Thread by @YossiGestetner

The less those work, the more they double down on it.

The UK is “offering” a second booster for people who are immunocompromised and is cutting the time between shot(s) and booster from 6 months to 3.

Obviously, if the shots work as planned, they wouldn’t need these changes.

Fauci said he does not expect the vaccines to eliminate COVID—19 as done to MMR. Of course not. Those shots are not like MMR which makes compulsory vaccination against C19 idiotic because by the time you get to the second half of the population, the first needs their booster.

At any rate, it’s a waste of time to bark here or on cute little “conservative” websites about all this if and as long national health/political reporters don’t challenge Fauci, @CDCDirector and Pharma CEOs with some basic stuff. They never do which is why nothing changes.

Moderna’s CEO said yesterday that two boosters may be needed against #Omicorn and Pfizer’s CEO said that annual shots may be needed against COVID-19. Whichever way you cut it, these vaccines hold for less time than advertised and for less variants too. Hence the ongoing shots.

You KNOW that most who rushed to get a C19 vaccine did so with the illusion that it will set them free; not that there will need to be a booster after 6 months and now a second booster (as seen in the UK for immunocompromised which usually gets extended to everyone).

The vaccine fanatics in government/policy circles and C19 vaccine salesmen on TV like Scott Gottlieb (Pfizer board member), don’t want to hear about better lifestyle choice; early care for COVID—19 or expended hosital capacity. It’s jab jab jab, and if the jabs work less than

thought then jab more. Let me remind you AGAIN that lockdowns were sold to slow - NOT stop - the spread so that hospitals don’t get overwhelmed from a surge. The “flatten the curve” chart of March 2020 showed spreading out the hospitalizations over time; not stoping COVID.

We are almost two years into COVID-19, how many hospital beds and staff were added and why are some people still pushing lockdowns whose function was initially sold as a tool against hospital capacity; not to eliminate COVID-19 as an issue? Wasting my tome here. One anchor on

CNN or CNBC echoing this rant every few weeks on air would do more than 10,000 tweets from me or any other non-Lib. BTW @drsanjaygupta, Fauci told you two months ago that you are right that he needs to look into natural immunity. Did he circle back with running numbers in it?

No @drsanjaygupta, the CDC study from 6 weeks ago about infections among the jabbed versus reinfections among the previously infected does not count due to multiple issues that I tweeted about a dozen of times. Where are the raw running numbers on it? Many states and NYC release

data on deaths among vaccinated and unvaccinated but refuse to show a column of COVID deaths among those who were previously infected. This is so because it will cool off the drive for the vaccines that work less and less which is why more/more boosters are needed.

When vaccine fanatics are presented with logic and facts, they retort with yells of “anti-vaxx” because as malfunctioning zombies that can’t debate on merit. However, in our household we go along with all mandated jabs in NY which are TWENTY THREE jabs for kids before age of 12!

I know you are shocked because you didn’t notice that in NY, your children get jabbed 23 times from birth to pre-age 12 if you follow all mandates as we do. This is why I don’t rollover to “anti-vaxx” screams from vaccine fanatics. Debate on merit or pound sand.

P.S. The widely reported CDC study that prevously infected people are 5 times more likely to be hospitalized with reinfections than the vaxxed, was 1.6% among the jabbed and 8.4% among the previously infected. The latter number is 5.25 worse than the first but on the flip side it

meant that 91.6% previously infected did not need hospital which is quite close to the 98.4% among the jabbed. But headlining this doesn’t sell jabs as good as looking at the inverse number of 1.6% infections vs 8.4% and selling it as 5 X worse despite them being so close.

AGAIN:

The CDC did not headline that 91.6% previously infected did fine vs 98.4% among the jabbed.

The CDC did also not headline that the infections were 1.6% among the jabbed vs only 8.4% among the previously infected.

CDC meme was on how many times worse 8.4% is than 1.6%.

It’s blatant vaccine disinfo and misrepresentation of a commercial product.

Worse: That CDC chart 🔺was from Jan-June data. Gap between jabbed vs infected was much closer during Delta and closer than 5X for the study overall. They chose the best part and hyped it as shown above.

The above numbers are basics and available for anyone to see, but not one person on CNN or CNBC grilled the @CDCDirector about the joke findings and about the misleading way with which it was sold. Most @FoxNews anchors/hosts probably don’t know of it either! cc @BretBaier

There is more: The above CDC study shows infections in only 1.6% of vaccinated people. If this were reflective of how vaccines hold, they would not push boosters; sure not after 3 (UK) months or 6 months and second boosters. That 1.6% is maybe of very newly vaccinated people.

The UK is already giving second boosters for some; UK cutting booster time from 6 to 3 months; Moderna speaking about a possible second booster for everyone (“due to #Omicorn” and not because immunity wanes regardless). Basically 3-4 shots in a year and you are still not done!

According to science denying vaccine fanatics, natural immunity is totally irrelevant as a factor; early care is mocked despite its upsides; more and more jabs are needed, and needed more frequently (see above tweets).

