Recent well liked threads
A downed Ukrainian FP-2 medium-range strike UAV is equipped with both a Starlink and an anti-jamming four-element CRPA satellite navigation module.
Starlink functions over occupied Ukraine, including Crimea where many strikes of critical Russian equipment have been made,
1/
Starlink functions over occupied Ukraine, including Crimea where many strikes of critical Russian equipment have been made,
1/
Over Russian territory, the ACH-5706 commercial CRPA system from the Ukrainian company KB Center provides GPS/GLONASS navigation.
For the final strike, an LTE modem with a Russian SIM card connects with a mobile network, allowing direct control by an operator in Ukraine.
2/
For the final strike, an LTE modem with a Russian SIM card connects with a mobile network, allowing direct control by an operator in Ukraine.
2/
Controlled Reception Pattern Antennas resist jamming by adjusting reception.
Using multiple elements, directions of lowest sensitivity (nulls) are aimed toward a jammer, while maintaining gain for GPS signals.
Adaptive beamforming defeats multiple jammers for stable reception.
3/
Using multiple elements, directions of lowest sensitivity (nulls) are aimed toward a jammer, while maintaining gain for GPS signals.
Adaptive beamforming defeats multiple jammers for stable reception.
3/
Kaiser permanente is so evil. My legs are terrifyingly heavy now. Like each is made out of iron bones. I’m so afraid.
I also have fluoroquinolone-driven neuropathy-driven edema (swelling) and it is compressing the calcaneal nerve in my heel. And prevent preventing it from enervating muscle and causing muscle death in my foot.
This is progressive and if more muscle dies, I will not be able to stand without a brace or prosthesis. This is so fucking evil.
IV magnesium infusions will solve this and Kaiser has done the most evil and horrible thing. Kaiser administrators have sent out a memo prohibiting me from getting magnesium infusions that will save my muscle in my foot, preventing my lifetime irreversible debilitation.
The IV magnesium would also stop the life-threatening cardiac symptoms I have.
They are stopping a hero doctor from further prescription of this for me and another who needed more information to do it and had gotten the OK from the nephrology department. I have very healthy kidneys and cardiovascular system.
Every step I take endangers my ability to stand. Just existing without the magnesium with the intracellular depletion fluoroquinolones do endangers my ability to stand.
This is sheer evil and what reason would they have to do this except just utter evil vindictiveness for my posting here to desperately try to get the care they have owed me since October 7 when I demanded a practitioner with knowledge and expertise and scope of practice to evaluate diagnose and treat me.
They’ve left me without a diagnosis and prey for doctors treating outside the scope of practice and harming me and denying me care.
This is the most evil and horrible thing anyone has ever done to me, starting with the negligence of the doctor, the cornea surgeon, who prescribed me a Fluoroquinolone antibiotic concurrently with a glucocorticoid, no informed consent, no discussion of interaction effects and the terrible risk. And no instructions on use to minimize systemic absorption.
Medical battery.
I had to sit on the pavement of the sidewalk when they called me to the window like an In-N-Out window outside the pharmacy where they sprint prescriptions at night because they got me there too soon and I can’t afford to stand.
Kaiser is monstrous. Not getting a magnesium this weekend and immediately, means that I just have to hope I don’t lose much more muscle. But the nerve damage is cut off. I really don’t have a choice in the matter.
MONSTERS! @KPMemberService
I also have fluoroquinolone-driven neuropathy-driven edema (swelling) and it is compressing the calcaneal nerve in my heel. And prevent preventing it from enervating muscle and causing muscle death in my foot.
This is progressive and if more muscle dies, I will not be able to stand without a brace or prosthesis. This is so fucking evil.
IV magnesium infusions will solve this and Kaiser has done the most evil and horrible thing. Kaiser administrators have sent out a memo prohibiting me from getting magnesium infusions that will save my muscle in my foot, preventing my lifetime irreversible debilitation.
The IV magnesium would also stop the life-threatening cardiac symptoms I have.
They are stopping a hero doctor from further prescription of this for me and another who needed more information to do it and had gotten the OK from the nephrology department. I have very healthy kidneys and cardiovascular system.
Every step I take endangers my ability to stand. Just existing without the magnesium with the intracellular depletion fluoroquinolones do endangers my ability to stand.
This is sheer evil and what reason would they have to do this except just utter evil vindictiveness for my posting here to desperately try to get the care they have owed me since October 7 when I demanded a practitioner with knowledge and expertise and scope of practice to evaluate diagnose and treat me.
They’ve left me without a diagnosis and prey for doctors treating outside the scope of practice and harming me and denying me care.
This is the most evil and horrible thing anyone has ever done to me, starting with the negligence of the doctor, the cornea surgeon, who prescribed me a Fluoroquinolone antibiotic concurrently with a glucocorticoid, no informed consent, no discussion of interaction effects and the terrible risk. And no instructions on use to minimize systemic absorption.
Medical battery.
I had to sit on the pavement of the sidewalk when they called me to the window like an In-N-Out window outside the pharmacy where they sprint prescriptions at night because they got me there too soon and I can’t afford to stand.
Kaiser is monstrous. Not getting a magnesium this weekend and immediately, means that I just have to hope I don’t lose much more muscle. But the nerve damage is cut off. I really don’t have a choice in the matter.
MONSTERS! @KPMemberService
@threadreaderapp unroll
Researchers sent the same resume to an AI hiring tool twice. Same qualifications. Same experience. Same skills. One version was written by a real human. The other was rewritten by ChatGPT.
The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time.
A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B.
Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself.
GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won.
Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective.
It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect.
Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance.
99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time.
If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars.
Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.
The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time.
A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B.
Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself.
GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won.
Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective.
It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect.
Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance.
99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time.
If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars.
Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.
1/Same person. Same resume. Same skills.
One version written by a human. One rewritten by GPT-4o.
GPT-4o picked its own version 97.6% of the time.
Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. GPT-4-turbo hit 93%.
Every major model running on hiring platforms today prefers AI writing over real humans by more than 20 to 1.
One version written by a human. One rewritten by GPT-4o.
GPT-4o picked its own version 97.6% of the time.
Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. GPT-4-turbo hit 93%.
Every major model running on hiring platforms today prefers AI writing over real humans by more than 20 to 1.
2/The first reaction is always "the AI just prefers better writing."
The researchers tested this directly. They had real humans grade the resumes for clarity and quality. Then they ran the experiment again, controlling for actual writing quality.
The bias survived. GPT-4o still picked its own writing 81.9% of the time even when the human resume was objectively better.
Quote from the paper: each AI "consistently selected its own generated summary over the human-written alternative, even in cases where human annotators judged the human-written summary to be higher quality."
The AI is not picking better writing. It is picking writing that sounds like itself.
The researchers tested this directly. They had real humans grade the resumes for clarity and quality. Then they ran the experiment again, controlling for actual writing quality.
The bias survived. GPT-4o still picked its own writing 81.9% of the time even when the human resume was objectively better.
Quote from the paper: each AI "consistently selected its own generated summary over the human-written alternative, even in cases where human annotators judged the human-written summary to be higher quality."
The AI is not picking better writing. It is picking writing that sounds like itself.
Look at this map.
Nagpur 45°. Ahmedabad 44°. Prayagraj 43°. Delhi 42°. The entire country is a single dark red mass. This is not a heatwave. This is a country that was told its forests were fine.
And this is April. Not May. Not June. The hottest months have not even arrived yet.
The past few days have been hell. So I did what I always do when something bothers me. I went looking for answers.
What I found was a policy con job that has been running for over two decades.
But before I explain what happened, let's clear some definitions.
A garden is not a forest. An orchard is not a forest. A plantation is not a forest.
A forest is a living system. Soil, water, fungi, insects, birds, mammals, decades of accumulated complexity, specific to its land and climate. It cannot be designed. It cannot be harvested. It regulates water, cools land, shelters hundreds of species. It takes decades to become what it is.
You can plant a forest. But it will take decades to become one.
In 2001, India's forests were disappearing. The Indian state, led by the Vajpayee government, faced a choice. Protect what remained, or change what the numbers said.
It chose the numbers.
