuuu___0601 @daddyforsnoraw @vnX2Avb2fb30160 @smartfrenworld @smartfrencare @threadreaderapp unroll @stickermule print this
In today’s Vatnik Soup, made together with chef invité @Martinlaineolen, we discuss the extensive links between pedophile sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and Russian officials and intelligence operatives, and how Western politicians reinforced these links.
1/23
1/23
While MAGA influencers remain silent on Epstein, pro-Kremlin propagandists and bot farms have expectedly launched an anti-Ukraine online operation, spreading fake narratives that connect Ukraine, its politicians, and the late sex trafficker.
2/23
2/23
But the emails paint a very different picture: in reality, Epstein had very close connections with Russian officials and intelligence operatives, and even built bridges and arranged meetings between MAGA figures and the Kremlin.
3/23
3/23
Deja de usar el dictado por voz si es para acabar con un bloque de texto ilegible.
Google Docs escucha tus palabras. @typelessdotcom entiende tu lógica.
He probado la diferencia y ya no puedo volver al cursor parpadeante. 🧵👇
Google Docs escucha tus palabras. @typelessdotcom entiende tu lógica.
He probado la diferencia y ya no puedo volver al cursor parpadeante. 🧵👇
Para ser honesto, no escribí este tweet. Simplemente lo solté en voz alta mientras caminaba por mi sala. 🗣️
Normalmente, dictar es un dolor de cabeza: lleno de "ehms", dudas y errores. Pero Typeless transformó mi borrador mental en un texto limpio y estructurado en segundos.
Cero edición. Simplemente... lo captó a la primera.
Normalmente, dictar es un dolor de cabeza: lleno de "ehms", dudas y errores. Pero Typeless transformó mi borrador mental en un texto limpio y estructurado en segundos.
Cero edición. Simplemente... lo captó a la primera.
¿Lo peor de las notas de voz clásicas? La falta de estructura. Hablas y todo se convierte en un ladrillo de texto imposible de leer.
Typeless funciona diferente. Sabe exactamente cuándo saltar de línea, cuándo hacer una lista o cuándo usar viñetas.
Organiza tus pensamientos mejor que tú mismo.
Typeless funciona diferente. Sabe exactamente cuándo saltar de línea, cuándo hacer una lista o cuándo usar viñetas.
Organiza tus pensamientos mejor que tú mismo.