A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
CJI: We are looking for pin pointing arguments.
Jain: My lords just give the same courtesy as given in Suit 5.
Jain: My lords may plz look at the WS again.
Jain: My ld. friend has shown those evidence in his way, i want to emphasise, i have prepared a note.
Reads WS in Suit 5 where NA has stated that Plaintiff 3 in Suit 5, Devki Nandan Agarwal is not a worshipper and can't represent deities as next friend.
J. Bobde: What is this line? aren't both the same.
Jain: Temple is different and Ayodhya is very large.
Jain: My lords allow me ...
J.Bobde: We are asking you, what is there to allow.
Jain: My lords will not appreciate unless i read the plaint.
J. Bobde: Ok. Keep this question in mind.
J. Bhushan: We are not concerned with that.
Jain: We are, because they (in suit 5) are claiming that too.
Jain: My Lords..
J. DYC: You are disputing plaintiff 2 also.
J. Bobde: Are you not saying Suit 5 should be dismissed.
Jain: I am saying Plaintiff 3 cannot maintain.
Jain: Because they are claiming everything.
J.Bhushan: That has not been decreed, no one argued this.
Jain: they are claiming outside area also.
Jain: Owned word has also to be read in context of management. Evwrywhere i am claiming just management.
J. Bobde: All right you are entitled.
Jain: They have not alleged that i am not the shebait.
DYC: You show us documentary and oral evidence.
Jain: Yes oral, without denial.
Jain: It means Ram Chabutra temple, i did not divide.
J. DYC: It is not so. read you have made a distinction between disputed temple and Ram Chabutra.
J. Nazeer: Mr. Jain this oral examination on Affidavit verified by an advocate is not the same as in witness box.
J. Bobde: Aren't sadhus supposed to be poor, away from wealth?
Jain: 1982 my outer portion goes, in 91 my entire temple goes, my land my power is all gone.
Jain: He was a bairagi.
J. Bobde: We are asking if he eas connected to you.
Jain: I do not know.
J. Bobde: So you did not install the idols that he did.
J. Bobde: He did not install an image?
Jain: No, it was a flag.
J. Bhushan: Who is Dharam Das?
Jain: He is the one who commited dacoity in 1982,he was chela of Abhiram Das.
Jain: To show that i am the Shebait and that there was no dispute regarding this by Hindu Parties. None of the Hindu parties chose to cross examine me.
Bench rises for the lunch.
Bench has assembled.
Senior advocate SK Jain resumes his arguments for Nirmohi Akhara.
J. Bhushan: In fact they have relied upon your arguments.
Jain: Yes my lords, all they (plaintiff in suit 5) want is to oust me and my traditions.