The Forest Survey of India quietly changed the definition of what a forest means. Any land with 10% tree canopy cover and more than one hectare in area was now a forest. Your mango orchard. A coconut plantation in Tamil Nadu. A tea garden in Assam. Lodhi Garden in Delhi.
All forests, on paper.
The FSI will tell you that 10% canopy cover follows international norms. The FAO also uses 10% as its threshold. But the FAO's definition comes with a crucial exclusion that India's FSI quietly dropped.
The FAO explicitly states that fruit tree plantations, oil palm plantations, olive orchards, and agroforestry systems are not forests. The World Bank says the same. India adopted the number but discarded the exclusion.
It took the cover of international legitimacy while gutting the standard that gave it meaning.
The government will also tell you this was never hidden. That it was publicly stated in every report, disclosed in Parliament. That is technically true. But a disclosure buried in a technical government document is not transparency. It is the appearance of transparency.
I did not know any of this until I went looking. Neither do most Indians whose forests, whose land, whose air this directly concerns. The con is not in what was hidden from experts. It is in what was never explained to the people it was done to.
This is not a technicality. This is the con.
It was a trick as old as power itself. If you cannot fix the problem, fix the measurement.
For ten years after 2001, Congress governed India. Two terms, two environment ministers, including Jairam Ramesh, one of the more serious ones. They saw the numbers. They knew what the numbers meant.
They did nothing.
Because the lie was convenient. India looked good in international climate negotiations. The fiction of a greening India served everyone in power, so everyone in power kept it. Congress did not create this lie. It simply chose, year after year, to live inside it.
The BJP is different.
When they returned to power in 2014, they came with something Congress never had. An absolute majority, and no coalition compulsions. They did not merely inherit the lie. They built on it. And in 2023, they legislated it.
The Forest Conservation Amendment Act of 2023 removed legal protection from "deemed forests." Forests that existed outside the official definition but were ecologically real.
Forests that Adivasi communities had lived in and depended on for generations. Forests that cooled land, held water, sheltered species. They were not on the right list. Since the amendment, forest destruction on Adivasi land has accelerated.
The people who knew these forests best, who had protected them longest, now watch them being cleared. Legally.
CONT++
Nagpur 45°. Ahmedabad 44°. Prayagraj 43°. Delhi 42°. The entire country is a single dark red mass. This is not a heatwave. This is a country that was told its forests were fine.
And this is April. Not May. Not June. The hottest months have not even arrived yet.
The past few days have been hell. So I did what I always do when something bothers me. I went looking for answers.
What I found was a policy con job that has been running for over two decades.
But before I explain what happened, let's clear some definitions.
A garden is not a forest. An orchard is not a forest. A plantation is not a forest.
A forest is a living system. Soil, water, fungi, insects, birds, mammals, decades of accumulated complexity, specific to its land and climate. It cannot be designed. It cannot be harvested. It regulates water, cools land, shelters hundreds of species. It takes decades to become what it is.
You can plant a forest. But it will take decades to become one.
In 2001, India's forests were disappearing. The Indian state, led by the Vajpayee government, faced a choice. Protect what remained, or change what the numbers said.
It chose the numbers.
The Forest Survey of India quietly changed the definition of what a forest means. Any land with 10% tree canopy cover and more than one hectare in area was now a forest. Your mango orchard. A coconut plantation in Tamil Nadu. A tea garden in Assam. Lodhi Garden in Delhi.
All forests, on paper.
The FSI will tell you that 10% canopy cover follows international norms. The FAO also uses 10% as its threshold. But the FAO's definition comes with a crucial exclusion that India's FSI quietly dropped.
The FAO explicitly states that fruit tree plantations, oil palm plantations, olive orchards, and agroforestry systems are not forests. The World Bank says the same. India adopted the number but discarded the exclusion.
It took the cover of international legitimacy while gutting the standard that gave it meaning.
The government will also tell you this was never hidden. That it was publicly stated in every report, disclosed in Parliament. That is technically true. But a disclosure buried in a technical government document is not transparency. It is the appearance of transparency.
I did not know any of this until I went looking. Neither do most Indians whose forests, whose land, whose air this directly concerns. The con is not in what was hidden from experts. It is in what was never explained to the people it was done to.
This is not a technicality. This is the con.
It was a trick as old as power itself. If you cannot fix the problem, fix the measurement.
For ten years after 2001, Congress governed India. Two terms, two environment ministers, including Jairam Ramesh, one of the more serious ones. They saw the numbers. They knew what the numbers meant.
They did nothing.
Because the lie was convenient. India looked good in international climate negotiations. The fiction of a greening India served everyone in power, so everyone in power kept it. Congress did not create this lie. It simply chose, year after year, to live inside it.
The BJP is different.
When they returned to power in 2014, they came with something Congress never had. An absolute majority, and no coalition compulsions. They did not merely inherit the lie. They built on it. And in 2023, they legislated it.
The Forest Conservation Amendment Act of 2023 removed legal protection from "deemed forests." Forests that existed outside the official definition but were ecologically real.
Forests that Adivasi communities had lived in and depended on for generations. Forests that cooled land, held water, sheltered species. They were not on the right list. Since the amendment, forest destruction on Adivasi land has accelerated.
The people who knew these forests best, who had protected them longest, now watch them being cleared. Legally.
CONT++
The 2001 change inflated the numbers. The 2023 change cleared the ground.
Together they form a complete project. First make the destruction invisible, then make it legal.
India today is one of the hottest regions on earth. Heatwaves that once struck the arid northwest now reach coastal cities, places that had never known this kind of heat. In 2024, India recorded its hottest year since 1901.
This is not a mystery. Forests cool land. They hold moisture in the soil and release it back into the air as coolness.
A living forest is not just a carbon sink. It is a cooling system, a water system, a climate system embedded in the ground beneath your feet.
When you destroy forests, land heats up. When you destroy forests and pretend you haven't, no corrective action is ever taken.
The data says everything is fine. The policy says everything is fine. Meanwhile the temperature rises.
Deforestation is not the only reason India is burning. Global warming, reckless urbanisation, failing monsoons. These are all real and all compounding. But forests were India's partial buffer against all of them. And that buffer was first faked on paper, then stripped away in law.
It is worth noting that Kerala, Karnataka, parts of the northeast, have seen genuine recovery of forest cover. But that recovery reflects the will of state governments, not central policy. It happened despite Delhi, not because of it.
There is a particular kind of governance that does not solve problems. It solves the appearance of problems. It changes the definition of drought instead of finding water. It changes the definition of poverty instead of reducing it. It changes the definition of a forest instead of saving one.
In 2001, the Forest Survey of India changed what a forest means. In 2023, the BJP changed what a forest deserves. Between these two acts lies two decades of rising heat, disappearing biodiversity, and a population told that its natural inheritance was intact while it was being steadily consumed.
A garden is not a forest. An orchard is not a forest. A plantation is not a forest.
And a government that cannot tell the difference, or worse, one that can and doesn't care, is not a government that will save you from the heat it helped create.
Together they form a complete project. First make the destruction invisible, then make it legal.
India today is one of the hottest regions on earth. Heatwaves that once struck the arid northwest now reach coastal cities, places that had never known this kind of heat. In 2024, India recorded its hottest year since 1901.
This is not a mystery. Forests cool land. They hold moisture in the soil and release it back into the air as coolness.
A living forest is not just a carbon sink. It is a cooling system, a water system, a climate system embedded in the ground beneath your feet.
When you destroy forests, land heats up. When you destroy forests and pretend you haven't, no corrective action is ever taken.
The data says everything is fine. The policy says everything is fine. Meanwhile the temperature rises.
Deforestation is not the only reason India is burning. Global warming, reckless urbanisation, failing monsoons. These are all real and all compounding. But forests were India's partial buffer against all of them. And that buffer was first faked on paper, then stripped away in law.
It is worth noting that Kerala, Karnataka, parts of the northeast, have seen genuine recovery of forest cover. But that recovery reflects the will of state governments, not central policy. It happened despite Delhi, not because of it.
There is a particular kind of governance that does not solve problems. It solves the appearance of problems. It changes the definition of drought instead of finding water. It changes the definition of poverty instead of reducing it. It changes the definition of a forest instead of saving one.
