#ChristianPrivilege is trending because of this disgustingly bigoted article. playboy.com/read/the-gospe… In it, @C_Stroop claims that anyone who disagrees with her liberal stances is immoral. Specifically, if you don't value helping illegals over following immigration law. /1
@C_Stroop The thing is, people support immigration restrictions for various reasons, not because of some fundamentally racist strain in American Christianity. We welcome immigrants, but legal limits are important for the health of a pluralistic republic. /2
@C_Stroop The real problem with the article has nothing to do with her oversimplification of the immigration debate. It has to do with her lies about Christianity. Here's what she says about Christianity and Jesus: /3
@C_Stroop She says Christianity is fundamentally oppressive, that Jesus seems similar to a guy who led his followers into mass suicide, and that conservative Christianity is fundamentally racist. /4
@C_Stroop She presents an oversimplistic view of history — "EUROPEAN COLONIALISM IS EVIL" — that overlooks how Christianity ended abortion, created the first orphanages and hospitals, and cared for the sick when no one else would in Ancient Rome and onward. /5
@C_Stroop Her view also overlooks how Christianity encouraged science pjmedia.com/faith/2015/11/… and humility, making the lives of billions better. /6
@C_Stroop Yes, of course many Christians in history have committed evil acts, but they have also done great good — Hernan De Soto condemned the Spanish atrocities against Native Americans and laid the groundwork for international law. /7
@C_Stroop As for racism, Christianity is spreading fastest in Subsaharan Africa and South America. Some Christians twisted the Bible to defend slavery (yes twisted — read Philemon), but Christians also led the abolitionist movement. /8
@C_Stroop Fights for religious freedom have nothing to do with racism or #ChristianPrivilege, but rather in allowing people to live and let live in the confusing legal world after Obergefell, and Justice Kennedy supported such things IN THAT DECISION. /9
@C_Stroop So, when someone demonizes a faith, concocts a conspiracy theory about racism within it, advocates for #EmptyThePews, she demonstrates that concerns about #ChristianPrivilege are overblown. Yes, conservative Christians have holidays off. But we're routinely demonized as well. /10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Can we please stop lying around here? Here's the grand jury indictment laying out why Don Lemon was charged.
At the pre-op briefing Chauntyll Louisa Allen briefed Lemon and the other conspirators about where and what they were doing.
On camera, Nekima Armstrong tells Lemon—who knows the location but is hiding it from his audience—that they're going to "disrupt business as usual" at what we later learned was Cities Church.
When did the disruption start? As the pastor was beginning his sermon.
The agitators "oppressed, threatened, and intimidated the Church's congregants and pastors by physically occupying most of the main aisle and rows of chairs near the front of the Church, engaging in menacing and threatening behavior (for some) chanting and yelling loudly at the pastor and congregants, and/or physically obstructing them as they attempted to exit and/or move about within the church."
🧵2/7
In this indictment, we learn that it was William Kelly ("DaWoke Farmer") who shouted at a little kid, "Do you know your parents are Nazis? They're going to burn in hell."
When Don Lemon observed others leaving the service, he described people as "frightened," "scared," and "crying," which he said was understandable because the experience was "traumatic and uncomfortable," which he said was the purpose of the invasion.
Again Lemon said "the whole point of [the operation] is to disrupt."
The invasion of Cities Church was even worse than we thought.
Agitators blocked stairs so "parents were unable to get to their children" at Sunday School.😡
One told a kid, "Do you know your parents are Nazis, they're going to burn in hell?"
🧵1/7
William Kelly, "DaWoke Farmer," shouted, "This ain't God's house. This is the house of the devil."
🧵2/7
About 50 members of the congregation were "stuck" towards the front of the church. Not only did the agitators take over the service, but they "made it nearly impossible for parishioners to get out and leave."
The Congressional Black Caucus and 270 left-leaning groups tried to block me from testifying in Congress. Their rationale was extremely hypocritical and, dare I say, Orwellian.
CBC Chair @RepYvetteClarke said the hearing—which focused on my research on the SPLC—was a "deliberate effort to intimidate and discredit an institution that has spent decades defending civil rights, exposing hate, and advancing opportunity for all Americans."
🧵2/12
She said the hearing "undermines the very civil institutions that give everyday people voice, protection, and power."
So, she's endorsing the SPLC's "hate" accusations and failing to admit that the SPLC itself has undermined "civil institutions." More on that later.
Here's @RepCohen's press release touting that he questioned the "smear" that the SPLC is anti-Christian, suggesting that he stood up against supposedly false claims.
But I know what really happened, because I was the witness.
🧵1/7
Cohen did mention that some Christians support the SPLC. I don't disagree. It seems he thought I wouldn't be able to defend my assertion that the SPLC is anti-Christian, however.
I came ready to defend the claim.
🧵2/7
Here's theclip. Thanks to @chiproytx for allowing Cohen's questions to go over the 5 min in the @JudiciaryGOP hearing.
I noted that the SPLC, when branding @RuthInstitute a "hate group," cited as evidence @DrJrobackmorse's quoting the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Gov-elect Abigail Spanberger apparently doesn’t consider it disqualifying for someone to endorse an activist group that considers the official teaching of your faith “hateful.”
The whistleblower account @Minnesota_DHS went viral after accusing Tim Walz of retaliation against whistleblowers amid the massive fraud scandals. X suspended the account. Conservatives think this was more retaliation.
“Certainly it was retaliation, the question is by whom?” @billglahn with @MNThinkTank told me.
He said the X account had been feeding him information only insiders would know.
🧵2/8
State Rep. @KRobbinsMN suggested "someone went to X and said, 'They're not who they say they are,' which just is not true." Robbins told me that she has met in person with the whistleblowers behind the account.