1/With people freaking out about the Honduran migrant caravan now forcing its way through Mexico, I figured it might be time for a thread about Central American immigration.
3/First, some useful background. MEXICAN immigration to the United States collapsed a decade ago. Since then, there has been a decrease in the Mexican-born population living in America of about 500,000.
4/Why did Mexican immigration to the U.S. collapse?
The Great Recession was a catalyst, but the real reasons are much longer-term things:
1. Mexico got a lot richer
2. Mexicans stopped having lots of kids.
5/But even as Mexicans have left the U.S., Central American immigration from the three "northern triangle" countries of El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala has (modestly) increased.
In addition, Central American immigrants tend to be much less educated than other immigrants.
7/This is why most of our public immigration debate - family separations, migrant caravans, etc. - now centers around Central Americans.
Central America is the U.S.' only remaining major source of inflows of less-educated, unauthorized immigration.
8/BUT, there are very good reasons to think that the Central American mini-wave of immigrants is a temporary phenomenon that will end soon.
First, Central Americans, like Mexicans a decade earlier, have recently stopped having a bunch of kids.
9/Fewer kids means fewer people to send to America to work and send money home.
It means young Central Americans will need to stay home, to take care of aged parents, to take over family businesses, etc. etc.
10/The second reason is that Central American countries have also been getting steadily richer.
11/Once a country passes about $7000-$8000 (PPP), it usually starts sending fewer migrants abroad. ftp.iza.org/dp8592.pdf
12/Together, the fertility and income numbers mean that immigration from El Salvador - source of the gang MS-13 that Trump likes to scare people about - will collapse very soon. Guatemalan immigration will soon follow.
13/Honduras, the source of the caravan that's now in the news, is still poor, and has slightly higher fertility than El Salvador. Thus, I expect Honduran immigration (or at least, attempted immigration) to continue for about a decade before it too collapses.
14/In other words, the illegal immigration debate AND the low-skilled immigration debate are now almost entirely about three small Central American countries.
And soon it will be only about one small Central American country (Honduras).
15/This should help put the immigration debate in perspective.
Are we really that scared of Honduras? Is Honduras so scary that we're willing to brutalize families and change our whole immigration policy?
I would say no.
(end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
FWIW, I think "culture war concessions" works only at the level of the candidate, not at the level of policy -- when it works at all. Nothing could ever have convinced America that Obama was socially conservative, even though he was and is.
Biden is making all kinds of compromises and concessions on immigration, and no one is recognizing it or caring (except for progressives who notice and get mad).
You saw the same exact pattern with Jimmy Carter. By the end of his presidency he had tacked so far to the Right that progressives primaried him with Ted Kennedy and almost won. But Republicans kept on thinking he was leftism incarnate.
3/Biden got off to a good start, passing a Covid relief bill that included a pioneering Child Tax Credit similar to Canada's successful program, passing an infrastructure bill that repaired roads and did some other good stuff, and passing a semiconductor industry support bill.
1. NYC building styles range from "fairly ugly" to "very ugly", but Americans love them because NYC is our only dense city, so Americans associate those building styles with urban density
2. Star Trek DS9 was neocon. It glorified a morally inspired leader engaging in preemptive war with an enemy who would never see reason and only respected force.
All the usual suspects are jumping all over Lisa Cook's paper from 2014 and pointing out small errors. But Ken Rogoff served on the Fed Board of Governors and I bet you nobody combed over his papers for errors before he was confirmed! And I bet you he made a few.
Econ academia has very little quality control for data errors. When people do comb over papers for mistakes, they generally find them.
We need a Xillennial-Zillennial alliance, of people who are just a little too old for Millennial bullshit and people who just are a little too young for Millennial bullshit.
Anyone who was born 1980-1986 or 1997-2003 is in the Xillennial-Zillennial alliance. We must unite against the people whose brains were broken by coming of age between the Great Recession and Trump.
The people in that middle decade shall be known as the Harry Potter Generation