I am seeing a lot of stuff about succession for #VAGovernor mess. Most of it is misleading. What's the order of succession if one or more resign? Well, it depends on timing, plus interpretation of #VAConstitution & other laws 1/12
If Northam resigns, the VA Constitution is fairly clear: he would be replaced by Lt Gov (currently Fairfax) for full term. 2/12
What if Lt. Gov office is vacant when Gov resigns (say, if Lt Gov resigns too)? I've seen reports that Senate President Pro Tempore takes his place. This is currently Republican Senator Stephen Newman 3/12 senatornewman.com
Well, wait a minute - relevant law does NOT say this Senator REPLACES Lt gov - he/she just "discharges their duties" (most likely referring to the main Lt Gov job of presiding over the Senate), so the Lt Gov office would still be vacant! 4/12
Instead, the #VAConstitution states that if there's a vacancy in the Lt Gov when a Governor resigns, the AG becomes Governor. Simple, right? 5/12
Hold on a moment, though - the text of the Constitution says the AG will "succeed to the office of Governor for the unexpired term or serve as Acting Governor". What does that "or" mean - who would decide Acting or full term? No idea. 6/12
Plus there wouldn't likely be a vacancy in the Lt Gov office for long. Statute says that the Governor can appoint a replacement. Tho some fuzzy language, the appointee likely would hold office until next general election, when Lt Gov would be elected (prob for rest of term) 7/12
So if Northam resigns, he would be replaced by either Fairfax (currently), the replacement Lt Gov appointed by Northam (if Fairfax resigns), or the newly elected Lt Gov (if Fairfax resigns and Northam resigns next year) 8/12
But this procedure doesn't apply to the AG office, which is under a DIFFERENT law - a vacancy in the AG would be filed by an election of the #VAGeneralAssembly (currently both houses held by GOP). 9/12
But even that is ONLY if the #VAGeneralAssembly is in session; if the AG resigns or is promoted AFTER the session, the Governor gets to appoint a temporary AG until the NEXT session (no idea if a special session called mid-year could do this - law is unclear) 10/12
Only if all 3 top officials resigned at the same time would House Speaker Kirk Cox take the Governor's chair, and his succession has the same constitutional language about being Governor OR Acting Governor, with no indication of how to decide between the two 11/12
Bottom line: this is way more complicated than articles or tweets or "lines of succession" flowcharts make it seem. The Constitution and law are super-unclear. Timing of resignations is huge deal, and courts would likely play a role. (Also, forget about Senator Newman.) 12/12
Finally, let me note that this is a problem of state constitutions in general, as @ProfGulley points out in the excellent thread below:
UPDATE: And just in case i wasn’t clear how fuzzy the law is, see 1982 AG opinion dug up by @gmoomaw & my subsequent argument w/ @SpotsyHoya , who has very different take than I on LG appointment
UPDATED UPDATE: VA's Constitution guru, Dick Howard, has weighed in, says courts may see elevating an appointed LG to Governor as violating spirit of Constitution. So Northam/Fairfax resignations would still lead to Governor Herring washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As I prep my political theory class for this fall, I'm struck that one thing the TX abortion law should hammer home, and that some of us sometimes forget: conservatism is openly hostile towards individual freedom #Thread
1/
As ideology, conservatism embraces ancient ideas of difference. Plato's Republic imagines world where people are sorted according to innate characteristics; Aristotle thought democracy was worst form of government. To Greeks, some people just better suited to rule than others
2/
In 1790, Brit Edmund Burke essentially launched conservatism by criticizing the French revolution. Liberty is fine, Burke argued, but what if it's the liberty of a "madman" or "murderer"? Freedom needs constraints, and isn't for everyone
3/
As #VAGOP convention approaches, candidates talking about banning "critical race theory" from our schools. We know that racist appeals work on many white voters (hi Donald!) but this one is especially insidious. Here's why #Thread
1/
First, #CriticalRaceTheory is term for some pretty high-level scholarship and theoretical work, like real pomo philosophy shit. Crenshaw, Delgado, Bell. Mostly influential in legal theory. Time mag explainer (h/t to @bluevirginia) is just fine: 2/ time.com/5891138/critic…
Key here: CRT is WAY less influential than critics claim, even in theory circles. Often mocked by traditional establishment voices. Just check this '98 Cornell law review article that claims to take CRT seriously, but actually drips w mockery/disdain 3/ scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Background: the federal govt's Home Owners' Loan Corporation was a New Deal org aimed at helping people keep their homes post-Depression. Financially, it did pretty well - even turning a small profit 2/ trumanlibrary.gov/library/public…
But to "help" mortgage lenders, they generated maps of urban areas, color-coded by how "secure" neighborhoods would be for home loans. Here's the RVA map - guess what they based "security" on? 3/
Happy weekend VA! Earlier this week I tweeted out #VoteNoOn1, the redistricting commission amendment. I'm still a No, but feel a Prof's need to clarify after hearing from some folks on both sides #Thread 1/
Earlier I said we all want Non-partisan, but even A1 supporters say that's basically impossible. What we actually want is INDEPENDENCE. Current SB 5015 tries to specify criteria for citizen members beyond "party picks" so it would help if passed 2/
But doesn't get over the fact that legislators are on the commission, and that one or two of them could use their veto power for mischief. In an uneven partisan environment (where GOP routinely kicks Dems' ass on process/power) I don't see a way around that 3/
Good morning VA! As early voting ramps up around the state, now’s a good time to remind you to Vote NO on Amendment 1, which supposedly ensures fair redistricting. I’m not convinced. Here's why: #VoteNOon1 #Thread 1/
Background: you probably know that “redistricting” - drawing district lines for state legislature and Congress - is super important is for setting the political course of the next decade. So do politicians, which is why they try to control it 2/
A coalition pushed for fair, non-partisan process by 2019 deadline. (Constitutional amendment in VA needs GA to pass a resolution twice, then approved on voter ballot Q.) They didn't get it! Instead, they put in place a compromise
3/
Anyone check out the #RVAProtests "112 Days" show on @CBS6 last night? You can watch it on MSN (linked below), but I did so you don't have to. Two big thoughts: #Thread 1/
First, the doc not great on repping protestors. Some efforts to give voice to protest, but probably not central figures. I get it - it's hard to parse, there's no "President of the Movement," and lots of folks probably didn't want to talk
2/
But still - why so much freakin' Mark Holmberg? Why let him complain that protestors marched at Lee Circle but not Gilpin Court- and then ignore multiple anti-eviction actions? 3/ richmond.com/news/local/wat…