@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis You clearly DON'T know what I said
Climate "Scientists" are running a scam
Scientists who know what they are talking about can debunk them
But most daren't as their careers depend on government Carbon Tax funded MMGW & linked "Research" Grants
But if the scammers are...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis But if the scammers are running a scam can a Glaciologist uncover hidden emails admitting it
Can an Atmospheric Physicist establish collusion
A computer scientist isn't an expert on MMGW
But they are experts on what computers can
And CAN'T do
An Engineer isn't either
But...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis An Engineer isn't an expert on MMGW either
But they do know about eg hydraulics & fluid dynamics
In the real world
And they know you still can't accurately model flow in a canal never mind a river or estuary
To model the climate which is average weather you have to model...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis To model the climate which is average weather you have to model not just fluid flow in rivers lakes estuaries coastal seas oceans..
And the atmosphere
But temperature & eg salt flow within the water
And temperature within the water and between it & the atmosphere
And gas...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis And gas exchange between water & air
Airflow around the world
Etc Etc
On a very fine scale (100m cubes?) as chaotic systems
The MMGW models work on kilometre (? or bigger) cells ignore water vapour clouds etc etc
As the most powerful computers can't begin to cope
And...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis And the MMGW "experts" haven't a clue how it all works anyway
Engineers & real scientists know the MMGW "Scientists" haven't a clue
Once saw a MMGW documentary where they showed two screens showing weather patterns
Once showed actual weather data as it came info the area...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis The other screen showed the weather as calculated by the climate model
They exactly matched
And had been exactly matching for 30 years
They tried to give impression they'd set the model running 30 years ago & it had bee correctly "forecasting" the weather for 30 years
If....
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis If that was true we'd now be getting spot on 50 or 100 year weather forecasts never mind 30 year ones
What was actually happening was the model could take the data coming in & forecast ONE SECOND ahead before breaking down!!!
If they were telling the truth wouldn't need to lie!
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis And if they could "prove" MMGW by doing an experiment "proving" CO2 was a Greenhouse Gas in a yard long horizontal tube a "greenhouse" model or even a gallon container in your garage you could model the weather in them too
YOU CAN'T!
What they're doing is trying to model...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis What they're doing is trying to model historic climate (which is average weather) trends & project them forward
That's like trying to model someone's weekly travel Mon-Fri & project to the WE
Or even daily travel for months then try to project travel during holiday
CAN'T WORK!
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis They can look at data for 40 years travel then try to predict travel in retirement
YOU CAN'T!
They don't even know how the weather works
Never mind what it's going to do
So they can't model it
They assume CO2 drives the climate
Assume how it did...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis They assume CO2 drives the climate
Assume how it did it in past & how it will in future
Try to write a program to model that
Run it
It shows increasing CO2 increases temperature
So they claim they've "proved" CO2 drives temperate
Done nothing of sort
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis Which is why their projections are ALWAYS wrong
So wrong they even have to go back & "correct" historic data (what they have of it) to make their "models" "work" "better"
Do the 1970s projections get 2020s temperatures right?
Do the 1980s ones? 1990s?!
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis Do even the 2000s models predict the 2020s temperatures
Show me OLD PAPERS SHOWING OLD PROJECTIONS
THAT CORRECTLY SHOW TODAY'S TEMPERATURES
The ClimateGate emails PROVED the WORLD'S "top" Climate "scientists" ADMITTED" Warming had stalled
And their top "modellers" admitted...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis ClimateGate emails also PROVED WORLD'S "top" Climate "Modellers" ADMITTED" top "models" weren't modelling actual temperatures
AND DIDN'T KNOW WHY
Lawyer engineer whistleblower or hacker pointing this out NOTHING to do with "false expert fallacy clown"🤦♂️
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis Did you catch the FOUR UK TV/Radio "ClimateGate" "documentaries"/"docudramas" before COP26
All basically said Climate "scientists" truthful heroes saving planet & Special Branch had to investigate evil criminal hacker who tried to libel them with false..
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis All "documentaries" said hacker libelled "scientists" with false accusation of con-trick
Were thousands of emails & lines of annotated code showing collusion conspiracy to get pal-review block dissent get rid of opponents destroy data if threatened...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis ONE email was about clever "trick" to splice tree-ring & satellite data
Climate "scientists" claimed Climategate claimed was con-trick but "scientists" said actually meant clever scientific trick
But actually IS a con
BEST tree-ring data from freshly felled or cored trees...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis BEST tree-ring data from freshly felled/cored trees
So why not use latest dendrochronology / dendroclimatology
Why replace BEST tree-ring data for Hockey Stick graph
And use WORST for rest of graph
ONLY explanation is that BEST date gave "wrong" answer
So MUST be CON trick!
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis The pre COP26 "documentaries" & Climate "scientists" also claim many investigations by peers confirmed Climate "scientists right & is MMGW
Actually only one by mate of subject totally exonerated him & claimed was right
Others (now 9?) basically all said
On evidence looked at..
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis Others (now 9?) basically all said
On evidence looked at-ie didn't look at all could
Didn't find any DEFINITE proof DELIBERATELY tried to con anyone
Most said Climate "Science" really very very hard statistics
And climate "Scientists" not very good at v. v. hard statistics...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis Many of investigations said Climate "scientists" simply made basic undergraduate errors in their statistics
Some even that made schoolboy howlers
And one or two went so far as to recommend if they wanted to continue their research should get a proper statistician who had a clue
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis MMGW Climate "Scientists" & supporters also keep claiming ALL the data is already available in the public domain
Despite insisting they couldn't release it as wasn't theirs
And was commercially sensitive
Michael Mann sued a guy who called him a fraud
The guy counter sued &...
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis Michael Mann sued a guy who called him a fraud
The guy counter sued & demanded to see his data
Mann stalled for EIGHT YEARS
When judge finally tried to force him he dropped the suit!
Why if everything is out in open & transparent?!
More #ClimateGate BS!
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis Mor on MMGW Climate "Science"
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis Some quotes from IPCC reports
That strangely don't make it into the media!😱🤦♂️
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis MMGW Climate & "Consensus""Science" isn't even believed by Climate "Scientists"
Unsurprisingly!😱🤦♂️😂🤣🤣
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis #MMGW #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #Climatemodelling #Scam #ClimatePrediction #PredictingFuture #Astrology
@TyotoRiffle @DrLoupis #MMGW #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateModelling #Scam #ClimatePrediction #PredictingFuture #Astrology
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.