In 2001, the Forest Survey of India changed what a forest means. In 2023, the BJP changed what a forest deserves. Between these two acts lies two decades of rising heat, disappearing biodiversity, and a population told that its natural inheritance was intact while it was being steadily consumed.
A garden is not a forest. An orchard is not a forest. A plantation is not a forest.
And a government that cannot tell the difference, or worse, one that can and doesn't care, is not a government that will save you from the heat it helped create.
(1/5) Najlepszym dowodem na to, że nie radzimy sobie w Polsce z dezinformacją, jest to, że 17-latka oszukała prezydenta, redakcje największych tytułów, jurorów konkursów i miliony Polaków.
10 marca 2026 r. prezydent Karol Nawrocki odznaczył Kornelię Wieczorek,Srebrnym Krzyżem Zasługi „za wybitne osiągnięcia w dziedzinie wynalazczości, za aktywność naukową i społeczną".
Wcześniej Time umieścił ją na liście „Girls of the Year 2025".
Forbes Women wpisał ją na listę 100 najbardziej wpływowych kobiet jako najmłodszą Polkę w historii.
National Geographic napisał, że „zmienia świat nauki".
Wiadomości TVP, Gazetapl, Super Express – wszyscy powtarzali tę samą historię o cudownym dziecku polskiej neurobiologii, „współpracującej z Cambridge", „badającej choroby neurodegeneracyjne", „wszywającej myszom czipy".
10 marca 2026 r. prezydent Karol Nawrocki odznaczył Kornelię Wieczorek,Srebrnym Krzyżem Zasługi „za wybitne osiągnięcia w dziedzinie wynalazczości, za aktywność naukową i społeczną".
Wcześniej Time umieścił ją na liście „Girls of the Year 2025".
Forbes Women wpisał ją na listę 100 najbardziej wpływowych kobiet jako najmłodszą Polkę w historii.
National Geographic napisał, że „zmienia świat nauki".
Wiadomości TVP, Gazetapl, Super Express – wszyscy powtarzali tę samą historię o cudownym dziecku polskiej neurobiologii, „współpracującej z Cambridge", „badającej choroby neurodegeneracyjne", „wszywającej myszom czipy".
(2/5) Problem w tym, że gdy w kwietniu anonimowi internauci na Reddicie i Wykopie postanowili zweryfikować te „osiągnięcia", posypało się jak domek z kart:
→ Zero publikacji naukowych. Google Scholar, PubMed, DOI – nic. Żadnego wkładu autorskiego.
→ Współpraca z Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience – w oficjalnej odpowiedzi mailowej instytut zaprzeczył, by Kornelia kiedykolwiek tam pracowała.
→ „Praca w Cambridge" – nie chodzi o Uniwersytet w Cambridge, tylko o Cambridge Centre for International Research, prywatną firmę oferującą płatne programy edukacyjne dla młodzieży, której nazwa odsyła do miasta, nie uczelni.
→ Nawóz Rhizobiotic, za który dostała laury – projekt zespołowy, którego liderką była jej koleżanka Diana Serjant.
→ Aplikacja do wykrywania raka skóry – pomysłodawcą był jej kolega Leon Krupa.
→ Po publikacji analizy na Reddicie post zniknął, autor usunął konto, a w sieci pojawiły się informacje o krokach prawnych podjętych wobec krytyków.
→ Zero publikacji naukowych. Google Scholar, PubMed, DOI – nic. Żadnego wkładu autorskiego.
→ Współpraca z Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience – w oficjalnej odpowiedzi mailowej instytut zaprzeczył, by Kornelia kiedykolwiek tam pracowała.
→ „Praca w Cambridge" – nie chodzi o Uniwersytet w Cambridge, tylko o Cambridge Centre for International Research, prywatną firmę oferującą płatne programy edukacyjne dla młodzieży, której nazwa odsyła do miasta, nie uczelni.
→ Nawóz Rhizobiotic, za który dostała laury – projekt zespołowy, którego liderką była jej koleżanka Diana Serjant.
→ Aplikacja do wykrywania raka skóry – pomysłodawcą był jej kolega Leon Krupa.
→ Po publikacji analizy na Reddicie post zniknął, autor usunął konto, a w sieci pojawiły się informacje o krokach prawnych podjętych wobec krytyków.
(3/5) I tu zaczyna się właściwy temat. Bo to nie jest historia o jednej nastolatce. To historia o ekosystemie, który kompletnie zawiódł:
Dziennikarze – nikt z Time'a, Forbesa, NatGeo, TVP nie zadał pytania, którego anonimowy redditor nauczył się w 30 minut: „pokaż jedną publikację".
Instytucje przyznające nagrody – plebiscyty, rankingi, kapituły konkursów. Każdy przepisywał życiorys od poprzednika.
Kancelaria Prezydenta – Srebrny Krzyż Zasługi to odznaczenie państwowe. Ktoś podpisał wniosek bez weryfikacji.
Duże media – Onet, WP, TVN24, Gazetapl – do tej pory milczą o kontrowersjach, choć temat od dwóch tygodni żyje w internecie.
My, odbiorcy – posty o Wieczorek zbierały po 20 tys. polubień. Bo „genialna dziewczyna z Polski" to dobra historia w którą chcielibyśmy wierzyć. A dobra historia wyłącza myślenie krytyczne.
Dziennikarze – nikt z Time'a, Forbesa, NatGeo, TVP nie zadał pytania, którego anonimowy redditor nauczył się w 30 minut: „pokaż jedną publikację".
Instytucje przyznające nagrody – plebiscyty, rankingi, kapituły konkursów. Każdy przepisywał życiorys od poprzednika.
Kancelaria Prezydenta – Srebrny Krzyż Zasługi to odznaczenie państwowe. Ktoś podpisał wniosek bez weryfikacji.
Duże media – Onet, WP, TVN24, Gazetapl – do tej pory milczą o kontrowersjach, choć temat od dwóch tygodni żyje w internecie.
My, odbiorcy – posty o Wieczorek zbierały po 20 tys. polubień. Bo „genialna dziewczyna z Polski" to dobra historia w którą chcielibyśmy wierzyć. A dobra historia wyłącza myślenie krytyczne.
I landed on the helipad of Seattle Children's last night for only the 2nd time, despite having transported 50+ children there. How is this possible? Unless the child is extremely critical, we're required to land over 1 mile away at an alternate pad-and finish by ambulance. 🧵
The reason? These entitled fucks in the Laurelhurst neighborhood. With their money and influence, they bullied the hospital and city into implementing this unnecessary and hazardous additional operation. "It's just a mile, what's the big deal?"
Oh, it matters.
Oh, it matters.
1. Delay of patient care. This alternate LZ, delays hospital level care by 10-20 minutes. Moving our litter onto an ambo gurney is not usually quick and easy, especially if the patient is on multiple drips, Os and tubed. The 🚑 has traffic to contend with as well. The 🚁 doesnt.
THIS IS ACTUALLY INSANE.
Claude just got native integration inside Microsoft Word… and it’s a game-changer.
The days of blank pages and manual formatting are officially over.
Here’s everything you need to know👇
Claude just got native integration inside Microsoft Word… and it’s a game-changer.
The days of blank pages and manual formatting are officially over.
Here’s everything you need to know👇
1. How to edit and review documents in Word using Claude Opus 4.7
Step 1: Open Microsoft Word.
Step 2: Click Add-ins in the Home tab (or Insert tab)
Step 3: Search "Claude by Anthropic"
Step 4: Install it and open the sidebar
Step 5: Sign in to your account (Requires Claude Team or Enterprise plan)
Step 6: Select Opus 4.7 (latest model)
Step 7: Open your document (or cross-reference an open Excel/PowerPoint file)
Step 1: Open Microsoft Word.
Step 2: Click Add-ins in the Home tab (or Insert tab)
Step 3: Search "Claude by Anthropic"
Step 4: Install it and open the sidebar
Step 5: Sign in to your account (Requires Claude Team or Enterprise plan)
Step 6: Select Opus 4.7 (latest model)
Step 7: Open your document (or cross-reference an open Excel/PowerPoint file)
2. Sample Prompt: 👇
"I've opened my rough draft of a 15-page business proposal.
