#US military will no longer publish info on districts under control of #Afghan gov't with US command saying 'they no longer saw decision-making value in these data' according to #SIGAR
This was one of the mast metrics available for measuring progress!
The move fits a trend of less information being released about the war in recent years, often at the insistence of the Afghan gov't, which had previously stopped U.S. military from disclosing the number of Afghans killed in battle as well as overall attrition within the #ANDSF
I don't think it makes sense, Sopko said. The Afghans know which districts are controlled by the Taliban. The TB obviously know which districts they control. Our military knows it. Everybody in Afghanistan knows it. The only people who don't know what's going on are US taxpayers.
The war in Afghanistan is largely forgotten in much of America, as is the enormous, continuing financial cost.
Overall, the U.S. has spent $737 billion on the war and lost more than 2,400 military lives according to the Pentagon, $132 billion have been spent on reconstruction
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@CrisisGroup published a report this week about regional states’ engagement with the Taliban. Reading our paper could help you understand the extraordinary news in recent days about Afghanistan’s relationship with its neighbors. A short thread. 1/
The Taliban hosted their first international conference on Monday. China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Turkey and Indonesia sent officials to Kabul to talk regional cooperation — a diplomatic ‘win’ for the unrecognized Taliban regime.
Article states:
“Bahiss says TB leaders are divided into two groups: relative pragmatists who see the militant group’s policies as an obstacle to gaining international recognition and securing the removal of sanctions,…
and extremists who are bent on monopolizing power and imposing a strict form of Shari’a law.”
The actual quote provided to outlet was:
“Bahiss sees the Taliban leaders broadly driven by two lines of thinking...
On the other hand, it keeps insisting that the reserves are frozen by court orders and the administration has no capacity to unfreeze them, regardless of the compromises the Taliban can offer.
But unfreezing half the assets, it is only signalling that the above argument is only partially true and there are workarounds that would unfreeze the assets.
Sheikh Abdul Hakim is a top spiritual leader amongst the Taliban, particularly the southerners. He is often considered to be Hibatullah Akhundzada’s right hand man.
Worth noting that in the previous government, the leadership of the Supreme Court was not among the most desired jobs.
For the past two decades, the Court sometimes acted as a rubber stamp for the President, at least on matters having political implications.
Yes, media’s role varies from advocacy, to awareness to accountability and so forth. But media has huge impact and often informs policy that can have huge ramifications.
IMO, this offers is a far more realistic assessment on composition of cabinet:
(I have included Ghazni, Wardak, Logar etc in “Loya Paktya” and the entire North in “Shamal”.
“Sharqi” is eastern provinces including Kunar & Nangarhar).
NOTABLE PROMOTIONS:
Most of the names are “old guard” and respectable figures within the movement.
Salam Hanafi & Muttaqi were notable promotions. Haqqani & Yaqub have also solidified their positions, taking control of all security sectors.