That's why I am getting a few death threats, which is normal and fine. But I would like to add a few more observations from DeRogatis' book that couldn't make the (already longer than the agreed upon word count) cut:
I had a couple hundred words on @nvancleve work on Cook County in her book "Crook County", which you should all read. Her work resolved for me something that seems to underpin a lot of the incredulousness that JD explores in his book
Namely: how do we explain how a rich black man got so much preferential treatment in one of the largest, most racist court districts in the country?
Nicole talks about how the very busy Crook County system, its structure and its actors, achieve their remarkable efficiency. They use racial tropes to speed up adjudication. One such trope she describes is the "mope".
What's stumping people is how Kelly got so much leeway in that kind of system. DeRogatis is amazed by it and his facts are amazing. A racist Irish American judge with his own criminal history sets up a kangaroo trial for the ages in Kelly's first major trial.
I mean, you have to read this to believe it. He narrows the allowable evidence to the point of making evidence irrlevant. He allows the defense a ludicrous amount of leeway in their case. He drags out pretrial for six years. He effectively gave Kelly the white boy deal
It's easy to see it that way. Thus the conundrum. But if we think about the mope as cultural toolkit that this court districts has used for ages, to great effect, then the conundrum is resolved. For all the celebrity fetish in the trial they ultimately treated Kelly like a mope
He is treated like a simpleton who performed the kind of immoral acts that a mope from a culture of poverty performs. He lived down to the expectations that court has for a mope and despite his wealth and fame, nothing more could be expected of him
Even more, he performed his racialized poor culture on people from the same poor culture. In crook county that is barely a crime.
A detail I relished in this book is how gross Kelly is. He stinks and I started to imagine him as that man who always has dirty fingernails even though he works in a call center. He is a boor.
We only imagine him as a sex God because of low expectations, not high ones - Just like his celebrity perversely augmented his mope-ness.
I recommend @nvancleve book paired with DeRogatis' "Soul-less". Also, stop sending me death threats. They bore me. Thank you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Possible! But they're going for a strong black excellence talented tenth campaign so I'm going with she married the stockboy and has been trying to find him to get an annulment, i.e. something that will keep her socially in play.
a baby takes her out of play, imo. But it's tv and they're pretending she would even be there so anything is possible.
(I really think they're too invested in Peggy and them to give her a secret baby. BUT, given all the drama that made Peggy's storyline even make it this far, they could slip it in there.)
Listen, I’m a nobody in the grand scheme of academic things. But I am a Black woman with — depending on who you ask — a touch of the sight OR keen attention due to trauma. Nothing was more clear to me a few years into the game than this.
Winning or losing was always gonna be zero sum to somebody and if that somebody has any power over you, you will feel it. Your wins can be turned into losses and vice-versa.
I totally get that the vast majority of people think this way. I easily concede. I’m just too old and/or tired to be uncomfortable for a long time so we can hang-out when we are…traveling to a place to hangout.
This is just the way that I am. I don’t need all that much watering and feeding. And I look at transport as utilitarian. I get it done as efficiently as possible and see you at the destination.
In my view, we need to line up single file, have our boarding passes ready, not change seats once boarded, sit quietly, and get there already.
I am going to tackle this one quickly for a couple reasons. One, these replies have been going steadily for a couple of days. All from men. All of them. So let’s do some light discourse analysis…
The primary document features a woman’s first person account in an area that overlaps with her professional expertise. Based on what that document provides, this woman is a trustworthy subject.
Nowhere in that primary document does the woman describe her actions as fraught.
A non-expert but generally trustworthy reader assigned “incredibly fraught” to the primary text.
More seriously let me say something. I theorized years ago that info societies threatened masculinity by attaching economic value to femininities characteristics, like social ties and discourse.
Clawing that back is how we get to a place where feminized qualities like basic care work is so passionately diminished that many people will burn down public health to avoid it.