Here's what I need you to do: Review the entire document for clarity, consistency, and professional tone. Rewrite any repetitive or overly complex sections. Read through the comment threads left by my colleagues and implement their suggested changes. Make sure to preserve all my existing formatting, headers, and legal numbering. Finally, apply every single edit as a native Tracked Change so I can review, accept, or reject them one by one."
"I've opened my rough draft of a 15-page business proposal.
Here's what I need you to do: Review the entire document for clarity, consistency, and professional tone. Rewrite any repetitive or overly complex sections. Read through the comment threads left by my colleagues and implement their suggested changes. Make sure to preserve all my existing formatting, headers, and legal numbering. Finally, apply every single edit as a native Tracked Change so I can review, accept, or reject them one by one."
Robert Sapolsky is a Stanford neuroscientist who proved chronic stress is the silent killer doctors ignore.
On Chris Williamson's podcast, he revealed 10 "normal" habits you do every day that wreck your sleep, mood, and nervous system:
1) Replay conversations in your head
On Chris Williamson's podcast, he revealed 10 "normal" habits you do every day that wreck your sleep, mood, and nervous system:
1) Replay conversations in your head
Sapolsky's exact words: "ruminating about that weird thing you said to a teacher 15 years ago."
Your brain doesn't know the conversation isn't happening right now. It triggers the same cortisol surge as the original threat.
Notice it. Name it. Redirect.
Your brain doesn't know the conversation isn't happening right now. It triggers the same cortisol surge as the original threat.
Notice it. Name it. Redirect.
2) Worry about scenarios that haven't happened
Sapolsky's signature line: a zebra reacts to a lion for 30 seconds, then grazes peacefully. A human worries about an imagined lion for 30 years.
When you catch yourself: ask "is this happening right now?"
Sapolsky's signature line: a zebra reacts to a lion for 30 seconds, then grazes peacefully. A human worries about an imagined lion for 30 years.
When you catch yourself: ask "is this happening right now?"
Cole Allen is the Dunning-Kruger Assassin.
Allen is not some random nut job from the fringes of society. He’s a very articulate graduate of Caltech, which means he has a high degree of native intelligence. He’s in the education profession. He is on BlueSky. He goes to No Kings protests. He’s your basic rank-and-file Democrat.
But it’s that high native intellect that led him astray.
The Dunning-Kruger Effect is, at its simplest level, people thinking they know more that they do. People who are high achievers in one area often mistakenly believe their native abilities make them experts in all areas.
So you get a super-smart guy like Allen, he excels in one narrow area, and extrapolates that excellence into thinking he knows more than he does in other areas. He goes into Blue Sky, he goes to No Kings protests, and he is easily swayed into believing all of the insane, violent lies those sorts of intellectual cesspools foster. All of a sudden this computer science expert is a national political policy expert too, except that latter expertise is derived from insane propaganda. The man with the intellectual skill to write code is not smart enough to recognize when he himself has fallen prey to propaganda, so he KNOWS that Donald Trump is Hitler and must be stopped.
And when you KNOW that someone is Hitler, what’s the right thing to do?
That’s what is so scary at this very moment—the sheer number of ostensibly educated Democrats who KNOW so many things are “true" that are actually so very, very untrue.
In many ways, Cole Allen is just an average Democrat, and like most average Democrats, he fell prey to credentialism and Dunning-Kruger. But Cole took it to the next level; let’s pray more do not.
Allen is not some random nut job from the fringes of society. He’s a very articulate graduate of Caltech, which means he has a high degree of native intelligence. He’s in the education profession. He is on BlueSky. He goes to No Kings protests. He’s your basic rank-and-file Democrat.
But it’s that high native intellect that led him astray.
The Dunning-Kruger Effect is, at its simplest level, people thinking they know more that they do. People who are high achievers in one area often mistakenly believe their native abilities make them experts in all areas.
So you get a super-smart guy like Allen, he excels in one narrow area, and extrapolates that excellence into thinking he knows more than he does in other areas. He goes into Blue Sky, he goes to No Kings protests, and he is easily swayed into believing all of the insane, violent lies those sorts of intellectual cesspools foster. All of a sudden this computer science expert is a national political policy expert too, except that latter expertise is derived from insane propaganda. The man with the intellectual skill to write code is not smart enough to recognize when he himself has fallen prey to propaganda, so he KNOWS that Donald Trump is Hitler and must be stopped.
And when you KNOW that someone is Hitler, what’s the right thing to do?
That’s what is so scary at this very moment—the sheer number of ostensibly educated Democrats who KNOW so many things are “true" that are actually so very, very untrue.
In many ways, Cole Allen is just an average Democrat, and like most average Democrats, he fell prey to credentialism and Dunning-Kruger. But Cole took it to the next level; let’s pray more do not.
📲🔗AI can now build financial models like Goldman Sachs investment bankers (for free).
Here are 12 insane Perplexity Computer prompts that replace $200K/year IB analysts (actually from GS bankers)
(Save for later)
Here are 12 insane Perplexity Computer prompts that replace $200K/year IB analysts (actually from GS bankers)
(Save for later)
1. The Goldman Sachs DCF Valuation Model
"You are a VP-level investment banker at Goldman Sachs who builds discounted cash flow models for M&A transactions valued at $1B+ for the firm's most demanding Fortune 500 clients.
I need a complete DCF valuation model for a company built from first principles.
Build:
- Revenue projection: build revenue 5 years forward using bottoms-up drivers (units × price, users × ARPU, or segment-level)
- Cost structure modeling: COGS, SG&A, R&D, and D&A as percentages of revenue with trend assumptions
- EBITDA bridge: walk from revenue to EBITDA showing every line item's margin contribution
- Free cash flow calculation: EBITDA → taxes → capex → working capital changes → unlevered FCF
- WACC calculation: cost of equity (CAPM with beta, risk-free rate, equity risk premium) blended with after-tax cost of debt
- Terminal value: both perpetuity growth method and exit multiple method calculated and compared
- Enterprise value to equity value bridge: subtract net debt, minority interest, and preferred equity
- Implied share price: divide equity value by diluted share count including options and RSUs
- Sensitivity table: share price at 5 different WACC rates × 5 different terminal growth rates
- Football field summary: DCF range alongside comps and precedent transaction ranges on one visual
Format as a Goldman Sachs-style DCF model specification with every formula written out, assumption tables, and a valuation summary page.
The company: [ENTER COMPANY NAME OR TICKER, ITS INDUSTRY, AND ANY SPECIFIC REVENUE DRIVERS OR GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS YOU WANT MODELED]"
"You are a VP-level investment banker at Goldman Sachs who builds discounted cash flow models for M&A transactions valued at $1B+ for the firm's most demanding Fortune 500 clients.
I need a complete DCF valuation model for a company built from first principles.
Build:
- Revenue projection: build revenue 5 years forward using bottoms-up drivers (units × price, users × ARPU, or segment-level)
- Cost structure modeling: COGS, SG&A, R&D, and D&A as percentages of revenue with trend assumptions
- EBITDA bridge: walk from revenue to EBITDA showing every line item's margin contribution
- Free cash flow calculation: EBITDA → taxes → capex → working capital changes → unlevered FCF
- WACC calculation: cost of equity (CAPM with beta, risk-free rate, equity risk premium) blended with after-tax cost of debt
- Terminal value: both perpetuity growth method and exit multiple method calculated and compared
- Enterprise value to equity value bridge: subtract net debt, minority interest, and preferred equity
- Implied share price: divide equity value by diluted share count including options and RSUs
- Sensitivity table: share price at 5 different WACC rates × 5 different terminal growth rates
- Football field summary: DCF range alongside comps and precedent transaction ranges on one visual
Format as a Goldman Sachs-style DCF model specification with every formula written out, assumption tables, and a valuation summary page.
The company: [ENTER COMPANY NAME OR TICKER, ITS INDUSTRY, AND ANY SPECIFIC REVENUE DRIVERS OR GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS YOU WANT MODELED]"
2. The Morgan Stanley Comparable Companies Analysis
"You are a senior associate at Morgan Stanley's M&A advisory group who builds comparable company analyses (comps) that determine whether a stock is cheap or expensive relative to its closest peers.
