#ChristianPrivilege is trending because of this disgustingly bigoted article. playboy.com/read/the-gospe… In it, @C_Stroop claims that anyone who disagrees with her liberal stances is immoral. Specifically, if you don't value helping illegals over following immigration law. /1
@C_Stroop The thing is, people support immigration restrictions for various reasons, not because of some fundamentally racist strain in American Christianity. We welcome immigrants, but legal limits are important for the health of a pluralistic republic. /2
@C_Stroop The real problem with the article has nothing to do with her oversimplification of the immigration debate. It has to do with her lies about Christianity. Here's what she says about Christianity and Jesus: /3
@C_Stroop She says Christianity is fundamentally oppressive, that Jesus seems similar to a guy who led his followers into mass suicide, and that conservative Christianity is fundamentally racist. /4
@C_Stroop She presents an oversimplistic view of history — "EUROPEAN COLONIALISM IS EVIL" — that overlooks how Christianity ended abortion, created the first orphanages and hospitals, and cared for the sick when no one else would in Ancient Rome and onward. /5
@C_Stroop Her view also overlooks how Christianity encouraged science pjmedia.com/faith/2015/11/… and humility, making the lives of billions better. /6
@C_Stroop Yes, of course many Christians in history have committed evil acts, but they have also done great good — Hernan De Soto condemned the Spanish atrocities against Native Americans and laid the groundwork for international law. /7
@C_Stroop As for racism, Christianity is spreading fastest in Subsaharan Africa and South America. Some Christians twisted the Bible to defend slavery (yes twisted — read Philemon), but Christians also led the abolitionist movement. /8
@C_Stroop Fights for religious freedom have nothing to do with racism or #ChristianPrivilege, but rather in allowing people to live and let live in the confusing legal world after Obergefell, and Justice Kennedy supported such things IN THAT DECISION. /9
@C_Stroop So, when someone demonizes a faith, concocts a conspiracy theory about racism within it, advocates for #EmptyThePews, she demonstrates that concerns about #ChristianPrivilege are overblown. Yes, conservative Christians have holidays off. But we're routinely demonized as well. /10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Southern Poverty Law Center, which trades on its history bankrupting the KKK to smear conservatives as secret supporters of "white supremacy," has put the largest conservative youth org—@TPUSA—on the "hate map" with Klan chapters.
Every year, the SPLC puts out a new version of the "hate map," partly to scare donors into ponying up cash and partly to "cancel" its opponents—cutting them off from polite society.
This year, the "hate map" includes Turning Point USA.
🧵2/15
The SPLC accuses Turning Point and its founder, @charliekirk11, of propping up "white Christian supremacy."
Now, if Charlie Kirk were racist & theocratic, would Turning Point have a presence on more than 3K campuses?🤔
The EEOC under Biden tried to rewrite federal law to force gender ideology on state and local governments—and on every company that hires at least 15 people.
@KenPaxtonTX and @Heritage sued.
This week, a judge threw out the EEOC guidance.
🧵1/12
Bear with me: the case is complicated but as I lay it out, you'll see just how outrageous it is.
Also, please bookmark the first post in this 🧵, so you can go back to it. I'll walk you through how Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk just eviscerated the Left's false narrative.
Colorado LGBTQ groups pushed for HB25-1312, a bill that would define "misgendering" and "deadnaming" as "coercive control" and mandate custody courts consider them.
Democrats excluded parental rights groups from discussion, comparing them to the KKK.
🧵2/10
The bill passed the Colorado House, 36 in favor, 20 against, and 9 absent in a largely party-line vote.
The Colorado House has 43 Dems and 22 Republicans. The Colorado Senate has 23 Dems and 12 Republicans.
Who are the Biden political appointees who "burrowed in" to the federal bureaucracy?🤔
The list includes a former White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council member, former USAID staff, and immigration lawyers.
I'll explain "burrowing in," then get to the names.
🧵1/15
First, what is "burrowing in?" @hughhewitt gave a good concise definition in an interview with me at @JobCreatorsUSA's Freedom Fighters Summit
Presidents appoint more than 3K people for "political" positions, but there are at least 2.3M federal workers. Most are in ostensibly non-political "career" positions.
Burrowing in involves switching from a "political" to a "career" position.
🧵2/15
Why is this a problem?
“The biggest challenge that every single new Cabinet secretary and their subordinates will face is the entrenched bureaucrat,” @TheFGA's @stew_whitson told me.
He described both overt opposition to the president and “quiet insubordination.”
The SPLC released its hate map for 2018, and Nessel responded by pledging, "Hate cannot continue to flourish in our state."
"I have seen the appalling, often fatal, results of hate when it is acted upon," she added. "That is why I am establishing a hate-crimes unit in my office—to fight against hate crimes and the many hate groups which have been allowed to proliferate in our state."
That may sound noble, but if you know anything about the SPLC, it should be unnerving, if not downright terrifying.
🧵2/10
You see, the SPLC is no neutral arbiter on hate.
It champions almost every leftist cause you've ever heard of, and accuses those who dare disagree of being driven by "hate."
Do you follow the traditional Jewish or Christian teachings on sexuality? You're an "anti-LGBTQ hate group."
Want our immigration laws enforced? You're an "anti-immigrant hate group"—even if you have legal immigrants on the board.
Are you concerned about radical Islam inspiring terrorism? You're an "anti-Muslim hate group."
Do you think parents should have a say in their kids' education? You're an "anti-government extremist group" and on the hate map.
Last year, the SPLC even added groups of doctors who oppose "gender-affirming care" and @againstgrmrs to the "hate map."
When the FBI was caught citing the SPLC's "hate map" in targeting "radical traditional Catholics," it was rightly a huge scandal.
A shocking new poll from @ScottWRasmussen shows just how many D.C.-based bureaucrats who voted for Kamala Harris say they plan to disobey a lawful Trump order if they consider it bad policy.
Yes, people who work for the taxpayer plan to disobey the people's elected president. This is the key definition of the deep state.
RMG Research, Rasmussen's polling firm, identifies federal government managers as federal employees in the DC region who earn at least $75K.
The firm asked this essential question:
"Suppose that President Trump gave an order that was legal but you believed was bad policy. Would you follow the president's order or do what you thought was best?"
THREE QUARTERS—75%—of DC bureaucrats who voted for Kamala Harris said they would "do what I thought was best" rather than follow Trump's order.
Only 16% said they'd do as the people's elected president ordered.😲
🧵2/10
NOTE: This isn't asking if they'd follow Trump over the law.
This is just asking if they place their own opinion of good or bad policy ahead of the person who was elected by the people to lead the executive branch.
It's also worrying that 18% of those who voted for Trump say they'd "do what I thought was best" instead of following the order. That's probably a lot lower than it would have been if the poll was conducted in 2017, however.