4/Once you can propose and ratify Constitutional amendments at will, you can *theoretically* do basically anything.
Legalize slavery.
Strip women of the vote.
Anything.
5/Would Trump legalize slavery or strip women of the vote? I highly doubt it. But here is what I do think he - or a similarly minded successor - would do:
6/Now, what does it mean to end birthright citizenship?
It might simply mean that no new birthright citizenships can be handed out.
OR, Trump might try to make it RETROACTIVE.
7/Ending birthright citizenship retroactively would mean that anyone who was born to non-citizen parents on U.S. soil - whether those parents were here legally OR illegally - would be stripped of their U.S. citizenship.
8/That would mean that a large percentage of the Hispanic, Asian, and Middle Eastern citizens of the United States would suddenly become non-citizens - and without visas or citizenship, they'd all be liable for immediate deportation by ICE.
9/Obviously, this would be a large-scale program of ethnic cleansing (though Trump defenders would insist that it wasn't ethnically based).
It would have the effect of restoring America to something approximating the demographics of the 1950s.
10/Now, do I think it's LIKELY that the GOP will do this?
Of course not.
Do I think it's likely Stephen Miller has thought of this idea?
I think it's certain he has. And several steps beyond, too.
11/Of course, this policy might cause a civil war, but that would merely give Trump an excuse to do far worse stuff.
Large-scale civil war might cause those laughable "Nazi" scenarios to become not-so-laughable.
See the Spanish Civil War for a historical analogy.
12/Anyway, remember, this is a worst-case scenario.
It is not a prediction.
The purpose of a worst-case scenario is to realize the amount that might conceivably be at stake in our current political era.
It's a lot.
(end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
FWIW, I think "culture war concessions" works only at the level of the candidate, not at the level of policy -- when it works at all. Nothing could ever have convinced America that Obama was socially conservative, even though he was and is.
Biden is making all kinds of compromises and concessions on immigration, and no one is recognizing it or caring (except for progressives who notice and get mad).
You saw the same exact pattern with Jimmy Carter. By the end of his presidency he had tacked so far to the Right that progressives primaried him with Ted Kennedy and almost won. But Republicans kept on thinking he was leftism incarnate.
3/Biden got off to a good start, passing a Covid relief bill that included a pioneering Child Tax Credit similar to Canada's successful program, passing an infrastructure bill that repaired roads and did some other good stuff, and passing a semiconductor industry support bill.
1. NYC building styles range from "fairly ugly" to "very ugly", but Americans love them because NYC is our only dense city, so Americans associate those building styles with urban density
2. Star Trek DS9 was neocon. It glorified a morally inspired leader engaging in preemptive war with an enemy who would never see reason and only respected force.
All the usual suspects are jumping all over Lisa Cook's paper from 2014 and pointing out small errors. But Ken Rogoff served on the Fed Board of Governors and I bet you nobody combed over his papers for errors before he was confirmed! And I bet you he made a few.
Econ academia has very little quality control for data errors. When people do comb over papers for mistakes, they generally find them.
We need a Xillennial-Zillennial alliance, of people who are just a little too old for Millennial bullshit and people who just are a little too young for Millennial bullshit.
Anyone who was born 1980-1986 or 1997-2003 is in the Xillennial-Zillennial alliance. We must unite against the people whose brains were broken by coming of age between the Great Recession and Trump.
The people in that middle decade shall be known as the Harry Potter Generation