1/ The mainstream media naturally portrayed yesterday's Intelligence Community worldwide threat briefing as the IC contradicting the foreign policy views of @realDonaldTrump and his admin. The real issue is why we have these unclassified briefings. @joshrogin @peterbakernyt
2/ Our standing peacetime intelligence agencies exist to inform presidential policy. They must speak truth to power and tell the President and his admin what they need to know to make good policy decisions. However, intel agencies are barred from policy prescription.
3/ Its fine for intel analysts to privately tell the President or another policymaker that they believe a policy will not succeed. As a CIA analyst, I did this many times. Its not OK for intel analysts to undermine presidential policy by voicing such reservations publically.
4/ That's what happened in yesterday's worldwide threat briefing. The IC should give Trump officials their reservations about policy on ISIS, North Kore, Iran, etc, but when intel agencies do so publically, they are undermining the admin and are pushing their own policies.
5/ For example, IC officials said yesterday that North Korea remains "unlikely to give up" its nuclear weapon stockpiles. All observers knew this. But such a public finding could affect NK's position at nuclear talks and undermine US efforts to convince NK to give up its nukes.
6/ The IC statements on Iran's nuclear program were impossible to take seriously. DNI Coates said: “We do not believe Iran is currently undertaking activities we judge necessary to produce a nuclear device.” CIA Dir Haspel said: At the moment technically they are in compliance”
7/ Haspel and Coates ignored that Israel found a warehouse of nuclear equipment and radioactive materials in Tehran earlier this year that the IAEA refused to inspect so it would not have to find Iran in nonompliance of the nulear deal . . .
8/ Haspel & Coates also ignored that Iran is engaged in nculear weapons-related activities by continuing to enrich uranium & develop advanced centrifuges. Iran also continues to refuse to allow the IAEA to inspect military bases where it likely is engaged in nuclear weapons work
9/ But the most important objection to the unclassified Worldwide Threat Briefings and the accompaning unclas report is that they give US adversaries a huge amount of information of IC assessments of them. This makes no sense.
10/ This is why I urged @realDonaldTrump on @LouDobbs Tonight last night that it is time to end unclassified worldwide threat briefings because they are being used by the IC to meddle in policymaking and are helping US adversaries. facebook.com/LouDobbsTonigh…
11/ Congress should continue to receive annual worldwide threat briefings from the IC, but only in classified, closed sessions. @MiekeEoyang @SpyTalker @gregpmiller

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fred Fleitz

Fred Fleitz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FredFleitz

4 Sep
1/ How we know @JeffreyGoldberg's @TheAtlantic article on @realDonaldTrump comments about US troops during his November 2018 trip to France is absolutely false: it is NOT in former National Security Adviser John Bolton's book & Bolton was there.
foxnews.com/politics/john-…
2/ It is very suspicious that Goldberg would publish such an article 60 days befoe the election about something that allegedly occurred 2 years ago using anonymous sources. But if @realDonaldTrump actually said the disparaging things about US troops that Goldberg claims . . .
3/ Bolton would have known about them since he worked so closely with th president and COS John Kelly. And since Bolton attacked the president's character with everything he had in his book, it is impossible to believe that Bolton left this out.
Read 7 tweets
31 Aug
1/ Critical article by investigative reporter @jsolomonReports on how the @DNI_Ratcliffe may finally reveal how @JohnBrennan and other intel officials politicized a 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment to undermine the @realDonaldTrump presidency.

justthenews.com/accountability…
2/ I am grateful to @jsolomonReports for writing this important article and for including these paragraphs whcih quoted me:

"In other words, an assessment that was portrayed as unanimous when it was made public in early January 2017 was anything but at the analyst level,...
3/ ... according to Fred Fleitz, a longtime intelligence officer who was briefed on the House intelligence committee's concerns when he served as chief of staff in the National Security Council."When I was briefed on the House Intelligence Committee report on the January 2017...
Read 6 tweets
30 Aug
@StevenLHall1 @MZHemingway 1/ Let me explain this to you, Steve. I worked for CIA and the House Intel Committee staff. The ODNI will follow the law in keeping the oversight committees "fully and currently informed" with written briefings to most committee members on election security. There's no ...
@StevenLHall1 @MZHemingway 2/ . . . legal requirement for in-person briefings, however, in-person briefings WILL CONTINUE for the "Gang of Eight" -- the top House and senate leaders and the leaders of the intel committees. In-person briefings are being mostly curtailed because leaks by Dem members . . .
@StevenLHall1 @MZHemingway 3/ . . . is getting out of hand. @DNI_Ratcliffe responded to these leaks by "working to the rule" -- providing only what the exec branch is legally required to provide Congress on election security in the run-up to thje November election. The ODNI is not required to brief. . .
Read 5 tweets
18 Aug
1/ @NatashaBertrand & @KenDilanianNBC: I found this paragraph in the new SSCI report on Russian meddling in the 2016 election to be quite interesting. The committee found on a bipartisan basis that Russia was meddling "to tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration... Image
2/ I have another interpretation of this that I'll discuss later. But this paragraph is important because it destroys the dubious finding in the a 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that Russia meddled in the election TO HELP TRUMP WIN.
3/ I have long argued that Russia, like the whole world in 2016, expected Clinton to win the 2016 election. It never made sense to argue that Russia thought it could change this outcome.
Read 5 tweets
24 May
@GeorgeCroner 2. I note that you again ignored the strange circumstances raised by @AndrewCMcCarthy of the "never masked" FBI info on the 12/29/16 @GenFlynn -Kislyak call. Why was Flynn's name not masked? Why wasn't there a warrant? You don't want to talk about that . . .
@GeorgeCroner @AndrewCMcCarthy @GenFlynn 3. . . . because you know there's no good answer. On numbers of recent unmaskings, you are again trying to confuse the issue. You know there are legit reasons to unmask. You are trying to distract from the indefensible 100s of Obama admin requests to unmask Trump . . .
@GeorgeCroner @AndrewCMcCarthy @GenFlynn 4. . . . aides. And yes, if 100s of these unmasking requests came to NSA, there should have been complaints to the NSA IG or the intel committees. I also noted that you ignored the huge problems with the 2017 ICA on Russian meddling in the 2016 election. I assume you . . .
Read 4 tweets
24 May
@GeorgeCroner .1. Another series of gibberish tweets by former NSA counsel George Croner on the Obama admin's weaponization of intelligence against @realDonaldTrump's campaign and transition staff. This time he let loose on @AndrewCMcCarthy for his excellent @NRO on this issue.
@GeorgeCroner @realDonaldTrump @AndrewCMcCarthy @NRO .2 McCarthy's article is very significant because he tries to explain why @GenFlynn's name apparently was contained in an FBI report of surveillance of Russian Ambassador Kislyak and was not masked. McCarthy raises a point I made on @IngrahamAngle's show last week that . . .
@GeorgeCroner @realDonaldTrump @AndrewCMcCarthy @NRO @GenFlynn @IngrahamAngle .3 . . . this collection may have been in response to standing FISA collection against Kislyak. This meant it was not necessary to get a warrant to spy on @flynn in late December 2016. Croner ignores this central point of McCarthy's article.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!