I need a complete trading comps analysis with a properly selected peer group and valuation multiples.
Build:
- Peer selection: identify 8-12 truly comparable companies based on business model, size, growth, and margins
- Selection criteria justification: why each comp was included and what makes it genuinely comparable
- Trading multiples: EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E, and P/FCF for every peer
- Growth-adjusted multiples: PEG ratio and EV/EBITDA-to-growth to normalize for different growth rates
- Statistical summary: mean, median, 25th percentile, and 75th percentile for each multiple
- Outlier identification: flag and explain any peer trading at extreme premiums or discounts
- Implied valuation range: apply median and 75th percentile multiples to my company's metrics
- Premium/discount analysis: is my company trading above or below the peer median and why
- Historical multiple trend: how the sector's average multiples have moved over the last 3 years
- Valuation summary: implied enterprise value and per-share price range from the comps analysis
Format as a Morgan Stanley-style comparable companies output page with a peer multiple table, statistical summary, and implied valuation range.
The company: [ENTER TARGET COMPANY TICKER, AND IF POSSIBLE, SUGGEST 3-4 PEERS YOU THINK ARE COMPARABLE]"
"You are a senior associate at Morgan Stanley's M&A advisory group who builds comparable company analyses (comps) that determine whether a stock is cheap or expensive relative to its closest peers.
I need a complete trading comps analysis with a properly selected peer group and valuation multiples.
Build:
- Peer selection: identify 8-12 truly comparable companies based on business model, size, growth, and margins
- Selection criteria justification: why each comp was included and what makes it genuinely comparable
- Trading multiples: EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E, and P/FCF for every peer
- Growth-adjusted multiples: PEG ratio and EV/EBITDA-to-growth to normalize for different growth rates
- Statistical summary: mean, median, 25th percentile, and 75th percentile for each multiple
- Outlier identification: flag and explain any peer trading at extreme premiums or discounts
- Implied valuation range: apply median and 75th percentile multiples to my company's metrics
- Premium/discount analysis: is my company trading above or below the peer median and why
- Historical multiple trend: how the sector's average multiples have moved over the last 3 years
- Valuation summary: implied enterprise value and per-share price range from the comps analysis
Format as a Morgan Stanley-style comparable companies output page with a peer multiple table, statistical summary, and implied valuation range.
The company: [ENTER TARGET COMPANY TICKER, AND IF POSSIBLE, SUGGEST 3-4 PEERS YOU THINK ARE COMPARABLE]"
En 1981, una actriz de 30 años llegó a un set de filmación en Londres y cambió la percepción que toda una generación tenía de una mujer en una película de acción. No estaba allí para gritar, desmayarse o esperar ser rescatada. Estaba allí para darle un puñetazo a Indiana Jones y regentar un bar en el Himalaya.
Karen Allen creó a Marion Ravenwood para En busca del arca perdida, y Marion no era la compañera de nadie. Era dueña de una taberna en Nepal donde retaba a escaladores borrachos a concursos de bebida. Poseía información que podía cambiar el curso de la guerra. Cuando Indy apareció buscando respuestas, ella le dio un puñetazo por haberle roto el corazón una década antes, y luego se vio envuelta en la búsqueda del tesoro más peligrosa del siglo, en sus propios términos.
En busca del arca perdida se convirtió en la película más taquillera de 1981, recaudando casi 390 millones de dólares y dando inicio a una franquicia que definiría el cine de aventuras para generaciones. Harrison Ford se convirtió en una de las mayores estrellas del planeta. Las secuelas no se hicieron esperar. Llegaron las loncheras, los videojuegos, las atracciones de los parques temáticos.
Pero Hollywood miró a Karen Allen y no tenía ni idea de qué hacer a continuación. Marion no encajaba en los estrechos estereotipos que la industria había creado para las mujeres. Demasiado astuta. Demasiado independiente. Demasiado humana. Les encantaba el personaje. Simplemente no sabían cómo elegir a la actriz que le daba vida.
Así que Allen tomó una decisión que la mayoría de los actores nunca se atreven a tomar. Se alejó de los focos y construyó una vida que realmente significara algo para ella. Actuó en películas que le importaban, como Starman y Scrooged. Actuó en Broadway. Crió a su hijo en las tranquilas colinas de Massachusetts. Impartió clases de yoga. Vivió.
Luego, en 2003, abrió un estudio de artes textiles en Great Barrington. No como un proyecto vanidoso ni como un negocio secundario para la fama, sino como un regreso a algo que había amado desde los diecisiete años, mucho antes de que nadie supiera su nombre. Karen Allen Fiber Arts vendía prendas de punto de cachemir diseñadas a mano. Ella misma manejaba las máquinas de tejer japonesas. La construyó con sus manos, tal como lo habría hecho Marion Ravenwood.
Cuando Spielberg la llamó en 2008 para pedirle que regresara para una cuarta película de Indiana Jones, aceptó. Volvió por unos meses, interpretó a Marion por última vez y luego regresó a casa con sus lanas, sus máquinas y la vida que había elegido.
Karen Allen nos demostró que lo más valioso que se puede hacer en Hollywood es saber exactamente quién eres sin la industria.
El Instituto de Tecnología de la Moda le otorgó a Allen un doctorado honoris causa en 2009, no por interpretar a Marion Ravenwood, sino por sus genuinas contribuciones al diseño textil y a la comunidad de las artes de la fibra. Había estudiado allí de adolescente, décadas antes de que En busca del arca perdida existiera siquiera como concepto en la mente de George Lucas.
Cuando Allen regresó para Indiana Jones y el reino de la calavera de cristal en 2008, habían pasado 27 años desde la película original. Fue uno de los pocos elementos de esa película que recibió elogios unánimes de la crítica y el público. Ella aportó la misma pasión, la misma seguridad en sí misma, la misma negativa a ser un adorno para nadie.
Su estudio Karen Allen Fiber Arts funcionó durante años en Great Barrington, Massachusetts, donde ella misma diseñaba los patrones y manejaba la maquinaria. Continuó aceptando papeles ocasionales que le interesaban, apareciendo en todo tipo de producciones, desde The Sandlot hasta películas independientes recientes, siempre bajo sus propias condiciones.
Karen Allen creó a Marion Ravenwood para En busca del arca perdida, y Marion no era la compañera de nadie. Era dueña de una taberna en Nepal donde retaba a escaladores borrachos a concursos de bebida. Poseía información que podía cambiar el curso de la guerra. Cuando Indy apareció buscando respuestas, ella le dio un puñetazo por haberle roto el corazón una década antes, y luego se vio envuelta en la búsqueda del tesoro más peligrosa del siglo, en sus propios términos.
En busca del arca perdida se convirtió en la película más taquillera de 1981, recaudando casi 390 millones de dólares y dando inicio a una franquicia que definiría el cine de aventuras para generaciones. Harrison Ford se convirtió en una de las mayores estrellas del planeta. Las secuelas no se hicieron esperar. Llegaron las loncheras, los videojuegos, las atracciones de los parques temáticos.
Pero Hollywood miró a Karen Allen y no tenía ni idea de qué hacer a continuación. Marion no encajaba en los estrechos estereotipos que la industria había creado para las mujeres. Demasiado astuta. Demasiado independiente. Demasiado humana. Les encantaba el personaje. Simplemente no sabían cómo elegir a la actriz que le daba vida.
Así que Allen tomó una decisión que la mayoría de los actores nunca se atreven a tomar. Se alejó de los focos y construyó una vida que realmente significara algo para ella. Actuó en películas que le importaban, como Starman y Scrooged. Actuó en Broadway. Crió a su hijo en las tranquilas colinas de Massachusetts. Impartió clases de yoga. Vivió.
Luego, en 2003, abrió un estudio de artes textiles en Great Barrington. No como un proyecto vanidoso ni como un negocio secundario para la fama, sino como un regreso a algo que había amado desde los diecisiete años, mucho antes de que nadie supiera su nombre. Karen Allen Fiber Arts vendía prendas de punto de cachemir diseñadas a mano. Ella misma manejaba las máquinas de tejer japonesas. La construyó con sus manos, tal como lo habría hecho Marion Ravenwood.
