And, of course, I have to ask this: since RadarOnline
a) used to be owned by one of the accused child rapists before being sold to
b) its current owner (AMI), known known to be directly involved in conspiring to fraudulently conceal Trump's sexual activity...
How did they manage to get an exclusive on the Katie Johnson lawsuit against Trump and Epstein?
You might find it interesting that Norm Lubow - aka Al Taylor - who found Katie and helped her file the initial suit has prior relationships with AMI, the Daily Mail, and Cheney Mason, who eventually signed on to the case just before it was dropped theguardian.com/us-news/2016/j…
& on a similar note to what's at the top of this thread, I've been told that ABC's @BrianRoss was in Katie's attorney's office on June 25, 2016, as the paperwork was being filed... the same reporter left ABC after reporting on given imprecise information by a Trump-linked source,
claiming that Trump directed Flynn to contact Russians during the campaign (though the source later clarified it was during the transition),which was 'corrected' shortly thereafter.
Side note: Given @BrianRoss's history of 'inaccurate' reporting linked to topics like Abramoff, Hastert, mass shooters' political affiliations, etc, I'd keep an eye on this - it seems much of that may not have been incorrect reporting - just then lacking sufficient proof. ;)
In any case, I'm guessing there are some details about that 2015 conversation between Cohen, Trump, and Pecker that we'll be learning about soon that might explain quite a bit about how and why the Katie Johnson story followed the trajectory it did,
and why, after someone identified an open missing person's case that probably would not have been covered by a non-prosecution agreement re: sex trafficking, they quickly followed up with Pizzagate, within hours.
Somebody needs to write the canonical book called “Black History for White People.”
Explicitly put the focus on social structures and POWER, and fear - not on whiteness or presumed racial characteristics. Inherently, that’s not what it’s about.
TBC, a more accurate title would actually be “Black History for Everybody Else,” but the black vs white dichotomy and the origin of the term “black” is such a fundamental conceptual metaphor that it needs to be addressed too.
Black is dirty, scary, to be avoided.
Think about it.
In that sense, “black” references a concept - as opposed to clarity and purity of “whiteness” (see Mary Douglass, “Purity & Danger”) - and the extension of that metaphor is a fundamental pathway to the perpetuation of injustice and oppression.
One other bit that is helping - reporting the percentage of Republican support for Trump, civic violence, etc, without mentioning the actual proportion of Americans, overnormalizes the opinions that will drive democracy into the grave.
The proportion of Americans identifying as Republican # has dropped 5-10% since 2005, to an avg ~26% in 2021 (same trend for Dems).
OMG 80% of Republicans believe…
Is really
20% of adult Americans.
Not reporting THAT alongside every partisan percentage is malpractice.
Reporting trends absent that context hyperinflates the power of that fraction of society, both normalizing and enhancing fear and stasis, fomenting distrust and increasing our isolation from our neighbors.
Truth is, 80% of Americans aren’t willing to die for Trump.