So in their mind/plans, what’s the end game to COVID-19?

🔥 A study funded by Moderna tracked 705,756 people; half who took both Moderna shots; other group unvaccinated.

“During follow-up, COVID-19 infections occurred among 289 vaccinated patients and 1,144 unvaccinated patients.”

99.67% unvaccinated and 99.91% vaxxed had no COVID.

Now imagine Moderna headlines that their study of 352K unvaccinated people found 99.6% had no COVID. Their stock price would crash so instead the study authors focus on the percent gap between the two categories among those who did have COVID. Note the red section 🔻

There is more: Vaxx Pass policy assume vaccinated people are fully protected against COVID—19 infection and severe outcome which is not true.

For example, 25% COVID deaths in Michigan in recent months are among the vaccinated. I oppose these draconian restrictions no matter the

metric, but if health policy makers were not science-denying vaccine fanatics they would set travel privileges based on immunity levels and infection status; not mere vaccination. Indeed, a triple vaxxed Israeli doctor traveled to London and was one of those who brought the

#OmicronVarient into Israel. More, the first #Omicron case was ID’d in the US and… the person was double vaccinated! Mass vaccine disinformation led millions to think that a vaxx means no COVID so they take no mitigation/early care measures; thus contributing to the spread.

BTW attached is the part which claims that Moderna funded that study. Don’t know who KP is or if that website is just doing a poor job at pro-vacx disinfo propaganda. It’s out there so I brought it to your attention (because it uses the same spin as used by the CDC study).

Scary about all of the above is, that the lies-by-omission, spin and suppression of facts are done to COVID-19 whose data is easy to read.

Imagine the lids that is pulled regarding global warming whose data and “models” most people don’t understand and we are left to “trust” it.

New: “Minnesota Man Who Traveled to NYC for 2-Day Javits Convention Is 2nd US Omicron Case.”

He was vaccinated and most likely was vaxx checked at the door.

I warned months ago that the vaxx pass policy is a mess because it will cause spread.

Germany and many highly vaxxed places have now record high COVID cases.

Setting freedoms based on vax status ignores that vaccinated people can get infected and spread it.

What does Germany do in response to record high cases? They impose more restrictions on C19 unvaccinated.

I read this morning (left attachment) that Israel officials will discuss a second booster “with the spread of the new, worrying Omicron variant.”

Small issue.

A second booster was already discussed 3 months ago in early September; well before Omicron (right attachment).

Take a look at data from Vermont.

In its data from March 2020 through Aug 11th of this year, the state has had 25,883 Coronavirus cases.

In its data through Dec 1st, the state has had already 51,113 cases.

4 months added a similar number of cases as SEVENTEEN months? Wow!

As of August 11th data, Vermont had only 630 breakthrough cases (COVID among the vaccinated). In its latest data they have 9,227 breakthroughs.

This is a jump of 8,597 such cases in a time that the state added 25,230 COVID cases.

So… 34% of new cases are among the vaccinated.

This out of Vermont is 🚨 🚨 🚨

The state shows 164 new Coronavirus deaths August through November. In those 4 months, breakthrough deaths rose from 8 to 95. That’s 87 such deaths.

Basically, 87 of VT’s 164 recent COVID deaths are among the vaxxed!

That’s 53%

All here 🔻🔻

Let’s summarize data from highly vaccinated Vermont (screen shots from state’s own data is 🔺):

- Last 4 months added similar amount of cases as the 17 months before.

- 34% of those added cases are among the vaccinated.

- 53% COVID deaths the last 4 months were vaccinated.

The above, recent data from Vermont should lead to conversations of tackling C19 with steps beyond just jabs such as a national focus on lifestyle and early C19 care; especially that Fauci said recently he does not think Coronavirus will be eliminated like Polio, Measles. Video:

The previous 2 FDA Commissioners (not including Acting ones) went to work for the industry that they regulated a mere few months before getting their new jobs.

As humans, current FDA/CDC staff want to keep their options open which helps explain their vaccines fanaticism.

On a similar note, pharma spends nice on ads especially on news entities with influence on policy makers.

You think this has no impact on news coverage? Ha.

This thread has plenty of clear-cut items that anyone doing basic journalism would report on, but they don’t.

This dynamic (senior FDA people getting hired by vaccine producers months after leaving their job and many media outlets earn big from those producers), helps explain why basic data and logic gets ignored and why the more the C19 jab policies come up short the more it’s pushed.

If the vaccine series were to protect everyone who takes it and held long enough to protect everyone from C19 before a booster were needed, maybe you can start to argue if authoritarian steps around getting the vaccine is ok or not. You can try to argue precedent of other

vaccines such as Polio, MMR. But I don’t recall me needing a new MMR shot every 6 months (you get one at 15 months; the next between age 4-6), or that a new MMR variant means that the first shots are potentially worth much less than thought so we need even more shots.