Cuando Spielberg la llamó en 2008 para pedirle que regresara para una cuarta película de Indiana Jones, aceptó. Volvió por unos meses, interpretó a Marion por última vez y luego regresó a casa con sus lanas, sus máquinas y la vida que había elegido.
Karen Allen nos demostró que lo más valioso que se puede hacer en Hollywood es saber exactamente quién eres sin la industria.
El Instituto de Tecnología de la Moda le otorgó a Allen un doctorado honoris causa en 2009, no por interpretar a Marion Ravenwood, sino por sus genuinas contribuciones al diseño textil y a la comunidad de las artes de la fibra. Había estudiado allí de adolescente, décadas antes de que En busca del arca perdida existiera siquiera como concepto en la mente de George Lucas.
Cuando Allen regresó para Indiana Jones y el reino de la calavera de cristal en 2008, habían pasado 27 años desde la película original. Fue uno de los pocos elementos de esa película que recibió elogios unánimes de la crítica y el público. Ella aportó la misma pasión, la misma seguridad en sí misma, la misma negativa a ser un adorno para nadie.
Su estudio Karen Allen Fiber Arts funcionó durante años en Great Barrington, Massachusetts, donde ella misma diseñaba los patrones y manejaba la maquinaria. Continuó aceptando papeles ocasionales que le interesaban, apareciendo en todo tipo de producciones, desde The Sandlot hasta películas independientes recientes, siempre bajo sus propias condiciones.
Un dato interesante: Steven Spielberg ha dicho que Marion Ravenwood fue escrita intencionalmente como la igual de Indy, no como su interés amoroso. La famosa escena del concurso de bebida en Nepal fue idea de Karen Allen para mostrar la dureza de Marion sin violencia. Allen improvisó gran parte de la expresión corporal y la actitud de Marion, logrando que se sintiera auténtica y real, en lugar de un personaje escrito.
Otro detalle: Allen rechazó numerosas películas de gran presupuesto en la década de 1980 que la habrían convertido en una gran estrella, precisamente porque los papeles le parecían vacíos en comparación con Marion. Desde el principio, eligió la autenticidad por encima de la fama.
Otro detalle: Allen rechazó numerosas películas de gran presupuesto en la década de 1980 que la habrían convertido en una gran estrella, precisamente porque los papeles le parecían vacíos en comparación con Marion. Desde el principio, eligió la autenticidad por encima de la fama.
🧵 Ekadashi isn’t just “religion” — it’s the original BIOHACK (11th Day Science) 🌙⚡
Most people think Ekadashi is only about pleasing Lord Vishnu.
But what if I tell you…
Ekadashi is actually a 5000-year-old body reset system designed by our Rishis. 🚩
👇THREAD (Must Read)
Most people think Ekadashi is only about pleasing Lord Vishnu.
But what if I tell you…
Ekadashi is actually a 5000-year-old body reset system designed by our Rishis. 🚩
👇THREAD (Must Read)
1/ what is Ekadashi?
2/
🗳️🇨🇴 Invamer just published Colombia Opina #21. Read the headlines and you'd think Cepeda has this election locked 🐾
he leads first round at 44%, he wins every simulated second round, and the trendline since 2024 favors him. That's the story Caracol and BluRadio are selling tonight.
The actual data inside the 60-page report tells a very different story. Once you stop reading the cross-tabs the way the pollster wants you to read them, the picture flips.
he leads first round at 44%, he wins every simulated second round, and the trendline since 2024 favors him. That's the story Caracol and BluRadio are selling tonight.
The actual data inside the 60-page report tells a very different story. Once you stop reading the cross-tabs the way the pollster wants you to read them, the picture flips.
Time to talk methodology, because this is where Invamer's structural bias becomes visible.
The technical sheet reports a non-response rate of 72.50%!!!! LOL 😂
For every four doors the surveyors knocked, three people refused to participate. Treat that number as the single most important piece of metadata in the entire document 💩. Everything else flows from it.
At a 72.5% refusal rate, the 3,800 published respondents do not constitute a random cross-section of Colombian voters, they are a self-selected pool of people willing to invite a stranger into their home and answer political questions in person, and that pool has predictable demographic and political tilts
The voters most likely to decline an in-home interview of that length are working-age professionals with time constraints, men in their 30s and 40s, urban dwellers with privacy concerns, and voters who distrust the mainstream media outlets funding the survey. Those are exactly the segments where Paloma and Abelardo over-perform.
ISO 20252 certification doesn't fix this problem. It just documents that the bias is being introduced in compliance with the standard.
The technical sheet reports a non-response rate of 72.50%!!!! LOL 😂
For every four doors the surveyors knocked, three people refused to participate. Treat that number as the single most important piece of metadata in the entire document 💩. Everything else flows from it.
At a 72.5% refusal rate, the 3,800 published respondents do not constitute a random cross-section of Colombian voters, they are a self-selected pool of people willing to invite a stranger into their home and answer political questions in person, and that pool has predictable demographic and political tilts
The voters most likely to decline an in-home interview of that length are working-age professionals with time constraints, men in their 30s and 40s, urban dwellers with privacy concerns, and voters who distrust the mainstream media outlets funding the survey. Those are exactly the segments where Paloma and Abelardo over-perform.
ISO 20252 certification doesn't fix this problem. It just documents that the bias is being introduced in compliance with the standard.
Look at who actually responded. From the demographics section:
- Age 55 and over: 26.3% of the sample
- Strata 1 and 2 combined: 51.4%
- Homemakers, retirees, and unemployed combined: 30.0%
- Rural: 22.4%
This sample skews older, lower-strata, and more economically inactive than the actual Colombian voting-age population.
That demographic envelope is where Cepeda's vote lives. The young urban professional, the natural base for Paloma's rise and the soft anti-establishment vote that Abelardo is capturing, is structurally invisible to this methodology.
Not under-represented. Invisible. Those people are at work, at the gym, telling the surveyor they don't have time. They become the 72.5%.
- Age 55 and over: 26.3% of the sample
- Strata 1 and 2 combined: 51.4%
- Homemakers, retirees, and unemployed combined: 30.0%
- Rural: 22.4%
This sample skews older, lower-strata, and more economically inactive than the actual Colombian voting-age population.
That demographic envelope is where Cepeda's vote lives. The young urban professional, the natural base for Paloma's rise and the soft anti-establishment vote that Abelardo is capturing, is structurally invisible to this methodology.
Not under-represented. Invisible. Those people are at work, at the gym, telling the surveyor they don't have time. They become the 72.5%.
🇨🇦 𝗠𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 — 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 𝟭/𝟭𝟭
𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀 — 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱.
Eleven posts. One closed loop.
Every receipt your government hopes you never connect — pulled from public filings, parliamentary records, SEC documents, UN reports, and the Auditor General.
If the receipt doesn't exist, we don't post it.
────────────────────────────
🍁 𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 @𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆𝗙𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀
A non-partisan Canadian accountability project.
No opinions. No conspiracies. Only the public record.
This is not Conservatives vs Liberals.
It's the documented proof of a system that's been broken for decades — no matter who's in power.
────────────────────────────
🔍 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱:
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟮 — How Canada got a Prime Minister who has never won an election. Not municipal. Not provincial. Not federal. Never.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟯 — The Goldman Sachs pipeline. Same alumni, same crisis, same playbook — across five countries at once.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟰 — What it cost Canadians, in dollars. Why a $300K home costs $900K. Why your savings stopped growing.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟱 — Air Canada's CEO warned Ottawa about a fuel mandate. One week later, he was gone. Guess who profits from the fuel.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟲 — $35.8 million in taxpayer grants to entities in the PM's wife's network. Same minister announced every one.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟳 — The UN, Amnesty International, and the University of Toronto confirm it: slave labour on Canadian farms in 2026.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟴 — Brookfield's footprint in four countries. Brazil. Colombia. United States. Canada. Same company. Same man at the top.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟵 — 3,000 Canadian auto workers laid off in Brampton the same week the PM flew to Beijing.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟭𝟬 — 13 bills in 12 months that change what you can say, watch, and spend. Most Canadians have never heard of them.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟭𝟭 — What we do next. Together.
────────────────────────────
🪄 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝘁:
The PM appoints the Governor General.
