This New York Times article interviews one of the "gun-loving defenders of free speech" at Charlottesville who also hate racists. nyti.ms/2FdSb4h
The one time CNN reported the "fine people" quote correctly before reporting it incorrectly from that point on: cnn.it/2BGMpV6
The transcript from Trump's Charlottesville speech in which he specifically excludes the racists from the "fine people" category and says they should be "condemned totally."
Just to round things off: Compilation clip of Trump Disavowing David Duke and the KKK bit.ly/2USNDXI
And if that isn't enough, my blog post on why Democrats hear a secret racist dog whistle and Republicans do not: bit.ly/2K8ZAnL
Remember that story about the Durham filing suggesting the Clinton campaign paid for "spying" on Trump communications before and after the presidency?
CNN and its co-conspirators morphed that into fake news. Here's how....
First, they debunk the claim the Clinton campaign paid for the data. The data was free. They don't mention that Clinton paid lawyers to go get the data to frame Trump (per Durham). That seems important.
Then CNN claims the data all came from before the Trump era. They don't tell you their "debunk" is irrelevant to the story because no one involved in framing Trump (allegedly) cared if the data was accurate. They only cared if it got the job done.
The "I told you so" crowd acts as if we aren't dealing with a far-less-killy-more-spready variant (possibly engineered) in the context of lots more data, vaccines preventing almost all hospital deaths, and dramatically better treatment options.
We're seeing Dunning-Kruger on steroids as the people who were never trained in risk-management got one right-- as they often do -- with the simple rule "Everything experts/politicians do makes things worse."
But that group is only "right" because they are pairing their predictions made under situation A with outcomes happening under situation B. And no, they didn't predict situation B, except in the most obvious ways.
Here are the trial results for using light as a disinfectant inside the body. It worked. Conclusion: Trump asked a well-informed question on a topic his own "experts" did not yet know about.
Here's the full transcript of Trump's comments about "injecting a disinfectant" inside the body. Note his references to light at the start and the end are typically edited out for the Fake News clips you have seen. Removing them changes the meaning.