Stephen Fisher Profile picture
Jul 22, 2018 16 tweets 8 min read Read on X
The #selfie stick: a military history thread.

Selfie sticks have, of course, been around as long as the wheel. But despite this, their use in the military can only be traced back to the 17th century.
Prince William of Orange bought the fad to England from Europe when he landed at Torbay in 1688. Not one to show off, William always avoided looking directly at his phone. Artist Jan Wyck has beautifully captured William's sideways glance as he struggles to line up the shot.
It was George Washington who started the fashion for looking directly at the camera when he captured the moment of his victory at Trenton in 1777. Enraged that his horse, Blueskin, refused to look at the phone, Washington later returned him to his original owner.
By the dawn of the 20th century, selfie sticks were rightly recognised as one of the world’s most lethal weapons. Hurried exercises with dummy sticks sought to find a suitable defence against them. It was soon realised that there was none.
During #WW1, it became highly desirable to capture a wider audience in the selfie, but the narrow angle lenses of the era’s mobiles made this difficult. Here King George V extends an experimental telescopic selfie stick to position the phone further away and capture a wider view.
During the two World Wars, selfie sticks were much sought after by the rank and file. Senior officers often had to guard them closely to make sure that there was no danger of pilfering.
But one could frequently be had away from an officer when his back was turned and little time was wasted by the enlisted men in posing in the field.
Another ardent fan of the selfie was, unsurprisingly, General Patton. Here he has slung his phone over his shoulder to access a small compartment in the stick. Although it's often claimed Patton modified it to contain a blade, in fact it held a small microfiber cleaning cloth.
Winston Churchill recognised the selfie stick as an essential propaganda tool and never missed the opportunity to capture images of himself next to famous generals.

But even Churchill wasn’t in the same league as the century’s most prolific selfie stick user…
… Erwin Rommel. Never without a selfie stick, his staff were ordered to carry spares. It's rumoured that he was so obsessed with photographing himself that he was still capturing images the moment his staff car was shot up in July 1944. Sadly the photos have never surfaced.
Rommel's legacy continues to this day. James Mason spent several months perfecting the Field Marshall's selfie technique when he played him in The Desert Fox in 1951. Several of Rommel's original selfie sticks went missing during filming and have never been found.
But selfie sticks were becoming one of the world’s most detested weapons. Most armies destroyed their own stocks after the war and, along with mustard gas and landmines, they have been banned by the Geneva Convention.
For some time the British public’s only awareness of them was through Dad’s Army, where Captain Mainwaring was frequently seen armed with a Home Guard improvisation. In reality Home Guard units had been well equipped with military grade selfie sticks during the war.
The release of Saving Private Ryan in 1998 created widespread panic in military circles. The film introduced the selfie stick to new generations of a worldwide audience: several countries considered preemptive rearmament, lest rogue nations should start to develop their own.
To great relief, this hasn’t yet happened and worldwide, armies continue to rely on safer ways of recording events in the field.
Modern images purporting to show world leaders experimenting with the weapons occasionally surface, but these are quite obviously crude fakes. The horror of the stick remains firmly in the past.

Thanks to @rgpoulussen and @KnowledgeVoyage for the inspiration to research this.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Fisher

Stephen Fisher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeaSpitfires

Mar 22
Having looked further into the latest Duff D-Day claim – that Poole was "the third largest embarkation point" for D-Day – it appears that this is a classic example of how history can get lost as time passes. Let's see how. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
But let's get this out the way first. Many places played important and often unique roles in the war. This thread isn't to diminish any contribution made by any place. Nor is it to denigrate anyone in particular. Mistakes can be made and it can be all too easy to assume that...
... people before you did their research work properly. But that carries with it certain risks that – in this case – have created an error. Here it is on Wikipedia for example. It's quite a big one really. Image
Read 23 tweets
Oct 19, 2024
Last night I gave a talk about the archaeology and historical research I conducted during the restoration of LCT 7074. It meant revisiting a lot of my earlier work and updating some of it 4 years later. And I’ve found something rather exciting! Image
There were only 3 known surviving LCT when 7074 was recovered. LCT 147 is a museum ship in Haifa, and LCT 203 is a working ship on Lake Superior. Both served in the Med during the war – neither of them was at Normandy. 📷Bukvoed, via Wikimedia Commons & Paul Swansen Image
Image
During the restoration of 7074 I became aware of another LCT on the Zegrze Reservoir near Warsaw. From the hull it was clearly a Mk 5 but did not appear to have any identification beyond that. It had been converted into a floating theatre but seemed unused now. 📷© Rohatyniec Image
Read 13 tweets
Jun 19, 2024
This is not an attempt to justify what happened at Stonehenge today, or even to change anyone’s mind about it. I’d simply like to add some context that I feel has been missing from some reports, statements and tweets. Image
3 stones have been impacted, from L to R in the above image they are numbers 23, 22 & 21. They are sarsen stones, a type of sandstone and whilst they are porous, the substance thrown at them was apparently cornflour. The stones are not in any danger, nor are any carvings on them.
The stones have also suffered far worse. 23 and 22 were both re-erected in the 1960s, 23 after it mysteriously fell over a few years after it was whacked by 22 when it was itself being hoisted up by a crane. The lintel above 22 and 21 was similarly replaced by a crane. Image
Read 6 tweets
Oct 10, 2023
I should be writing, so here's an impromptu #DDayfromAbove instead. I say impromptu – this one has been sat on my desktop for a while and I've tried, but failed, to complete the jigsaw. But sometimes you just don't have all the pieces. Anyway, to Gold Beach. 📷 NARA Image
So, where are we? Well, that stream, the Ruisseau du Marais, is the perfect clue to line up an aerial shot like this. Here's the same spot today. 📷Google Maps
Image
Image
And where is this on Gold Beach? It's right at the far east end of Jig Red Beach. Technically nothing was supposed to land here, but the bunker at WN37 (far right of the photo) created sufficient chaos on Jig Green to force the beachmasters to close the beach and divert to red. Image
Read 13 tweets
Feb 1, 2023
Did the Allies almost land on Gem Beach on D-Day? Turns out, yes. So let's try and work out how and why this happened and what (if anything) it tells us about the final choice of perhaps the most famous beach names in the world.
I have tackled this before in this thread, but more has now come to light which helps to answer a few more questions. So you can read this again if you like, but I'm going to start from the beginning again anyway.
First, at some point in the early 1940s, probably 1942 or 1943, the Inter Service Topographic Department identified potential landing sites on the enemy-held European coast. This included beaches and chines in the cliffs where troops or vehicles could get ashore.
Read 35 tweets
Jan 27, 2023
One for @Books2Cover #photofriday is this paperback that arrived this week and will help inform my own book. And it comes with a little anecdote that is sure to be of interest to @copp_survey.
@Books2Cover @copp_survey Apparently HMS Middleton neatly rammed X23. Now I come across all sorts of extraordinary anecdotes a out D-Day and most can be discounted with a look at contemporary reports. But this one may actually be true...
X23 was marking position DD, the intended launch line of the DD tanks. In their report the crew state the main assault force passed them 1000 yards to the west. That puts X23 about where the green dot is. Middleton (red) would have sailed past her to get to her bombardment slot.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(