The GG rubber-stamps the PM's bills into law.
The Senate is stacked by the PM.
That's not democracy.
That's 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 — and every party that wins power uses it the exact same way.
────────────────────────────
🤍 𝗙𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗶𝘅𝗲𝘀:
1. Parliamentary confirmation of every Governor General appointment
2. Prime Ministerial powers written into law — not left to "gentlemen's agreements"
3. Real conflict-of-interest rules with mandatory cooling-off periods and full divestiture
4. Every international treaty ratified by Parliament before it becomes Canadian law
5. Provinces push back hard when Ottawa overrides Section 92/92A jurisdiction
Five reforms. That's it.
Not tearing the system down — just forcing it to work the way Canadians already 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 it does.
────────────────────────────
They spent years making us angry at each other.
We're all angry now.
𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 — 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿.
────────────────────────────
🔖 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱:
◦ Bookmark this post first — so you can find it again
◦ Read straight through, or jump to the post that grabs you
◦ Each post links to a deeper deep-dive with every source
◦ Send it to one Canadian who hasn't seen it yet
────────────────────────────
🤍 Like if this hits
🔁 Repost if it stops your scroll
💬 Quote with your own words
✍️ Reply — even one word boosts the thread
📲 Send to family chats, Facebook, texts — because 75% of Canadians aren't even on here
Every engagement = one more Canadian finally holding the same receipts.
Thread continues below 👇
────────────────────────────
We give Canadians the receipts they haven't seen yet.
Stand on Guard 🇨🇦
Share this with someone who hasn't seen it yet.
#StandOnGuard #StandOnGuardCanada
𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀 — 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱.
Eleven posts. One closed loop.
Every receipt your government hopes you never connect — pulled from public filings, parliamentary records, SEC documents, UN reports, and the Auditor General.
If the receipt doesn't exist, we don't post it.
────────────────────────────
🍁 𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 @𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆𝗙𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀
A non-partisan Canadian accountability project.
No opinions. No conspiracies. Only the public record.
This is not Conservatives vs Liberals.
It's the documented proof of a system that's been broken for decades — no matter who's in power.
────────────────────────────
🔍 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱:
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟮 — How Canada got a Prime Minister who has never won an election. Not municipal. Not provincial. Not federal. Never.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟯 — The Goldman Sachs pipeline. Same alumni, same crisis, same playbook — across five countries at once.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟰 — What it cost Canadians, in dollars. Why a $300K home costs $900K. Why your savings stopped growing.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟱 — Air Canada's CEO warned Ottawa about a fuel mandate. One week later, he was gone. Guess who profits from the fuel.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟲 — $35.8 million in taxpayer grants to entities in the PM's wife's network. Same minister announced every one.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟳 — The UN, Amnesty International, and the University of Toronto confirm it: slave labour on Canadian farms in 2026.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟴 — Brookfield's footprint in four countries. Brazil. Colombia. United States. Canada. Same company. Same man at the top.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟵 — 3,000 Canadian auto workers laid off in Brampton the same week the PM flew to Beijing.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟭𝟬 — 13 bills in 12 months that change what you can say, watch, and spend. Most Canadians have never heard of them.
𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟭𝟭 — What we do next. Together.
────────────────────────────
🪄 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝘁:
The PM appoints the Governor General.
The GG rubber-stamps the PM's bills into law.
The Senate is stacked by the PM.
That's not democracy.
That's 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 — and every party that wins power uses it the exact same way.
────────────────────────────
🤍 𝗙𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗶𝘅𝗲𝘀:
1. Parliamentary confirmation of every Governor General appointment
2. Prime Ministerial powers written into law — not left to "gentlemen's agreements"
3. Real conflict-of-interest rules with mandatory cooling-off periods and full divestiture
4. Every international treaty ratified by Parliament before it becomes Canadian law
5. Provinces push back hard when Ottawa overrides Section 92/92A jurisdiction
Five reforms. That's it.
Not tearing the system down — just forcing it to work the way Canadians already 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 it does.
────────────────────────────
They spent years making us angry at each other.
We're all angry now.
𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 — 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿.
────────────────────────────
🔖 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱:
◦ Bookmark this post first — so you can find it again
◦ Read straight through, or jump to the post that grabs you
◦ Each post links to a deeper deep-dive with every source
◦ Send it to one Canadian who hasn't seen it yet
────────────────────────────
🤍 Like if this hits
🔁 Repost if it stops your scroll
💬 Quote with your own words
✍️ Reply — even one word boosts the thread
📲 Send to family chats, Facebook, texts — because 75% of Canadians aren't even on here
Every engagement = one more Canadian finally holding the same receipts.
Thread continues below 👇
────────────────────────────
We give Canadians the receipts they haven't seen yet.
Stand on Guard 🇨🇦
Share this with someone who hasn't seen it yet.
#StandOnGuard #StandOnGuardCanada
🇨🇦 MASTER THREAD — POST 2/11
The closed-loop system we just exposed in Post 1?
𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹-𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲.
This is the 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 who has 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 to any office.
Not municipal. Not provincial. Not federal. 𝗡𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿. 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲.
Here's exactly how it actually happened:
🚨 Trudeau's government was hours away from losing a confidence vote. Conservatives, NDP, and Bloc were all ready to vote him out. Polls had Conservatives up 𝟮𝟰 𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀. Game over.
So Trudeau 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗼𝗴𝘂𝗲𝗱 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 — he suspended democracy to dodge the vote. CBC reported it straight: 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘥 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦.
While the House was shut down, the Liberal leadership race ran. 𝟭𝟱𝟭,𝟴𝟵𝟵 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 voted. That's 𝟬.𝟯𝟴% 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀.
Then Trudeau — the man Parliament had already lost confidence in — advised the Governor General to appoint 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 as Prime Minister.
At the moment of appointment, Conservatives were leading Liberals 36% to 33%.
Carney then "won" an election… but 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆.
So how did the majority appear? 𝗙𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗠𝗣𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗿. No by-elections. No voter approval. d'Entremont. Ma. Jeneroux. Idlout. Gladu.
𝟳𝟰% 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀 say floor-crossers should face a by-election (Angus Reid). They never did.
The same government that couldn't survive a confidence vote one year earlier… now controls Parliament with zero real opposition.
You cannot claim a Prime Minister has the "confidence of Parliament" when Parliament was 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁.
Full documented timeline with every receipt 👇
────────────────────────────
❤️ Like if this actually shocks you
🔁 Repost if every Canadian needs to see it
💬 Quote with your reaction
✍️ Reply (even one word boosts the thread)
📲 Send to family chats, Facebook, texts — because 75% of Canadians aren't even on here
Thread continues below with more receipts 👇
🔖 Bookmark the whole master thread. Keep going.
────────────────────────────
The closed-loop system we just exposed in Post 1?
𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹-𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲.
This is the 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 who has 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 to any office.
Not municipal. Not provincial. Not federal. 𝗡𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿. 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲.
Here's exactly how it actually happened:
🚨 Trudeau's government was hours away from losing a confidence vote. Conservatives, NDP, and Bloc were all ready to vote him out. Polls had Conservatives up 𝟮𝟰 𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀. Game over.
So Trudeau 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗼𝗴𝘂𝗲𝗱 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 — he suspended democracy to dodge the vote. CBC reported it straight: 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘥 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦.
While the House was shut down, the Liberal leadership race ran. 𝟭𝟱𝟭,𝟴𝟵𝟵 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 voted. That's 𝟬.𝟯𝟴% 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀.
Then Trudeau — the man Parliament had already lost confidence in — advised the Governor General to appoint 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 as Prime Minister.
At the moment of appointment, Conservatives were leading Liberals 36% to 33%.
Carney then "won" an election… but 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆.
So how did the majority appear? 𝗙𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗠𝗣𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗿. No by-elections. No voter approval. d'Entremont. Ma. Jeneroux. Idlout. Gladu.
𝟳𝟰% 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀 say floor-crossers should face a by-election (Angus Reid). They never did.
The same government that couldn't survive a confidence vote one year earlier… now controls Parliament with zero real opposition.
You cannot claim a Prime Minister has the "confidence of Parliament" when Parliament was 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁.
