So this is Rod Liddle in the Spectator (apparently the *leading* magazine of the UK right), writing about how it's SO difficult to avoid being racist.
Let's talk about Rod Liddle's own history, since its not that well known.
In 2010, Rod Liddle blamed black people for "the overwhelming majority of street crime, knife crime, gun crime, robbery and crimes of sexual violence in London"
The Spectator published the PCC ruling and an apology on its website, but seems to have deleted it now. I guess they really care about accuracy spectator.co.uk/essays/all/587…
(sorry, the story is not deleted! It just didn't show up for me earlier)
This is what the Mail wrote on Rod Liddle:
Liddle wrote: "There's thousands of organisations catering exclusively to black and asian minorities. **** 'em, close them down. Why do blacks need a forum of their own? As a power base and cash cow for ****s and in order to perpetuate the myth of widespread discrimination."
Liddle denied making racist comments, saying that others sometimes logged in under his account and posted comments with his username.
Oddly though, we couldn't find any comments complaining about others doing this, though. Must be an oversight.
BUT we did find DOZENS of racist/sexist comments made by 'monkeymfc' on that Millwall site.
"Fcking outrageous that you can’t smoke in Auschwitz."
"the correct term would be ni**ermeat, rather than wogmeat? You’ve got to get your terminology correct."
"Semi-house trained Muslim savages"
Rod Liddle never explained to us how these comments ended up being posted under his username. Odd, right? You would think he would want to clear up his name, given he is SO opposed to racism.
Anyway those are the facts. I'll leave you to decide about how anti-racist Rod Liddle is
And what does it say about the Spectator that it has a column for human excrement Rod Liddle to write regularly? And these people love to lecture others on anti-racism.
Oh I almost forgot Rod Liddle's finest hour.
"ROD LIDDLE, former editor of Radio 4’s Today programme, was arrested on election night after allegedly punching his pregnant girlfriend. " thetimes.co.uk/article/liddle…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If the UK can manage to get all its electricity from clean sources by 2035, it will set a precedent for the world.
The framing - it will make us less vulnerable to gas / oil price shocks - is spot on too
Politically, Labour should have been making these kind of targeted, bold promises.
Instead we make vague promises about spending billions and arguing about the 'green new deal' (which the public know FA about). 😞
Yes, but it will have an impact regardless.
It sets targets for solar and wind industry, which helps them. More money will start to flow towards solar + wind.
Also puts coal and gas on notice - which will affect their investment and funding.
I think the England football team are teaching something important.
For the right, they are creating symbols of a new English identity: comfortable in its diversity and tolerance (pro-LGBT, pro-BLM).
For the left, they illustrate what progressive patriotism looks like.
[thread]
Naturally, this is why some on the left and right are uncomfortable.
Some right-wingers fear the #ENG team is mainstreaming cultural values they dislike. Some on the left fear the team are popularising 'jingoism' or nationalism.
Both strands are (deservedly) being left behind
What’s interesting is how sport stars are (again) leading this nation building.
When I was growing up, being British and the Union flag were controversial among minorities.
But Linford Christie, Natasha Danvers, Amir Khan, Kelly Holmes and other British athletes changed that.
Detailed policies are a good goal. But we are putting the horse before the cart. The leader of the Labour party needs to know how to connect with people before he can get their vote. That doesn't come through policy. It comes by earning their trust first.
I’ve not been saying this for ages because, as some may remember, I believed Miliband could win by being a nice guy with nice policies. It didn't work.
Blair's genius wasn't policy. He knew how to connect with people. Corbyn was good at connecting with some, but not enough.