Full documented timeline with every receipt 👇
────────────────────────────
❤️ Like if this actually shocks you
🔁 Repost if every Canadian needs to see it
💬 Quote with your reaction
✍️ Reply (even one word boosts the thread)
📲 Send to family chats, Facebook, texts — because 75% of Canadians aren't even on here
Thread continues below with more receipts 👇
🔖 Bookmark the whole master thread. Keep going.
────────────────────────────
🇨🇦 MASTER THREAD — POST 3/11
The closed-loop system we just exposed in Post 1?
𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝘁.
You were told Carney saved the Canadian economy. He saved the 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀.
🪄 Before he ran the Bank of Canada, Carney spent 𝟭𝟯 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 at 𝗚𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝗮𝗰𝗵𝘀. London. Tokyo. New York. Toronto. He left as Managing Director of Investment Banking.
He wasn't acting alone. During the same global crisis, Goldman alumni pulled the same move across the world — at the exact same time.
🇺🇸 𝗛𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹𝘀𝗼𝗻 — Goldman CEO → US Treasury Secretary → oversaw the $𝟳𝟬𝟬 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 TARP bank bailout.
🇪🇺 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗼 𝗗𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗵𝗶 — Goldman MD → European Central Bank → pumped €𝟭 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 in cheap loans into European banks. Slashed rates to zero. Then negative.
🇮🇹 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗼 𝗠𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶 — Goldman international advisor → Prime Minister of Italy.
🇬🇷 𝗟𝘂𝗰𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘀 — ran Greece's central bank when Goldman helped 𝘩𝘪𝘥𝘦 its debt → Prime Minister of Greece → oversaw a €𝟭𝟯𝟬 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 bailout.
🇨🇦 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 — Goldman MD → Bank of Canada → Bank of England → Brookfield → Prime Minister.
Le Monde literally called them 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘎𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘚𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘴. They weren't even hiding it.
Goldman alumni running the US Treasury, the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, the Italian government, the Greek government — all at the same time. 𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝗱𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴.
Rates to the floor. Banks bailed out. 𝗪𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘂𝗽.
In Canada specifically, Carney's Bank of Canada handed the Big 6 banks $𝟭𝟭𝟰 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 in support — $𝟯,𝟰𝟬𝟬 for every man, woman, and child in this country. Three of those banks (CIBC, BMO, Scotiabank) were so far underwater that government support 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱 their entire market value.
Same period — those banks reported $𝟮𝟳 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 in profits. Their CEOs got an average 𝟭𝟵% raise.
The government called it 𝘭𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵. Not a bailout. You decide what to call it.
The same Big 6 banks that took the bailout? RBC is now the 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗻𝗲 institutional holder of Brookfield Corp — Carney's own former company. BMO, TD, Scotiabank — all top holders. They don't just back Brookfield. They 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀. Same incentive as the PM.
This isn't conspiracy. It's a documented career pipeline. 🇨🇦
Full Goldman Government deep-dive 👇
────────────────────────────
❤️ Like if this connects dots you didn't know existed
🔁 Repost so every Canadian sees the pipeline
💬 Quote with your reaction
✍️ Reply (even one word boosts the thread)
📲 Send to family chats, Facebook, texts — because 75% of Canadians aren't even on here
Thread continues below with more receipts 👇
🔖 Bookmark the whole master thread. Keep going.
────────────────────────────
The closed-loop system we just exposed in Post 1?
𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝘁.
You were told Carney saved the Canadian economy. He saved the 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀.
🪄 Before he ran the Bank of Canada, Carney spent 𝟭𝟯 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 at 𝗚𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝗮𝗰𝗵𝘀. London. Tokyo. New York. Toronto. He left as Managing Director of Investment Banking.
He wasn't acting alone. During the same global crisis, Goldman alumni pulled the same move across the world — at the exact same time.
🇺🇸 𝗛𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹𝘀𝗼𝗻 — Goldman CEO → US Treasury Secretary → oversaw the $𝟳𝟬𝟬 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 TARP bank bailout.
🇪🇺 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗼 𝗗𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗵𝗶 — Goldman MD → European Central Bank → pumped €𝟭 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 in cheap loans into European banks. Slashed rates to zero. Then negative.
🇮🇹 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗼 𝗠𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶 — Goldman international advisor → Prime Minister of Italy.
🇬🇷 𝗟𝘂𝗰𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘀 — ran Greece's central bank when Goldman helped 𝘩𝘪𝘥𝘦 its debt → Prime Minister of Greece → oversaw a €𝟭𝟯𝟬 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 bailout.
🇨🇦 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 — Goldman MD → Bank of Canada → Bank of England → Brookfield → Prime Minister.
Le Monde literally called them 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘎𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘚𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘴. They weren't even hiding it.
Goldman alumni running the US Treasury, the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, the Italian government, the Greek government — all at the same time. 𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝗱𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴.
Rates to the floor. Banks bailed out. 𝗪𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘂𝗽.
In Canada specifically, Carney's Bank of Canada handed the Big 6 banks $𝟭𝟭𝟰 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 in support — $𝟯,𝟰𝟬𝟬 for every man, woman, and child in this country. Three of those banks (CIBC, BMO, Scotiabank) were so far underwater that government support 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱 their entire market value.
Same period — those banks reported $𝟮𝟳 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 in profits. Their CEOs got an average 𝟭𝟵% raise.
The government called it 𝘭𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵. Not a bailout. You decide what to call it.
The same Big 6 banks that took the bailout? RBC is now the 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗻𝗲 institutional holder of Brookfield Corp — Carney's own former company. BMO, TD, Scotiabank — all top holders. They don't just back Brookfield. They 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀. Same incentive as the PM.
This isn't conspiracy. It's a documented career pipeline. 🇨🇦
Full Goldman Government deep-dive 👇
────────────────────────────
❤️ Like if this connects dots you didn't know existed
🔁 Repost so every Canadian sees the pipeline
💬 Quote with your reaction
✍️ Reply (even one word boosts the thread)
📲 Send to family chats, Facebook, texts — because 75% of Canadians aren't even on here
Thread continues below with more receipts 👇
🔖 Bookmark the whole master thread. Keep going.
────────────────────────────
Bayer is a German chemical company. They make Roundup. Roundup gives people non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Bayer has paid over $11 billion in cancer lawsuits.
This week, Congress is going to vote on a bill that gives Bayer permanent immunity from being sued by Americans who get cancer from their product.
Here is how it happened. 🧵
This week, Congress is going to vote on a bill that gives Bayer permanent immunity from being sued by Americans who get cancer from their product.
Here is how it happened. 🧵
In February, President Trump signed an executive order. The order declared that glyphosate — the active ingredient in Roundup — is critical to national defense. He invoked the Defense Production Act of 1950. The same law used in wartime to make companies build tanks and bombers.
The executive order does one thing that matters. It shields the manufacturer from being sued.
▶️ AfD-Politiker Beckamp sponserte Auftritt von Martin Sellner in Düsseldorf
Ein Auftritt des österreichischen Rechtsextremisten Martin Sellner (37) in einer Sonderfahrt einer Düsseldorfer Oldtimer-Straßenbahn sorgte vor zwei Wochen für Entsetzen. share.google/oQjeMf2Kx7fLHO…
Ein Auftritt des österreichischen Rechtsextremisten Martin Sellner (37) in einer Sonderfahrt einer Düsseldorfer Oldtimer-Straßenbahn sorgte vor zwei Wochen für Entsetzen. share.google/oQjeMf2Kx7fLHO…
Die Chefin der Rheinbahn AG war nach eigener Aussage „geschockt“, als sie ein Video der Sellner-Fahrt sah. Jetzt kommt heraus:
▶️ Die Veranstaltung wurde von der Firma eines AfD-Politikers gesponsert.
▶️ Die Veranstaltung wurde von der Firma eines AfD-Politikers gesponsert.
Das Unternehmen mit Sitz in Windeck (NRW) betreibt einen Online-Shop und verkauft Merchandising-Produkte von
▶️ AfD-nahen und rechtsextremen Influencern, darunter ein rechtskräftig wegen Volksverhetzung verurteilter YouTuber, der im Gefängnis saß.
▶️ AfD-nahen und rechtsextremen Influencern, darunter ein rechtskräftig wegen Volksverhetzung verurteilter YouTuber, der im Gefängnis saß.